Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Shiva Bhaskar

Shiva Bhaskar has started 53 posts and replied 506 times.

Post: Raising rents on existing tenants when buying property!?

Shiva BhaskarPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 523
  • Votes 475
Originally posted by @Hector Salas:

Hello BP community! I have been analyzing a lot of properties that have great potential, but rents are way below market value. What steps would I need to take to raise rents to current market value, on a recently purchased property, given the property is in good condition. I am searching in Los Angeles CA, San Bernardino CA, and Riverside CA. 

Hi Hector, check on which rent control law applies. If you're looking in Inland Empire, the state rent control will apply to most pre 2006 multifamily builds. Does not apply to single family unless you own 10 or more, or own through corporations etc. You can raise rent by 5% per year plus inflation (whatever that is indexed at, usually 2%). So, 7% total, on the multifamily properties.  

If you're investing in Los Angeles, you have LA city rent control on 1978 and before builds (this law is known as LARSO), LA County rent control for unincorporated areas, and also rent control for cities like Santa Monica. You'll want to check which applies.

My advice would be to send notice of rent increases to tenants according to legal requirements, typically 60 days before the lease is expiring. It would not hurt to do it even 75 to 90 days ahead. This is both a courtesy to the tenants, and lets you plan ahead, if you're going to need to find a new tenant. 

Keep in mind that paying tenants to move (a tenant buyout) is always an option. In city of Los Angeles, landlords do this quite often. 
 

Post: Buyers purchased a house with another agent behind my back

Shiva BhaskarPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 523
  • Votes 475
Originally posted by @John Apple:

I have buyers who I spent the last 3 months driving all over the county showing properties to. We recently took a ‘pause’ as they paid off debt to get a higher preaproval. Then, yesterday I came across a Facebook photo of them with another agent and a ‘sold’ sign. Is there anything I can do? We signed a buyer agency agreement but my broker told me those are barely enforceable and not worth the time to pursue legal action.

It sucks when this happens. I'd be curious as to whether the other agent found something which you didn't. That would be great learning. I'll also share a story. I was an agent many years ago. I knew another agent, who showed a bunch of rentals to these two young women, who were moving into New York City. They liked working with him. 

He failed, however, to show them 2 that might have been of interest, and the rented one of those. He felt really bad. The thing was, these two really liked him. He congratulated them, and suggested that they let him know when they had friends who needed help. He got 4 deals that summer out of friends of theirs, whom they referred. Some of those friends sent friends, and you get where this is going. learn what you can, and remember you'll have other clients who will rave about how great you are. Go find those people. 

Originally posted by @J. Mitchell Bernier:

@Mike Terry Seems like everyone commenting here thinks people will do the smart thing and use the cash out refis to buy an asset and not a liability.

Hate to break it to everyone, if you are betting on the majority of people picking the smart, rational, financially savvy route you are going to lose. The sad truth is that most people are not financially responsible and will use that cash out to fund a lifestyle purchase and when the market does turn they will have not increased their income or the value of their home. The majority of people aren’t on BiggerPockets, they don’t read Rich Dad Poor Dad, they don’t keep budgets, and they definitely don’t make the right financial decisions.

So should investors cash out and purchase property or increase the value of their asset yes. But will normal everyday Americans, I will vote no and someday that chicken will come home to roost.

Agree with all of this. 

I share the same concerns, especially on people doing cash outs on single family, non rental properties. My focus is multifamily, and most investors in this category (I hope at least) are savvy enough to save most of the money for future acquisitions and keep some reserves. I think plenty of single family investors are savvy in this way as well. 

I do worry about the folks overleveraging to spend on boats and vacations and so on. I don't think this is 2008, but it is an issue. 

Post: Finding off market properties?

Shiva BhaskarPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 523
  • Votes 475
Originally posted by @Michael Egan:

I keep hearing all about how the best deals are off market. But, obviously, they are hard to find by virtue of being off market. How do you all find good off market deals? Is there a way to efficiently learn about them or do I just ask brokers to send them to me? If you have an answer specific to multifamily and/or Los Angeles that would be great but I'd also love to hear your thoughts in general. Thanks!

