Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Michael Ealy

Michael Ealy has started 68 posts and replied 1506 times.

Post: Why do most syndications sell instead of long term hold?

Michael EalyPosted
  • Developer
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 1,582
  • Votes 3,434
Originally posted by @Tony Kim:

I'm not Alina and I don't want to speak for her, but one potential angle that one can take is that a 7 to 10 year holding period might be relatively safer than a 3 year holding period at this moment in time because a good syndicator will secure a 13 year term loan at a nice low rate and will be able to ride out the next down cycle. On the other hand, a 3 year investment with a 5 year term might be in trouble because the dip could very occur at right around that time.

I specifically used a 13 year term loan because a syndicator that I really like has secured a loan for precisely that period.....13 year term loan at 3.87% for its upcoming QOZ fund. I would think that a 13 year term loan, as long as the LTV is reasonable, would provide some security against any potential upcoming downcycle in the RE markets.

But aside from the anticipated length of the deal, the far more critical factors are to evaluate each deal with cautious skepticism and also closely evaluate each sponsor's track record and especially how they performed during the last real estate cycle (sorry, but that eliminates 99% of syndicators here on BP, despite there being some very talented ones here).

 I don't know why a syndicator will risk his/her investors' money by getting a 5-yr term.

Even though I do value-add and I like to exit in 3-5 years, I get the longest term possible (10 years or even longer). I plan for the worst - which is - what if I am forced to hold longer than 3-5 years? If the only way I can make money is to hold it short term or hold it long term (meaning, I have no flexibility either way), then the deal is not worth the risk and I move on.

I guess I am part of that 1% you mentioned then since I've been investing since 1999 and actually made money during the 2008-2009 Great Recession. 

Post: Some Say Owning a Rental House is NOT Passive - Prove/Disprove It

Michael EalyPosted
  • Developer
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 1,582
  • Votes 3,434
Originally posted by @Meir Greenblatt:
Originally posted by @Michael Ealy:
Originally posted by @Meir Greenblatt:

@Michael Ealy

Texting my tenant to pay rent once or twice a month ~2 minutes.

Putting the same income and expenses in the spread sheet: 2 minutes once a month. Logging in to the mortgage company account to make sure the auto pay went through 2 minutes once a month. = 6 minutes a month + 1 time visiting the place to sign a 2 year contract 2 hours every 2 years. Its pretty passive.

 You can also automate the process which becomes more relevant as you get more properties. I have 1,000 apartment units and 45 houses - so can you imagine sending text messages to all my tenants? You can use a property management app to send an email or text message to tenants to remind them of the rent and it will automatically send notices to tenants who are late on their rent. It will automatically put the income received in a spreadsheet for you too.

 Sounds like a great tool to have,  it can help me with my Airbnb guest's. 

What app do you recommend/use?

 I like Propertyware

My tenants can even pay online through the Propertyware portal

Post: Why do most syndications sell instead of long term hold?

Michael EalyPosted
  • Developer
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 1,582
  • Votes 3,434
Originally posted by @Todd Dexheimer:
Originally posted by @Kalen Jordan:
Originally posted by @Todd Dexheimer:

Maximum profits. If you fix and add value to an asset its highest value is shortly after the renovation is done. The longer you keep it the less ROI/IRR

Interesting - I'd have thought that holding it essentially forever and having the tenants pay off your mortgage and then getting a pop at that point would give you the best ROI - similarly to how people tend to long term hold SFRs.

I realize additional capex expenses come into play down the line but don't you just have to properly budget for them?

When you complete a value add on multifamily, you maximize rents, which in turn greatly boosts your NOI and property value. Your income to expense ratio is at its greatest spread right away, which even further adds value.

Also, its about the velocity of your money. If we can sell and make $500k, we can use that for a down payment on the next asset. Rinse and repeat and you can see that after several times you will have millions more for a down payment. 

I agree completely with Todd.

Let me give you an example Kalen - from one of my deals. 96-unit apartment complex. Once we stabilized it (after a 2 yr hold), the cashflow we receive is about $12,000 a month or $108,000/yr. Our investors' money in the deal was $1.2 Million or a project CoC of 9% (and since it was a 50-50 split with 6% pref, they get 7.5% yield).

