Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Juan Diaz

Juan Diaz has started 44 posts and replied 152 times.

Post: Myrtle St, Oakland flip

Juan DiazPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Emeryville, CA
  • Posts 158
  • Votes 124

Post: Myrtle St, Oakland flip

Juan DiazPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Emeryville, CA
  • Posts 158
  • Votes 124
Originally posted by @Raquel Pea:

Nice job, @Juan Diaz, lovin' the look. Mind me asking what your ROI turned out to be? Is this one of your foreclosure investments soon to be featured in the Foreclosure Investor Tour meetup? ;)

 Off the top of my head, something like 30-40%

This is an older flip, I think we had a meetup there about a year ago. Long since sold, so can't host, sorry!

Post: The Best Investment on the Peninsula!

Juan DiazPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Emeryville, CA
  • Posts 158
  • Votes 124

@Chris Mason thanks! We look at whatever opportunities arise. It's difficult to find a good deal if it's a house that's been all fixed up and looking pretty, but if you have something that's move-in ready but not in great shape, we can work with that. We're usually looking at fixers, but we'll move on anything where the numbers work out.

Post: The Best Investment on the Peninsula!

Juan DiazPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Emeryville, CA
  • Posts 158
  • Votes 124

In the San Francisco Bay Area, we’ve been pretty active in two places: the East Bay and the Peninsula. What we’ve found is a market inefficiency that has allowed us to make at least a million bucks on the Peninsula!

Is this a trade secret that we’re spilling? Maybe. We’ve certainly made good money, but we’re not the type of people to keep everyone in the dark. It’s only a matter of time before the market catches on and eradicates this inefficiency, and we’ve made our living as real estate investors finding and exploiting the market inefficiencies before anyone else. We’re confident that when the market inefficiency here changes, we’ll be ready to move on to the next one.

So what is this market inefficiency we’ve been referencing that’s made us a million bucks? It’s made up of two things: location and our approach to construction. Everyone knows about the next trendy area that’s going to explode, the Brooklyn to Manhattan, the Oakland to San Francisco. These areas usually gentrify over the course of years or decades in a highly visible way. Numerous think pieces are written about them, lots of media attention is focused on them, and prices invariably rise. The easy way to take advantage of this type of location is to buy early, sit back, and watch your asset value rise in your sleep.

But we’re more active investors here. We don’t want to rely just on the vagaries of the market. We want to find other avenues of monetizing that asset value increase faster than simply waiting on the market. So how in the world can we go about doing that? That’s where our approach to construction comes in. In this overheating market, there are segments of the market that are not sufficiently filled, where you can get a greater price per square foot than you would in other market segments. For instance, if there was a glut of large houses in a gentrifying neighborhood, take a huge house and cut it up into multiple condos. This is a time-honored tradition among developers—maximize your price per square foot by maximizing the number of units in the building.

This however, is not the case in the market sweet spot that we’ve found. We’ve found a method of development that basically gives us a 100% return on investment for every dollar we put in. So where are we doing this—and what are we doing?

So where are? We are doing it in San Carlos. San Carlos is the crest of the huge wave that is the real estate market on the Peninsula. If you have a house anywhere on the Peninsula, your home values have increased significantly, but if you’re in San Carlos you’re in a special place.

Palo Alto, Atherton and Menlo Park have long been the places to be on the Peninsula, with the best schools and some of the most expensive real estate. But as their real estate gets even more expensive, people have been searching for other neighborhoods that are very nice, but not quite as expensive. This search has lead them to look for a similarly-sized community nearby. They want to keep the short commutes and fun downtowns, but where are they going to be able to find that? East Palo Alto is still viewed as dangerous. Mountain View is big and suburban, and right next to San Jose. Redwood City has parts that are undesirable. So where are they looking? They’re looking at Belmont and San Carlos.

Belmont and San Carlos maintain the two most important things that these wealthy home-buyers are looking for: vibrant downtowns and convenience. Belmont and San Carlos are conveniently located close to 280, 101, and have a Caltrain station as well. Transportation is convenient by multiple means, whether to San Francisco or towards San Jose.

Not only that, but Belmont and San Carlos both have a nice stretch of downtown restaurants near El Camino Real, which serves as the main thoroughfare through the area. It’s a vibrant, walkable area that is rather rare on the Peninsula. These homebuyers are finding that they are able to enjoy many of the amenities of Palo Alto in the downtowns of San Carlos and Belmont.

Belmont and San Carlos have been enjoying the benefits of these transplants from Palo Alto, seeing some of the highest growth in home values since the recession. But of the two, we don’t work in Belmont very much. Why is that, when both have seen tremendous growth? The reason lies entirely with the building departments.

For what we’re doing to get our amazing return, we’re going to need permits. And the city of Belmont can be quite a hassle to deal with. On the other hand, the process for the city of San Carlos is much smoother and has allowed us to successfully flip many properties there. This is why I recommend sticking with San Carlos, and not venturing into Belmont as often.

