Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Mark H.

Mark H. has started 3 posts and replied 476 times.

Originally posted by Steve Babiak:
Too recent for that BK to show on credit. BK that isn't yet discharged is a show stopper for me :)

Bks show on your credit sometines within days of filing.. that's how your other creditors know to turn off your credit ..

Originally posted by Amie D.:
Bryan Vince, the first couple is married, the 2nd couple list each other as "fiance'".

But... I just looked up the county court records and it showed a current court case on the woman in couple #2. One of the collections agency is suing her for a portion of the debt and just opened the case on Nov 1.

When I clicked on the "case history", it read
1/24/2013 Suggestion of Bankruptcy, filed.

Not knowing what this is, I looked that up and it said, "Suggestion of bankruptcy is a document filed with a court to put it on notice that the defendant in a pending lawsuit has filed a bankruptcy case." (from http://definitions.uslegal.com/s/suggestion-of-bankruptcy/).

So she has filed for bankruptcy? Of course this was not mentioned before. This also didn't show up on the credit report. I would think it would denote that somewhere? Unless it was too recent?

Might be a good question for that lawyer theyre having call you.. if it was an old bankruptcy, the debt would be discharged, and there wouldnt be a lawsuit..

Post: Fair hourly wage to pay a realtor?

Mark H.Posted
  • SFR Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 484
  • Votes 181
Originally posted by Sean D:
Is E&O needed if I give the realtor standardized contracts? My leases are very "plain vanilla"

$1,300 (1 month's rent) to place a renter sounds fair if the agent does everything, but I handle:

1) All the marketing
2) All the tenant screening (the biggest time sink)

So the realtor would only need to schedule showings and finalize the contracts. I estimate between 4-15 hours of work per job. Is $25/hour fair for conducting

showings and having simple contracts signed & submitted (excluding E&O)

How are you doing "all of the marketing?".. arent you putting your rentals on mls?

I suspect you may end up paying more for less if you go this route..

The "typical" comission splits are so low in my area, that most agents wont even bother showing rentals.. trying to cut those fees even further would be a great way to have an empty rental..

Paying someone who isnt licensed (or the owner) to show a property likely goes against your states re laws..

Post: Particleboard vs Plywood Kitchen Cabinets in Rental Unit

Mark H.Posted
  • SFR Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 484
  • Votes 181

I used the stock white cabinets from the depot in my last rehab. They turned out great & the tenants love them. If you have a water leak, its going to destroy any cabinet, at least with stock cabinets, replacing them is quick and cheap.

Post: Fire, flood or other destruction - landlord's responsibilities

Mark H.Posted
  • SFR Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 484
  • Votes 181
Originally posted by Mary Joe:
I am sorry if this has been answered or discussed before but i can't seem to be able to find the answers.

Does anyone know what are landlords' responsibilities when, for example, a fire breaks out in units where the tenants have signed a one year lease? It doesn't have to be a fire, it can be any incidents or major catastrophe that render the house uninhabitable and assuming that it is not the tenant's fault.

Do landlords have the responsibility to find temporary housing for the tenants? What if the tenants do not like the temporary housing that the landlord finds? Can the tenants find temporary housing on their own and the landlord reimburse all costs involved?

In my state, the tenant can break the lease without penalty if the home becomes uninhabitable due to fire, flood or other disaster. The landlord isnt responsible for finding alternate accomodations, nor are they required to pay for it. There isnt anything that would prevent a landlord from doing so, if the ll wants to try to retain the tenant..

If the landlord is somehow responsible for the property becoming uninhabitable (unlicensed contractor floods the home or causes a fire), then the landlord might be on the hook..

Definitely worth an hours consult with a local attorney if you're in either situation..

Post: realtors take a good investment first?

Mark H.Posted
  • SFR Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 484
  • Votes 181

In my area, there are thousands of licensed agents that maintain the license for the primary purpose of investing. You cant get too hung up on it, because you arent going to beat them to the easiest/best deals on the mls. You'll get leftovers in my area without a license, which can still be fairly lucrative. The only way to beat them is to join them, which really isnt much of a hurdle in most states.

Originally posted by Alex R.:
My thinking is because REO only happens when all previous steps fail (short sale - prefoclosure – foreclosure – auction - ) then there is a better chance and higher probability of a low offer being accepted.

Is that true or false?

Id say false - short-sales often close at well under market value in my area, due to the fact that they arent really "open market" transactions.. the seller is only concerned with the deal closing, not the price they get.. and banks are terrible at determining market value.

Post: Renting to a Mexican citizen living in the US

Mark H.Posted
  • SFR Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 484
  • Votes 181
Originally posted by Brian Hoyt:
Originally posted by Randy F.:

The fact that political ideology and pandering to a voter block trumps principle in Washington DC, doesnt mean the rest of us have to sell out to either complacency or greed and aid and abet criminals. Thats what illegals are and that is what you are doing by renting to them.

Being more a capitalist than a nationalist, yes, I will rent to anyone who will pay the bills and take care of my property. That is all that matters to me. The reason why I do criminal background checks or credit checks is strictly to reduce my risk and nothing to do with idealogy - one way or the other. That is the way I would expect any red blooded American business man to act.

If you're checking for a criminal background, doesn't criminal behavior mean something to you? Crossing the border illegally, I'll give you that as a freebie, but would you knowingly rent to a white guy who gave the feds the finger on april 15th?

If you know they're willing to pick and choose which laws they're going to obey, before they even move in, can you actually expect to use the US court system to bounce them out when they ignore the terms of your lease?

Capitalism is fine and dandy, but you can't take the "as long as the money is green" approach and then expect to use the legal system to help you in your dealings with criminals. Freedom isnt free and all..

Post: Renting to a Mexican citizen living in the US

Mark H.Posted
  • SFR Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 484
  • Votes 181
Originally posted by Rob K:
Originally posted by Deborah Mettler:
We no longer consider any applications from hispanics that do not have a legitimate green card. No exceptions to this.

In my state of SC, the landlord can be fined heavily for doing so.

Are they able to get a driver's license without a green card? If so, shouldn't the state stop this practice? It seems ridiculous to me that the landlord would be punished for renting to illegals if the state gives them a drivers license.

If they don't issue a driver's license without a green card, wouldn't possesion of a driver's license prove that they're legal and you wouldn't need to check for a green card?

Last I knew, Michigan was one of the states that would give a drivers license without proof of legal status.

Post: Renting to a Mexican citizen living in the US

Mark H.Posted
  • SFR Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 484
  • Votes 181

Its very common in my area of the country. You, as a landlord arent required to verify citizenship, however you also won't likely have any recourse if they trash your house and run. If they're working "off the books", a judgement would be worthless.

A credit report supplied by a tenant has no value.

You have a solid reason to reject the application based on a lack of verifiable credit and employment history, and if you accept this tenant and reject others because of credit or employment, one could argue that you were discriminating against that future tenant. (Reverse discrimination).

You basically have no idea who these people are if they don't supply a soc. They could be felons or sex offenders on the run, you have no way to know.