Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Ken M.

Ken M. has started 64 posts and replied 858 times.

Post: Sub-To Pre-foreclosure Deal

Ken M.#2 Buying & Selling Real Estate ContributorPosted
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, Dallas
  • Posts 881
  • Votes 496
Quote from @Khon Kounbandith:

The house was in good condition.  Renovation cost is roughly $30K.

I guess what throws me off is that you say 

Cash invested: $60


Post: Uhaul Report - Where people moved in 2024

Ken M.#2 Buying & Selling Real Estate ContributorPosted
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, Dallas
  • Posts 881
  • Votes 496
Quote from @Andrew Syrios:
Quote from @Walter Jones:

I always like seeing this report each year. Tennessee holding steady at #5

And of course California came in dead last. And that was last year before the fires. This year will likely be even worse. 
Maybe, but so far the reports are about neighborhoods where people have real money. They can go to their second home or buy another. And if they work in Hollywood, they probably want to be close to where things are happening.

Post: Due On Sale Being Called!!

Ken M.#2 Buying & Selling Real Estate ContributorPosted
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, Dallas
  • Posts 881
  • Votes 496
Quote from @Michael K Gallagher:
Quote from @Account Closed:

I did a loan assumption that is currently a GIANT pain in the ***. I’m here to share my story for whatever that’s worth.

Over a year ago I did a wrap around mortgage on a place here in Phoenix at 3.5% over 27 years. Everything was smooth until it wasn’t. 6 months into it the tenant called and the toilet had failed in an upstairs bathroom. The house was flooded to the tune of $70,000 in repairs. 

No big deal, I worked with insurance and contractors to get the repairs done. Six months later my insurance dropped me and here is where it gets sticky. I got a new insurance policy at a higher rate. I let the original borrower know they needed to update the lender on the new insurance policy. 

The higher insurance premium required a higher escrow payment which the original borrower didn’t let me know.  A few months go by and unbeknownst to me the escrow account had now drawn negative which triggers the lender to no longer apply what’s considered a “partial” payment to them, given that I’m now paying less that what’s due given the escrow increase required but not relayed to me even though I expected it at some point.

Last month I’m on Zillow looking at the value of my properties. One of my properties says it’s going to auction in March because it’s being foreclosed on. My heart rate goes through the roof as I have about $90k in equity in that house. I reach out to the original borrower and ask them what’s going on. They weren’t paying attention to it, and why would they, it’s not their house anymore. 

They send over 3 months of notices from the bank. $10,000 has been collected by the lender and is in an “unapplied” status due to the short payments. They are foreclosing and are not open to discuss it. I call them, they won’t speak to me about the loan at all BECAUSE ITS NOT IN MY NAME. 

I have to sell it, but guess who has to request the payoff amount from the lender….thats right, the ORIGINAL borrower. So I am at the mercy of that person for basically EVERYTHING.

I am still waiting on that payoff amount 9 days later and am up against a clock where they have scheduled the home for sale at auction come March.

Take it all for what it's worth, I've learned plenty of lessons and made my share of mistakes. One thing is for sure, if I ever wrap another mortgage I am getting a POA to access the docs on the original loan so that I am never again at the mercy of that borrower to relay information. If it wasn't the insurance it would have been the property taxes. FFS

THE END. 

Let me know what you would have done differently?!




Thanks for sharing, the POA to access the original docs is a great idea, and I'm totally stealing it for the future. also curious if its best practices when assuming a loan to forgo the escrow and just pay the taxes and ins out of pocket when needed....but perhaps that triggers something else? just spit ballin here.

.

"just spit ballin here."  Very funny. You're like the boat builder who doesn't know to seal the planks. Lol

I've said enough. Oh, the surprises that await you. ;-)




Post: Is Subto legal?

Ken M.#2 Buying & Selling Real Estate ContributorPosted
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, Dallas
  • Posts 881
  • Votes 496
Quote from @Tom Gimer:
Quote from @Ken M.:
Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Tom Gimer:
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Eyal Goren:
Quote from @Mitch Messer:
Quote from @Eyal Goren:

I read that every mortgage has a Due on Sale clause, which means you have to notify the lender when you sale the property and pay the entirety of the loan when you sell the property. 

How do people work with the clause and make these kinds of deals?


First, let's be very clear here.

The mortgage your speaking of is a private agreement between the seller and the lender. The "due on sale" clause (DoSC) obligates the seller to notify the lender if the property is sold.

Failing to do so would place the seller in violation of this agreement, giving the lender the right to accelerate the loan.

But no laws are being broken here.

So, subto is neither legal nor illegal.

Second, it only works because most lenders are more interested in receiving payments than in invoking the DoSC clause and foreclosing on the property.

But, it can work, provided seller and buyer are both on board and the proper process is followed.


