All Forum Posts by: George Blower
George Blower has started 0 posts and replied 3583 times.
Post: Getting started in Alaska and looking to meet others

- Retirement Accounts Attorney
- Southfield, MI
- Posts 3,675
- Votes 1,213
Welcome to BP.
Post: Newbie trying to get started. Ready to get started,HUNGRY 4 DEALS

- Retirement Accounts Attorney
- Southfield, MI
- Posts 3,675
- Votes 1,213
Welcome to BP.
Post: New investor from Calgary, AB, Canada

- Retirement Accounts Attorney
- Southfield, MI
- Posts 3,675
- Votes 1,213
Welcome to BP.
Post: New investor looking for advice

- Retirement Accounts Attorney
- Southfield, MI
- Posts 3,675
- Votes 1,213
Welcome to BP.
Post: New investor in the Chicagoland area

- Retirement Accounts Attorney
- Southfield, MI
- Posts 3,675
- Votes 1,213
Welcome to Bigger Pockets.
Post: Solo K financing question

- Retirement Accounts Attorney
- Southfield, MI
- Posts 3,675
- Votes 1,213
You hit the nail on the head in that seller financing would fall under the non-recourse loan category; therefore, UDFI would not apply.
Post: Newbie wanting to get started!

- Retirement Accounts Attorney
- Southfield, MI
- Posts 3,675
- Votes 1,213
Welcome to Bigger Pockets.
Post: Solo 401K or Self Directed IRA Providers

- Retirement Accounts Attorney
- Southfield, MI
- Posts 3,675
- Votes 1,213
Unlikely as investment income (whether earned through an LLC or not) is not typically considered self-employment income. For example, if the income flows to Schedule E it will not be considered self-employment income and therefore, not form a basis to set up a Solo 401k.
You would need to be reporting self-employment income (such as income reported on Schedule C) with no full-time employees working for you, etc. in order to be eligible to set up a Solo 401k.
Post: Advice on new Real estate investing

- Retirement Accounts Attorney
- Southfield, MI
- Posts 3,675
- Votes 1,213
If you are self-employed with no full-time w-2 employees, you can set up a Solo 401k & rollover funds from a non-Roth IRA as a tax-free direct rollover and then invest in real estate.
Solo 401k vs. Self-directed IRA
A Solo 401k has several advantages as compared to a Self-Directed IRA including the following which specifically apply to your situation:
- Unlike a Self-directed IRA, you can have the account for the Solo 401k at a bank or brokerage that does not charge maintenance fees and where you will have checkbook control.
- Unlike a Self-directed IRA, if you use leverage (which must be non-recourse financing in either case) to acquire real estate with your Solo 401k the income will not be subject to Unrelated Debt Finance Income tax
General Considerations Re Investing Retirement Funds in Real Estate:
1. If you purchase via an IRA (as opposed to a 401k), you will need to open an IRA account at a specialty trust company which allows for investments in real estate. Unless you invest via an LLC owned by the IRA, you will not have checkbook control over the funds which means you need to run transactions (e.g. income, expenses, etc.) through the trust company who will need time to process the transactions and generally charge fees for each transaction. On the other hand, keep in mind that there are costs associated with maintaining an LLC (such as the $800 annual franchise tax in California).
2. If you are self-employed with no full-time employees, you can set up a Solo 401k through a 401k provider which allows for investing in real estate. In that case, you can simply have the account at a bank or brokerage where you will have direct checkbook control.
3. In either case, all of the income and expenses will need to flow in and out of the retirement account.
4. In either case and if you will you debt to acquire the real estate, it must be non-recourse financing. See more at the following link: https://www.biggerpockets.com/blogs/9552/70408-ira... If debt-financed real estate is acquired via an IRA, any income attributable to such investment will generally be subject to unrelated debt finance income tax.
5. In either case, you can't live on the property or otherwise use it for personal use.
6. In either case, you can't work on the property as it must be a passive investment (e.g. you must hire someone to fix the toilet and can't pay the expense with non-retirement funds).
7. In either case, you must purchase/sell real estate from/to an unrelated person and the real estate can't be titled in your name personally (e.g. in the case of the 401k, it would be titled in the name of the 401k and you would sign as trustee of the 401k).
8. In either case, you should verify that you are eligible to transfer the funds from your existing retirement account (e.g. if the funds are in your current employer 401k, you will likely not be able to transfer until you quit your job).
Post: Is it worth pulling all money out of 401k to jump in buy/hold?

- Retirement Accounts Attorney
- Southfield, MI
- Posts 3,675
- Votes 1,213
Here are considerations regarding taking a 401k loan vs. purchasing real estate via the 401k:
Purchasing Real Estate via a Solo 401k:
1. First, you must meet the eligiblity requirements including that (i) you are self-employed; and (ii) you do not have any full-time w-2 employees (i.e. working 1000 hours or more per year) working for your self-employed business or otherwise working for you. Given this understanding, you would be eligible to establish a self-directed Solo 401k which allows for investing in real estate.
2. If you are self-employed with no full-time employees, you can set up a Solo 401k through a 401k provider which allows for investing in real estate. In that case, you can simply have the account at a bank or brokerage where you will have direct checkbook control.
3. All of the income and expenses will need to flow in and out of the retirement account.
4. If you will you debt to acquire the real estate, it must be non-recourse financing. See more at the following link: https://www.biggerpockets.com/blogs/9552/70408-ira...
5. You can't live on the property or otherwise use it for personal use.
6. You can't work on the property as it must be a passive investment (e.g. you must hire someone to fix the toilet and can't pay the expense with non-retirement funds).
7. You must purchase/sell real estate from/to an unrelated person and the real estate can't be titled in your name personally (e.g. in the case of the 401k, it would be titled in the name of the 401k and you would sign as trustee of the 401k).
8. You should verify that you are eligible to transfer the funds from your existing retirement account (e.g. if the funds are in your current employer 401k, you will likely not be able to transfer until you quit your job).
Regarding taking a 401k loan and then purchasing the property in your own name:
- You would have to confirm that your 401k plan allows for a 401k participant loan (and that you have not had an outstanding loan in the last 12 months).
- If yes, you can borrow up to 50% of the balance not to exceed $50,000.
- The repayment terms are equal monthly/quarterly payments (as you prefer) of principal and interest (e.g. prime + 1%) spread over a 5 year term (or longer if you will use the loan to purchase your primary residence). There are no prepayment penalties and no restrictions on what you can do with the proceeds of the 401k loan. Please note that you are obligated to pay back their 401k (regardless of the performance of your real estate investment).
- Per the loan offset rules that went into effect with the 2018 Tax and Job Act: if you leave your job and the loan is current at the time you leave your job but then the loan goes into default because you left your job, you will have until your tax return deadline (including any timely filed extension) to make the loan current by depositing the outstanding balance into an IRA (and thereby avoid the taxes and penalties that would otherwise apply).
- If you are self-employed with no full-time employees & you can rollover the funds, you could set up a Solo 401k, rollover the funds and take a 401k loan from the Solo 401k.
- In this case, you would purchase the property with the proceeds of the loan. This means that the property is owned in your own name and you are not subject to the rules and restrictions that apply when purchasing property via a 401k.