Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Marcus Auerbach

Marcus Auerbach has started 157 posts and replied 4547 times.

Post: Milwaukee’s median sale price jumped 20% year over year in February

Marcus Auerbach
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Investor and Real Estate Agent
  • Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
  • Posts 4,661
  • Votes 6,732

Redfin just posted their February numbers and listed Milwaukee #1 followed by Detroit and other Midwest markets. Bottom of the list FL and TX. Here is a link to the article: https://www.redfin.com/news/home-prices-rise-midwest-2025/

Milwaukee has been a trick market to invest over the last few years. With inventory ultra-low sellers have no reason to negotiate discounts and even properties in poor condition sell for close to the same price as their updated comparables down the street. The Midwest mentality has a hard time wrapping their head around this: always humble and a little self-deprecating, they don't believe in superlatives and that is what kept the market (and prices) sort-of grounded for the last few years. 

But I have been saying this on my channel for years: if you travel a little bit you realize Milwaukee is not a below-average city. So it makes no sense that Milwaukee real estate is selling so much below the national average. Speaking of national average: Redfin say the average US median price increase in February was 3%.

Here is the data from our local MLS system for the City of Milwaukee:


Milwaukee metro area - including the suburbs:


This is single-family only, I suspect that Redfin is looking at all categories, hence the slightly different numbers. 

In a couple weeks we will have March numbers, but from what I have seen in the market the last couple weeks the numbers are not going to be any softer. 

Post: Out of State investing does not work. With very few exceptions.

Marcus Auerbach
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Investor and Real Estate Agent
  • Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
  • Posts 4,661
  • Votes 6,732

@Bryan F. lot's of good points! 

Learning at home first is huge! Based on that, it is easier to learn a second market and it sounds like you spend a lot of time there. Once you have multiple properties in that market, built knowledge and relationships the lines between OOS and homefield-investing start to blur, at least you narrow the gap. 

What you did is in stark contrast to the person who wants to buy one property and then move on to the next State for "diversification". They never reach critical mass on knowledge, relationships and revenue with service providers. 

Or the person who tells me they don't want to spend the money on a flight to Milwaukee (have never been here) and invest "fully remote".

It also forces you to take yourself out of the equation as a handyman and property manager, which has pros and cons. I assume you probably self-managed at first with your Chicago properties. It really helps you learn the job and saves some cash which is critical in the beginning to buy your next deal. But at some point you also become the bottle neck and you can't grow your biz any further because of your own limitations.

Post: Out of State investing does not work. With very few exceptions.

Marcus Auerbach
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Investor and Real Estate Agent
  • Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
  • Posts 4,661
  • Votes 6,732
Quote from @Crystal Smith:

 I'm coming to this thread late and will agree that OOS has not worked for the poster of this thread. Here's how it has worked for us in the past- It worked for us when we acted as a local- i.e. local partners, local attorneys, local realtors, local.....  And that includes budgeting for traveling into the local market.

Yup, that's my point: there is friction involved that you don't have when you are local and you can stop by on your way home. This gives the OOS investor a built-in disadvantage over local investors. With a large enough economic delta between the market where you live and where you invest, it still does make financial sense. The benefits outweigh the friction losses. And you can mitigate those by investing in better-quality properties. The lower grade the investment is, the more interactions you will have for repairs and tenants, the more opportunities for extra friction - which materializes as a cost. If you apply first principle thinking, you want to strategically minimize the number of opportunities to interact with the property.

That's why over the years we have tightened the radius of our investments even more to about 20 minutes, so I don't go to the south side of Milwaukee, even though I see a lot of great opportunities there. 

And I am lucky to live in a great market; however I have to add it was not considered great when I started here in 2009 and everything was falling apart. That was really just dumb luck that my corporate job got me here. 

Post: Putting $1M into Crypto

Marcus Auerbach
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Investor and Real Estate Agent
  • Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
  • Posts 4,661
  • Votes 6,732
Quote from @Chad U.:
Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:
Quote from @Chad U.:
Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:

Crypto is 100% speculation. Remember the dutch tulips? 

