@Jacob White
From my perspective, as someone who has wholesaled properties, there are pros and cons to the practice. The cons do not apply to all wholesalers or wholesale transactions while the pros are universal when a wholesale transaction is correctly executed.
Cons:
1. A property can only have one contract on it at a time. If the property is encumbered by a contract a wholesaler does not have the intention or ability to close on, the property is not available for contracts from individuals who may actually be interested in purchasing the property.
2. Con men. A decietful wholesaler who leads a seller to believe they are purchasing the property and does not explain that someone else will be purchasing the property can leave the seller angry and feeling lied to.
Pros:
1. Quick close. When a wholesaler has a buyers list they are often able to help a seller close on the property within a matter of weeks.
2. Seller has options. When a wholesaler educates the seller about the process and the seller's other options - including listing the property with a realtor - the seller can make an informed decision as to what is right for them and their property.
3. No "showings". A wholesaler with an active buyers list can send a property to multiple individuals thus avoiding having to keep the property in "showable" condition.
4. Seller decides the terms. A wholesaler can help the seller create terms that will benifit them and their situation while keeping the situation private and avoiding lengthy negotiations.
I am sure other people can come up with different pros and cons but that is my list based upon my experience with wholesaling and other wholesalers. I do think the practice has its positive points and can be very helpful in certain situations but it can be harmful when someone does not abide by ethical standards.....
I am not sure how how being licensed corrects ethics though. Ethics are personal. They do not suddenly materialize because someone has a license. Frankly, I think the whole RE system is broken. Why is it okay for a Realtor to put a contract on a property with a buyer that has not been approved for a mortgage? When the buyer backs out 5 weeks later because they could not qualify, the property has been tied up for weeks and missed other potential buyers while it was encumbered with the non-performing contract. This can be very devistating for a seller and is no different than the wholesaler who cannot close on the property. Also, why is it okay for Realtors to put a sign in the yard then list the property on the MLS simply to hope and pray another Realtor will bring a buyer so they can get paid? Or for a realtor to tell a seller their property is worth "X" just to get a contract then tell the seller to drop the price thousands of dollars a few weeks later because the proerty is overpriced? These practices hurt sellers just as much as a bad wholesaler. I don't say these things to make people upset, but to get people to think about the system and how it could be improved. It needs more than just laws targeting a few individuals who don't have an RE license.