Six months later, we got a great offer/ we sold it and we netted $1.5 MILLION profit. My investors were happier to sell because they got their money back and they got 50% of that net profit - which is $750K giving them a 66% ROI just from the sale.

So the choices were: 

A) continue getting 7.5% yield and maybe get an even higher payoff in the future or
B) get 66% ROI after 2.5 years + all my investment back (with the possibility of growing that money even more)

If you were one of my investors and you know that we can line up another good deal like that, doesn't it make sense to choose B) rather than A)?

Post: How to Invest in Hotels and Leave a Legacy - want to learn more?

Michael EalyPosted
  • Developer
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 1,582
  • Votes 3,434
Originally posted by @Surya Chahar:

What are the best resources to learn the basics of hotel investing in terms of books or podcasts? I want to learn the following things for example: 

1. How many rooms are considered small, medium, and large size hotel respectively when it comes to the flagged hotels?

2. How much is the avg investment for these sizes?

3. What is considered a good deal? Is it based on the cap rate or some other criteria?

4. What is the average cash on cash returns for the investors?

5. What are all the calculations/terms I need to know from an investor's perspective?

I have found a few hotel operations management books and planning to work in a hotel part-time to get an idea of operations, but couldn't find any book on the basics of hotel investing that could answer above listed questions and more. Any recommendations?

P.S: I completed my MBA from the University of Cincinnati and planning to move back to Ohio soon. So, glad to find you guys. 

 Hi Surya,

Too bad you missed the webinar we did on it a few months back but we're doing it again.

To be honest, there are not many books on hotel investing. Maybe I should write one ;)

But to answer your questions, hotels are also evaluated based on cap rate.

NOI/cap rate = value

But how you get to the NOI is a little bit different than with apartments. There are terms that are different with hotels vs. apartments like:

RevPAR

ADR

MPI

From an investors' perspective, like apartments, there are three numbers:

Cash on cash return

IRR (project and investor)

and

Equity Multiple

Hotels - I like 100 keys (that's what they call rooms or units - "keys") or more. Smaller than that and there's not much scale. 

I can tell you what I buy. I buy hotels in the $5M to $15M range.

A good deal for me (not necessarily good for everyone) is at least a 30% project IRR but that's my target for apartments as well. I do value-add and that's how I get such great returns for me and my investors.

Post: Some Say Owning a Rental House is NOT Passive - Prove/Disprove It

Michael EalyPosted
  • Developer
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 1,582
  • Votes 3,434
Originally posted by @Meir Greenblatt:

@Michael Ealy

Texting my tenant to pay rent once or twice a month ~2 minutes.

Putting the same income and expenses in the spread sheet: 2 minutes once a month. Logging in to the mortgage company account to make sure the auto pay went through 2 minutes once a month. = 6 minutes a month + 1 time visiting the place to sign a 2 year contract 2 hours every 2 years. Its pretty passive.

 You can also automate the process which becomes more relevant as you get more properties. I have 1,000 apartment units and 45 houses - so can you imagine sending text messages to all my tenants? You can use a property management app to send an email or text message to tenants to remind them of the rent and it will automatically send notices to tenants who are late on their rent. It will automatically put the income received in a spreadsheet for you too.

Post: Some Say Owning a Rental House is NOT Passive - Prove/Disprove It

Michael EalyPosted
  • Developer
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 1,582
  • Votes 3,434
Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:

to me real estate is a lifestyle.. however there is no doubt that in the rental world the quality of the asset will dictate the time spent and risk's involved.  IE  Hood rentals are going to be quite a bit more hands on than median price point and higher end of the rental rates in a given market is my experience. with both types.. IE C D and new Construction A . 

 I agree with you Jay.

The effort/time involvement if I plot it vs. property type/location will look something like this:

Post: Some Say Owning a Rental House is NOT Passive - Prove/Disprove It

Michael EalyPosted
  • Developer
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 1,582
  • Votes 3,434
Originally posted by @Ronan Donnelly:

@Michael Ealy, for me the most passive investments in real estate are investing via a syndicate. These investments do require upfront work to verify the market, sponsor, deal, management company etc but once that is done it is completely hands off.

