Respectfully, I disagree with this assertion that somehow my interpretation of rights is "shallow." 

(Which I'm interpreting to mean that it could be developed into 5 units) It was our first property, and we house hacked and rehabbed it, and pulled our money out via a HELOC last year (now fixed at 6% over 20 years).

Even professionals find this topic very complex and challenging to interpret.

So far, all I can gather from your posts is your bitterness toward ONE Agent who, based on your interpretation, tried to persuade you to complete a deal you ultimately decided did not suit your best interests.

How would you interpret this behavior?

., sorry, but I still have to disagree with your interpretation of what is protected and what is not protected in the trust I described. 

@Andrew AngererMy biggest roadblock sometime is the lack of American Sign Language (ASL) interpreters.

In a perfect world I'd have access to an MD as well...to run and interpret my blood work every six months or so..If this could afford me more energy to work a few hours longer each day (not counting the time savings from cooking, figuring out what to eat etc..)

What matters is how a judge or the CFPB will interpret your agreement if the buyer ends up leaving before they own the house and decide to sell the house to recover the equitable interest which you have conveyed or to sue you to recover the equitable interest if you block the sale.

It is open for interpretation if having a contractual agreement to purchase is enough to be considered equitable interest in a home.