Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Jack B.

Jack B. has started 419 posts and replied 1844 times.

Post: Tenant fined by HOA for repeat parking violations

Jack B.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 1,888
  • Votes 1,047
Originally posted by @Stephen E.:
Originally posted by @Jack B.:
Originally posted by @Stephen E.:

 Sue them in small claims court over $200 dollars? Have you ever been to court? It costs more than this just to file and have a process server serve them. 

But, I will point to their shoddy credit, utility bills, late rent and HOA violations as a talking point if there is more push back.

It is a small sum, but I think it is just the start and that these tenants are intent on stiffing you for this and other bills. There is a lot of face involved in knowing that you have paid the bills and then progressively asking for greater and greater evidence of offences that they know they have committed. You are becoming their supplicant in playing to this. Simply receiving a statement of claim may cause them to wise up a little. But presently you seem to be rationalising away paying their parking fines. These are not good tenants. They may have been good tenants once, but those days are over. Now they are creating trouble and costing you money. The only question remaining is how long you are going to let them. If you do decide to go after them rather than eat these costs as you are now contemplating, you can get your filing fee and other costs back from them if you prevail. In my jurisdiction I would be stuck with these characters, but in yours since you have them on a M2M lease you can just not renew. One thing I have learned over time is that PITA tenants rarely get any better. Once they are on a downward trajectory they just keep going. You can get better tenants than this if you go out and look for them.

 Dude, calm down. As I've repeatedly said in my OP and other posts, I plan on taking it out of their deposit, not eating the cost. And again, spending thousands on vacancy and turnover costs over $200 that I can take out of their 3K deposit on a house I make 60K a year off of is just plain bad math. 

I agree with you that they suck as tenants. As I said, I stopped responding to their texts when they asked if they had pics. For one, you have the same notice I have, I sent you what they sent me after all. Second, you have a bankruptcy, a brand new Lexus SUV, and all kinds of past due utility bills and I've personally witnessed and photographed many of the violations they sent you. No debate, pay the fine or I will give you notice to move out since you are on a MTM lease and I will take it out of your deposit. Good luck with a bad landlord reference, a bankruptcy, etc. finding a new place to live...

Heck, since I don't want to press the issue to much until rental season (spring/summer) I may just go along for now without saying I'm forgiving the fine. Then I will just give them notice in April and take it out of their deposit, send them on their merry way into the trailer park they belong in.

Post: Looking for Flooring Recommendation?

Jack B.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 1,888
  • Votes 1,047

All I know is anything BUT carpet will be going into my rental when the carpets need replacing. Each and every single tenant craps on them like it's 1999.

Post: What site / tools used to see how rough an area is without going?

Jack B.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 1,888
  • Votes 1,047

The other thing too, google street view is very telling of a neighborhood...I avoid investing in the ghetto. 

Post: Managing a property manager

Jack B.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 1,888
  • Votes 1,047

Hmmm...I could see that, though I have not read it anywhere. I suspect areas like Detroit, Compton, St Petersburg, etc. are going to be much rougher tenants and much higher PM turnover. 

I've never used a PM to date, so take it with a grain of salt, but in my opinion, even though they deal with the day to day plumbing emergencies, rent collection, leasing and paperwork, you're still on the hook in court, financially, legally, emotionally. They just get a new client. You could be sued for millions. Buying properties in C areas is just plain problematic. Higher cap rates be damned, not all things can be measured with cap rates...I'd much rather buy an A or B building. Pay twice as much, buy half as many (The Magic of Thinking Big).

Post: What site / tools used to see how rough an area is without going?

Jack B.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 1,888
  • Votes 1,047

Crime maps on Trulia works real well. Also, City Data Forums are good if you need more information about trends or general areas to avoid, etc. 

Post: Be Careful of Dead Equity!!

Jack B.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 1,888
  • Votes 1,047
Originally posted by @Michael Swan:

Hi @Jack B.

You could do a mixture of Refinance tax free and 1031 exchange other and keep a few in Seattle like I did here in San Diego.

Swanny

 So funny you mention that. I've been considering doing just that as I don't want to have all my assets in RE. Right now I'm about 17% cash 5% stock, with the rest tied up in RE. I have enough equity to buy a large complex, but I want to keep maybe 500K from a cash out refi long before an exchange. I can use the money to spruce up the houses a bit too. Perhaps keep my favorite one as well. Exchange to a different type of rental. Eventually when prices dip again I will deploy that 500K into highly leveraged houses in Seattle again, maybe more, riding another wave of equity up. 

