All Forum Posts by: Matthew McNeil
Matthew McNeil has started 31 posts and replied 686 times.
Post: I threatened to stop paying escrow to my new lender. It worked!

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Originally posted by @Shamit S.:
I asked my lender this morning about escrow vs no-escrow and here's the response I got:
You can waive escrows but typically there is a .25% (of loan amount) cost
I received this note during a Q&A w/lender before applying for a loan (w/20% down payment), so not sure how it would fare after loan docs have been signed.
Hi Shamit. Turns out that it worked to my benefit after I demanded they comply with my request. See my response to Shannon below. Cheers!
Post: I threatened to stop paying escrow to my new lender. It worked!

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Originally posted by @Shannon Robnett:
@Matthew McNeil First of all Nice Work! We have all had an experience with a bad debt servicer. Just be careful and follow up with something in writing while, because while this may look and sound good at first glance , you are going to want to get everything in writing. The reality is your loan docs stipulate that you will pay these things through escrow and if you do not you would be in default of the documents you signed. And as we all know it stated many times in the hundreds of pages of documents that you signed that failure to pay will result in default. We also know that while you are very keenlyaware of what is happening with all your properties, most servicers are not. Communication from one department to another could break down and you could find yourself in a world of hurt!
I am wanting to hear how this resolves its self so keep me posted, just document everything.
Shannon, regarding my “threat” to stop paying Escrow to the lender that bought my loan after I completed a REFI. You asked for an update.
The Lender formally “closed” Escrow and mailed me supportive hard copy documentation. The monthly mortgage amount was recalculated to show that I would only be paying principal and interest. Furthermore, they gave me a full refund on the Escrow I paid at Closing. So, it worked out to my benefit without hassle. Cheers!
Post: Quit Claim Deed / Finding Lender - Please Help!

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Originally posted by @Caroline Gerardo:
Existing hard money lender can and will call the note if you record a deed selling to a LLC even if it is your LLC. If you are doing this as a refinance the lender/attorney/escrow officer orders a demand for payoff from the hard money lender, then they are wired the funds at closing and deed is transferred to LLC at closing. Many conventional lenders are not lending to LLC entity that is new, they require the deed and note to be in your name. You might use a Living Trust, with different trusts for each property the deed change is a FAMILY transfer not a sale. Other issue is your property taxes will go up when you change to LLC as they can assess to current full value. re @MatthewMacNeil 's interpretation. If you change to LLC as a sale transfer (and there is no way to call it a family transfer) and have a conventional loan the servicer WILL find out in six months to a year. Your hazard insurance will be a problem as well - ask your agent if he will bump up price to commercial policy. If you make a late payment expect the notice of default from your servicer. Fannie and Freddie are not the owner they just guaranteed 25% of the loan. The servicer can enforce due on sale then you have a mess.
Your advice is full of holes. You have no idea what you're talking about as is proven by the fact that you don't understand his question.
Post: Quit Claim Deed / Finding Lender - Please Help!

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Originally posted by @Mack Owens:
Hello BP,
Currently house-hacking a duplex purchased at the end of May using private money but am running into the road block of finding a bank in my area that is willing to work with a Quit Claim Deed. Obviously I am wanting to secure long-term financing while rates are so low and get the property into an LLC for the added protection.
Most banks that I have spoken with seem to understand the concept and do not seem opposed but aren't willing to provide any form of written guarantee that once the Quit Claim Deed takes place they won't call the note due.
Would love suggestions, advice, connections if at all possible!
The lender can exercise the "due on sale" clause if the name(s) of the buyer are not the same name(s) as the members identified as the owners of the LLC. For clarity; as with a trust, lenders do not exercise the "due on transfer/sale" clause when real property is transferred to the SAME individuals in an official capacity (e.g. Joe and Jane Smith as trustees of Smith Trust). Typically, the same applies to LLCs where you and your spouse are sole members (single or multiple member LLC).
If you take out a mortgage personally and transfer the property to your LLC that you control, you should be exempt. Also, if your loan was conventional; Fannie Mae recognizes the legitimacy of a QC between the mortgage holders and the LLC so long as the LLC is controlled by the borrowers;
If the property was owned prior to closing by a limited liability corporation (LLC) that is majority-owned or controlled by the borrower(s), the time it was held by the LLC may be counted towards meeting the borrower’s six-month ownership requirement. (In order to close the refinance transaction, ownership must be transferred out of the LLC and into the name of the individual borrower(s). See for additional details.)
I believe Freddie Mac follows suit. Here’s a BP post on the same topic;
Next is to check with the Title Company regarding the Title insurance. Generally, the coverage of the policy will state; “The coverage of this policy shall continue in force as of Date of Policy in favor of an Insured after acquisition of the Title by an Insured or after conveyance by an Insured, but only so long as the Insured retains an estate or interest in the Land, or holds an obligation secured by a purchase money Mortgage given by a purchaser from the Insured, or only so long as the Insured shall have liability by reason of warranties in any transfer or conveyance of the Title.” Again, as with the question regarding the lender mentioned above, its best to ask your Title company if the insurance coverage remains intact if the asset is transferred.
I am not a lawyer and this is not professional advice.
Post: I have a potential Deal, Yes , My first potential deal. Help!

