All Forum Posts by: Austin Fruechting
Austin Fruechting has started 13 posts and replied 758 times.
Post: FORBES 400 LIST IS NOT HEAVILY WEIGHTED WITH REAL ESTATE MOGULS

- Investor
- Kansas City, MO
- Posts 791
- Votes 1,670
Good info and good post. The statement I had heard was that majority of wealthy people have investments in real estate, not that they made their wealth through real estate. I never fact checked it, but it makes it a very different statement.
Post: It's not possible to get a decent ROI with a cap rate <10%

- Investor
- Kansas City, MO
- Posts 791
- Votes 1,670
Originally posted by @Jeff Greenberg:
@Austin Fruechting Sorry that I will have to disagree. How does an offering cap rate reflect more than a moment in time. That moment is usually 12 months. That is the problem with having cap ex in the cap rate calculation. One roof replacement on 12T P&L is going to look a lot different than a 12t without the roof replacement. The whole concept of the cap rate is to be able to value and compare a property (or business) based on it's income and operating expenses. For example, I start up a business and need to pay a one time expense of 1 mil for equipment that should last 30 years. That 1mil is not going to amortized and have an effect on my cap rate for the next 30 years(it may have an affect on taxes, but that is another story). How are you going to calculate this mythical "true cap rate should represent the long term average of all CapEx expenses" If you want to invent a new term "true cap rate" go for it. The industry standard on all commercial properties uses a 12 month NOI to determine the cap rate.
...
That's why many of us pay no attention to CAP rates when underwriting a property.
CAP is only meaningful if calculated on properties which are priced based upon the cash-flow of the business and if calculated in the same manner and on all properties being compared. Even then, it is of marginal benefit when underwriting an acquisition and there are far more pertinent measures which should receive focus.
I think that cap rate and NOI for underwriting should be the long term average of expenses especially since I'm a long term buy & hold guy... and that number will usually look much different than the 12T P&L... so I agree and disagree, LOL. I fully agree with this last paragraph. This discussion, even if I'm wrong, is of good benefit for anyone looking at investments to realize all sides of analyzing a property and to rely on their own analysis for their goals.
Post: It's not possible to get a decent ROI with a cap rate <10%

- Investor
- Kansas City, MO
- Posts 791
- Votes 1,670
Originally posted by @Jeff Greenberg:
@Austin Fruechting I understand the logic of putting the annual capex reserve in with the operating expenses, but major cap ex or one time expenses would greatly skew the cap rate and the overall performance of the property. Logic or not, the industry standard is to put it below the line. The important thing to know is where they put it when you are given it. With that said, as I look at value add deals, the cap is less and less important.
Ok. Perhaps industry standard on the stuff you're looking at. It's not industry standard to have it below the line on the stuff I have looked at, unless it's denoting a recent major renovation. A 20-25 unit apartment building will average 1 HVAC replacement a year, that's not just a one time large thing.
And I disagree with a major capex expense like a roof on a 25 unit building greatly skewing the cap rate, unless you are looking at a single years P&L then of course it does. The CapEx number for calculating a true cap rate should represent the long term average of all CapEx expenses. So the CapEx account should be 1/30th of the roof costs, 1 HVAC per year, etc etc.
Post: It's not possible to get a decent ROI with a cap rate <10%

- Investor
- Kansas City, MO
- Posts 791
- Votes 1,670
Originally posted by @Jeff Greenberg:
@Austin Fruechting 99% of the time I see capex below the line and not included in the cap rate. @Nick Rose I have never seen management below the line and not in the cap rate. I have however see the management missing all together, which doesn't give you a true cap rate.
Interesting. In my area that's all included, as it should be, because otherwise you aren't looking at actual NOI, and therefore not looking at a true cap rate. The only CapEx that wouldn't show is if someone did a major value add rehab. Other than that CapEx is an expense that should be a part of calculating the NOI
***albeit all expenses are generally underestimated to make it look better.
Edit to add, by your market putting CapEx below NOI they are trying to sucker in unsophisticated or new buyers that take the pro-forma at its word. Bravo for actually digging in and doing your homework to not get taken in that.
Post: It's not possible to get a decent ROI with a cap rate <10%

- Investor
- Kansas City, MO
- Posts 791
- Votes 1,670
Yep, pro-formas will almost always leave out some expenses and paint the rosiest possible picture they can. I always assume if I see something listed at an 8cap, in actuality its a 6cap just as you pointed out there. The TRUE cap rate would be after all expenses including cap-ex.
Post: It's not possible to get a decent ROI with a cap rate <10%

- Investor
- Kansas City, MO
- Posts 791
- Votes 1,670
If that is a true 8cap, that NOI would already have property management fee accounted for.
Post: Investing Partner Interview?