Thanks for the clarification. What happens if the lender does accelerate the loan? I guess the seller would like to address that in the agreement. 


If you dont pay the loan off it goes to foreclosure and the original owner gets their fico CRUSHED.  its highly risky for most mom and pops to sell on sub to.. and its simply not a way for those without substantial wherewithal to buy property and keep the seller safe.. Lots of absolute nightmares come out of sub to when folks get into title but dont have the money to pay the loan off or the ability to refi.
Short term, leaving financing in place during rehab prior to resale — great strategy with limited risk to either party. 

Long term hold, with buyer planning on carrying existing financing to term without the ability to quickly cure default — terrible strategy with huge risk for both parties. 

Exactly Tom all of my sub to over the years have been deals were we got the assets for far below market did rehab and resold generally within 9 to 12 months we never bought them to keep as rentals. Its a very poor situation for the original owner to be on the mortgage for years and years without the benefits of ownership and the control.

Why do you say its bad for the original owner long term? I would think in most situations the original owner is in financial trouble, probably delinquent on their mortgage and facing foreclosure. So, selling sub-to, the mortgage is brought current and timely payments are made by the new owner helping the original owner's credit CONSIDERABLY!

Also, I believe I saw somewhere that the mortgage won't count against the original owners DTI after a period of time if they show someone else is paying the mortgage. So, they could potentially buy another house later on.

I do agree the lack of control is a potential issue.

.
People recover over time and they want their name off of the loan.

They have no way to force removal, other than to pay off the loan on a home they no longer own. 

So they contact the lender and tell the lender they no longer own the property and want to be removed. The lender at that point can exercise the Due On Sale and it becomes a problem for the subto buyer, who now has to find new financing or lose the house to foreclosure. This destroys the credit of the original owner who can then sue the subto buyer.

Another issue is if the subto seller claims they were taken advantage of by the subto buyer at a vulnerable time (pre-foreclosure) and an attorney or regulator raises the question of equity skimming. Bank related issues can be prosecuted for 10 years. Serious punishments.

With all of that, Subject To is legal. Just make sure you do it the legal way. Driving a car is legal, as long as you follow the rules. It's the same idea.


FYI I've seen subto contracts which provide for ~$50,000 in liquidated damages against a seller that reports the sale to the lender and that results in the loan being called. How do you think that provision would fly in a deal that goes sideways and ends up in court?

Hilarious. There just are no boundaries for some people.

Post: Due On Sale Being Called!!

Ken M.#2 Buying & Selling Real Estate ContributorPosted
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, Dallas
  • Posts 881
  • Votes 496
Quote from @Account Closed:
Quote from @Ken M.:
Quote from @Account Closed:

I did a loan assumption that is currently a GIANT pain in the ***. I’m here to share my story for whatever that’s worth.

Over a year ago I did a wrap around mortgage on a place here in Phoenix at 3.5% over 27 years. Everything was smooth until it wasn’t. 6 months into it the tenant called and the toilet had failed in an upstairs bathroom. The house was flooded to the tune of $70,000 in repairs. 

No big deal, I worked with insurance and contractors to get the repairs done. Six months later my insurance dropped me and here is where it gets sticky. I got a new insurance policy at a higher rate. I let the original borrower know they needed to update the lender on the new insurance policy. 

The higher insurance premium required a higher escrow payment which the original borrower didn’t let me know.  A few months go by and unbeknownst to me the escrow account had now drawn negative which triggers the lender to no longer apply what’s considered a “partial” payment to them, given that I’m now paying less that what’s due given the escrow increase required but not relayed to me even though I expected it at some point.

Last month I’m on Zillow looking at the value of my properties. One of my properties says it’s going to auction in March because it’s being foreclosed on. My heart rate goes through the roof as I have about $90k in equity in that house. I reach out to the original borrower and ask them what’s going on. They weren’t paying attention to it, and why would they, it’s not their house anymore. 

They send over 3 months of notices from the bank. $10,000 has been collected by the lender and is in an “unapplied” status due to the short payments. They are foreclosing and are not open to discuss it. I call them, they won’t speak to me about the loan at all BECAUSE ITS NOT IN MY NAME. 

I have to sell it, but guess who has to request the payoff amount from the lender….thats right, the ORIGINAL borrower. So I am at the mercy of that person for basically EVERYTHING.

I am still waiting on that payoff amount 9 days later and am up against a clock where they have scheduled the home for sale at auction come March.

Take it all for what it's worth, I've learned plenty of lessons and made my share of mistakes. One thing is for sure, if I ever wrap another mortgage I am getting a POA to access the docs on the original loan so that I am never again at the mercy of that borrower to relay information. If it wasn't the insurance it would have been the property taxes. FFS

THE END. 

Let me know what you would have done differently?!