It really is true about equity. Out of the 200K a year I make from my small portfolio of houses here, 75% of it is from appreciation while the rest is from principal pay down and cash flow. Gotta love it. Make good money while you sleep. And I've only been doing this a few years, adding a property every 2 years or so. It's been incredible in just a short period of time even while slowly adding to the portfolio. Can't wait to see it really snowball now that it's in place.

Post: Do you pool reserves for all your properties?

Jack B.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 1,888
  • Votes 1,047

For example, I set aside a specific amount for each rental. Each year it comes out to about 7,500 in reserves to cover vacancy, maintenance, for each of a small handful of rentals (let's say 3). It's really rare I have to touch it. An odd repair of a $100 here and there, that's about it. A little bit of vacancy, that's about it. Of course it is set aside for anything damage deposits don't cover, and cap ex, though I'm leaning toward flipping every few years to avoid cap ex, as it will eat you alive if you hold forever. I'd hate to have to spend 30K on a new roof, 40K on a kitchen remodel, 15K per bathroom on EACH bathroom remodel, paint, carpets, etc. as it needs updating over 30 years...

I figure pooling it is kosher since there I operate the rentals like a multifamily as a single owner. Thoughts? To date I'd say I have yet to spend more than $1,000 on repairs, capex or vacancy combined per year so far. In four years...But I have two roof replacements coming up. If I sell next year I may perhaps come out even further ahead by keeping these extra 6.5K each year...

Post: Cashflow Doesn't Build Wealth?

Jack B.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 1,888
  • Votes 1,047
Originally posted by @Aaron Mazzrillo:

I have a few dozen houses at any given time. As @Account Closed stated, one pile pays my bills and puts food on the table, the other pile is for horse trading. Your experience is EXACTLY why buying California property makes the most sense to me. People brag about their $300 cash flow from their dumpy *** $60,000 house out east of the Rockies. Really? I bought a few dozen houses back in 2009-2011. I'm now selling some of them off as they go vacant. The last house I recently sold, I paid $81,000 for it 4 years ago and just sold it for $274,900. On top of that phenomenal gain (approx $150K net), I collected $1,550/month rent from the same tenant all 4 years. 

Now, the naysayers be like "Well, that was the bottom of the market. That can't be done now!" 

I just closed on a nice Riverside house out by UCR. Paid $90K for it. My private lender wired $125K to escrow. I got a $28K refund check from escrow. (Read that as nontaxable income.) Property will rent for $1,700 when I'm done fixing it up. 

Have fun on your airplane ride and staying in Motel 8 naysayers.

I agree with you, but when you said CA RE I thought your were buying 700K properties that go up 50K+ a year each, etc. Sounds like you're using the BRRRR strategy if not at least in part. Brilliant strategy on the escrow transfer from the lender. That's how the mega wealthy pay almost nothing in taxes. Borrow against their assets...Pay the debt back with devalued dollars. Refinance, repeat...

Post: Creative way to write off travel expense?

Jack B.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 1,888
  • Votes 1,047

From what I've read online/Nolo if you didn't buy not deductible.

Post: Be Careful of Dead Equity!!

Jack B.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Seattle, WA
  • Posts 1,888
  • Votes 1,047
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

I think it depends on where you are in your financial life. If you want to live off the cash flow, your argument is correct. If you want to build wealth, you are better off keeping your appreciating assets. Im in a similar boat with a ton of equity in Bay Area properties. But while ROE based on cash flow is low, ROI is actually great due to appreciation. While I am working and not using the cash flow, I prefer to build equity. Sometime down the road maybe I will have to convert that equity into higher cash flow. But that will be the end game. Right now, Im okay building equity. And as Jay says, the liquidity of west coast property is huge. You cant sell your Ohio apartments in a hurry or without seller finance etc.

 This is one thing that worries me about selling my fancy houses in Seattle and exchanging them for apartments is the fact I'd be losing this fantastic appreciation. Alas, I will have to do it eventually as you say. I want to preserve my capital from residential real estate cycles at some point.