- Investor
- Kansas City, MO
- Posts 791
- Votes 1,670
I'm copying pasting some of my replies from another thread here; https://www.biggerpockets.com/forums/109/topics/419349-partnerships--whats-the-deal
I have done many properties on my own, and multiple partnerships very successfully. The majority of my portfolio is with partnerships and it how I was able to grow my holdings incredibly fast. All of my properties are buy and hold. My ownership equates to 58 of 95 total rental units in partnerships.
I have a VERY solid LLC Operating Agreement for the partnerships that lines out absolutely everything and all decisions. I am designated the master of the LLC and as such get to make all the decisions as far as daily operations and expenditures up to a certain amount. Then there is a "Major Decisions List" of things that require a majority decision. This includes things like refinancing, selling, expenditures over XXX, etc. That way there aren't surprises and everything is clearly lined out. It also includes everything in regards to ownership stakes, distributions, payouts at sale, etc.
.
(1A) If they are happy with just getting a certain return over time that's closer to a hard money loan and structure it like that with a promissory note. They wouldn't be an actual partner in property, but just a lender for a certain return and you'd make payments back to them at the agreed upon interest rate and timeline.
(1B) Let's say we're looking at a true partner in the LLC and the cash investor gets a certain percentage ownership. You can structure this in any way you want to make it beneficial for all parties. Often, but not always, the cash investor gets a preferred return of 3-8% on their investment off the top, and then the rest is split according to the equity stakes. EXAMPLE: In one of my partnerships, the cash needed was $120,000. The annual cash flow should average to about $34,600 per year. My investors get 7% preferred return on the $120k per year so $8,400. That comes off the top leaving $26,200 to be split according to ownership percentages, which we have set at 50/50. I get 50% of the 26,200, so $13,100 and they get $13,100 + their preferred return for a total of $21,500. They get a great return and I'm happy to make $13k a year for putting the deal together and doing monthly bookkeeping and oversight. We hire property managers so I don't have to do any of that work. If I did I would either charge a property management fee to the LLC or take a larger equity stake for doing that.
(2A) If we sell (still using my partnership example) the way it works is mortgage gets paid back first, their investment second, and then whatever is left would be split 50/50. If we refinance it's the same thing. If we refinance and still hold the properties, they maintain their ownership percentage, but if they have all of their cash back there will no longer be the preferred return.
(2B) If they want bought out, but it's not majority to sell the properties, they can sell their ownership stake along with all benefits to any one at any time. I have right of refusal though so if they do get a qualified offer from someone for their share, I can choose to match the terms. If I don't their ownership and all interest will transfer to the new person. I have it in the operating agreement though that if that happens, the new person does not have voting rights. I didn't choose to go into business with the new person, so they have say in what happens.
(3) Get a VERY solid operating agreement that clearly spells everything out. The LLC will get the loan, although many banks will still underwrite the members and want personal guarantees from all members that own a substantial percentage (with my bank any partner that has more than 25% has to do this).
(4) Include everything you can possibly think of! It's better to have everything lined out before than to have any questions or disputes later.
There are endless ways to set up splits. It's all about finding the scenario that works for all parties given the investment you are looking at. The preferred return is not always necessary and not only included. Equity stakes can be whatever you want too... 50/50, 60/40. etc.
On another partnership, I injected cash into as well. The structure was similar. The cash represented 50% ownership and my expertise represented 50%.... I injected enough 40% of the cash needed, so I ended up with 70% ownership: my 50% plus 20% of the cash equity (0.5*0.4). The investor only gets the preferred return on the difference invested. So if it was 200k, I put in 80k, he put in 120k, he only gets the 7% on the 40k additional.
Post: At what point would you self manage?

