Originally posted by @Ben Leybovich:
Isn't anyone on this Forum, who gives sound advise that is, technically a "Guru"?
GURU defined by Webster: a teacher or guide that you trust; a person who has a lot of experience in or knowledge about a particular subject
The word is usually thrown around as a derogatory adjective, but do we sometimes give the noun version to the hype jockeys too many times whereby on some level validating them as such and forget the true meaning of the word? BP is a platform for Gurus of all kinds...and some of those Gurus use the platform to achieve personal gains which is also fine in my opinion...after all, we are an opportunistic society..right?
You can be a "Guru" or have a structured and informative program, book, spreadsheet, etc. and have a "Guru Program or Guru Tool" and that's OK by Webster if the information contained in the subject material is sound, proven, factual and relative to the subject at hand.
So I say...go be a Guru!...produce valuable Guru tools and publications...embrace the sound knowledge that you may have, share it as you see fit and from which you design valuable spreadsheets, informative podcasts/webinars or publish materials...but don't bash other valuable "Gurus" for personal gains.
In most industries, information is welcomed and embraced...yet in this industry it sometimes becomes a cut-throat mission not because the information, program or tool doesn't have value, but simply because of the human nature need to be recognized and valued as a leader figure (some say ego) in a community. I am here to say there is room for all to be valued and respected and feel that a forum should embrace those willing to stand up for their positions and inquisitions if they hold some form of merit instead of always trying to find fault with their language. A healthy debate is one thing, but often times you don't see that when a post gets a running and usually it's because someone feels threatened in some fashion or offended.
This post as it started, and why I chimed in to begin with, had merit and validity. Was there room for debate...SURE! But it seems to have moved from a healthy debate to a non-productive thread as so many of these unfortunately turn into in the end which ends up losing the point all together and becomes more of a distraction instead of a tool for readers to use.
Again...the point of this thread, as it started, was not the Guru Tools themselves, but simply questioned the timing to which those tools are being offered to new investors in training and the manner in which they are offered (published yet not guided) I believe...though I could be wrong!
I stand by the fact that knowledge should go before tools so that one can appreciate those tools more and actually get something useful from them in the end.
Happy Guruing!