So what in the world are we doing that we are going to need these permits? This is where our value proposition lies. San Carlos was a sleepy suburban town that became really built up during the post-war boom in the 1950s and 1960s. Because of that, most of the houses that were built are on the smaller side. There is not much existing stock that has a significantly larger square footage in the way that the transplants from Palo Alto would desire. This is where our building permits come in. We've found out that by adding square footage to existing houses in San Carlos, we can take advantage of this under-supplied market. Our larger houses fetch a premium, giving us something along the lines of 100% ROI for each dollar we invest into adding square footage.

So what do you need to do in order to successfully add square footage to a house in San Carlos? There are a few things that you need to keep in mind as you add on square footage. First, when you’re purchasing property, look for flat lots. Building on a flat lot is substantially cheaper than building on a slope, and much easier and quicker as well. The second item is making sure that you have the room to expand. Building out is cheaper than building up, and most jurisdictions have a 40% maximum building footprint, meaning that your horizontal space your building occupies on the lot can only be 40% of the lot size itself. Third, which might seem contrary to what was just said, is build up as well! It’s generally cheaper to build out than build up, but if you’re already building out, you can generate some cost savings on square footage by building up at the same time. It’s a great way to squeeze even more profit out of an addition. And lastly, make sure you’re using immaculate finishes! All your appliances should be gourmet or commercial grade, and your finishes should belong in a magazine.

Phew! That’s enough to get you started on your own path to taking advantage of this market inefficiency in the Bay Area. Buy a house, add on some square footage, and reap the profits. It’s not quite that simple, but if you’re in the business, you know how it goes. So what are you waiting for? This market inefficiency might close at any time! Who knows how many other hungry people are out there, ready to build large, opulent houses or add on lots of square feet? This is your chance! I hope to see you out there with me, investing in this fabulous market.

Cheers!

Juan Diaz

Post: Why Building/Developing is Better Than Flipping These Days

Juan DiazPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Emeryville, CA
  • Posts 158
  • Votes 124
Originally posted by @Ryland Taniguchi:
Originally posted by @Juan Diaz:
Probably not as bad as california, but in Seattle I hear the same thing that flipping doesn't exist. Some very experienced investors told me that flipping in Seattle was like a unicorn.

The general consensus is that you can not find the 70% of ARV minus construction costs.

I have a very different perspective on flipping. In Seattle, we are finding deals that are so incredibly good that are lawyers are making us go back and give all the money back to the sellers.

For example, in Seattle where flipping is a "unicorn" that does not exist, I picked up a deal that was at 12% of ARV. Everyone here says that doesn't exist but we found a couple home runs like that this year. But here is the crazy thing. In Seattle, they don't believe in capitalism and if you get "too good of a deal" it's called equity skimming. So our lawyers recommended we give the seller an additional $100,000 so we would be closer to 50% of ARV.

How is this America? The banks pick up deals at 12% of ARV all the time but make it quasi-illegal for investors to do. But I hire great attorneys to advise us on things like this. And you think sellers are ecstatic when we come back and say "Hey let's give you another $100,000."

So before thinking that flips don't exist, try a different mindset. How about doing 10x more action than every other investor out there?

If other investors make 4 Offers on the MLS a week, then make 40 a week. If other investors send out a 1000 mailers a month, then send out 10,000 mailers. If other investors door-knock here and there, organize a door knocking army that canvases the neighborhood. If other investors network with a couple of wholesalers a week, call 20 wholesalers every day.

It is really not that flips don't exist. It's more that you are not doing 10x what other people do.

There is no easy way to do this business. I have been driving for dollars six hours a week for 10 years now. I have every ugly house on entire maps of streets for multiple neighborhoods. Do more. You can't go just buy list source or property radar. You got to go drive every block systematically.

 By no means do I want to imply that I'm not flipping while I'm developing. Quite the opposite actually. You can still find deals in the market, but it's easier (and more lucrative) to find deals ATM that are building from scratch. And of course, I'm doing your usual driving everywhere, handwriting letters, sending postcards etc. 

I bought a house 20 days ago for $124K, and I'm pending today at $275K after doing nothing at all. It was great, and a nice find, but if I'm looking for something that gives me consistent results, in this market, it's far and away new construction.

Post: Alvarado St project: Modern Art

Juan DiazPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Emeryville, CA
  • Posts 158
  • Votes 124
Originally posted by @Jeff Tang:

Having grown up in San Leandro, I think this is a great idea.  My wife's been telling me that San Leandro is the next hot place.  A bunch of breweries have opened up shop, making it the next hip place to be.  The design looks cool.  Have you ever considered modular homes or shipping container homes?  Those would fit with the modern feel, as well as attract eager buyers.  Good luck with the project!

 That's what we're hoping for! The one thing that we think might choke off that hipness is if the interest rates go up again, and the Bay just kinda stagnates. 

And if San Leandro gentrifies...good lord, is Hayward up next in the gentrification process?

Post: Alvarado St project: Modern Art

Juan DiazPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Emeryville, CA
  • Posts 158
  • Votes 124
Originally posted by @Jonathan Payne:

Juan - coming from the East Bay, I think this is super smart and not that risky...they will sell like hotcakes. (I have clients right now whoe want one!) What are the size dimensions of the units? I'm sure there is an optimum, maybe 3/2's at 2000 sf? One question I hadn't thought of for a development like this - how much does it cost to get an HOA going with all the legal paperwork and CCR's?