Quick question, which Guru did you learn SubTo from?
I didn’t learn it from a guru. I read about it in several different places. It’s not rocket science. There are risks and rewards like anything else in life. 
It's not rocket science. Lol

Says he "I did a loan assumption that is currently a GIANT pain in the ***."

Post: If you had $150k where would you start?

Ken M.#2 Buying & Selling Real Estate ContributorPosted
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, Dallas
  • Posts 881
  • Votes 496
Quote from @Tyler Magee:

Hello everyone, I’m looking to get into real estate investing. I live in Tampa Florida. I am a husband and a father to 3 children. I work 40 hours a week usually from 4pm -12am. I’m 37 and I’m wanting to do real estate full time eventually(if it takes 5-10 years, that’s fine). 

So my question is, if you were in my shoes, where would you start if you had $150 cash with good credit?

I love the idea of flipping houses and I love finding good deals. I’ve been bouncing back and forth between markets like Chattanooga with higher appreciation, and markets like Birmingham with more cash flow. Im truly open to any suggestions and any markets (I chose those because of proximity to Florida).

Thank you in advance for any advice. 

I'd find the guy doing what I want to do, I'd buy him a long lunch and find out all of the things I should avoid.

Post: Who is responsible for back mortgage after paperwork is signed?

Ken M.#2 Buying & Selling Real Estate ContributorPosted
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, Dallas
  • Posts 881
  • Votes 496
Quote from @Becca Pariser:

Looking for advice:
We just closed on our first sub-to deal as end buyers (woo hoo!). We are responsible for the mortgage as of January 1 - but it's come to our attention that they stopped paying it back In October 2024. So they are two months behind. 

In this case, who is responsible for the catch-up? We already paid them a pretty sizeable entry fee ($30k) to cover some of their equity and debt in another project.

.

Your title report should have alerted you to the issue.

The payoff the escrow company got from the lender should have alerted you to the problem.

Your interview of the seller before you bought the house, should have alerted you to the problem.

You calculations on the numbers should have alerted you to the problem.

Check, cross check and check again. Sellers will lie to you and you have to "trust but verify"

It's your problem. You did things outside of the normal without proper knowledge. Not fun, expensive lesson, but "woo hoo" you got a subto.

Who trained you?

Post: Due On Sale Being Called!!

Ken M.#2 Buying & Selling Real Estate ContributorPosted
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, Dallas
  • Posts 881
  • Votes 496
Quote from @Account Closed:

I did a loan assumption that is currently a GIANT pain in the ***. I’m here to share my story for whatever that’s worth.

Over a year ago I did a wrap around mortgage on a place here in Phoenix at 3.5% over 27 years. Everything was smooth until it wasn’t. 6 months into it the tenant called and the toilet had failed in an upstairs bathroom. The house was flooded to the tune of $70,000 in repairs. 

No big deal, I worked with insurance and contractors to get the repairs done. Six months later my insurance dropped me and here is where it gets sticky. I got a new insurance policy at a higher rate. I let the original borrower know they needed to update the lender on the new insurance policy. 

The higher insurance premium required a higher escrow payment which the original borrower didn’t let me know.  A few months go by and unbeknownst to me the escrow account had now drawn negative which triggers the lender to no longer apply what’s considered a “partial” payment to them, given that I’m now paying less that what’s due given the escrow increase required but not relayed to me even though I expected it at some point.

Last month I’m on Zillow looking at the value of my properties. One of my properties says it’s going to auction in March because it’s being foreclosed on. My heart rate goes through the roof as I have about $90k in equity in that house. I reach out to the original borrower and ask them what’s going on. They weren’t paying attention to it, and why would they, it’s not their house anymore. 

They send over 3 months of notices from the bank. $10,000 has been collected by the lender and is in an “unapplied” status due to the short payments. They are foreclosing and are not open to discuss it. I call them, they won’t speak to me about the loan at all BECAUSE ITS NOT IN MY NAME. 

I have to sell it, but guess who has to request the payoff amount from the lender….thats right, the ORIGINAL borrower. So I am at the mercy of that person for basically EVERYTHING.

I am still waiting on that payoff amount 9 days later and am up against a clock where they have scheduled the home for sale at auction come March.

Take it all for what it's worth, I've learned plenty of lessons and made my share of mistakes. One thing is for sure, if I ever wrap another mortgage I am getting a POA to access the docs on the original loan so that I am never again at the mercy of that borrower to relay information. If it wasn't the insurance it would have been the property taxes. FFS

THE END. 

Let me know what you would have done differently?!



Quick question, which Guru did you learn SubTo from?

Post: Is Subto legal?

Ken M.#2 Buying & Selling Real Estate ContributorPosted
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, Dallas
  • Posts 881
  • Votes 496
Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Tom Gimer:
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Eyal Goren:
Quote from @Mitch Messer:
Quote from @Eyal Goren:

I read that every mortgage has a Due on Sale clause, which means you have to notify the lender when you sale the property and pay the entirety of the loan when you sell the property. 

