All Forum Posts by: Jon Schwartz
Jon Schwartz has started 37 posts and replied 926 times.
Post: Short term rentals in LA, is it legal?

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @Elias Barend Westhof:
@Jon Schwartz
Anyways, the fourplex is just north of the 10, off of s la brea ave.
Thank you
Elias, this is the city of Los Angeles. In Los Angeles, you can only rent part of your primary residence as a short-term rental. You can list the fourth unit in the fourplex on Airbnb or VRBO, but only for a minimum stay of 30 nights.
There are further restrictions, outlined here:
https://www.airbnb.com/help/ar...
Best,
Jon
Post: Short term rentals in LA, is it legal?

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @Elias Barend Westhof:
I am getting conflicting information online about whether or not it is legal to do AirBNB in LA county, so I thought I would ask you guys. We have recently purchased a fourplex, where two of the units have long term renters, we intend to move into the third, and was considering doing Airbnb on the fourth one. Is this legal under current legislation?
Thank you for any input.
In what city is the fourplex?
Best,
Jon
Post: Purchasing out-of-state rental first or House-Hack here

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @Parker Radford:
Hello,
This is my first post and interaction with the community. I currently live in Carlsbad, CA (North County San Diego) and am not quite sure what action to take. I have enough capital to invest out-of-state and buy my first rental property in the Midwest. The other option would be to continue saving and wait another year to buy a MF House-Hack here in SoCal. I don't have enough capital to do both. I currently rent and have no problem staying here but want to make the best decision. This has probably been talked about before and I might be overthinking things but any advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Another vote (from another local) for house hacking here in Socal.
A trickle of cashflow from the Midwest is less valuable that reducing your cost of living and building equity here on the coast.
Best,
Jon
Post: CA Buyer in Default Refusing to Release Earnest Money

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @James Haig Streeter:
I recently sold my CA home, with the initial accepted offer being 7% over asking, with all contingencies removed from the outset. After paying the standard 3% earnest money into Escrow the buyer then cancelled the contract and demanded the deposit back. This is even though the California Purchase Agreement has a liquidated damages clause that states if the buyer defaults the seller “shall retain the deposit”. The buyer also signed a contingency release which has similar language.
I finally sold to a backup offer, for asking price – therefore a 7% loss compared to the initial offer. As this home is located in the SF Bay Area this represents quite a substantial sum.
Question: As the buyer who was in default is refusing to sign the release of the earnest money, are there any next steps I can take to compel them to sign? I understand that often this situation ends with an agreement for each party to take a 50/50 split. Any other options that anyone can suggest, keeping in mind this is a CA contract?
James,
I believe the next step is mediation. Read section 21 of the CA Residential Purchase Agreement (assuming you transacting on this document).
I've not been through mediation or arbitration myself, but if the buyer removed all contingencies when he submitted the offer, then cancelled, AND you suffered actual damages (a subsequently reduced sale price), your case seems pretty iron-clad to me.
I believe you can enter mediation and arbitration without a lawyer, so I say go for it! Keep you costs down and fight it!
Best,
Jon
Post: I don't know what to do.....

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @Roderic Baker:
Hey guys I'm in a bit of a pickle, I'm finally ready to invest in real estate, part of me wants to sell but if I can refinance and move someone in that'll be cool too. Here's a little history I bought my home back in 2014 as a foreclosure at 159k, I currently owe like 123k. My real estate agent believes I can get 270-280k with how the market is now. It's in a great neighborhood and the schools are good also here in Denham springs La, my agent and I have history we actually went to High school together. I consider him a good friend, he actually helped me find this home in 2014, he also invests in real estate. He told me that either way I go its a win. My plan was to take the money from selling the house and use it to pick up on some of these foreclosures that's about to hit the market, but if I can refinance the house and use my current home as my first investment property that would be awesome. When I bought the home my interest rate was/is 4.25% he told me if I refinance at 2% my note would go from $1200 to around $800, and I could probably get around 1600 in that neighborhood. I'm actually moved out of the home now and I've been doing some renovating. Any suggestions will be appreciated. Thanks.
Refinance. Foreclosures aren't about to hit the market. And when the relative handful of foreclosures do hit the market, they won't cost what they did in 2014.
Remember, in 2011 (and to a lesser degree, 2014), banks had too many foreclosures on their books and couldn't find any buyers. Nobody wanted to buy a house.
Today, everybody wants to buy a house and most banks have hardly any foreclosures on their books. Even when a few additional foreclosures do hit the market in about a year, it won't be like last time.
Post: Pros/Cons of Los Angeles?

