First off, I think it would be fair to say they everyone who posts here has made money and is making money in Real Estate. There are a few that are learning and the rest of us hope to enlighten you, entertain you and maybe even teach you a little about what we have learned, so maybe you will not have as many hard knocks as we have had.
I will admit that I have lost money on two pieces of real estate, one I lived in and the other was a rental. The owner occupied I purchased when I thought the bottom had been hit in Southern California, in 1992, and my timing was wrong. We sold it in 1996 for a loss. The other was a cheap rental in So Cal in 1988 and I ended up just deeding it to the tenants. So it happens to all of us, a bad deal now and then. But it also wise to know a bad deal and get out of it as soon as you notice it to cut your losses.
I real earlier in this thread that MikeOH stated something along the lines, “I can virtually guarantee you that 1% will not cash flow.†My personal life experience has proven otherwise. I can guarantee you that you can cash flow at .50% and even .25%. And this is whether you bought 2 years ago or 20 years ago. One example is a rental I bought in Texas 2 years ago, purchase price $103,000 and rent $1050 a month, 1.02%. I put 20% down and got an 82,000 loan at 6.875%. I make my PITI payment of $855 and my management company automatically deposits $966 every month into my bank account. The house was brand new when I bought it, so my total repair costs over the past two years was $70. It has never been vacant. Even if I average one month a year vacancy, I still ‘cash flow’, and in two years, there have been no vacancies. Last year, my uncle (who makes a six figure a month income on rentals) purchased a home in Fort Collins, Colorado for $248,000 and gets $1,250 a month rent, .5%. He manages it himself (not bad for an 82 year old man), paid cash so he receives $15,000, pays out 3,000 in taxes and 1,000 in insurance for a new of $11,000. That 4.4% annual return sure beats .85% on a six month CD, plus he can use the depreciation for more return, and we are not counting appreciation into the calculations anywhere. Let’s say my uncle only got $625 a month rent, .25%. He would get $7,500 a year, less taxes and insurance of $4,000 and he get $3,500 a month rent, 1.4%, still better than a CD.
I do have a question for MikeOH. I do want to say that I highly respect you and I think you have done well in real estate investing. The question is, where in the United States can you buy a single family residence for $300,000 and get $6,000 a month rent? Why would a tenant give you ¼ of your sales price back, in rent, in one year? I have an investor friend in CA who is buying patio homes for $55,000 and renting them for $1,250 a month. BUT, here is the catch. When he buys them, they are missing all the drywall, all the plumbing, all the fixtures, all the carpeting, etc.. He is basically buying a partially built house. When it is all said and done, he is into it at $100 to $120K, around the 1 percent mark. Plus ungodly, constant repair bills. I prefer 10 year old or newer homes, cuts way down on repair costs. If you want to be your own repairman, your own maintenance man and have the time, I guess you could buy a “clunker†and turn it into a cash cow. But some of us want to treat a rental like a passbook savings account. Don’t bother me with anything, just send me my check once a month.
For those that are buying houses from a bank, from a wholesaler or from a distressed seller, appreciation is NOT part of the formula. You are just buying at a discount and selling at full retail. Yes, you made money, which is the goal, but you did not experience appreciation in the true sense of the word. I bought a house in 2001 for $130,000 and sold it in 2004 for $200,000, that is appreciation. Why did I not turn it into a rental? Because it would rent for less than $1,000 a month and I used the profit to build a custom home to live in. I sold two rentals to help pay for a fairly nice custom home. Another benefit of owning rental real estate!
Also, I keep seeing the 50% mark being tossed around like it is some holy grail of real estate investing. If I understand it correctly, no more than 50% of the monthly rental income should go to all expenses. If I had a property that cost me 50% of the months rent for expenses, I would unload it as soon as I could. This is not counting debt service.
I need to correct myself from an earlier post of mine. IF, and that is a big IF, all my properties were currently rented, the scheduled gross income would be $30,245.00 per month. I have one commercial building that has been vacant for two years, which has cut into my monthly income severely. I had it sold but the sale died Friday, the buyer could not get it financed, so it is back on the market. I have a few other vacancies, but am still bringing in around $20,000 a month right now. Once it sales or leases, $30K a month will be easy. For those that are interested, this encompasses 21 different properties, 30 separate rental units. The lowest priced rental is $700 a month and the highest is $2,095 a month (not counting the commercial unit). Only three of the units have debt, total of $3,600 a month. My goal by the year 2020 is to have 50 rental units bringing in a gross of $50,000 a month and have less than $10,000 in monthly debt service. I should be able to retire on that. The current administration may screw me over, but that is out of my control, so I just keep on investing.
This is not to start a new debate or argument or to say “I am right, you are wrong.†It is to state that there are all kinds of ways to make money in rental real estate and most of the so called ‘gurus’ don’t have a clue on how to do it. You just need to have goals, do your homework, or as other’s call it “due diligence†and take the leap. Don’t expect to get rich quick, I have been buying rentals since 1979. Things happen like DIVORCE, RECESSION and CHILDREN. (What my children have cost me the past 6 years, I could have bought 2 rental houses for CASH) Slow and steady, smart and savvy, and you can have a much better retirement than Social Security could ever offer.