30 vs 40 year
I’m just getting into my real estate journey and am working on understanding all my financing options when it comes to my first purchase. I recently spoke with a lender that is able to offer a 40 year mortgage with 10 years of interest up front. Wondering if anyone has experience with this type of loan? I know the overall interest is higher but the trade off of a low monthly seems to make up for it? What’s the drawback other than higher interest paid?
Purchase: 1,100,000
25% down
12k monthly income from rent
- Lender
- Austin, TX
- 3,394
- Votes |
- 3,400
- Posts
by 10 years of interest "upfront" you mean the first 10 years of the term are interest-only, right? Not like an upfront payment at closing of 10 years of interest?
No the interest is paid over the first 10 years
I would consider it basically a 10 year interest only loan. As “the experts say” there is zero chance interest rates won’t be lower sometime in the next 10 years and you’ll refinance, or you’ll sell.
Personally I hate interest only loans but I hate paying interest. I understand it has it uses. Is it all you can afford or does it do something for you a regular loan can’t do at a reasonable cost? If so go ahead.
@Arsalan J Khan
Depends also on risk, but what is the rate of the loan and can you invest that money and do better, most likely not because it’s a small amount and it will have taxes on top of it, so I would rather pay the higher amount to build more equity
Like others I hate paying interest
You are referring to what's called a hybrid loan. There are a few different iterations, but essentially, you have a 40 year fixed rate that is broken up into two parts; the first ten years is interest only, then automatically "converts" to an amortized loan over the next 30 years. There are a few advantages to this structure, but the real questions are two things; how long to you plan to hold this property?, and is there a Prepayment Penalty on the loan?
If you plan to hold this loan for 30 years, your total interest paid will be way higher compared to a traditional 30 year fixed loan. If you are hedging the market for a few years to see what happens and plan to refinance if/when rates fall, then it may be a good option to increase your cash flow in the interim. I am not recommending Prepayment penalties any longer than 3 years right now. Some of my clients even opt for 1 or 2 year PPP. If conventional, then PPP is not an issue.
Cheers!
Quote from @Nick Belsky:
You are referring to what's called a hybrid loan. There are a few different iterations, but essentially, you have a 40 year fixed rate that is broken up into two parts; the first ten years is interest only, then automatically "converts" to an amortized loan over the next 30 years. There are a few advantages to this structure, but the real questions are two things; how long to you plan to hold this property?, and is there a Prepayment Penalty on the loan?
If you plan to hold this loan for 30 years, your total interest paid will be way higher compared to a traditional 30 year fixed loan. If you are hedging the market for a few years to see what happens and plan to refinance if/when rates fall, then it may be a good option to increase your cash flow in the interim. I am not recommending Prepayment penalties any longer than 3 years right now. Some of my clients even opt for 1 or 2 year PPP. If conventional, then PPP is not an issue.
Cheers!
3-2-1 prepayment penalty. I had thought I would refinance at the 4 year mark hopefully at lower rate at that point.
Just a higher interest rate. If rates drop in 1-2 years and you have a 3 yr PPP you not like the terms anymore...
-
Lender CA (#60DBO94130), TX (#1825506), CO (#100507291), AZ (#MB-0951257), and FL (#MBR5265)
- 480-336-3737
- http://www.waincapital.com
- [email protected]