If not, you might want to google it..

You basically buy crypto in the hope that someone else will buy it from you for more. Crypto has no intrinsic value. Crypto does not cash flow. It's even worse than gold in that way. Might as well buy an NFT. High on hopeum.

The best argument I see for crypto is that you can take it with you on a USB drive. But you gotta have some nerve to put your life savings on a USB drive, fly to New Zealand and hope that the USB drive is not broken when you plug it in.

Incorrect about crypto not cash flowing.  One can obtain yields far in excess of any RE investment in DeFi, just using stable coins that maintain their peg to the dollar.  Mind you, you could also lose every cent you put in if you get rugged, so it is not for the faint of heart.  

Well, if you run a lending business on crypto you get interest, but crypto in itself does not cash flow. Neither does gold.

There are several that do without having to lend, one in particular is called Ethena.  The premise behind it is a delta neutral basis trade that arbitrages funding rates on various exchanges, which has consistently paid 5-30%+ APR since its inception.

This is just one example, there are hundreds of other strategies where you obtain yield on your crypto.

Right, but that still does not make it an investment. It's a currency. You can lend out dollars too, (or Euros if you want it to sound more exciting). Nobody would say: I invest in dollars because they "cash flow". Same with crypto. 

Post: How do you handle an investor challenging your ARV?

Marcus Auerbach
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Investor and Real Estate Agent
  • Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
  • Posts 4,661
  • Votes 6,732

You can totally use Zillow for comps. The data is good (the same as MLS) and Zillow even has a comp tool you can use. The problem is that establishing ARV is both art and science. Most agents struggle with it, any training we offer is always packed. ut you don't need to be an agent to get good at ARVs, you get better with time and practice. Calculate 100 ARVs and see how close you get.. I would not argue with someone who does not have much experience.

Post: Putting $1M into Crypto

Marcus Auerbach
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Investor and Real Estate Agent
  • Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
  • Posts 4,661
  • Votes 6,732
Quote from @Andres Giraldo:
Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:

Crypto is 100% speculation. Remember the dutch tulips? 

If not, you might want to google it..

You basically buy crypto in the hope that someone else will buy it from you for more. Crypto has no intrinsic value. Crypto does not cash flow. It's even worse than gold in that way. Might as well buy an NFT. High on hopeum.

The best argument I see for crypto is that you can take it with you on a USB drive. But you gotta have some nerve to put your life savings on a USB drive, fly to New Zealand and hope that the USB drive is not broken when you plug it in.


 Hey Marcus,
Real Estate, Stocks, E.T.C. are based on the same principle. You buy it hoping that someone else will buy it from you at a higher price point. Most crypto, indeed, has no intrinsic value. The other remaining crypto will change the world. As your argument with the USB, it has a seed phrase, you do not need a USB, as long as you do not forget the 12 words (seed phrase). I would suggest you take some time and learn about blockchain, cryptography and hashing power.


Yes you can use use your zengo or coinbase wallet so you don't need to bring a USB stick. I was just making a point. Don't be so offended

If you buy a farm it does not matter if farm prices go up or down, you make money every year. If you buy an apartment building and real estate prices drop to half, it does not matter, because people can live in it and pay rent. If you buy dividend stocks, it does not matter, you get dividends...

You do know about the Dutch tulips right?

Post: Putting $1M into Crypto

Marcus Auerbach
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Investor and Real Estate Agent
  • Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
  • Posts 4,661
  • Votes 6,732
Quote from @Chad U.:
Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:

Crypto is 100% speculation. Remember the dutch tulips? 

If not, you might want to google it..

You basically buy crypto in the hope that someone else will buy it from you for more. Crypto has no intrinsic value. Crypto does not cash flow. It's even worse than gold in that way. Might as well buy an NFT. High on hopeum.

