Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Guy Gimenez

Guy Gimenez has started 48 posts and replied 1999 times.

Post: Red Vs. Blue States real estate investing

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,671

24 years of investing in Texas. Evictions are simple, clean and relatively inexpensive. For those that love blue state landlord-tenant laws, kudos to you. I'll stick with Texas where the population is growing like a weed. I'm guessing there's a reason for that. 

Post: Do I need a title company for this?

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,671

No, you don't need title insurance as long as you can afford to lose the amount invested without losing sleep. Otherwise, the answer is yes. Accepting someone at their word regarding ownership is the easiest way to lose your money. One of the most common real estate scams in the last couple of years has involved unimproved land sales. I highly recommend you get some help from a local investor or agent to help guide you through the process since this all new to you. Yes, you'll have to pay them but until you become familiar with investing, it's often well worth the expense. 

Post: Registering a Wyoming LLC in a state you invest In

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,671

You wouldn't register a Wyoming LLC in Texas, you're creating an LLC in Texas that is owned by the Wyoming LLC. You must also understand how to "run" and LLC in order to get any benefits from it should you be sued. Getting with an asset protection attorney is your best bet. Depending on your investment strategy / goals, there may be other options rather than creating multiple LLC's. But insurance companies have one goal in mind...accept policy premiums and pay out as little and as infrequently as possible. All the insurance in the world is of little help if you have to sue the insurer to pay a covered claim. Ask me how I know.

Post: Texas (Financially) Deadly Property Taxes!

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,671

I assume you started investing out of state because California is very toxic for landlords and the prices make investing untenable in most instances. And you're not alone. Look at the growth of Texas versus California in 2022/2023...California has a net loss of .19% and Texas has a net gain of 1.6%. Investors in Texas love California investors because we know they'll overpay for properties we're selling...it's actually a long standing joke here but one that I've personally confirmed. I agree taxes are high here and I don't like it either, but we don't have not state income tax here either which is why between 2010 and 2020, 25% of the net positive migration to Texas was from California. We saw some of the highest tax increases (post Covid) that I've ever experienced in my 24 years of investing yet we successfully raised rents on our properties to ensure we maintain our cash flow and not one tenant left. Another issue is that out of state investors seldom bother to protest their taxes which is an essential part of the process each year...if you don't push back, that's on the investor. Government everywhere is like a parasite that needs a host (taxpayer) to survive. You have to push back or accept the consequences for not doing so.   

Post: Does and should climate change factor into home buying and investing?

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,671

For those who believe in global warming, the next ice age or whatever the flavor of the day is when it comes to "climate change", those investors should absolutely take that into account in their investing strategies. For those of us who don't, it is not even on the radar as it relates to our investing. 

Post: Owner’s title insurance - to get or not?

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,671
Quote from @Peter Walther:
Quote from @Guy Gimenez:
Quote from @Peter Walther:
Quote from @Guy Gimenez:
Quote from @Peter Walther:
Quote from @Guy Gimenez:

I "almost" always get title insurance but I only purchase in Texas where title insurance is costly. Anything purchased for less than $5K I may not get T/I. I just had my first ever title claim. Underwriter's counsel took two months to confirm they were responsible for the claim even though is was clear they missed a $14,500 RTO (rent to own HVAC) lien that was filed in the public records at 4:30pm the day prior to my closing. Insurer's counsel negotiated the payoff down to $4K and then sent me an absurd set of documents to sign and refused to provide me a Bill of Sale and release of the UCC Financing Statement lien. Insurer's counsel was not acting in good faith as required by statute. After going back and forth over a couple of weeks, I finally had to hire an attorney who spoke directly to the RTO company, sent them the $4K on my behalf and I received both the release of lien and bill of sale via mail a few days later. My attorney then contacted the insurer's counsel for reimbursement and he refused to return emails or calls. I guess he knew my attorney solved the problem he refused to solve so why not wash his hands of the matter. I advised my title company I was filing a complaint with the Texas Dept. of Insurance and I then did a video (I have a good following on social media) explaining to my followers that I would be doing a subsequent video about the insurer's refusal to be accountable. Apparently the right person saw my post and within 24 hours my attorney received an email from the insurer's counsel say he would send a check immediately. So, the moral of the story is title insurance is valuable, but like any insurer, you'll likely need to hire your own attorney to get them to pay out on a covered claim. Don't expect title insurers to do the right thing unless you force them to do so. //// On a side note, I also sued Farmer's Insurance over a car accident when they refused to pay out over my uninsured/underinsured coverage. Took 7 years but Farmer's finally paid out the full policy amount. Yes, it seems there's a pattern here with insurers.


