Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Philip Johnson

Philip Johnson has started 16 posts and replied 175 times.

Post: Using an uninsured/unlicensed handyman

Philip JohnsonPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Hartford. CT
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 54
Originally posted by @Matthew Paul:

Reading the last couple posts is funny . First you arent hiring contractors  , you  are hiring labors . Contractors are businesses , legal and legit . Craigslist and home depot guys you find and hire , sure  they are cheaper than a professional , but when crap hits the fan and they get hurt or make a claim , you will lose BIG time . you can try to 1099 all you want , but when push comes to shove , you ARE THE EMPLOYER .  As a contractor , I could try to pay all my employees as subcontractors with a 1099 , once something happens guess who pays ?  Sure you may get away with it for years , but once someone gets injured , kiss your a$$ goodbye . Plain and simple . 

Licensed , insured contracting businesses cost a whole lot more . But its all about the money , thats called "penny wise and dollar foolish '.

One of my neighbors hired a "contractor" who was the cheapest by 60% . a 55 square roof replacement . Everything went well until the air compressor ran out of gas , a 17 year old was told to fill the gas tank . the kid spilled gas on the hot muffler , 3 degree burns on legs and torso .  " Contractor" had no license or insurance and barely spoke english . Neighbor is still in court and his legal fees defending himself are in the low 6 figures .

Here is where the homeowner screwed himself trying to save money , 1. he supplied the materials , paid for them and had them delivered on the roof . ( it was cheaper ) . He didnt have a written contract form the guys doing the work , certificates of insurance or copm , etc .  the homeowner lost he first round and has it on appeal .  He is also fighting with his insurance company who is denying coverage due to him hiring an unlicensed ' company' . 

This guy is dealing with real losses , 7  figures , just to save about $ 25 k on a roof of a million dollar house 

 Thanks for the advice I have heard these stories. The All state guy talking about mayhem keeps me on guard ! I have seriously injured myself installing a door and personal experience for me speaks volumes. So I do want to be covered. 

However, according to what I have read, there is nothing requiring a 1099 person to be licensed, nor a professional. A contractor is a contractor and 1099 but a 1099 is not necessarily what we think of as a contractor.  It is simply a way to pay them if I am not managing their hours, allow them to control the "journey to the destination" such as methodology to deliver work, no uniform, allow them to work for other people, not providing training, etc. 

Some of the people I hire are handymen with trucks who do the trade all day 7 days a week. I consider this individual not just a potential 1099 but a potential professional contractor. But as we all know most handymen do not get their GL insurance. So how do I cover them since WC doesn't cover them if I 1099 them. 

So I can hire as 1099 but they would not be covered by my WC. How do I protect myself from mayhem then?  

Post: non-licensed, non-insured roofer

Philip JohnsonPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Hartford. CT
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 54
Originally posted by @J Scott:
Originally posted by @Ashton Astillero:
Question for you J, is that would you hire an unlicensed plumber to do plumbing work? Also for HVAC and electrical? 

First, if the plumbing work required a permit, I wouldn't hire an unlicensed plumber, as they wouldn't be able to pull a permit (and I'll never try to get around pulling permits, as that's a liability risk I don't want to take)...

But, if we're talking about work that doesn't need to be permitted -- for example, replacing a trim kit on a faucet, replacing a toilet, etc. -- I'm happy to hire a handyman or a "plumber" who isn't licensed and/or isn't insured.  There is very little a plumber could do to injuring himself or create a serious liability in terms of bodily injury to a homeowner or tenant (liability for property damage is a risk I'm often willing to take).

As for electrical and HVAC, I nearly always want to have someone licensed and insured, as the liability is MUCH higher.  With electrical, there's a risk of the electrician injuring himself (electrocution) or killing an occupant (fire hazard from improper wiring).  With HVAC, there isn't much risk to the technician, but an improperly installed gas furnace can leak carbon monoxide, which can kill an entire family while they sleep.

If there's a chance of the contractor getting hurt -- and more importantly, if there's a chance of a homeowner or tenant getting hurt -- I want to be as free as possible from the liability of hiring an unlicensed contractor and as confident as possible that if there is a lawsuit, the contractor has insurance to protect himself and me.  Hiring an unlicensed/uninsured contractor makes for an easy argument of negligence against a rehabber -- that will pierce the corporate veil (i.e., your business won't protect you) and create bad-will from a judge and jury.

 Hiring an uninsured plumber is risky. I've done plumbing work myself and the work involves using a reciprocating saw and grinder, which can easily cut someone, not to mention the risk of getting stuck and injured in a crawlspace.

