All Forum Posts by: Ken M.

 This is not accurate at all. A couple moving parts here:

VA Loans, entitlement, and encumberance: as long as the original loan is in existence, it will affect the original veteran's VA entitlement for VA loans. If the loan defaults, this will directly impact the original veteran as well. The only way around this is to have the loan formally assumed by another veteran who has sufficient entitlement (the loan transfers to the new veteran's entitlement). This is also is considered a federal debt and being in default on it will affect the original veteran in other ways as well, such as being ineligible for forbearance and other loss mitigation programs on any other loans.

Credit report: this loan will continue to report on the original borrower's credit report until the creditor reports it paid off. You can try sending the bureaus a copy of the contractual agreement for the subto buyer to show that they are now legally obligated on the debt, but I have not seen any of the four bureaus accept this. This is similar to a divorce situation where one party is awarded the property and debt, but the loan remains as a trade on the other party's credit report. Even though the original party may no longer be responsible for the debt per court order, their credit is still on the line, and nonperformance on the trade in question will wreck the original borrower's credit. I have seen this happen several times, and I have seen it disputed/challenged at the bureaus, and I have seen this dispute fail every time. Anecdotal, but just my experience.

Impacts on future borrowing ability: this will vary by loan type. Fannie/Freddie have provisions for contingent liabilities that allow lenders to disregard debts that are the primary responsibility of other parties after the other party has paid the debt in question for 12 consecutive months. You will need bank statements or copies of the checks to prove this. FHA and VA have different rules. With VA, if there is any chance that you could be held to be obligated on the debt, then it gets included in DTI/residual income. I cant imagine that any competent lender will risk a buyback by allowing a subto agreement to suffice as proof that the original borrower is no longer responsible for the debt.

Guaranties and Insurance: VA and FHA loans are guaranteed/insured by agencies of the federal government. Subto's on these loans give the government standing to file suit against the parties on the loan if/when these go bad. The govt has been asleep at the wheel for a while with respect to this, but that is rapidly changing. The new administration is proactively going after these loans. Pay attention to what Pulte (FHFA director) and the other new directors are saying about fraud in the mortgage market. They're on the hunt for this kind of thing. Furthermore, if a VA or FHA loan has even gone into a workout and has received a partial claim through FHA insurance/VASP, expect the loan to be accelerated in the next 18 months if there has been a change of ownership (like in a subto deal). The servicers/subservicers on these loans are taking the brunt of this and are looking for ways to get bad loans off their books asap. I have heard directly from two different subservicer executives that they are proactively running title scrubs on these loans annually and will use the Due on Sale clause to accelerate these loans. 

Newer development with direct lenders: I have seen a couple instances now where lenders are deeming subto transactions as fraudulent and are declining refinances/new loans for the parties involved in these deals. This is more anecdotal and less likely to be widespread, but just know that it is on the radar.

 This is not accurate at all. A couple moving parts here:

VA Loans, entitlement, and encumberance: as long as the original loan is in existence, it will affect the original veteran's VA entitlement for VA loans. If the loan defaults, this will directly impact the original veteran as well. The only way around this is to have the loan formally assumed by another veteran who has sufficient entitlement (the loan transfers to the new veteran's entitlement). This is also is considered a federal debt and being in default on it will affect the original veteran in other ways as well, such as being ineligible for forbearance and other loss mitigation programs on any other loans.

Credit report: this loan will continue to report on the original borrower's credit report until the creditor reports it paid off. You can try sending the bureaus a copy of the contractual agreement for the subto buyer to show that they are now legally obligated on the debt, but I have not seen any of the four bureaus accept this. This is similar to a divorce situation where one party is awarded the property and debt, but the loan remains as a trade on the other party's credit report. Even though the original party may no longer be responsible for the debt per court order, their credit is still on the line, and nonperformance on the trade in question will wreck the original borrower's credit. I have seen this happen several times, and I have seen it disputed/challenged at the bureaus, and I have seen this dispute fail every time. Anecdotal, but just my experience.