I'm sorry you had a difficult time with the one title claim you had to file but please don't paint with such a broad brush with such a limited experience.  I don't know any of the facts of your claim which might give some justification to the delay but even if there is none, that doesn't mean there is a pattern with insurers.  I've had insured's sing my praises to the high heavens because I was able to resolve their issue quickly.


 It's not a personal attack...please don't take it as such. Having two insurers refuse to pay as stipulated in my policy may seem limited to you...it's very real to me. I have a good friend (attorney) who spent a good portion of his career suing insurers who refused to abide by their policies. Oddly enough, he never lacked for work. 


I didn't take it as a personal attack, I took it as an unfounded attack on all claims handlers who do their job every day in good faith and try had to provide the insured the benefits they are due.  I frequently had to explain to insureds, and their attorney's, why their claim wasn't covered under the policy, and rarely did they respond "oh, I'm sorry I was just trying to get something I wasn't entitled to."

I'm not claiming there aren't mistakes made in claims handling or incompetent or lazy claims handlers, just that there are lazy and incompetent attorneys representing insureds, but most aren't.

An attack? If you don't believe insurance claims are slow walked at times, you've been in the insurance industry too long. There was NEVER any doubt, not even by the insurers in my case, that they were responsible, otherwise they certainly would not have paid out on the claims. They simply made a business decision to force me to take action to get what I paid for. If stating a fact is an attack, you indeed did take it personally. 


 Ad hominems make for a weak response.

So do emotional responses. Truth is often a bitter pill. 

Post: Is the Pace Morby Subto program worth 10,000 dollars?

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,671
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Guy Gimenez:
Quote from @Tom Gimer:

A better question may be is the program worth 10,000 pesos.

When the DOS is called you can't reconvey to the seller and restructure the deal as a lease option... at that point the goose is already cooked.


Exactly. I see it promoted by gurus that they'll pay 110%+ of FMV if they get the financing in place and no balloon. Those 3% loans that get called due in a 7% world may have them second guessing their decision. Lots of sellers will be screwed. Mitch Stephen out of San Antonio has had 4 called due in the last couple of months. But he was smart enough to only take over properties with equity so he was able to refi out of them before the underlying lienholders could foreclose.

I wonder if Mitch was able to get his refi done before a NOD was filed and or late payments were put on the orginal sellers credit report.. this is the real risk to the seller if they value their fico score at all.. on some of this stuff the sellers credit is already trashed and they dont care.. but if folks buy from someone that does care holy cow when they get the NOD notice its right to the attorney.. When we did this in earnest we did not need to refi.. I had two lines of credit one unsecured for 5 million ( check book) and another for 10 million that we would secure them up with .. but you need time to do that bank required appraisal etc before we could tag the secured line and even at that they only lent 72% in these commercial loan structures.. So we never bought anything that was more than 75% of ARV current condition. EVER. But again our goal was flipping not holding.


Sounds like you and Mitch are on the same page. He still buys at a discount regardless of the strategy. His model is the exact opposite of what most gurus teach. 

Post: Owner’s title insurance - to get or not?

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,671
Quote from @Peter Walther:
Quote from @Guy Gimenez:
Quote from @Peter Walther:
Quote from @Guy Gimenez:
Quote from @Peter Walther:
Quote from @Guy Gimenez:

I "almost" always get title insurance but I only purchase in Texas where title insurance is costly. Anything purchased for less than $5K I may not get T/I. I just had my first ever title claim. Underwriter's counsel took two months to confirm they were responsible for the claim even though is was clear they missed a $14,500 RTO (rent to own HVAC) lien that was filed in the public records at 4:30pm the day prior to my closing. Insurer's counsel negotiated the payoff down to $4K and then sent me an absurd set of documents to sign and refused to provide me a Bill of Sale and release of the UCC Financing Statement lien. Insurer's counsel was not acting in good faith as required by statute. After going back and forth over a couple of weeks, I finally had to hire an attorney who spoke directly to the RTO company, sent them the $4K on my behalf and I received both the release of lien and bill of sale via mail a few days later. My attorney then contacted the insurer's counsel for reimbursement and he refused to return emails or calls. I guess he knew my attorney solved the problem he refused to solve so why not wash his hands of the matter. I advised my title company I was filing a complaint with the Texas Dept. of Insurance and I then did a video (I have a good following on social media) explaining to my followers that I would be doing a subsequent video about the insurer's refusal to be accountable. Apparently the right person saw my post and within 24 hours my attorney received an email from the insurer's counsel say he would send a check immediately. So, the moral of the story is title insurance is valuable, but like any insurer, you'll likely need to hire your own attorney to get them to pay out on a covered claim. Don't expect title insurers to do the right thing unless you force them to do so. //// On a side note, I also sued Farmer's Insurance over a car accident when they refused to pay out over my uninsured/underinsured coverage. Took 7 years but Farmer's finally paid out the full policy amount. Yes, it seems there's a pattern here with insurers.


