All Forum Posts by: Frank Jiang
Frank Jiang has started 16 posts and replied 542 times.
Post: Living in San Diego, investing out of state for cash flow

- Investor
- San Diego, CA
- Posts 592
- Votes 765
@Christine Lawrence Ping me! I used to own rentals in Memphis and Indianapolis (now fully divested). I am not a crazy who will say one way or another that investing OOS is a terrible or a fantastic idea.
There are definitely pitfalls of which you need to be mindful since there are a lot of bad actors in this space, but many people find decent returns in this space.
Post: Stumbled into a mess ....

- Investor
- San Diego, CA
- Posts 592
- Votes 765
Originally posted by @Patricia Steiner:
Yes, they should all be in an LLC. I wouldn't do it any other way nor would my clients. Here's why:
"An LLC for real estate is an established legal entity that allows investors to purchase and own real estate in such a way that protects them from personal liability. This means that the investor buys and sells real estate, as well as conducts other business, in the name of the LLC, rather than as an individual. In case any outside entities or individuals make a claim, the individuals behind the entity are able to avoid personal liability. In addition, property owners are allowed to establish individual LLCs for each separate property, meaning that they can avoid cross-liability between properties." (End; Fortunebuilders)
An example. Let's say someone is injured on the property and they decide to sue for the moon. The LLC removes all of your personal property and assets from the mix. If a judgement was awarded, only the assets held in the LLC could be attached.
There is no reason to commingle your personal and business assets. The potential liability is too great. As for the tax implication, it's a non-event:
"When the IRS "disregards" an LLC, it means that, although the LLC and it's owner are separate entities (for liability purposes), the IRS "disregards" them and just taxes the LLC however its owner is taxed. The IRS treats the owner and the LLC as one and the same." (End, LLCUniversity)
Some of my clients place each investment property into a separate LLC and others "group" them based on some criteria.
And, congratulations on that over-achiever family of yours. Very large - definitely impressive!
All of the things you mentioned are better mitigated by purchasing umbrella insurance, which is a far more important step to take in ensuring personal protection.
In terms of buying the newest condo in an LLC, buying a property in an LLC makes getting a loan on the property orders more difficult.
Post: Buy cash vs leverage - is my plan any good?

- Investor
- San Diego, CA
- Posts 592
- Votes 765
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Interesting. So is it a general rule that you get much better cash on cash ROI the more you leverage? But it's a bit riskier as you are in the hole if property values take a dive.
Leverage enhances your results. Making up numbers: if you would have had a good property making you 7% before leverage, you will make 15%+ after leverage. If you have a bad property making you -3% before leverage. You will make -10% after leverage.
Also, if you're afraid of using leverage, there's really no point in getting into RE in my opinion. The entire beauty of real estate is someone will be willing to give you money to invest with. Imagine asking the bank for a loan to go play on the stock market. Unlevered real estate performance for entry-level real estate is really quite unimpressive and you can get a similar return for far less work by just buying into the stock market or some high yield bonds.
Post: Clayton Morris / Morris Invest House of Cards starting to fall.

- Investor
- San Diego, CA
- Posts 592
- Votes 765
Originally posted by @Jay Hinrichs:
here is a
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-8hChD_I0I
nice U Tube from someone who has about as many followers as Morris has.
its front page of Google ..
Heartbreaking to read stuff like this.
Post: Advice on a horrible situation

- Investor
- San Diego, CA
- Posts 592
- Votes 765
And this is how the next wave of complaints about GEG from the private lenders starts coming in. Seems inevitable when you're underwriting 5% > 9% balloons on D class properties.
Post: Am I missing something?

- Investor
- San Diego, CA
- Posts 592
- Votes 765
Originally posted by @Jeremy Clark:
@Frank Jiang
Thank you for the feedback.
I did miss the closing costs but I shouldn’t be responsible for realtor commissions as the buyer? Unless I’m missing something else. When I’ve bought my primary residences the seller was responsible for those. Is there something different when it’s not my primary residence?
Once you own the property, at some point, you become the seller. You have to calculate the fees to exit in your analysis as well.
Post: Am I missing something?

- Investor
- San Diego, CA
- Posts 592
- Votes 765
Originally posted by @Jeremy Clark:
@Frank Jiang
I knew I was missing something on the COC return. That's makes more sense.
What do you mean by add the 5k principal back in?
Because every year you own the property, your equity in it increases by roughly 5K. When you one day sell the property, you will get all of that principal back in one big cash payment. So in essence, the principal portion of your payment doesn't count as a true expense because, barring a downturn or excessive exchange fees, you get it back when you sell the property. Only the interest piece counts as an expense.
There's a ton of other small but not inconsequential stuff you're missing, primary exchange fees (loan origination, realtor commissions, title, etc). With all this in mind, you can feel pretty decent about this property returning somewhere between high single digit to low teens barring anything extraordinary (market downturn, unforeseen capex, difficult eviction, etc).
Post: Am I missing something?

- Investor
- San Diego, CA
- Posts 592
- Votes 765
Well for starters your CoC calc at the end is wrong.
You have a monthly profit of $432. You've already deducted the mortgage through P/I so you don't take it out again. Your actual return is the $432*12 / Down payment = 7.4%.
Technically, you should add back the principal piece of roughly 5K in a year to the $432 so your return is closer to 13-14%.
Post: Putting Money Into Your Pocket

- Investor
- San Diego, CA
- Posts 592
- Votes 765
LLCs' are pass-through. You just take an owner draw.
Post: Just like everyone else.. Looking to buy first home

- Investor
- San Diego, CA
- Posts 592
- Votes 765
Do not take investment advice from Clayton Morris. Do a quick search of Morris Invest in the BiggerPockets search engine and you'll get yourself hours of perverse Schadenfreude material.