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
I (25) live in LA with my parents and am chugging along at work saving up money for whenever I figure out what I want to do with it. Recently, my uncle (who owns a few condos near his businesses that he rents to employees) called me up and said he's willing to go 50/50 on an investment property with me. Thus begins what could be the most important financial decision of my life.
Between then and now, I've started reading a few books and listening to a few podcasts to get some ideas. But at the moment ideas without enough background knowledge is all I have. Being in LA my entire life, its sort of the elephant in the room for me lol. So I ask the more experienced folks, what are pros/cons of Los Angeles?
Rajan,
You're going to get a lot of nay-sayers poopoo'ing LA real estate -- like the gentleman who has already commented. Please know to take any advice from out-of-staters with a huge grain of salt. They really don't understand real-estate investing in LA. It's a whole different beast.
LA is unique in many ways: an extremely constrained inventory, an extremely high gross rent multiplier (GRM) in most submarkets, a rent control ordinance, massive barriers to entry in both cost and permitting.
All of these can go under "Pro" and "Con" category depending on how you approach them. For example, the high GRMs mean property is expensive -- but it also means that converting a garage into an ADU will produce an ROI like you just don't see in other parts of the country. Or rent control: most out-of-staters see it as a bane that no landlord would willingly subject himself to, whereas seasoned LA investors know how to use the ordinance to their advantage.
I would say this: given your age, current living situation, and that offer from your uncle, it comes down to your income outside of real estate. If you have a good job/career that you can rely on for income for the next decade or so, definitely buy in LA.
Invest in a less expensive, but gentrifying submarket in order to cashflow. Your equity growth over the decade will be substantial and will outweigh any trickle of cashflow from the Midwest, no question.
Or house hack in a nicer neighborhood. The financials might be more difficult to work out with your uncle, but maybe part of your 50% can be the property management of the asset. House hacking will allow you to move out of your parents' house without having to pay typical LA rents. And again, in ten years, you'll have substantial equity in a grade-A asset.
What LA isn't great for is immediate cashflow. If you're just looking for an extra $100/month, look to the Midwest. But if you have a more longterm view, I'd stay in LA.
Best,
Jon
Post: Which beach city has the best chance of appreciation in 10 years?

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @David Stuart:
Hi guys,
I'm looking to invest in a property with the following criteria:
- It has "beach city" weather. I might have to live in this property for a few years first, and I *hate* hot weather. Looking for city where summer weather doesn't go above 80. So that includes Long Beach, San Pedro, Lomita, Seal Beach, Wilmington, Lomita, Westminster, etc.
- It's a city that's relatively cheap (i.e. not Palos Verdes or Huntington Beach) but is the fastest among up-and-coming beach cities in terms of gentrification . i.e. the area is continuously getting safer and the HHI of the neighborhood is getting higher for the next 10 years.
I think based on my criteria Long Beach should be top of the list. But if there are other cities that you think also fit into this criteria I would love to know. Thanks!
tldr: I want to invest in a home in a city with beach city weather that also has the most potential for gains due to gentrification in the next 10 years.
David,
For a 10-year time horizon, I recommend San Pedro.
Development has just begun on the waterfront. Pricing is still extremely favorable. In ten years, San Pedro will resemble what Long Beach is now.
Best,
Jon
Post: LA and Palm Springs Investing

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @Halle Doenitz:
Hi all- This is my first post. I own a structural engineering firm and co-own a design-build firm. Both of these business endeavors are new (~2 years old). I have over a decade of structural engineering experience, primarily on large commercial projects. Personally I'm looking to get into investing in real estate. I'm hoping to leverage my expertise and network- looking for opportunities for new builds, intensive renovations, etc. I'm interested in the Los Angeles and Palm Springs (and neighboring desert cities) areas. I'm located in Playa del Rey and looking to connect with others that have real estate experience in these markets. Would love to chat with other investors in the area and would greatly appreciate any advice. I know the building market is crazy right now with labor and materials, but if anybody has a good concrete/foundations crew that is looking for new work please let me know!
Halle, with your engineering experience and LA's high GRMs, you have a super unfair advantage when it comes to major reno's. I'd love to talk partnerships!
Best,
Jon
Post: Buy my own house first or invest in real estate?

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Briana,
I faced the same dilemma down here in Los Angeles.
I highly suggest you look into buying a duplex. If this is your first home, it's certainly not your "forever home," and an owner-occupied duplex is an incredible investment in a HCOL area like San Jose. The rent you collect on the second unit will blow away the trickle of return you'd earn on an out-of-state rental.
Out-of-state rentals are alluring because they're inexpensive and cashflow positive, but it takes scale for that return to be meaningful. When I mathed it out, I saved more faster by owning one rental until in LA (the other half of the duplex I live in).
Best,
Jon
Post: County assessor website

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Mat,
The LA County Assessor website withholds information, but it is public. To get the owner's address, you can to go to the Assessor's office and request it in person.
Have you tried calling the number you have?
Best,
Jon