All Forum Posts by: Ravi P.
Ravi P. has started 14 posts and replied 210 times.
Post: Need Structural Engineer ASAP

- Investor
- Schaumburg, IL
- Posts 219
- Votes 103
Post: Tile Install recommendation - Chicago

- Investor
- Schaumburg, IL
- Posts 219
- Votes 103
Post: Capital Gains Tax- 2 out of every 5 years or 2 years total?

- Investor
- Schaumburg, IL
- Posts 219
- Votes 103
Post: We are being sued! - Who is liable?

- Investor
- Schaumburg, IL
- Posts 219
- Votes 103
Post: $294 repair to snake out the bathtub is reasonable?

- Investor
- Schaumburg, IL
- Posts 219
- Votes 103
Post: Owner Financing - Is interest a good idea?

- Investor
- Schaumburg, IL
- Posts 219
- Votes 103
Post: Cost segregation analysis?

- Investor
- Schaumburg, IL
- Posts 219
- Votes 103
Post: My realtor refused to show me 2 deals because of his commision !!

- Investor
- Schaumburg, IL
- Posts 219
- Votes 103
Originally posted by @Ryan Murdock:
Originally posted by @Ravi P.:
The original poster stated he already bought a property with this agent for $252K at 2.5% that is a +-$6,000 commission check. The 2nd property was much less and would net him a $500 comission check. Thats $6,500 on 2 properties. Would you guys happily show and sell 2 properties that would net you 2 commissions checks for $3,250 each? Still netting you $6,500. This is pretty interesting discussion regarding Realtor Psychology. What's the difference in two scenarios? I can reapect his and your choice but the OP was not wrong to rely on him and feel sour about his response. Especially when this particular Agent does not seem to be adding value.
Flawed logic and flawed math here. Ravi, if you bought a property that netted $6k/mo would you then buy another one that lost $2k/mo and be satisfied that you're still ahead by $4k/mo? Twice the work for less money? No. You'd rather use your same valuable and limited resources (time and money) to invest in another profitable deal instead.
Also, you, like many, seem to believe that the entire commission amount ends up in the agent's pocket. After agency splits and office fees etc the agent often ends up with half of that amount......then they get to pay for all of their own advertising, gas, and other expenses from that. Whatever's leftover at that point is subject to a hefty self employment tax. The real net amount is usually a very long way from the number printed on that gross commission check.
@ryan murdock
No offense but I think your missing my point. While the flawed math in my example may not have considered the commission split the point is the agent is still netting the same amount of commission. Would you sell 2 homes, with 2 avg size commission checks? You would be netting you the same commission.
As for my flawed logic, my example is about the Realtor commission not the cash flow of an investor. No Investor goes into a property knowing they are going to have a negative cash flow, unless they have another angle in play. Such as, redevelopment oppurtunity, appreciation, and or some other value added oppurtunity. Occasionally an Investor may purchase a bad property and things may not have worked outlike they planned but that is a risk an Investor's make. What's at risk for the Realtor?
I feel there is not really a right answer to this situation. Anyone can operate their own business how ever they want. If I was a realtor, I would feel like the OP deserves a better business partner (agent) considering the scenario he mentioned and his intentions. But I don't see a difference, considering he purchased a property with him before.
Post: My realtor refused to show me 2 deals because of his commision !!

- Investor
- Schaumburg, IL
- Posts 219
- Votes 103
Post: First time Bed Bugs!!! Tenant wants to sue! Advice anyone?

- Investor
- Schaumburg, IL
- Posts 219
- Votes 103