- Investor
- Kansas City, MO
- Posts 791
- Votes 1,670
Do you want to be a full time property manager?
I'll be between $6500-7000 a month in management fees with the units I'm adding (will be 139 total). Still no desire to do it in house. It would take other staffing and operating expenses that would eat a big chunk of that amount away. I would just have a full time job being a property manager if I wanted to actually save anything.
If I hired that part out too I'd maybe just break even, but then have all the headaches of small business ownership again. I had a small retail business and I also started and sold a property management business.
After I got into the property management business, I realized it would take approximately 200+ units before I would make anything notable if I wanted to just be the big picture guy and have a full staff that did the day to day. I thought it would be much less until I actually hired people. I severely underestimated what employees could accomplish when that person wasn't me. But even if you find the right people, you still have cover during vacations, sick days, etc... or someone unexpected quits. You may have to cover that roll for months as you try to find another quality staff member, which is hard as a small business with little to no benefits.
I'd rather just find another deal to make more money.
Post: BiggerPockets Podcast 228 - Meghan McCallum

- Investor
- Kansas City, MO
- Posts 791
- Votes 1,670
Brandon - The Rundown, what a random reference, but a good one! It's been a while, might have to watch that again this afternoon!
Oh, and good podcast too, enjoyed your story Meghan, keep crushing it!
Post: What is everyone's obsession with hiring PMs!?!

- Investor
- Kansas City, MO
- Posts 791
- Votes 1,670
Originally posted by @Steve Vaughan:
Originally posted by @Austin Fruechting:
With my current portfolio I am on track to pay property managers just over $64,000 this year, and that doesn't include the deal I'm closing on next month. That will take it to over $70k for 2017 and over $80k for all years following.
I see those numbers and smile. I think about how great it is that that is all is costs me for them to deal with 139 units worth of showings, work orders, and rent collection of over $1mil per year. All this while I'm sitting outside, sipping my morning coffee, and deciding what I want to do for the day.
I self-managed in the beginning, but there will come a point where you won't have enough time for your day job, self managing, and still be finding/making new deals. Of those I chose to let the management go first because it definitely wasn't anywhere near a full salary. Plus I had done it enough to know I did not want to be doing that for the rest of my life!
At some point everyone will have to make that decision anyways. If they're having lots of issues, often times the answer is to hire a PM a little earlier than waiting on another few properties before making that leap.
Since this has evolved into a 'when you should hire a PM' thread, I'll add one last thing.
Austin, you make good points here, but I really doubt you have your annual costs nailed down so well if your PM uses the gross % + fees business model that most do. If they are getting 1 month's rent per turnover (for unknown & varying # of turnovers) plus upcharges as they call the Maytag man for every little fix (unknown # per year) there are a lot of variable costs. But I am glad it works well for you and congrats on being free!
I wish there was a middle ground for the repairs. I take care of so many service calls over the phone in a minute or 2 that you all are paying through the nose to have a tradesman come out for. I can not get over that. Even if the $100 doesn't matter, I'm just not built to take it, knowing I could have taken care of it over the phone or in 2 minutes myself. In the amount of time it takes to lick and stick a paper check in the mail, I would have fixed it (and connected with my tenants, which I like) while doing it.
I saved myself $1200 the other day before lunch. A PM would have had 2 plumbers and a water heater that only needed a lower element t-stat I replaced in 4 minutes. They would have also had an electrician and an HVAC guy out there. Oh and it would have taken 2 weeks and I would have had to come back to check the work anyway. Just one example.
Charging 1 month's rent to place a tenant is a complete rip-off. Are you kidding me? That's over 8% right there out the window. Now you have to earn 12% (to account for taxes) to pay for a simple I hardly notice. Like they have to put a full page ad in the NY Times or something. At least spread the fee out over the tenancy, standing behind your placement choice.
I choose which 'jobs' I do and which I don't. Years of self-managing allows me to afford tradesmen and service people if I want to use them. Years of tenant screening has earned me a house full of non-whining, flexible and tolerant low-maintenance tenants that respect my properties and auto-pay their rent. For the little stuff I do end up putting up with, a PM just isn't worth it for me.
When I sell out of my frothy market and buy large apt bldgs in a more affordable market I will have a PM for sure. For now - the things you noted, Austin: showings, work orders and rent collection - are the easies that save me the most money, easily the $80k/yr you quoted. I would love a 'turnover manager'. That's where I get stuck doing menial the most and this reminded me to get a system in place. Thanks for letting me share, everybody!
I have all my numbers nailed down and that quote spot on. Yes, my total management costs are flat 8%, no placement fee.
Not all PM's rip you off on labor and just call tradesmen out that charge $100-150 service call for everything. Both management companies I work with are large enough they have in house handymen that handle the majority of the work orders with a very reasonable fee. My repair work would not be any cheaper if I called a handyman to do the little stuff.
Yes it could be cheaper if I did the work... but that 2 minute fix can easily take an hour or two by the time you coordinate with a tenant, drive 20-40 min to the property, realize you need another part, drive 15 min to home depot, spend 15 min in home depot, drive 15 min back to the property, fix the issue in 2 minutes, then drive 20-40 min back home.