Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Michael Nahm

Michael Nahm has started 27 posts and replied 77 times.

Originally posted by @Account Closed:

I'm inclined to believe the management on this one. The motion sensors at the floor make the door open, not close. There is also a sensor in the motor to detect pressure, also triggering the door to open. If the springs somehow busted, the locking mechanism on the chain and the gears of the motor would hold the door in place - the springs ease the weight, they don't hold it, the lock is designed to hold the weight without the springs. So finally the only explanation is that the locking mechanism somehow became unlocked halfway through an open cycle, which would be generous to call that unlikely, but perhaps not impossible. However what is certainly plausible, common even, is that the driver either by misjudgment, distraction or operational error, drove into the door before it was completely open. Not only did they damage the door panels, they shattered their windshield too. Then, embarrassed, scared of the landlord/consequences and perhaps unable to pay for damages, claimed it was not their fault and it must have been the door. If the door came crashing down as the tenant claims, there would likely be some evidence on the hood of their car, at the very least some scratches when the door rubbed as they backed out, maybe even shards of glass stuck under the rubber scratching as the weight of the door dug them into the paint job...see anything like that on the hood of their car?

I dunno. Who knows. I'm just saying the more likely scenario is that the tenant drove into the thing.

I certainly appreciate the information and will look into it. Thank you! 

Originally posted by @Theresa Harris:
Originally posted by @Michael Nahm:
Originally posted by @Theresa Harris:

I would complain to the strata and say that they are lucky she didn't sue them or charge them for damages. If they insist on paying the invoice, pay it for her and then take them to small claims court.  There is no way a door should have come down on a vehicle let alone enough to do that damage. Even if a car was parked there, the sensors should have worked.  I'd also post notices and talk to other occupants to see if this has happened before.

Asking around may be an option. The letter attached to the invoice stated that she would be responsible for half the cost of fixing the garage door because another resident also damaged the door (they did not provide the other residents’ information). 

 The management company said it was in working order, so why costs to repair and red flags that the cost is split as another resident damaged it...what is the truth-it was fine or it was damaged already or did it damage another person's car as well?

 They are very ambiguous about the other resident. The invoice is from the garage door repairmen, which lists damage to the lower portion of the garage door.

Originally posted by @Colleen F.:

The question I have is how could another resident have been billed too if it was her "fault" ? She called garage door was half open and what? It fell on someone else? Someone drove through it too?  If she has been there a while I would lean toward believing her and have questions but fighting them may be a losing battle. 

Management’s letter was rather ambiguous and said that another resident damaged the garage door after her, thus they are splitting the cost of the door’s repair between them.

It all seems bizarre to me, however, she really has been a great tenant, and my thought is that if she had been at any kind of fault, she could’ve easily drove off, made the repair to her car and be done with it. Instead, she called the office to let them know what took place. She’s not asking for any money, simply wanted to make certain it doesn’t happen again. 
Then she’s presented with a bill. 

Originally posted by @Michael King:

I think there's some missing information here. Many good answers above. I would think that if the door came down hard enough to break the glass, then a spring broke. And she would also have a damaged hood as the door would have dragged across the top of it backing away from it. 

What height are the floor sensors? They are supposed to be 5-6" off the floor. A lifted Jeep, or if the sensors are too low, would compromise that safety feature of not letting the door close. 

Did the door come down, smash the glass and then retract upwards? It shouldn't have that amount of downward force. And there's no damage to the door, but she has a damages (or is the service call) bill? 

It's all very mysterious. 

I’m not a garage door expert, and again, from she explains, she was trying to enter the garage, and while entering, the door came down onto her front windshield. She then backed out of the garage (she couldn’t enter because the door was on her car), and called management. Apparently the door stayed put, halfway open.

Originally posted by @Theresa Harris:

I would complain to the strata and say that they are lucky she didn't sue them or charge them for damages. If they insist on paying the invoice, pay it for her and then take them to small claims court.  There is no way a door should have come down on a vehicle let alone enough to do that damage. Even if a car was parked there, the sensors should have worked.  I'd also post notices and talk to other occupants to see if this has happened before.

Asking around may be an option. The letter attached to the invoice stated that she would be responsible for half the cost of fixing the garage door because another resident also damaged the door (they did not provide the other residents’ information). 