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
You're asking us to tell you how to profit from the deal, but you've only given us two figures; minimal purchase cost and gross rent. You're not providing enough numbers for us to offer the advice you're seeking. It doesn't sound like you've carefully looked at this. Therefore, the best advice I can offer is don't do the deal.
Post: Nailing the Basics: Best Practices to Increase Value of Home

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Ending a long day and I'll offer this totally for fun. Buy in a high appreciating area :)
Post: Cashflow or Cash on Cash Return?

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Originally posted by @Joe Villeneuve:
Originally posted by @Jonathan Edmund:
yea I was just looking for opinion here. The amount of cashflow isn’t as important to me as how quickly I recoup the cash so I can keep purchasing. I was just really looking for people’s opinions regarding their preference because I hear some people say always buy cash but I look at financing as paying little cash and having a tenant pay the rest. You just don’t cashflow as much up front but can buy more units to offset that reduction. Am I wrong in that thinking?
Originally posted by @Andrew Frowiss:
@Jonathan Edmund I have to agree with @Joe Villeneuve in his reply. I would side on putting down %20 and using your funds on getting your next deal. Having cash allows you to do other things like finance flips for other investors. If you have money after you can use it on your next deal, or partner with other investors. It all depends on what your investing goals are. I don't try and get rich off 1 deal, and instead am always looking for the next one as this wont be my last.
Part right, and part not so right.
When you put down 100%, you are getting $329/month in CF, but it takes a lot longer to make a profit since you have to recover all of your cost (which is just your cash), before profits are made.
When you only put down 20%, your cash flow may only be $167.month for that same unit, however, if you started with the same amount of cash in both cases, you could buy 5 of the same property...at $167/month each, so your CF total, on using the same starting cash as the 100% cash option, would be 5 x $167/month = $835/month. Now, which one has the better CF, which one costs you less, and which one allows you to start to profit faster? The answers for all three are the same.
Well explained Joe. A fundamental tenant of RE investing that many people don't understand.
Post: Long-term Outlook For California

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Originally posted by @Jackson Andrews:
Howdy Bigger Pockets Peeps, As an agent in Austin TX, I have felt the inundation of California Natives to the Hill Country of Texas. This exodus has only just started but it has had a fairly significant impact on our market giving us a large amount of demand for both rental and luxury properties and a lack of supply (30% less supply than Q3 2019). Have my people inlaces like Nevada,Tennessee, Florida experienced this as well ? I am just curious about the current state of home demand in California and if the home prices will somewhat plateau or if they will depreciate. I feel that it is important to point out how geographically amazing California is, meaning that there will always be some demand to live there even if you are overpaying and taxed out the wazoo. Lastly, I have a question for all of my Californians, are as many people truly considering leaving the state as the internet is making it sound ?
Thanks , Jackson Andrews
Understand that California transplants bring “California equity” which is a two-edged sword that translates to both good and bad. Bend Oregon is a perfect example which was a symbol of what economists referred to as a “lifestyle destination.” If Californian’s are leaving due to political reasons then that’s a different incentive. Regardless, they are self-made exiles cashing in on their overpriced real estate which can unduly impact the recipient economy. Another example, Coeur d'Alene Idaho.
Post: Invest Now or Wait For Potential Crash

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Originally posted by @Kelsey Mortimore:
Hi!
I’m new to the investing world. I want to buy a multifamily and house hack it. Would it be wise to invest now, while my market (Providence, RI) is super hot or wait for a potential crash? Any advice is greatly appreciated!
You’ve presented a straight forward question without providing any figures. I’ll answer your question with a question; when is the potential crash coming? Smart investors here on BP aren’t asking that type of question. Rather, they move forward with securing additional assets with the intention to make sure they’re positioned properly in case a crash does come. There are different ways to do that which you can research and determine what feels best for you. Regardless of whatever strategy you employ, be sure to have reserve funds on hand which will enable you to pay the monthly expenses on the asset if you lose your tenant or if they can't pay the full rent.
Post: SFH Portfolio: Do you use an accountant for filing taxes?

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Originally posted by @Jeff Rutland:
As I accumulate SFHs for passive income, I'm wondering if I need an accountant. I've always done my own taxes (including a single rental) using TurboTax. I'd love to hear folks thoughts on the pros/cons, especially those of you who have a sizable SFH portfolio.
I've been investing in Meridian-Boise for the past decade. I used an online do it yourself tax program for years, but it got to a point where I felt I was missing some things. Someone referred me to a CPA based in Boise. I asked them to review my taxes going back a few years and they found a major mistake I'd missed. If you want to PM me, I'd be happy to provide the contact info. I'd suggest taking advantage of the initial free 30 minute consult (which is what I did) and ask them several questions. I was so impressed I hired them and haven't looked back. They take excellent care of me and I'm happy to pay the fee which I consider to be entirely reasonable, and its a tax deduction.