@Scott Trench
1. Real Wages have been growing from 2012-2019 but you can see a decline in 2020. Considering CPI is higher than wage gains over the past 2years I would expect that real median household income has gone down more than the ~$3,000 drop you see from 2019-2020

2. I agree the "wealthy" are seeing more paper losses but if the cost of food, shelter, and energy continue to rise people that earn less money will have a higher percentage of their income going towards basic necessities.
3. I would agree that if your money was in crypto or the stock market you felt more "pain" than someone that was not in either of those things. When you say current policy is promoting that are you referring to the FED tightening monetary conditions or the government raising taxes on wealthy people to distribute to low-income people? The government created the problem so now they are going to "fix it". They will do what they always do and make it worse.
4. I would argue that the economy has not recovered since the GFC. A recovery is when you go back to the previous growth trend line before the recession. If you notice Real GDP is on a slower growth rate than before the GFC and a slower growth rate after 2020. We live in a non-linear world so we are more interested in rate of change than a nominal #.

5. Powell says his main goal is to beat inflation, but we will see what he actually does. Triffin's dilemma is playing out in front of us. In the US raising interest rates may help to curb inflation, depending on if demand is going down faster than supply, but in the rest of the world the dollar is appreciating against most other currencies. A high dollar on the dxy is signaling dollar liquidity issues so the world needs lower interest rates and more liquidity. Since there is a lot of dollar denominated debt other countries will have to print more of their currencies to buy more dollars which will keep strengthening the dollar.
6. Ok
7. This is more philosophical debate on this one but a believe you should let the market determine wages not some bureaucrat that has never produced any goods or services in their life.
8. Once again different thoughts about things but supply was affected by the governments, all governments not just US, reaction to COVID. When they told everyone to go home and not produce that reduced supply and at the same time, they gave everyone stimulus checks which increased the demand for goods. Most of that money is still working its way through the system but you hear from retailers such as Walmart and Target that they now have an 143% of supply and they are going to drop prices to get rid of excess inventory. FYI if you want to pick up a TV or big-ticket item, they are on sale right now.
9. The only tool the FED has is to affect demand. Which I agree with you with the government putting up more regulations and constricting supply the FED has to decrease demand at a faster rate. Obviously from the rest of my response you can tell my thought is that you need to increase the supply side but since we are not doing that, I agree the FED will have to push down hard on demand. I know the news and mainstream economists say the American consumer has great balance sheets, but when I look at this chart, I see two spikes from stimulus checks and now we are back down to a personal savings around Jan of 2018. It also looks like consumer debt is increasing which goes back to aligning with Target and Walmart that they are seeing a decline in discretionary spending among their customers but not in their food. So more of people's wages are going towards food instead of goods


11. Agree to much dollar denominated debt in the world. It took about 60-80yrs for the Pound to lose reserve currency and before that took the Guilder about the same amount of time. This is something that historically will not happen overnight but good luck it may be different this time. I would say there is a greater possibility of having the dollar loosely based on gold, maybe a 20% reserve, than see Bitcoin become the reserve currency. There is no way the banks are going to allow a currency to come up that they cannot control.
12. I agree the difference between now and the 40s is we had fixed costs after the war, which would be like CapEx on a property. Once I pay to put on a new roof, I don't have to buy a new roof every year. So, when you increase the amount of currency units you will pay back those expenses in cheaper dollars. Now a lot of debt is indexed to inflation I know I heard somewhere and cannot remember the specifics, but we need to have high inflation for an extended period of time to bring our debt to GDP ratio back to a manageable level.
I will agree with most of your points at the end with buying positive CF assets that have long term fixed rate debt, but I would be careful buying stocks. Valuations are still pretty high and if you look through the last 100+ years buying the dip does not always produce great results. I definitely agree about now not being the time to speculate. Unfortunately, a lot of people over the past 10+ years are conditioned to expect a FED put and believe they will come to the rescue if the market starts to fall. No one knows for sure how long the FED will keep up with their tightening policies, but you should not base your investment portfolio on them backstopping the market. Remember about a year ago they did not see rate hikes till 2023. How did that work out? Now they are already planning rate cuts by 2024 and the market is saying late 2022. Good Luck Cathie Wood I hope your right about your ARRK fund having "deep value" because I do not see it.