Owning rental homes is more passive than working a full time corporate job but they do require hands on involvement, even with a management company.

I like to think of it in terms of how much leverage do I get from my most scarce resource, time. Multifamily syndication has allowed me to gain the most leverage. Good luck!

 That's true Ronan. I am both an active and passive investor myself.

I am an active apartment and hotel syndicator. I have about 1,000 apartment units, 2 hotel projects (and about to close on my 3rd), 45 houses and few parcels of land.

I am a passive investor in a syndicated medical building and I am also a private lender to a few real estate investors I know personally. SO I agree completely that being a passive investor allows you to leverage on OPE (other people's efforts) while they leverage on your OPM (other people's money).

Post: Some Say Owning a Rental House is NOT Passive - Prove/Disprove It

Michael EalyPosted
  • Developer
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 1,582
  • Votes 3,434
Originally posted by @Greg Olkhovsky:

@Michael Ealy

As someone who is about to buy their first rental property I stopped myself because of this very dilemma you presented. I then got thinking, why don’t I be the bank and do private lending? Do you believe private lending is more passive? Listen to some pitches from investors, vet them out, then Sit back and collect my $ every few months?

 Yes - Greg. I am a private lender to other real estate investors as well as an active apartment and hotel investor. I am also a passive investor in a syndicated medical building.

So I know the level of time committment involved with being an active real estate investor and I can compare that vs. being a lender or being a passive investor in a syndicated deal.

Yes - being a lender is more passive. It takes time to vet the right borrower and to do your due diligence on the property. But after that, you sit back and collect your interest payments. That's true passive income right there.

One thing you lose though is CONTROL but the more control you want, the less passive the investment becomes.

Post: Why do most syndications sell instead of long term hold?

Michael EalyPosted
  • Developer
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 1,582
  • Votes 3,434
Originally posted by @Kalen Jordan:

Interesting - I'd have thought that holding it essentially forever and having the tenants pay off your mortgage and then getting a pop at that point would give you the best ROI - similarly to how people tend to long term hold SFRs.

I realize additional capex expenses come into play down the line but don't you just have to properly budget for them?

Kalen,

Budgeting for capex becomes harder over time or as the building becomes older. After we renovate the building, we have more control on the repairs & maintenance and we have minimal capex in the first few years of holding it (since we renovate our properties the right way).

Yes you do get a "pop" on the CoC when the property becomes free and clear but your ROE (return on equity) drops significantly. That's basically "dead money" sitting in the property that could be put to better use - say through refinancing and then investing into another project - which will result in higher return for you and your investors.

Having said that - I also own houses (I have 45 of them) and I prefer them to be free and clear. Why? Because their vacancy risk is costlier than apartments. You get 1 vacant house for 2 months (with a mortgage) and your entire year's cashflow is gone. That's not the case with apartments. You get 1 vacant out of 20 units and you're still fine even if you have a 75% Loan to Value mortgage.

Post: Some Say Owning a Rental House is NOT Passive - Prove/Disprove It

Michael EalyPosted
  • Developer
  • Cincinnati, OH
  • Posts 1,582
  • Votes 3,434

Landlords, BIG and small...

Here's a question for you.

How many minutes/hours do you spend every month on average doing all of the following: (per property)

1. Calling your Operating team - Property Manager, leasing agent, eviction attorney, contractor, maintenance guy, etc

2. Tracking the income and expenses of your rental, monitoring your bank account(s)

3. Calling your Support team - your accountant, bookkeeper, Virtual assistant or secretary

4. Doing the work yourself on your rental

5. Going to Home Depot or Lowes or hardware store to buy materials for your rental

6. Answering the phone from tenants, tenant-prospects, etc

7. Any other activity I did not mention above as long as it's related to owning and operating your rental property

You don't have to give a detailed breakdown.

You can just have a total for all the above - say "I spend on average about 1 hour/month per property"

I like to know the answer the question: is owning & operating a single family home as a rental a truly passive investment?

Some say owning a single family home rental is NOT truly passive. What's your definition of a passive investment anyway?

Instead of debating the answer, let's get the numbers.