Our team is closing soon on a 10 unit in LA (county, unincorporated) which we acquired directly from the seller. Took a lot of work, but it can be done. Happy to chat about this. 

Post: Probate Investing With Attorney Denise Moore

Shiva BhaskarPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 523
  • Votes 475

One of the most lucrative ways to invest in real estate, is to purchase properties through probate sales. Yet, the probate process remains shrouded in mystery, and many investors don't know how to access these opportunities.

To demystify the probate investing process, we've invited a very special guest. Ms. Denise Moore is a trusts, estate and probate attorney with decades of experience in this field. Denise has assisted members of the LME Investments executive team with probate issues, and is an expert on the topic.

You won't want to miss this value-packed event! Please note that this meetup is held through Zoom.

Post: Utility Bills in Los Angeles

Shiva BhaskarPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 523
  • Votes 475

Hi Ted, fellow LA investor. at first glance, looks high. The only thing I could think of was all units are 3 or 4 beds, but that is not super common with quads. I would investigate further as to what is going on. 

Post: South Pasadena, Monrovia, Pasadena Areas

Shiva BhaskarPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 523
  • Votes 475
Originally posted by @Allen Wu:

Hi Friends,

I'm looking to buy a SFH in the Los Angeles, CA area specifically in South Pasadena, Pasadena, or Monrovia area. This home will be used as a primary, but potentially converting into a rental investment in future years. Purchase price will range between 800-1M, but people are submitting 10-30% above listing. Couple of questions:

1) Market is competitive. Is it worth to “over pay” by 10-20% and waive appraisal?

2) How do fellow investors buy a primary? I find it tough to buy a primary without my investor lens. My wife is focused on the “emotional buy”.

3) Would you overpay and waive certain contingencies if buying in a hot market like these cities for a primary?

4) Any general recommendations? Our thought is to continue to rent, but at an age now where we want a primary to start a family.

 Hi Allen,

I am a local investor(well, LA County, but not those specific areas), and have a few thoughts. 

1. Are you planning on living there for the long term? If so, I hesitate to suggest anyone waive an appraisal, but if we're talking 10 years or longer, I think you'll be fine. 

2. This is inevitable. I don't even know if it's "bad" that there be some emotions involved. You and your family will be living there, and I've always thought of a primary as a home first, and investment second. That isn't to say we should buy a bad deal, but my primary focus would be if you and your family have a place you're excited to call home. 

3. I would be very hesitant to ever waive an inspection contingency, unless we're talking a very new build or gut rehab. Even then, I would hesitate, since I've seen the mediocre work done on some of the flips in LA. As far as "overpay", I don't know that over asking is overpaying in the areas you mentioned. If you really can't see a 10 year horizon for this property, then don't buy it. 

4. Pasadena is always hot. I was waiting to see La Canada Cresenta on the list, that is the other one one that has blown up. 


Can I suggest you might also want to consider other parts of SGV? I know Pasadena and South Pasadena are hipper than say, Arcadia or Monterey Park, but those two areas have wonderful schools, though you might end up paying more in some cases. I have friends who grew up there and did very well.  If having good schools are a priority (I don't know anyone who would say it's not) not sure where work is for you and your wife. I would also look a bit further away, at Diamond Bar, Rowland Heights, Walnut, and perhaps Cerritos as well. Diamond Bar High School and Whitney High School are amongst the very best in LA County.

Post: Finding & Investing In Bankruptcy Properties

Shiva BhaskarPosted
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
  • Posts 523
  • Votes 475

We know the real estate investment market is very competitive. How do you get an edge? One less-known is by investing in properties which are owned by individuals or companies in bankruptcy proceedings.

How do you get access to these opportunities, and figure out whether they make for good investments? To answer those questions, and share more insights, we've invited Mr. Jonathan Vaknin, Esq.

Jonathan is a California-based bankruptcy attorney, with more than 12 years of practice experience. Jonathan will share some details about how the bankruptcy process works, and then dive into how investors can gain access to properties which are in bankruptcy court proceedings. This will be a highly informative session, with lots of practical advice. We look forward to seeing you there!

Hi Jennifer. Am interested. We host one as well and it's been a lot of fun - interested in checking yours out!