"funding source to help us re-purchase, rehab & expand our former men's resort property in rural Crawford, TX"
Couple questions for you.
"Re-purchase" - The "re" in there implies that you owned it before, somehow lost it, and are looking to buy it again. So there will 100% be questions about what caused you to lose it, and what's different this time. If ABC business at XYZ location already failed once, that's going to raise the question of "what's different this time?"
I obviously wasn't involved in your previous inquiries, but in this case it's possible that "our type of business" is being viewed as "a business that already failed once." Again, I have no idea, I can only go off of what you wrote. I recently had a client buy a restaurant building, the seller had purchased the building, spent a good chunk of change fixing it up, and then promptly went out of business b/c the food they were looking to 'supply' wasn't in 'demand' in that market (a restaurant's 'market' is the local area, a destination resort's market is obviously "the country" or "the world," so I think part of it is automatically solved in your case). So the buyer had to demonstrate all the differences between his restaurant business, which was established and had several successful other locations already, and the previous new startup restaurant that had failed, to get over the "his type of business" = "a business of that same sort, at that same location, in fact in that exact same building, that had already failed, WTF makes you any different?" hurdle.
He was not primed from past experiences to think lenders hate restaurants and restaurant owners, so he didn't go the route of thinking it was "anti-restaurant discrimination," but behind the scenes, truth be told, several of our partner lenders did in fact deny the loan outright based on "we are not looking for new restaurant opportunities at this time." Par for the course. Equal housing laws are for housing, not commercial real estate, so there would have been no point in him trying to sue anyone by assuming the "anti-restaurant" bias was actually "anti-his-nationality-food-type" bias (also, at least in his case, it wasn't...).
"Rehab" - These are tough in the current market. Plan on 65% LTC, at least one sponsor/borrower that has done a similar project in the past in terms of scope and dollar amount (inclusive of if you add a new partner willing to share in the risk/reward), 10% post-close liquidity (can't use loan proceeds to check this box), net worth equal to or greater than the requested loan amount not including subject property in net worth calculation (adding the other sponsor/borrower can fix this, too). I can't comment on if there was discrimination or not in your case as I wasn't involved, but the above requirements would be in place if Jeff Bezos called me for a loan to develop a new Amazon Warehouse and was willing to personally guarantee it and pledge his personal mansion and pay triple the normal mortgage broker fee. Credit markets are tough right now.
That rehab paragraph was a VERY tall order, which I think is why most folks are doing rehab loans with the hard money loan guys charging 13%+ and 3 points... 3 points and 13% is painful, but LESS painful than trying to check all those boxes laid out in the previous paragraph.
Good luck, if you think you can check those boxes (inclusive of adding a sponsor/co-borrower if needed) please feel free to reach out.