Post: Contractor Liability Waiver Form

Philip JohnsonPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Hartford. CT
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 54
Originally posted by @Donna Smolinski:

Thanks for detailed explation Joe. Exactly what I thought, but not what I wanted to hear. So, in other words, there is no safe way I can hire experienced painters who take on side jobs. I assume I could not obtain WC Ins on them as an owner/builder, since they are not licensed?? I believe WC Ins requires use of "licensed" contractors, unless the job is very petty. FYI... this property is in NV (not sure if regulations are the same as CA).

 Where did you here that WC insurance requires the use of licensed contractors? If you're hiring a licensed contractor they would need to have insurance.  If they have insurance, then you don't need worker's compensation.  If you're hiring a General Contractor or anyone who is subbing out, then they have a license and would be required to carry their own WC policy, so you would in turn not need your own WC policy because the GC is self-insured and insuring his employees with WC.

My understanding is that as an owner-builder taking out a Worker's comp policy, you would be getting this to hire employees as the owner-builder.  You could hire whoever you want, with or without a license, a random person off the street, and still be covered by the WC.  California here. 

Post: Contractor Liability Waiver Form

Philip JohnsonPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Hartford. CT
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 54
Originally posted by @Joe Bertolino:

Liability carriers often have what is called an "action over" exclusion. This means that you cannot sue yourself. If you hire a contractor that does not have their own insurance (GL or WC) then you are 100% on the hook for that jobsite and your insurance carrier is not going to protect you from your own employees (they are not considered subs at that point because they do not have their own contractors license or insurance). WC is the sole remedy for injured employees and you are the employer. If you hired them directly... they are your respondsibility and they cannot waive that respondsibility. You either need to take the risk with your own GL and workers' comp or you need to hire subs with a legit contract that carry their own GL and WC. You can get a certificate of insurance from them naming you as additional insured. You can also check the CSLB for their WC carrier information. If you sign a contract with an unlicensed contractor and they screw something up... it is very unlikely your insurance company is going to come to the rescue as they have requirements on how you will hire your subs (which includes contracts and certs of insurance naming you as AI). If you are hiring a one man show with his own Contractors license and GL... he doesn't need to carry WC because he doesn't have employees.

 Awesome post! I often hire unlicensed/uninsured (home depot/craigslist) and am looking to go more legit in my owner/build remodeling/rehabbing. I enjoy paying much less to people who are just starting off to give them an opportunity, or paying much less to people who are just in desperate need of work. 

On my next rehab, with all the research I've done, I think getting worker's comp is my best option.  Coughing up the $3000 is hard (expensive in CA!) but it looks like it will cover most of my bases.   

If I have an employee and they get injured, I'm covered from liability and injury for that employee with the WC.  From what I've read I would not need General Liability on top of WC, if I'm hiring employees.

However, I'm confused about 1099'ing people.  If I 1099 someone as an independent contractor in California, then they are not eligible to claim Worker's Comp. So, if they get injured, how do they get their money if they want to sue?  Would my WC policy become useless if I am 1099'ing people?   If I 1099 people, do I want GL insurance instead, or do I need both?  

Thanks for your clarity about contractors ONLY needing GL if they are not subbing anyone out!  

Post: Using an uninsured/unlicensed handyman

Philip JohnsonPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Hartford. CT
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 54
Originally posted by @Michael Woodward:

@Matt Liu , I would guess that part (or maybe all) of the reason your PM doesn't want you to hire your own help is because that can introduce all kinds of problems for them (if they're going to have to manage them). There are some good handymen out there (I have one) but there are a LOT of bad ones! If your PM is going to have to manage your handyman, he's going to want to know that they aren't going to cause problems. It's probably a lot simpler for him to stick with his regulars. All that aside, if their price is too high, you might have to get a new PM. Just a thought.....

As far as the insurance goes...... I had a really interesting conversation with an insurance provider a few years ago (when I was a licensed contractor) that told me that I was actually at a HIGHER risk than the uninsured guys because lawyers follow the money. I still opted to carry the insurance but I was shocked to hear that. Now that I'm not an active contractor (I hire it out now), I carry a personal umbrella policy of $1M that only costs about $30 per month to cover anything unforeseen. I'm not sure that helps but I thought I'd throw it in.

Good luck!

 I also have an umbrella policy.  But I don't think umbrellas cover commercial liability? Which in this case, it would be.  So, if I'm hiring an unlicensed, uninsured handyman who chops his finger off and wants $100,000, then my umbrella would likely do nothing as far as I understand it.  Have you verified that it covers you in your business practices?  