I'll be interested in tracking this for sure - maybe you can have a good symposium at the end? 

 I think we're going to end up doing 3/2 2000 sq ft or 3/3s, it depends on what the city gives us final approval for. We were going to do 2 x 2000 & 2 x 1600 to give two different looks, but the city didn't like

Sure, I'll give updates as we go throughout this process! Hopefully we can bring some more modern architecture to San Leandro

Post: Alvarado St project: Modern Art

Juan DiazPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Emeryville, CA
  • Posts 158
  • Votes 124

Today’s spotlight project is located in San Leandro, near the BART station and near to the downtown. For those of you who are unfamiliar with the geography of the San Francisco Bay, there are three parts to the Bay, the North Bay, East Bay, and Peninsula (I’m ignoring South Bay b/c it’s too far away for this house). The Peninsula includes San Francisco and Silicon Valley, and is home to the most ridiculously-overpriced real estate this side of Manhattan. North Bay is pricey, but car-dominant. The East Bay is where most of the gentrification in the Bay is happening, with the rapid-transit system, BART, being the main engine of growth for people who want a quick commute into their jobs in San Francisco.

Because of BART, Oakland has been rapidly gentrifying, and it’s slowly spreading southwards. In addition, the absolute hottest trend in housing is modern houses. There is next to no supply of modern housing in the East Bay, and anything that looks like a modern house has been snatched up super quickly. HOWEVER, these houses have only really been built in gentrified or rapidly gentrifying areas of Oakland or Berkeley (north of Oakland).

My entire project here is a leading indicator, to take both of those trends that I talked about above, and begin to introduce gentrification to San Leandro, the town immediately south of Oakland. I’m planning on building 4 townhouses (see the renderings below), and building them right next to BART. It’s a wager on the gentrification momentum continuing its inexorable progress, as people who are getting priced out of the safe parts of Oakland want: a) safety, b) BART station and c) a modern house.

We found a lender who will finance the costs of construction (100%!) so the numbers are looking like this: $240K to purchase the land, $1.2 mil to build, resale of $2.3 mil, and finance costs of $200K on our financing. Total profit: $565K, based on an out-of-pocket of $274K

I’m well aware of the dangers of doing a leading project like this, before something else similar has confirmed the viability. Still, there’s enough meat left in these projections that we could walk out of here without a loss, even if we’re well below what we think the market will support. But I’m excited about this—it’s all about getting creative and making some MONEY$$$!

Post: Leaving California for "sunnier" skies!

Juan DiazPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Emeryville, CA
  • Posts 158
  • Votes 124
Originally posted by @Wendell De Guzman:

 I agree in a way. This is why I included JOB GROWTH  in my 5-point analysis (volume of sales, supply or inventory level, new foreclosure filings, job growth and Long Term Case Schiller Index). People can't buy houses if there are no jobs. Hence, if you're right, LA-area appreciation is not fundamentally sound and hence, price is poised to go down. (but having said that, what if there's a lot of foreign money chasing real estate in LA - won't that push price up?)

I disagree in a way that there are no market cycles. It has been proven again and again that the price of real estate (as any other commodity) goes up and goes down. What causes market cycles is market inefficiencies and the human emotions of GREED and FEAR....not just job growth.

 To clarify, I don't believe there are 5-year or 7-year cycles, I don't know that anyone could make an argument against there not being up & downswings in the market, in that sense of a cycle.

And FYI, what I've found is that employment rate doesn't matter as much as median income, b/c the difference from McDonald's jobs & tech jobs is huge, and reflective in price. As to foreign buyers coming into the market, the reason they come is for safe-haven investments, and are just as likely to bail in case of a downturn (which would be based on the underlying economics) as any other investor

Post: Leaving California for "sunnier" skies!

Juan DiazPosted
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • Emeryville, CA
  • Posts 158
  • Votes 124
Originally posted by @Brent Seehusen:

@Matt R.

The best part of that William Yu story in the LA Times is the chart of 'real' home prices.

Notice that somebody buying in 1997 effectively paid the same price as somebody buying in 1980.  Similarly, somebody buying in 2012 paid the same price as somebody buying in 1989, a full 23 years later!  And for anybody that bought during the 2005-2007 time frame, they will still be selling for break even until sometime in the early 2030's, accounting for inflation.  That's a long hold time to break even!

I think this illustrates perfectly that appreciation in LA/OC is not a slam dunk. You can own a property for 20+ years and still not see any REAL appreciation at the end of it.  

Buy wisely folks.

 I don't buy the "cycles" doctrine. I do buy that there's a real cap on real estate prices--people's income. People's income, age of housing inventory, land constraints and rental vacancy rates are really the only things that I've found to have any correlation with housing prices. And in the LA-area, real income has been pretty stagnant, and most of the price increase has been the cheap cheap interest rates. 

But that's just my fin. analysis.