Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Seth Borman

Seth Borman has started 5 posts and replied 545 times.

Post: California to make "Solar "mandatory for new Homes!!!!!!

Seth BormanPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 314
Originally posted by @Andrew Smith:
Originally posted by @Brian Ploszay:

@Steve K.    Good reply.  I am still against it.  I believe in market forces.  If solar really reduces costs, then consumers, landlords and homeowners will add it.  There is an environmental / moral dimension to this, however, I can't understate the housing crisis in California.  

California subsides to affordable housing will not make a dent.  They need the relaxing of zoning and entitlement requirements that block density housing.  I grew up in the Los Angeles area, and it is a sea of low density neighborhoods all the way out to San Bernadino.  Density developers often spend a decade getting approvals for projects.  30 years of past behavior results in chronic housing shortage and a disappearing of affordable housing stock that continually gets renovated to supply wealthier residents.

As for clean energy, California built suburban style cities that rely on automobiles.  I'd focus on their transportation first and ease every restriction so more housing stock can be built.

 Maybe the three story requirement will force developers in CA to build up rather than out which could increase density and reduce costs?

 A three story apartment with 12 units, one stairwell and surface parking is probably the cheapest apartment product you can build and you can hit densities of 50 DU/AC with it if you have the right set backs and very little parking.

When you step up to four stories you need an elevator are often (but not always) stepping up to tuck under or garage parking.

So I don't see the upside.

Post: Purchase investment 4 plex fully rented with bad leases

Seth BormanPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 314

You need to get tenant estoppels and leases before you close.

Post: Low flow shower heads????

Seth BormanPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 314
Originally posted by @Nathan Gesner:

Thanks for that explanation. It sounds like your likely culprit is either a toilet that constantly flushes/runs. I would focus on replacing the guts of every toilet, inspecting for leaks, and talking to my tenants to see if they can help determine why the use is so high. A single toilet running constantly can eat up thousands and thousands of gallons of water.

 It's about the system that you build. If your system is to install low flow shower heads in every unit you aren't going to save a lot of money towards cash flow, but you are going to increase the value of the portfolio. If you have a tech going to every unit when you buy it the marginal cost of changing the showerhead is minimal.

Post: Low flow shower heads????

Seth BormanPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 314
Originally posted by @Nathan Gesner:

Average for a 900sq.ft. apartment in Pasadena is $102.60 and that includes water, electric, sewer, trash. I don't see how you could be paying $200 per unit per month unless you have running toilets or someone wasting some serious water. I'm not trying to start a fight or call you a liar; I'm just trying to understand why you are paying so much and how a low-flow shower head will fix that.

The average person uses 100 gallons of water per day. About 20 of that comes from showering. If you cut your shower use by 50% you would still be using 90 gallons a day. Again, we're talking a few dollars in savings a month unless your tenants are taking showers 5x longer than normal.

 I don't have the data on how much tenants use and for what. I know the averages across the portfolio. $208 was the high and usually meant there were huge problems such as bath tubs running 24/7/365.

The average at acquisition was about $60. 

This being LA you often have a lot of people in the unit. A studio might have 5-7 people living there. 

That doesn't include the savings from buildings that use a common water heater, which is very common in 5+ unit buildings.

Post: Low flow shower heads????

Seth BormanPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 314
Originally posted by @Nathan Gesner:

In my area, water is $2.60 for every 1,000 gallons. A low-flow shower head will allegedly cut water use in half...but only for the shower. It still doesn't save you in the toilet, sinks, laundry, etc. Best case scenario, you're going to save around $20 a year. Is it really worth it?

 In my area water bills run as high as $208/unit/month. Stabilized properties average $25/unit/month. What makes the difference? Fixing leaks, changing showerheads, and changing toilets.

Also, that $20 is a $400 improvement at a 5% cap, so there is that.

Post: Strategy to purchase and flip property in Los Angeles

Seth BormanPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 314

Following!

Post: HELP -- Is this 4 plex rehab a good deal?

Seth BormanPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 314

@Josh W. Michael made some good points about your assumptions.

In my limited experience the 50% rule doesn't apply to repositioned fourplexes in Los Angeles. Rents are so high that expenses are crowded out. Your own calculation reflects that. Also, you have expenses pro forma'd at a 3% increase YOY but your largest expense will be property taxes and they will go up at 2% each year. It's possible to "grow into" an investment.

The rents that you are talking about (I assume for three units) are stellar so the $1.2M assumption would seem to be low. The rehab amounts that you are posting are enough to gut rehab three units so you should be getting top dollar (whatever that means for the neighborhood).

The biggest problem I see is the low down payment.

To be clear, all four units are vacant? What neighborhood or cross streets?

Post: Ways to increase rent (multifamily, rent control)

Seth BormanPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 314
Originally posted by @Yannes Chiang:

@Seth Borman@Lee Ripma You are right. After doing the calculations, it makes great financial sense. One half of the tenants are paying 50% of the market rent and they have lived there for years. One low-paid tenant actually telling me he may move out in two years since he is ready to buy a SFH in two years. Although not sure whether he will finally move out voluntary, I am in dilemma whether to offer cash for key to other tenants before he moves out. How do you think?

 When you do your DD on the building you need to go into every apartment and talk to every tenant. Do they look like they would be willing to move? How clean is the place. Have they done work on it to fix it up? Do they have pictures on the wall from their kids Naval Academy graduation (saw that in Boyle Heights).

If you think they can be moved, decide how much it will cost. I've heard of people taking six figures. Where I was doing this we budgeted $3,000-$10,000. Sometimes you will be right and sometimes wrong. One building we bought with two vacancies (of ten) and a tenant passed the day prior to closing. Other buildings had tenants that refused to even talk about leaving.

Post: Ways to increase rent (multifamily, rent control)

Seth BormanPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 314

Buyouts are the way to go. There are people that specialize in them.

When you get the unit vacant you can renovate it to get it back on the market at peak rents. It's also a good time to look at reconfiguring the floor plan to add an extra bedroom.

Don't make the place too comfortable because you only want the tenants to stay for a few years.

Post: LA County to forbid discrimination on Section 8 status

Seth BormanPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Phoenix, AZ
  • Posts 553
  • Votes 314

As a rule of thumb, in Los Angeles County you're either going to be happy to get Section 8 rents  or charging so much more that they aren't even going to call you.

Not something I would worry about.