Post: Using an uninsured/unlicensed handyman

Philip JohnsonPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Hartford. CT
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 54
Originally posted by @Steve Babiak:

Unless you have workers comp coverage like @Rob K. mentioned, your insurance WON'T cover you for any injuries that happen to any worker you hire to do a job. If the worker has liability insurance only, that still does not cover the worker for injuries on the job. Only workers comp covers injuries on the job. You can try to use a waiver form for the worker if the worker is a sole proprietor, but there are no guarantees that when injured the worker will not file a claim / lawsuit against you.

Hi Steve,

I'm trying to get more people into the conversation here.  This post shows up on the first page of google when searching about unlicensed handymen so it's worthwhile to explore more here!

I replied to Rob here about strategies for paying people cash, 1099ing, and hiring as employees.  I'm wondering what good does having WC insurance do in CA, since 1099 folks are not eligible for WC claims.  Would this make it safer to hire someone as an employee instead? Because, if a 1099 "contractor" (home depot parking lot day laborer/craigslist gig worker) gets injured and gets denied a WC claim because I was legit paying him 1099, then he would want to sue me to get his medical and liabiltiies.  So, is there additional coverage needed besides WC? I'm looking into commercial general liability, but it's $1000 a year.  I don't want something I don't absolutely need, because WC is $3,000 a year in CA for owner-builders, same rate as for general contracting (5403 code carpentry in State fund).  

Post: Using an uninsured/unlicensed handyman

Philip JohnsonPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Hartford. CT
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 54
Originally posted by @Rob K.:

I have unlicensed and uninsured guys working for me. I purchased a workmans's comp policy in case one of them were to get hurt. As far as a license, they are supposed to be licensed to do this type of work. Nobody would ever check, but if so, I'm licensed and they could work under mine.

You can save a lot of money if you find the right people. I just had a guy paint a three bedroom bungalow with a dining room. He painted every surface including the basement walls and both staircases for $500 labor. It looks good too. Try finding a licensed and insured guy to do that. Would be more like $1,200.

 Hi Rob! Thanks for the post I'm considering doing the exact same thing.  I do 1-2 rehabs a year, and hire unlicensed/uninsured people from home depot and craigslist.  I am happy with their work about 90% of the time which I'm sure is the same satisfaction rate as paying a general contractor and subcontractors 30-70/hr.  

Questions - Do you just pay people cash, 1099 people, or put them on as employees? 

In California, you are required to have worker's comp if you have any employees.  However, 1099 folks are not considered employees and under CA law not covered by WC insurance.  So, I would be taking out WC insurance for 1099 people, even though they would be ineligible to claim.  So, if they were injured in the course of work and could not claim WC from me, then they would likely sue me to get money somehow.  In this 1099 situation, do you recommend extra coverage?  

My other consideration is to put people on as employees.If i put them on as employees and pay piecework   then I am covering them under my WC and still getting a good deal.  However I am worried this may push a lot of people away since they want these cash jobs to keep collecting their food stamps. 

So, if I pay cash to some people, the WC is still there as a backup? WC is expensive in CA, it's code 5403 "carpentry" for GC's and Owner builders, $2750 starting price.  

Post: Hiring handyfolks off Craigslist risky? Protection?

Philip JohnsonPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Hartford. CT
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 54

Ok so I've done a ton of research and have considered the following. 

-start my own sole proprietorship as an owner builder remodeler 

-get workers comp for carpentry at $2750/year to protect myself. 

-pay people with 1099 or hire them as an employee if necessary. Both ways I will be paying piecework. 

Question is regarding 1099. I called the state fund workers comp people and they said workers comp is mandatory in all cases if you're hiring someone. They said 1099 people ARE covered under my potential policy. 

But online other people say 1099 people are not covered. 

Which one is which ? Am I required to check for insurances and licenses if I am 1099ing people or is that unnecessary if I have my own workers comp policy ? 

Are there other strategies I could do? Looking for very cheap day laborer strategies, the kind you find at home Depot or craigslist 

Post: Tile trim ideas for tile?

Philip JohnsonPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Hartford. CT
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 54
Originally posted by @Ben Sears:

Just a reminder, the Schluter needs to go under the tile in order to adhere correctly. You won’t be able to just slide it under after the tile is installed. 

 Darn too late I already ordered it. Ty for he info. I guess we will see if I can rig it in somehow. 

Post: Freaked out, applicant says will sue

Philip JohnsonPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Hartford. CT
  • Posts 178
  • Votes 54

Use Google voice to manage your rentals and applicants. If you receive a threat hang up the phone and block their number.