The best argument I see for crypto is that you can take it with you on a USB drive. But you gotta have some nerve to put your life savings on a USB drive, fly to New Zealand and hope that the USB drive is not broken when you plug it in.

Incorrect about crypto not cash flowing.  One can obtain yields far in excess of any RE investment in DeFi, just using stable coins that maintain their peg to the dollar.  Mind you, you could also lose every cent you put in if you get rugged, so it is not for the faint of heart.  

Well, if you run a lending business on crypto you get interest, but crypto in itself does not cash flow. Neither does gold.

Post: Out of State investing does not work. With very few exceptions.

Marcus Auerbach
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Investor and Real Estate Agent
  • Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
  • Posts 4,661
  • Votes 6,732
Quote from @Matthew Becker:
Quote from @Austin Wolff:
Quote from @Marcus Auerbach:

Yup, thats exactly what it comes down to good boots on the ground, someone who has the necessary knowledge and you can trust. But of course there is a cost to that.

Partnering is an option, but I'd be very careful. Almost every biz partnership I have ever seen went sour sooner or later. Written agreement, spelled out responsibilities and a spelled out exit plan is a must!

Good point. I have yet to see a successful partnership that didn't go up in flames sooner or later. "Don't have a partner" is the usual advice I'm given when I ask my network for their most important business lesson they've ever learned (the context is that they specially meant don't have a 50/50 partner).


 I have done dozens of partnerships over the last 30 years.  I have never had one blow up.  No one ever sued anyone.  We always made money.  Generally, I want to own a 25% minimum and put my own money in.  One time, a partner wanted out.  The partnership absorbed his equity and paid him with equity we had.  All the other partners were happy to increase their equity.  I have four partners from California that I have never met in my life besides over a Zoom call, and they were all referred to me by other people I have partnered with.  I think if expectations are set and people do what they say they will, you will have very few problems.  But I would not partner with a newbie who needs $100K for his first deal in Ohia.  However, I did partner with my accountant, who needed $100k to close a deal.  I think if you are a higher-income earner in CA and want to get into real estate, the only option is to find out-of-state stuff.  I find good deals monthly, but I can't turn the cash around fast enough to not have partners.  I would need 3 to 4 million liquid all the time sitting doing nothing in a bank account if I did not find a deal.  I refuse to borrow money from hard money lenders I think that is a good way to loose your ***.  

Hi Matthew, excatly, it's the newbie who is unsure what to do and partners with a friend who is equally green and then they go and buy a duplex as tenants in common. Sooner or later one wants out and the other one can not aford to pay him out, or one rents to a bad tenant and they loose a bunch of money on an eviction and now the blame game starts..

The best partnerships are formed when 2 people complement each other, for example one has money and the other has time or skill. The odds of success of two pros partnering are much different than two noobs forming an LLC and then calling me, because they want to buy their first property and of course OOS... ;-)

Post: Out of State investing does not work. With very few exceptions.

Marcus Auerbach
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Investor and Real Estate Agent
  • Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
  • Posts 4,661
  • Votes 6,732

@Cody L. congratulations!! I only know a handful of people who have scaled this large! Most never went past 10 or 20 units, but even that wil chnage someones financial future. So my comments are aimed at investors who are looking at 1-4 unit deals, maybe a considering and 8 or 12 unit building. 

Once you go 100+ units the dynamic is obviously much different, you have a much bigger rent roll to pay contractors or full-time staff. Being local is not that important anymore..

Post: Out of State investing does not work. With very few exceptions.

Marcus Auerbach
#4 All Forums Contributor
Posted
  • Investor and Real Estate Agent
  • Milwaukee - Mequon, WI
  • Posts 4,661
  • Votes 6,732

Yup, thats exactly what it comes down to good boots on the ground, someone who has the necessary knowledge and you can trust. But of course there is a cost to that.

Partnering is an option, but I'd be very careful. Almost every biz partnership I have ever seen went sour sooner or later. Written agreement, spelled out responsibilities and a spelled out exit plan is a must!