All Forum Posts by: Shiva Bhaskar
Shiva Bhaskar has started 53 posts and replied 506 times.
Post: Multi family investing in New Jersey

- Investor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 523
- Votes 476
Originally posted by @Sidney Garcia:
Hello everyone, I'm looking to purchase a multi family property in New Jersey. Preferably a duplex to start out my investing. I'm trying to find areas in NJ that have positive job growth and economic development but the google searches aren't giving me anything substantial. What sites or methods do you guys use to truly investigate your market? And to any NJ investors out there, what places in NJ support multi family rental property investing? I'm looking to house-hack. The financing would most likely be an FHA loan.
Hi Sidney, you may want to follow Marc Gilbert on Twitter. He runs a firm that exclusively buys properties (small to medium sized multifamily mostly) in NJ. Seems to do very well and shares lots of great insights.
Post: There are no "bad markets", just bad strategies / operators?

- Investor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 523
- Votes 476
I've been thinking about this a lot. We focus in one market (Los Angeles), and have a strategy that has thus far worked. I've had folks tell me the market we're investing in is a good place to by real estate, and others tell me that it's a terrible one. I've heard the same about Cleveland, Tampa, New York City, Phoenix, Detroit, and every other metro area in the country.
This got me thinking. I know someone who is based in and operates in Detroit (which gets beat up on constantly in investing circles), doing flips and the BRRRR strategy for medium term holds. He's done very well, by any measure of returns. Yet, I'm sure others in Detroit, using the same strategy, or a different one, have had trouble. Know folks in Cleveland with similar situations.
Locally, in LA, I've seen folks get burned, despite how "good" of a market we're in. Often, their strategy was off, or they didn't execute well.
So, this raises the question: Are there any "good" markets? Or, is that different for each person? My view has been that the operator and the strategy is at least as important as market, but open to hearing otherwise.
Post: Good real estate newsletters to sign up for?

- Investor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 523
- Votes 476
Originally posted by @Brad Hammond:
The Real Estate Guys do a great newsletter with lots of high-level information about the economy and how it impacts real estate.
Thanks Brad! Definitely signing up for this.
Post: Good real estate newsletters to sign up for?

- Investor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 523
- Votes 476
I'm an investor in Los Angeles. We put together multifamily deals locally, and also run a monthly meetup group. Along these lines, we send out a weekly newsletter to our list, sharing things going on in our market, as well as more macro, in the real estate market and economy.
I am always looking for good sources of information, which I might share with our friends who are reading. I'm on the Stessa newsletter, which is very useful. Can anyone else suggest other real estate or economic newsletters where I can get big picture news on the real estate markets and economy?
Post: “Conservative UW is Dead”

- Investor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 523
- Votes 476
Originally posted by @Arn Cenedella:
There’s an old expression about numbers and it’s GIGO - garbage in garbage out.
Numbers in a spreadsheet can be tweaked incrementally but produce large differences in returns.
At the end of the day, it is the skill of the underwriter and not the excel formulas that really count. And that skill is primarily tied to local market knowledge.
When an underwriter has to decide: Does a $5,000 value add renovation add $100 or $125 or $150 to the rental rate of a unit? What’s the rent bump if any for granite over laminate? These type of questions are the key to the analysis.
I’m an old school guy and still carry around and use an HP12C calculator I bought back in the early 1980s while doing my CCIM coursework. I don’t see spreadsheets as the ultimate answer.
Here is maybe away to look at this.
If one was buying an asset 1000 miles from their home......
Which analysis would you trust more?
An analysis from someone who doesn’t own an asset in the area, visits for a couple days and then dives deep into Costar and then underwrites the deal.
OR
An analysis from someone who owns five similar assets in the area and then uses their own verified income and expense data complied from their five other assets plus their actual experience in the market where they KNOW what value adds produce the best returns in that market after several years of actual trial and error. They know the market (and minor local area nuances etc) they know what appeals and what doesn’t. They know precisely what it costs to paint a unit because they have painted hundreds in that market.
In my mind, the answer is obvious.
Costar is great but often contains errors. I recently looked at an asset and Costar said 763sf units. Actual measurement revealed 610sf.
There no right answer here and in some ways, we all are saying similar things - I think we all agree the data is important. The question is where do you get the data from and how accurate it is.
GIGO - definitely using this phrase in the future. I love it!
Post: Should I purchase a home with a tenant in it? CA

- Investor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 523
- Votes 476
Hi Brandon, I'm an attorney as well as investor locally, so I have a few thoughts:
Yes, you can evict them if this is primary residence. You'll need an attorney (or should hire one), and it can take some time and cost money. Are you getting a decent discount on the property, in exchange for taking it with these tenants? If so, it could make sense to proceed.
Post: Good Tenant? Refuses to do background check

- Investor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 523
- Votes 476
Background checks are standard. Under no circumstances should you agree to this.
Post: “Conservative UW is Dead”

- Investor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 523
- Votes 476
Originally posted by @Justin Goodin:
“Conservative underwriting is dead.”
Rob Beardsley brings up a great point. It’s extremely difficult to be an active real estate investor in this market if you are using extremely conservative underwriting techniques.
📈Values are inflated and deals are being listed for crazy prices. But yet, deals are still being bought and sold all around.
There are times deals do not pencil out to provide our required return metrics but then months later, I will see that deal being closed on LinkedIn and the buyers are projecting a 19% IRR. 🤔
📌Anyone else have thoughts on this? How is your team adapting to this competitive market and underwriting deals? 👇
Check out Rob’s video HERE
We put together deals and invest alongside LP's in a very competitive coastal market (Los Angeles). We underwrote very conservatively relative to what we had done in previous deals and what the market bears, and using those metrics, showed an IRR of slightly under 11%, on a long term hold.
We had great interest in the deal, but I had a few LP's tell me that they were not interested because some guys were sending deals with 19% to 22% IRR mostly out of state, and they were believing these crazy numbers. At first, I was a little disappointed, but I realized that I can live with it.
We'll likely beat the IRR we listed by a decent amount, and will definitely cash flow well. More importantly, the investors who can with us are realistic in their goals, and want to work with an honest operator who will preserve capital. I have definitely seen that building such trust means you'll sleep at night, and have referrals to more investors in the future.
I suspect many of the deals we're seeing are being pushed because of low rates, and lots of people joining the syndication bootcamps, and figuring that they can do it. As a result, there are a lot of bad transactions getting done. Most of these won't end up in foreclosure of course, but the investors will get mediocre returns and be disappointed.
So it goes I suppose. Smart underwriting is the only way to preserve wealth long term.
Post: How do yall feel about buying a rental property all cash?

- Investor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 523
- Votes 476
All cash and refinance later is a great strategy. You can get some nice discounts that way too. We did this with a 7 unit property here in Los Angeles recently (14 day closing, private money) and got a great deal. I am a fan of smart use of debt and leverage where needed, but sometimes you can "steal" a deal by going all cash. In such situations, do it if you can afford to.
Post: House Hacking in Los Angeles: Rent vs Buy Fourplex Multifamily

- Investor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 523
- Votes 476
Hi Colby, I am an LA multifamily investor. At first glance, I would suggest renting for at least a little while. Get to know the market. There are many good areas for buying one unit and renting others. I know a great agent for folks looking to househack if you want the referral.
We buy multifamily in very different areas (from where you mentioned) in LA County. We are still seeing strong deals and returns, but the neighborhoods are of course very different.