I'm sorry you had a difficult time with the one title claim you had to file but please don't paint with such a broad brush with such a limited experience.  I don't know any of the facts of your claim which might give some justification to the delay but even if there is none, that doesn't mean there is a pattern with insurers.  I've had insured's sing my praises to the high heavens because I was able to resolve their issue quickly.


 It's not a personal attack...please don't take it as such. Having two insurers refuse to pay as stipulated in my policy may seem limited to you...it's very real to me. I have a good friend (attorney) who spent a good portion of his career suing insurers who refused to abide by their policies. Oddly enough, he never lacked for work. 


I didn't take it as a personal attack, I took it as an unfounded attack on all claims handlers who do their job every day in good faith and try had to provide the insured the benefits they are due.  I frequently had to explain to insureds, and their attorney's, why their claim wasn't covered under the policy, and rarely did they respond "oh, I'm sorry I was just trying to get something I wasn't entitled to."

I'm not claiming there aren't mistakes made in claims handling or incompetent or lazy claims handlers, just that there are lazy and incompetent attorneys representing insureds, but most aren't.

An attack? If you don't believe insurance claims are slow walked at times, you've been in the insurance industry too long. There was NEVER any doubt, not even by the insurers in my case, that they were responsible, otherwise they certainly would not have paid out on the claims. They simply made a business decision to force me to take action to get what I paid for. If stating a fact is an attack, you indeed did take it personally. 


It appears you missed my point.  Your apparently bad experience does not match up with my knowledge of the handling of thousands of claims which for the most part were handled appropriately.  Your comment that an insured will probably need an attorney is really off the mark in my opinion.

I didn't miss your point Peter. I simply stated a fact based on my experience. Frankly, consumers are tired of being told by insurers how the insurers are honest, fair, transparent, etc. It just rings hollow. Please move along. We'll never see eye to eye as our experiences and facts are completely different and you're at risk of sounding like a politician when telling us how honest you are and that you're here to serve us.

Post: Owner’s title insurance - to get or not?

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,671
Quote from @Carlos Ptriawan:
Quote from @Guy Gimenez:
Quote from @Peter Walther:
Quote from @Guy Gimenez:
Quote from @Peter Walther:
Quote from @Guy Gimenez:

I "almost" always get title insurance but I only purchase in Texas where title insurance is costly. Anything purchased for less than $5K I may not get T/I. I just had my first ever title claim. Underwriter's counsel took two months to confirm they were responsible for the claim even though is was clear they missed a $14,500 RTO (rent to own HVAC) lien that was filed in the public records at 4:30pm the day prior to my closing. Insurer's counsel negotiated the payoff down to $4K and then sent me an absurd set of documents to sign and refused to provide me a Bill of Sale and release of the UCC Financing Statement lien. Insurer's counsel was not acting in good faith as required by statute. After going back and forth over a couple of weeks, I finally had to hire an attorney who spoke directly to the RTO company, sent them the $4K on my behalf and I received both the release of lien and bill of sale via mail a few days later. My attorney then contacted the insurer's counsel for reimbursement and he refused to return emails or calls. I guess he knew my attorney solved the problem he refused to solve so why not wash his hands of the matter. I advised my title company I was filing a complaint with the Texas Dept. of Insurance and I then did a video (I have a good following on social media) explaining to my followers that I would be doing a subsequent video about the insurer's refusal to be accountable. Apparently the right person saw my post and within 24 hours my attorney received an email from the insurer's counsel say he would send a check immediately. So, the moral of the story is title insurance is valuable, but like any insurer, you'll likely need to hire your own attorney to get them to pay out on a covered claim. Don't expect title insurers to do the right thing unless you force them to do so. //// On a side note, I also sued Farmer's Insurance over a car accident when they refused to pay out over my uninsured/underinsured coverage. Took 7 years but Farmer's finally paid out the full policy amount. Yes, it seems there's a pattern here with insurers.


I'm sorry you had a difficult time with the one title claim you had to file but please don't paint with such a broad brush with such a limited experience.  I don't know any of the facts of your claim which might give some justification to the delay but even if there is none, that doesn't mean there is a pattern with insurers.  I've had insured's sing my praises to the high heavens because I was able to resolve their issue quickly.


 It's not a personal attack...please don't take it as such. Having two insurers refuse to pay as stipulated in my policy may seem limited to you...it's very real to me. I have a good friend (attorney) who spent a good portion of his career suing insurers who refused to abide by their policies. Oddly enough, he never lacked for work. 