Originally posted by @Scott Mac:
https://www.tmz.com/2008/11/28/iron-mike-plows-through-iron-gate/Originally posted by @Michael Nahm:

Hi Michael,

Was the door coming down and the tenant hit the gas to try to get through before the door (closed, cycled and was ready for a reopen signal)?

People try to do that at apartment complex gates sometimes and get their paint scraped by the heavy gate as it bumps into them. There are signs warning of this--one car only--situation.

Apartment gates are on timers to stay open, and will auto close after so many seconds. If more than one driver tries to get a car through the gate, it may contact the car, which causes the gate to reset and go into re-open mode for another cycle.

I suspect the common garage door may do the same thing. Open, hold open for so long and then re-close if no one is on the sensor.

Trying to beat a closing door to not have to wait for the re-cycle to allow it reopen may have happened here.

Maybe she didn't want to be late for work, or was just impatient.

Or maybe the door just fell because something broke, but maybe not.

Just my 2 cents.

 https://www.tmz.com/2008/11/28/iron-mike-plows-through-iron-gate/

 Obviously, I wasn’t there and am going by what she has explained. I have absolutely no reason to doubt her, especially since she isn’t even asking for them to pay for any of her damages (she filed with her insurance, which replaced the windshield already).

She has a truck, and is aware that since it is a rather tall car, she has to wait until the door is fully open in order to proceed.

The sensors should’ve prevented this from happening and the fact that the windshield wasn’t scratched or cracked, rather, shattered, is to me, proof that something crashed onto it.

Her description of the situation makes sense to me, and the fact that she was given an invoice in return, is staggering. I’m not an engineer though, so am asking on this forum whether there is anything else o should take into consideration.

Thank you for your thoughts. 

Originally posted by @Mike McCarthy:

Something doesn’t really add up. If the spring snapped and the garage door crashed down, it would have taken 2 people to lift it up off the car, one to hold it while the car was removed.

Garage doors, even the cheap ones are heavy. I wonder if the door was closing, she backed out, and basically backed into the closing door?

Are there any pictures pre-repair? What exactly was repaired? Was the door itself damaged?

From what I gather, the garage door stayed stuck after shattering the windshield, and she was able to back up and out of the garage’s entryway.


To clarify, she was trying to enter the garage, and her front windshield got shattered by the door, which to me, seems to have come down abruptly, thus shattering it.

Originally posted by @Bill B.:

Man that’s insane on the condo’s part. She could just as easily have asked for them to repair her windshield. It certainly sounds like a spring snapped and the full weight fo the door came down. Any chance they have security cameras covering the garage area? (You always want to be on the right side of a he said she said argument, especially if there’s a video.). 

From what I understand, there are no security cameras on the property.

The complex’s managementsent a letter to the tenant omg with the invoice, stating that the garage door repair personnel checked the garage door and determined it is in proper working order. They then fixed it and sent her the invoice 🧐. 

Hi everyone,

I have a great tenant in a condo, that’s been with us for years. Recently, as she was going through the common garage, the door abruptly slammed down on her windshield and shattered it.

From what she explains, she was shaken, backed out slowly and called the complex’s management office to let them know what happened.

In the meantime, her insurance covered the windshield replacement.

A bit later, she received an invoice from the complex’s management for the repair of the garage door.

The garage door has sensors, which would prevent the door from coming down if there was a vehicle going through. The fact that the windshield shattered, to me, is evidence of a strong force, such as the garage door abruptly coming down.

I feel I should also add that this tenant did not ask for a thing from management. In fact, she’s an immigrant, and does not speak English fluently. All she wanted to do was inform them of what happened. My feeling is that management is taking advantage of her, as any other person would go “suit” happy.

My question is, am I missing something? I’m about to write a letter to management on her behalf demanding they remove the charge, and would like your thoughts. 

Thank you all.

Hi to all in the BP community.


I recently had tenants move out of my rental after residing there for a couple years.

Usually, I’m rather lenient on damage and wear and tear, and have rarely not returned a full security deposit.

I did notice that the granite in the kitchen has a rather large chip (on the edge, about the size of a quarter).

Since I recently redid a vanity countertop at another unit and am familiar with the huge cost it brings, I was wondering if this chip should be deemed wear and tear or not, and if not, how would you go about it.

I should add that these tenants were great while at the property.