Impacts on future borrowing ability: this will vary by loan type. Fannie/Freddie have provisions for contingent liabilities that allow lenders to disregard debts that are the primary responsibility of other parties after the other party has paid the debt in question for 12 consecutive months. You will need bank statements or copies of the checks to prove this. FHA and VA have different rules. With VA, if there is any chance that you could be held to be obligated on the debt, then it gets included in DTI/residual income. I cant imagine that any competent lender will risk a buyback by allowing a subto agreement to suffice as proof that the original borrower is no longer responsible for the debt.

Guaranties and Insurance: VA and FHA loans are guaranteed/insured by agencies of the federal government. Subto's on these loans give the government standing to file suit against the parties on the loan if/when these go bad. The govt has been asleep at the wheel for a while with respect to this, but that is rapidly changing. The new administration is proactively going after these loans. Pay attention to what Pulte (FHFA director) and the other new directors are saying about fraud in the mortgage market. They're on the hunt for this kind of thing. Furthermore, if a VA or FHA loan has even gone into a workout and has received a partial claim through FHA insurance/VASP, expect the loan to be accelerated in the next 18 months if there has been a change of ownership (like in a subto deal). The servicers/subservicers on these loans are taking the brunt of this and are looking for ways to get bad loans off their books asap. I have heard directly from two different subservicer executives that they are proactively running title scrubs on these loans annually and will use the Due on Sale clause to accelerate these loans. 

Newer development with direct lenders: I have seen a couple instances now where lenders are deeming subto transactions as fraudulent and are declining refinances/new loans for the parties involved in these deals. This is more anecdotal and less likely to be widespread, but just know that it is on the radar.

𝐇𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐅𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠. 𝐀𝐫𝐞 𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐒𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐖𝐚𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠?
For the first time in over 2 years, home prices in the top 20 U.S. markets are declining.
That “perfect time” you’ve been waiting for?  It's here.
Markets like San Diego, Portland, and Phoenix are already seeing drops — and more are expected to follow.
Here’s what that means for you:
Motivated sellers
More negotiable deals
Prime opportunities for creative strategies.  Sure, cash on hand makes things easier.  But you don't need deep pockets and an 800 FICO.  
But many new investors? Stuck. Scared. Watching.
If you've been sitting on the sidelines, unsure how to start, this market shift is your invitation in.  There are many members here on BP that are happy to share their experience and know how.  You only need to ask.

If it weren't for the love & sacrifices of my now deceased grandparents (I just lost my last living one 2 weeks ago) I'd still be the average American struggling with credit card debt. Thanks to my inheritances I've been able to honor their memory by paying off all my debts FIRST and then proceeding with other ventures. I have no advice or suggestions for you. Just leaving you with my experience that it feels really darn good knowing I did what they would have wanted me to do. I sleep well at night knowing I don't owe anyone (I paid off our mortgage, credit cards, AND 3 cars!) and I'm now free to do whatever, wherever I want.

My question is this:

can they foreclose BEFORE the probate opens?

 Negative and unhelpful. I also asked Pace’s community on Facebook. 

Can a lender foreclose on a home if the owner is deceased and probate has not been opened? Or is it required that probate be initiated, and PR's assigned before the foreclosure can take place?

Real estate broker here — I facilitated a subto transaction in 2023 with a VA loan in California.

The seller of that property now wants to buy a new home. However, the lender is including her payment on the property she sold, because the loan is still in her name.

I was always told that “after 12 months of payments through a third party payment processor, the loan will fall off of the seller’s credit.” Pace Morby himself told me this at a conference. 

What am I missing? How do we fix this?

Hi all, 

I have numerous leads where the homeowners declared chapter 7 bankruptcy 5-10 years ago. Since then, they have severed all ties with the homes. And only recently has the foreclosure proceedings begun. 

The lender is not looking to collect any debt from them as that has all been relieved. The lender is simply looking to repossess the property through the foreclosure process.

Are the homeowners at all affected if the home forecloses at this point?  Will their credit be affected?  Could they short sale their home at this time?