I didn't take it as a personal attack, I took it as an unfounded attack on all claims handlers who do their job every day in good faith and try had to provide the insured the benefits they are due.  I frequently had to explain to insureds, and their attorney's, why their claim wasn't covered under the policy, and rarely did they respond "oh, I'm sorry I was just trying to get something I wasn't entitled to."

I'm not claiming there aren't mistakes made in claims handling or incompetent or lazy claims handlers, just that there are lazy and incompetent attorneys representing insureds, but most aren't.


An attack? If you don't believe insurers don't believe insurance claims aren't slow walked, you've been in the insurance industry too long. There was NEVER any doubt, not even by the insurers in my case, that they were responsible. The simply made a business decision to force me to take action to get what I paid for. If stating a fact is an attack, you indeed did take it personally. 


Title insurance company is hard to lose money though, there's cap of dollar amount that can be claimed. So say max cap for the title insurance is $10,000 ; while owner purchase it for 2k. Then lets say there's only 1 title issue out of 500 being issued. This is great business.

This thread is good though, because all Title master is willing to give answer for the question with lot of details ! so I appreciate their effort.


 There are literally title insurers on ever corner in Texas. Why? Because the claims (both number and the amounts paid out) is minimal and we have one of the highest costs for title insurance in the U.S. Business is apparently very good. 

Post: Owner’s title insurance - to get or not?

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,671
Quote from @Peter Walther:
Quote from @Guy Gimenez:
Quote from @Peter Walther:
Quote from @Guy Gimenez:

I "almost" always get title insurance but I only purchase in Texas where title insurance is costly. Anything purchased for less than $5K I may not get T/I. I just had my first ever title claim. Underwriter's counsel took two months to confirm they were responsible for the claim even though is was clear they missed a $14,500 RTO (rent to own HVAC) lien that was filed in the public records at 4:30pm the day prior to my closing. Insurer's counsel negotiated the payoff down to $4K and then sent me an absurd set of documents to sign and refused to provide me a Bill of Sale and release of the UCC Financing Statement lien. Insurer's counsel was not acting in good faith as required by statute. After going back and forth over a couple of weeks, I finally had to hire an attorney who spoke directly to the RTO company, sent them the $4K on my behalf and I received both the release of lien and bill of sale via mail a few days later. My attorney then contacted the insurer's counsel for reimbursement and he refused to return emails or calls. I guess he knew my attorney solved the problem he refused to solve so why not wash his hands of the matter. I advised my title company I was filing a complaint with the Texas Dept. of Insurance and I then did a video (I have a good following on social media) explaining to my followers that I would be doing a subsequent video about the insurer's refusal to be accountable. Apparently the right person saw my post and within 24 hours my attorney received an email from the insurer's counsel say he would send a check immediately. So, the moral of the story is title insurance is valuable, but like any insurer, you'll likely need to hire your own attorney to get them to pay out on a covered claim. Don't expect title insurers to do the right thing unless you force them to do so. //// On a side note, I also sued Farmer's Insurance over a car accident when they refused to pay out over my uninsured/underinsured coverage. Took 7 years but Farmer's finally paid out the full policy amount. Yes, it seems there's a pattern here with insurers.


I'm sorry you had a difficult time with the one title claim you had to file but please don't paint with such a broad brush with such a limited experience.  I don't know any of the facts of your claim which might give some justification to the delay but even if there is none, that doesn't mean there is a pattern with insurers.  I've had insured's sing my praises to the high heavens because I was able to resolve their issue quickly.


 It's not a personal attack...please don't take it as such. Having two insurers refuse to pay as stipulated in my policy may seem limited to you...it's very real to me. I have a good friend (attorney) who spent a good portion of his career suing insurers who refused to abide by their policies. Oddly enough, he never lacked for work. 


I didn't take it as a personal attack, I took it as an unfounded attack on all claims handlers who do their job every day in good faith and try had to provide the insured the benefits they are due.  I frequently had to explain to insureds, and their attorney's, why their claim wasn't covered under the policy, and rarely did they respond "oh, I'm sorry I was just trying to get something I wasn't entitled to."

I'm not claiming there aren't mistakes made in claims handling or incompetent or lazy claims handlers, just that there are lazy and incompetent attorneys representing insureds, but most aren't.

An attack? If you don't believe insurance claims are slow walked at times, you've been in the insurance industry too long. There was NEVER any doubt, not even by the insurers in my case, that they were responsible, otherwise they certainly would not have paid out on the claims. They simply made a business decision to force me to take action to get what I paid for. If stating a fact is an attack, you indeed did take it personally.