Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Mike F.

Mike F. has started 11 posts and replied 542 times.

Post: Are we reliving 2006 in 2016?!

Mike F.Posted
  • Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 570
  • Votes 520
Originally posted by @Luke F.:

 Mike how do you feel about the Denver market?

A crash?I don't see any visible signs at all, reexamine things every 3 months. The economy is more of an issue to me right now.

Post: Are we reliving 2006 in 2016?!

Mike F.Posted
  • Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 570
  • Votes 520
Originally posted by @Frank Boet:

We are in a RE bubble, but people refuse to believe it or accept it. When you have multiple offers for a property and the property sells for above asking, something is wrong

A couple of things - how are those properties being bought? A lot of them are all or mostly cash offers, that's totally different than someone buying a house with no verified job or income as back in 2006.

The other thing is multiple offers over asking are a result of a limited supply of homes for sale on the market, watch the supply numbers carefully.

Post: Whats the most amazing inexpensive countertop on the planet?

Mike F.Posted
  • Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 570
  • Votes 520

quartz is the best option if you want a long term, less maintenance solution at holds up but still gives an awesome hugged look. No sealing required, and scratch and stain resistive. Search for a commercial grade manufacture so it will hold up even better and they tend to have more neutral color options. I'd recommend a darker color for a rental unit because even with low staining, the lighter colors will stain or become very hard to clean if say coffee or red wine are left on the surface too longer. Material cost wise, you can find $15-25  per linear foot, (plus labor cost) on the lower end if you go through an architect that has connections with local reps. 

 A lot of people are buying into marketing hype when it comes to granite versus quartz.

Use the facts to make your choices and not the marketing hype by the manufacturer of the product you are buying.

Hardness issues of granite and quartz are like speed issues between a Ferrari and a Lamborghini. The Ferrari will do 210 mph, the Lamborghini with do 220. You're driving them both to work every day, how much is the 10 mph going to be a factor in your comute to work everyday?

Granite and Quartz hardness issues are the same. On the Mohs hardness scale granite is a 6-7 and Quartz is a 7. Both of those hardness scales are giving you two products both of which are so hard that the difference is irrelevant.

For long term maintenance - over 90% of granite will not benefit from a sealer, if you apply a sealer you are wiping it back off with the rag you are using to buff it with, the stone will not absorb it.

Your choices between quartz or granite should be based on only two things - price and looks.

Post: 40 E-mails, 5 RSVP's, 0 Actually Show

Mike F.Posted
  • Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 570
  • Votes 520
Originally posted by @Matt Rothwell:

 Its been a couple years since I was a renter, but the whole "sneaky open house" thing is REALLY annoying.  The first time it happened, I walked in and there was another couple talking to the owner/manager and I said, "oops, sorry, don't mean to intrude" and drove off.  I assumed (maybe correctly) that the place wasn't actually available.  The second time, I showed up early, and two other couples came.  We were all confused because they had told us all the same time to be there, it made it look like the owner/manager had no idea what they were doing.  I decided to pass on that place as well.

That's the point. If you passed on both of them, you really didn't have a lot of interest in the first place. Let's face it if your perceptions of both of those places was really high you'd have invested the effort. That's the exact idea, pair the broad numbers down to really interested prospects so you're spending your valuable time with 'buyers'. 

With any type of auto-filtering system there is always going to be a small percentage of loss. The idea in business though is nobody can run a business catering to the minuscule percentages, you have to play to the big percentages.

In other words it's like fishing - on Monday you can go out to an area that has 10 ponds.  7 of those ponds have no fish at all 3 have fish. You could spend Monday fishing for 10 hours, spending 1 hour per pond and catch no fish in the 7 ponds that are empty and catch 1 fish in each pond with fish. Your productivity comes down to catching 1 fish per hour. 

On Tuesday you go to another spot with 10 ponds, 7 of those ponds have no fish again, but this time you watch the water surface of all the ponds before doing any fishing, you qualify 2 ponds as having signs of fish and 8 that don't. You eliminated 1 pond with fish by pre-qualifying by watching the surface. You then spend 10 hours fishing the 2 ponds with fish. Your productivity is the same you will catch 1 fish per hour, but this time of course you come home with 10 fish since all your fishing was done in ponds with fish. Now you missed all the fish in pond #3 that had fish that you eliminated in your pre-qualification, but you still caught 10 fish in 10 hours one Tuesday where on Monday you caught 3 fish in 10 hours. 