How do people work with the clause and make these kinds of deals?


First, let's be very clear here.

The mortgage your speaking of is a private agreement between the seller and the lender. The "due on sale" clause (DoSC) obligates the seller to notify the lender if the property is sold.

Failing to do so would place the seller in violation of this agreement, giving the lender the right to accelerate the loan.

But no laws are being broken here.

So, subto is neither legal nor illegal.

Second, it only works because most lenders are more interested in receiving payments than in invoking the DoSC clause and foreclosing on the property.

But, it can work, provided seller and buyer are both on board and the proper process is followed.


Thanks for the clarification. What happens if the lender does accelerate the loan? I guess the seller would like to address that in the agreement. 


If you dont pay the loan off it goes to foreclosure and the original owner gets their fico CRUSHED.  its highly risky for most mom and pops to sell on sub to.. and its simply not a way for those without substantial wherewithal to buy property and keep the seller safe.. Lots of absolute nightmares come out of sub to when folks get into title but dont have the money to pay the loan off or the ability to refi.
Short term, leaving financing in place during rehab prior to resale — great strategy with limited risk to either party. 

Long term hold, with buyer planning on carrying existing financing to term without the ability to quickly cure default — terrible strategy with huge risk for both parties. 

Exactly Tom all of my sub to over the years have been deals were we got the assets for far below market did rehab and resold generally within 9 to 12 months we never bought them to keep as rentals. Its a very poor situation for the original owner to be on the mortgage for years and years without the benefits of ownership and the control.

Why do you say its bad for the original owner long term? I would think in most situations the original owner is in financial trouble, probably delinquent on their mortgage and facing foreclosure. So, selling sub-to, the mortgage is brought current and timely payments are made by the new owner helping the original owner's credit CONSIDERABLY!

Also, I believe I saw somewhere that the mortgage won't count against the original owners DTI after a period of time if they show someone else is paying the mortgage. So, they could potentially buy another house later on.

I do agree the lack of control is a potential issue.

.
People recover over time and they want their name off of the loan.

They have no way to force removal, other than to pay off the loan on a home they no longer own. 

So they contact the lender and tell the lender they no longer own the property and want to be removed. The lender at that point can exercise the Due On Sale and it becomes a problem for the subto buyer, who now has to find new financing or lose the house to foreclosure. This destroys the credit of the original owner who can then sue the subto buyer.

Another issue is if the subto seller claims they were taken advantage of by the subto buyer at a vulnerable time (pre-foreclosure) and an attorney or regulator raises the question of equity skimming. Bank related issues can be prosecuted for 10 years. Serious punishments.

With all of that, Subject To is legal. Just make sure you do it the legal way. Driving a car is legal, as long as you follow the rules. It's the same idea.

Post: Is Subto legal?

Ken M.#2 Buying & Selling Real Estate ContributorPosted
  • Investor
  • San Antonio, Dallas
  • Posts 881
  • Votes 496
Quote from @Mitch Messer:
Quote from @Eyal Goren:

I read that every mortgage has a Due on Sale clause, which means you have to notify the lender when you sale the property and pay the entirety of the loan when you sell the property. 

How do people work with the clause and make these kinds of deals?


First, let's be very clear here.

The mortgage your speaking of is a private agreement between the seller and the lender. The "due on sale" clause (DoSC) obligates the seller to notify the lender if the property is sold.

Failing to do so would place the seller in violation of this agreement, giving the lender the right to accelerate the loan.

But no laws are being broken here.

So, subto is neither legal nor illegal.

Second, it only works because most lenders are more interested in receiving payments than in invoking the DoSC clause and foreclosing on the property.

But, it can work, provided seller and buyer are both on board and the proper process is followed.

Actually "

The "due on sale" clause (DoSC) obligates the seller to notify the lender if the property is sold."

Please explain how you come to this emphatic conclusion.
The Due on Sale clause does not contain a phrase to that effect.
Case law does not support your comment.

It is more properly stated that "you can not hide the fact with intent to deceive".

In law, there is a significant difference between intentionally being deceitful (fraud) and buying properties using creative finance using escrow and properly reporting the
transaction. 

The lender has a duty to track their loans and recorded documents are notice of the change in ownership.

The most serious problem is when a "kitchen table transaction" is used and not-recording the deed is used to intentionally hide the transfer. 

That approach is commonly being couched in terms like, "you can save money by not going through escrow". Which I have heard a guru say he uses as a technique, no escrow, simple paperwork between buyer and seller.  That is disaster waiting to be uncovered. When a guru says he does that, it's a tacit endorsement of the action. Very dangerous action. By the way, anything to do with a bank loan has a 10 year period in which to enforce legal action. You don't even have to own the property any longer and they can still charge fraud.