@Kevin Greene Awesome that you’re putting your money to use, And BP is great place to educate yourself on how to do just that. Although private lending is a great way to invest I will offer an alternative idea to you and all other readers on this thread.
I am a big proponent of having ownership of real estate as an investment. The following example I have used before is exactly why.
When it comes to real estate investment the two most powerful things are debt (leverage) and taxes. You receive neither of those benefits when doing hard/private money lending.
Here is an example of two investment channels you mentioned:
Hard money/private lending:
$100k lent out for 1 year at 12% interest w/ 2 points will give you a gain of $14k or a pre tax COC of 14%. Lets assume you are in a 35% tax bracket. You will cut a check to the IRS for $4,900, leaving you with $9,100 or a after tax cash on cash of 9.1%
Apartment building investment:
$100k down payment on a $500k building. At an 8% capitalization rate (very achievable) you are left with $40k net operating income. lets assume when you borrowed the $400k from the bank they lent it to you at 4% interest over a 25 year term. This means your year one mortgage payment is $25,332 ($15,827 interest, $9,505 Principle) leaving you with $14,668 in cash flow or a pre tax cash on cash return of 14.6%. This beats your total pre tax return of 9.1% from the Lending example above BUT we haven't even started on all the other benefits of investing in real estate.
So you cash flowed $14,668 do you pay tax on $14,668?? NO! Another beauty of real estate and leverage is the depreciation tax benefit. Even though you only put 20% of the $500k in to the property you get ALL of the depreciation. Apartment buildings/houses are depreciated over 27.5 years, which means you get to depreciate the building value. The buildings value does not equal the property value because the building sits on land and that land also has value. The IRS does not allow you to depreciate the land. A typical percentage of a property value to allocate to land value is 20%, or in this example it would be $100k. This leaves you with 400k of building value to be depreciated $400k/27.5=$14,545. What does this mean? It means you barely pay any tax on that $14,668 cash flow you made on the building. You actually only have a taxable gain of $9,628 ($14,668 + $9,505 - $14,545) we add back the principle amount of your mortgage payment because it is not deductible and subtract out the deprecation we listed above. Again assuming a 35% tax bracket the gain of $9,628 would result in cutting a check for $3,370 to the IRS. This means your after tax return is 11.3%. A 2.2% increase on after tax return when compared to hard money lending
That’s all great and will make you a lot of money, butHMLhas no tenants, no phone calls, no toilets. That piece of mind in its self is worth not receiving the additional 2.2% return owning real estate provides right? I don’t think so because there is one more major piece to this puzzle.
Another huge difference between HML and owning investment real estate is the power of debt and with debt comes amortization. Wealth is built in the amortization of the debt you put on the property. Back to our example the $400k in debt you put on the building will have an army of tenants paying down your mortgage month after month. In our example after 10 years you will only owe $285K on the building IF the property never appreciated one cent and it was still worth $500k in 10 years you would have $215K in equity. You could then sell it or refinance it (again tax free).
Now lets wrap the amortization into our example. Using the loan terms I mentioned the first years of the loan will result in a $9,505 reduction in principle or if the value stays the same that would be seen as a $9,505 increase in equity. If we add that $9,505 to the cash flow and tax benefits we are left with an all inclusive after tax return of 20.8%.
This is just the basics. You can accelerate depreciation benefits through cost segregation, Structure loans for quicker amortization depending on your goals and many other tricks.
If you have no desire to be an active owner of real estate you can receive all of these same benefits from investing in syndications where an experienced investors raise capital from passive investors and shares in the equity/profits of the property. This leaves the heavy lifting to the experienced investor willing to put in the legwork and the passive investor reaps all the same benefits since they are an equity owner. I know there is loads of information on syndications on BP, also If you cant tell I really enjoy this stuff so feel free to reach out if you ever have questions!
Wishing you the best what ever strategy you choose!