Avoiding those 7 ponds with no fish in them through pre-qualifying is the same thing you do with a pre-qualification technique with tenants, you might toss out a couple good prospects, but it doesn't matter as you've gave yourself the opportunity to spend your time productively with just good prospects so the ones you tossed out don't really matter.

Post: 40 E-mails, 5 RSVP's, 0 Actually Show

Mike F.Posted
  • Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 570
  • Votes 520
Originally posted by @Justin Fraser:

On Saturday I invited everyone (about 20) who had called to a 2 hour open house, and had about 40% show up.

On Sunday I invited everyone (about 30) who had emailed to a 2 hour open house, and had 0 people show up.

There you go, if nothing else that certainly shows the relationships between phone call prospects and email prospects.

Post: 40 E-mails, 5 RSVP's, 0 Actually Show

Mike F.Posted
  • Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 570
  • Votes 520
Originally posted by @Caroline Hedin:

 and ask if they're available on Tuesday or Sunday for a viewing

There is no magic days of the week. If I put the ad out on a Tuesday I'm not going to put off the appointments for 5 days because Sunday is a superstitious magical renting day. I can rent a unit on a Wed or a Thursday as easily as a Tuesday or a Sunday.

Post: 40 E-mails, 5 RSVP's, 0 Actually Show

Mike F.Posted
  • Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 570
  • Votes 520
Originally posted by @Edwin Williams:

Why not hire a Property Management Company to find the tenants; they normally charge a one month fee. You pick the tenant, they do the showings and it saves you a lot of time.

 I'd like to see some statistics of turn over rates and profitability of rental units of self-managed versus property management company managed. I can only guess the results based upon all of the different property owner's stories I've heard over the years crying the blues about their rentals, with the common denominator being they aren't self-managed.

Post: 40 E-mails, 5 RSVP's, 0 Actually Show

Mike F.Posted
  • Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 570
  • Votes 520
Originally posted by @Jim C.:

Remember, all it takes is 1 good application. 

This ^^^

That's exactly right, why even mess around with 20 people who won't rent your unit if you can whittle that down to just dealing with 3? No emails, no text. Talk to them on the phone, qualify them, only set up showings with the best of the best, forget the rest, let them go waste someone else's time. 

This in not a numbers game as so many unfortunately think, it's not about throwing it all at the wall and seeing what sticks, it's about dealing only with real buyers of the product you are selling.

Post: 40 E-mails, 5 RSVP's, 0 Actually Show

Mike F.Posted
  • Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 570
  • Votes 520
Originally posted by @Brian M.:

 Staggering appts w even a small overlap will help reduce your wasted time along with trying to gain a little skin from them,

I have great success with this technique, when a property is available there will be calls all day long and I tell the first ones as they call in "We are showing the place at 5:00 pm today", set an appointment with 2 or 3 of them. With the next calls we tell them "We are showing the place at 5:15pm today." set an appointment with 2 or 3 of them. With the next calls its "We are showing the place at 5:30 pm today.."  None of them know that I'm setting appointments with multiple people at the same time.

I go there at 4:45pm, stage whatever needs to be done and I wait for people to show, in this case I'd be there for no more than 1 hour from start to finish, I have no idea who they are as they show up, if they are late or on time, as I've taken no information from them, I've only qualified them and set mass appointments.  If someone shows interest we work with them, the rest either leave or many never showed at all, but I don't care the only ones I care about are those that showed and are interested. Those are the only ones that matter. 

Post: 40 E-mails, 5 RSVP's, 0 Actually Show

Mike F.Posted
  • Investor
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 570
  • Votes 520
Originally posted by @Caroline Hedin:

  I have responded to more than 40 e-mails.  

For what it's worth I don't ever correspond with potential renters via email or text, they have to phone call me so I can talk to them to set up a showing (which will be a group showing - and it will be a group showing that they don't know it will be until they get there and discover it for themselves by seeing other potential renters there at the same time, we never ever do an open house, and especially never on a weekend, if people aren't interested enough to set a specific appointment to look at the place I don't want to waste my time with them). You might want to try it. Email and text is too anonymous, plus you can tell a whole lot more about a person by speaking to them. Taking control of the situation eliminates all the time wasters. You're a bit way too 'customer oriented' in the way you're showing your property for me. I prefer to control every aspect of it and maintain methods that are super productive and minimize my time involved.