Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: John Rooster

John Rooster has started 10 posts and replied 391 times.

Originally posted by @Shaun Reilly:
This $5K thing is clearly BS as reading the attorney response shows that they had to pay off the mortgage (I assume in the just under $50K range based on the auction amounts) as well as the back taxes. I'm sure the investor was still looking at good money, since why would she bother otherwise, but probably the $195K implied in the article.

Yes, like most newspaper articles about real estate, it omits or gets wrong some important facts, and the reader is left to guess what really happened. My guess is that this house was sold at auction for $48,358, an odd number so it probably went back to the Bank. I am further guessing that there is a post sale redemption period, and this investor bought it during the redemption period for $5000, subject to the $48,358 and any other existing debt. Heck, that $48,358 might have been a 2nd DOT for all I know.

Post: Sheetrock cost?

John RoosterPosted
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 409
  • Votes 105

They charge labor by the sheet. Prices will vary greatly depending upon supply and demand. This time of year is a good time to hire a sheet rock crew. I like to pay for the materials directly to the supplier.

Post: Who do you think will win: Zillow, Trulia, or ????

John RoosterPosted
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 409
  • Votes 105
Originally posted by @Bryan L.:
@John Rooster - John, I also choose not to advertise my client's home with a Super Bowl ad. Seems like that would be in their best interest though as it would surely sell very quickly if I were to do so.

There would be a sizable fee associated with a super bowl ad, if I were an agent I would agree to provide such a listing to my client if he/she paid said fee. Is there a sizable fee associated with checking the box to syndicate the listing?

Post: Who do you think will win: Zillow, Trulia, or ????

John RoosterPosted
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 409
  • Votes 105
Originally posted by @Patrick Connell:
Originally posted by @John Rooster:
Originally posted by @Joe Delia:
Originally posted by @John Rooster:

Not only is a doable its being done already.

If there is a metro area that Zillow and Trulia can not service because they are being stonewalled by the local MLS please name it. I would like to research this more.

Austin, starting May 1.

A piece of a newsletter sent out a month ago from ABOR:

"Last week, the ABoR Board of Directors voted to return decisions regarding listings syndication to brokers by agreeing to terminate ABoR’s relationship with ListHub after April 30, 2014, and stated its intention to cease facilitating the syndication of members listing data to non-REALTOR consumer websites. After April 30, 2014, brokers will choose independently whether to provide data to non-REALTOR consumer websites on a case-by-case basis as dictated by clients and agents best interests."

Thank You. Something with the fonts makes it read odd, I edited to make it more readable

This isn't stonewalling this is just delegating the authority for deciding to syndicate the listing to the Broker/Agent. Which is the way it is in Denver, and probably most markets, currently. Which brings me back to the point I made earlier.... The agent deciding not syndicate the listing would be, in almost all situations, a dis-service to the home owner. To not syndicate the listing would be a violation of the Agent's duty. No?

Post: Who do you think will win: Zillow, Trulia, or ????

John RoosterPosted
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 409
  • Votes 105
Originally posted by @Joe Delia:
Originally posted by @John Rooster:

Not only is a doable its being done already.

If there is a metro area that Zillow and Trulia can not service because they are being stonewalled by the local MLS please name it. I would like to research this more.

Post: Who do you think will win: Zillow, Trulia, or ????

John RoosterPosted
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 409
  • Votes 105
Originally posted by @Patrick Connell:

Well, what do you think of the various opinions you've gotten so far?

My overall long term view point has not changed. From my view point, the only two serious players in the market are Trulia and Zillow. I think they are both fairly valued relative to each other, and would buy similar amounts of each. I would bet that one will buy out the other in the next couple years. I think the entire internet stock sector is set for a pullback, and will wait for said pullback before buying.

Post: Who do you think will win: Zillow, Trulia, or ????

John RoosterPosted
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 409
  • Votes 105
Originally posted by @Bryan L.:
@John Rooster - It has already begun. There are some MLSes who have already stopped sending data to zillow et al. And many others who are considering it. And many brokers as well (both large and small). There will be a big fight over this. I wouldn't buy their stock (or trulia's).

I understand that an agent can technically not check the box that forwards the listing to Zillow/Trulia/et al, BUT that seems to me to be a violation of the agent's duty to their client. In almost all situations, the client is best served by having the listing forwarded to other data bases, imo any agent that does not check that box (without the express consent of the client) is violating their Realtor duty to their client.

Post: Do you have to lie to wholesale?

John RoosterPosted
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 409
  • Votes 105

I would be interested to know your perception of wholesaling after you have actually done a couple of wholesale deals.

Post: Foreclosure sales less profitable in 2014?

John RoosterPosted
  • Denver, CO
  • Posts 409
  • Votes 105

It is now brutal at foreclosure sales in the Denver area. Twice as many bidders bidding on one forth as many properties. Simple math. Many of the bidders are in the same boat as me, running out of work for my crew, willing to take a smaller profit to keep them working, but still getting outbid. REOs on the MLS have been selling at full retail for a year now.

I would think it is not as bad in FL since they still have a good back log of foreclosures (so I read on the interweb). I would not be surprised if some investors have moved from the Denvers et al to FL, and that is contributing to your increase in competition.

You can't make anyone do anything. All you can do is collect as much information as possible about them now so that if they leave, you can locate them to serve them. Then you can get a judgment against them. Having a judgment against three college grads is a pretty good judgment in the spectrum of ex tenant judgments. It might take 2, 4 or 10 years, but some day you will locate one of them on Linkedin or MyFace, boom goes the garnishment.