Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Holly Williams

Holly Williams has started 6 posts and replied 193 times.

Post: Flipping in Staten Island, NY

Holly WilliamsPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • New York City
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 271

NYC is a foreign country.  Staten Island has been trying to succeed for many years but it ain't gonna happen.  You gotta really know your stuff, the laws are not at all landlord-friendly, and it's a "buy for appreciation" play.  In addition, population growth is just not happening relative to other areas of the USA. On the other side, with risk can come great reward. It's just too risky relative to where I am in life, only you can judge your situation, and what keeps you up at night.

Post: Women are more risk-averse as investors

Holly WilliamsPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • New York City
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 271
Originally posted by @Dennis M.:

@Holly Williams

Yikes ...When did you have your husband neutered ?

Gotta start early in the game, lol.  I did however let the "put down the toilet seat" go by the wayside, and 19 years later one of my few regrets is that I didn't tackle that one at the same time!  :-)

Post: Women are more risk-averse as investors

Holly WilliamsPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • New York City
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 271
Originally posted by @Erin Spradlin:

@Angelo Mart - I'm sure that just because one female decided to not work with you does not mean you believe no females can be reached. 

@Holly Williams - are you kidding? Fake news is a term simple people use when they don't like transparency or don't want to explain themselves or are too lazy to actually debate. 

I'll elaborate now that I'm at my computer and not my phone. I can assure you that I'm not lazy, I love transparency, and after 35 years in market research and advertising, and 20 years of real estate investing, I can assure you that you can make data say whatever you want it to.  How often does Barrons write about alternative investing outside of the stock market? Who are the advertisers that pay the bills?  The article ONLY talks about Wall Street, and specifically mentions the fact that women question financial advisors more and are more likely to take their money elsewhere. It also says that women are more likely to engage in tax planning, long-term care, etc. That's actually SMART. The article doesn't talk about wealth...it talks about investing in the stock market with financial advisors, most of whom have no idea what the market is going to do beyond "over time the returns have been 10%...just hang in there."  The article looks at one metric..."how much do they invest in wall street products?"  Wall Street gets richer, we pay huge fees, stock investors pay more tax in general, and to make a blanket statement about how ignorant women are about financial matters is an ignorant statement in and of itself.

When you talk about investing, you have include all assets...not just stocks.  My parents drank the cool-aide, and I watched them have to withdraw their retirement funds when the market was down.  I watched what wealth they had disappear, and you can bet the farm that my portfolio would look to Barrons like I'm "risk averse."  

"Fake News" was probably not how I should have articulated things.  I should have said, and will now, that it's a one-sided article written by a very smart woman that has spent her career writing about wall street, published in a magazine that is owned by Dow Jones and is a sister publication to the Wall Street Journal.  It's a blanket statement that women are more risk-averse than men, less financially savvy, and lack confidence.  As women, we should question that. 

I believe that the US population as a whole is not as financially literate as we should be.  It has less to do with sex, and more to do with our educational system and the media we consume.

Hope that helps clarify, and thanks for getting this thread started. It's a very good topic to explore.

Post: Women are more risk-averse as investors

Holly WilliamsPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • New York City
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 271

@Erin Spradlin. If anything, the men are investing because the women told them what to do. I work with investors all day. The vast majority of men do what their spouses tell them to do. Maybe I’m living in a different bubble, but I run the financial show in my house.

Post: Women are more risk-averse as investors

Holly WilliamsPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • New York City
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 271

@Erin Spradlin and I just glanced at the article. Fake news. Barons wants nothing but for everyone to invest in the stock market. The article was actually pretty offensive.

Post: Women are more risk-averse as investors

Holly WilliamsPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • New York City
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 271

@Erin Spradlin You are kidding right?

Post: Why do I keep hearing 401(k)’s are garbage?

Holly WilliamsPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • New York City
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 271

@Craig Jeppesen if you have a Roth option then that’s a game-changer. Big difference.

Post: Why do I keep hearing 401(k)’s are garbage?

Holly WilliamsPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • New York City
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 271

@Brian Eastman. Very true. For me, maxing out was not a bad move. I just wish I knew then what I know now. That said, when you walk away from a 35 career with $500k there are worse mistakes I could have made. It’s not not that good of a return.

Post: Why do I keep hearing 401(k)’s are garbage?

Holly WilliamsPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • New York City
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 271

@Cody Brown oh let me count the ways. I always did the maximum though, but if your income isn’t high enough to make a difference on your taxes I would do things differently. The main thing for me is that upon retirement they tax the gains as regular income, not capital gains. Fees are terrible too. I could go on and on, but others will probably chime in.

Post: How to avoid taxes on an inherited 401K?

Holly WilliamsPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • New York City
  • Posts 208
  • Votes 271

@Trent Vick sounds like you have a w-2 job. I have an inherited IRA and the only way I have been able to avoid taxes is by offsetting the gains with losses. Mine is only $100k or so and I am only required to take out 6-10k so it's not bad. It is indeed ******** though. Talk to your CPA, I don't think you can even roll it over. The government wants their money.