Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Guy Gimenez

Guy Gimenez has started 48 posts and replied 1999 times.

Post: Scammed by restoration company

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,672

Bottom line is you need to retain an attorney.

Post: Seller Financing w/ existing mortgage??

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,672
Quote from @Jessie Russell:
Quote from @Guy Gimenez:
Quote from @Jessie Russell:

The only “risk” in a Subject to transaction is not having it structured properly. The more you learn about them the better they are properly executed.  Also, if it is too much going on for you why not just do a lease-option where the deed is not transferred, aka potentially triggering due on sale? The subject to can also be changed to a lease option IF the note gets called.


You don't want to do L/O in Texas if they exceed 180 days (see "executory contract"). Few attorneys would encourage such here. L/O can be done up to 36 months but the penalties for improper management of a L/O for that term can be financially disastrous for a seller.


 Yes Texas laws are very different. I don’t know much about them but I do know absolutely the PNW states.


 O.P.'s property is in Texas. 

Post: Is Texas a nightmare to be a landlord?

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,672

Fear will ensure you never own a rental anywhere. I've owned rentals in Texas for the last 20 years, all of which I self managed. Taxes are high...but the tenant pays them. That's how rentals work. If you know how to find "off market" investments, appreciation is just icing on the cake...it's not the cake itself. If you're depending on projections of appreciation to make your purchase a good deal, you're a speculator, not an investor. Each area of the U.S. has it's own climate challenges...Texas is no different. Buy a rental in Colorado and see what challenges the weather provides you there. I lived there too so I know. Texas is certainly more landlord friendly that many states and that is more important to me than the weather. Learning how to overcome hurdles will help you tremendously as an investor. It's not what you see, it's what you don't see that is important. 

Post: Deed Restrictions in Texas

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,672

They'll be filed with the county clerk for the county in which the property is located. Most larger counties have these records available online. 

Post: Seller Financing w/ existing mortgage??

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,672
Quote from @Connor Feist:
Quote from @Guy Gimenez:

1.  Selling via a wrap mortgage is not uncommon...I've bought and sold this way, but never with a tenant in place. Your target market for such a sale is an end buyer who will occupy the property, not an investor. Investors buy properties subject to the existing mortgage (or on wraps) with very little out of pocket so coming out of pocket with 15%+ down at 7% would make little sense, more especially if the property is tenant occupied which leaves the wrap buyer with fewer exits. No, this does not automatically trigger the due on sale clause. 

2.  Your terms would be more appealing for an owner occupant rather than an investor. 

3.  Again, you "might" find an investor who is looking for a turnkey rental but that's a lot of capital tied up for the potential cash flow and it would greatly depend on the community and rental competition. 

4.  An attorney won't market the house for you, he/she will only assist you in the transaction documents and guidance. You'll need proper exposure to find a buyer, but again, if the property is already tenant occupied, your pool of potential buyers is significantly lower. 


Thanks, Guy! If a 1031 exchange investor is going to do a cost seg and write off ~$100k in depreciation year 1, plus have $12k in cash flow, I think the economics can be competitive vs other opportunities in the market today.

Definitely agree with you on a larger market with owner occupants. The 1031 idea was a way to execute a transaction in Jan-Feb of 2024, vs waiting until maybe Q3 2024 to sell to an owner occupant.


With no disrespect, if an investor has to create a "machine" to make it a deal, it's probably not a deal. Cost segregations are not cheap and while the unicorn investors you describe do exist, I think you'll find they are in much smaller numbers than you hope, more especially in uncertain economic times where proformas don't hold a lot of water. Still plenty of low hanging fruit to invest in rather than create a matrix to make a marginal deal look like a winner. 

Post: Seller Financing w/ existing mortgage??

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,672
Quote from @Jessie Russell:

The only “risk” in a Subject to transaction is not having it structured properly. The more you learn about them the better they are properly executed.  Also, if it is too much going on for you why not just do a lease-option where the deed is not transferred, aka potentially triggering due on sale? The subject to can also be changed to a lease option IF the note gets called.


You don't want to do L/O in Texas if they exceed 180 days (see "executory contract"). Few attorneys would encourage such here. L/O can be done up to 36 months but the penalties for improper management of a L/O for that term can be financially disastrous for a seller.

Post: Seller Financing w/ existing mortgage??

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,672

1.  Selling via a wrap mortgage is not uncommon...I've bought and sold this way, but never with a tenant in place. Your target market for such a sale is an end buyer who will occupy the property, not an investor. Investors buy properties subject to the existing mortgage (or on wraps) with very little out of pocket so coming out of pocket with 15%+ down at 7% would make little sense, more especially if the property is tenant occupied which leaves the wrap buyer with fewer exits. No, this does not automatically trigger the due on sale clause. 

2.  Your terms would be more appealing for an owner occupant rather than an investor. 

3.  Again, you "might" find an investor who is looking for a turnkey rental but that's a lot of capital tied up for the potential cash flow and it would greatly depend on the community and rental competition. 

4.  An attorney won't market the house for you, he/she will only assist you in the transaction documents and guidance. You'll need proper exposure to find a buyer, but again, if the property is already tenant occupied, your pool of potential buyers is significantly lower. 

Post: Dealing with Pre-Foreclosures homes

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,672

You can best help a homeowner in preforeclosure by signing a purchase contract and closing on the purchase. In Texas, it's best to use the TREC contract form. If you're  attempting to assign a contract on a home in preforeclosure, you're not really helping the homeowner, you're hurting them if you're unable to unwilling to complete the purchase. 

Post: Unenforceable Lien Discovered by TCo

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,672

Yes, anyone can fraudulently file a lien on real estate in Texas and it becomes your problem. The staff at the real property records section of the county clerk's office are not able to determine the validity of a lien. This is why construction contracts should be air tight and include binding arbitration and contractual POA authorization so you, as seller, can release the lien without the contractor's signature. And always get "progress" and "final" lien waivers that are in the statutory format. Attorney fees alone to file the suit and attend court will likely be $10K+...and possibly considerably more if the contractor shows up to court.

1.  Do you have a 1st lien mortgage on the house? 

2.  Any other liens outside the mechanic's lien?

3.  Any taxes owed from 2022?  

Post: Quitclaiming a property

Guy GimenezPosted
  • Investor
  • Corpus Christi, TX
  • Posts 2,065
  • Votes 1,672
Quote from @Erin Church:
Quote from @Guy Gimenez:

@Spencer Cuello

Use a special warranty deed to make the transfer, not a quit claim. It'll be problematic down the line. 


I'm not familiar with using a special warranty deed as we don't tend to do that in GA and SC. :) I did a quick Google on special warranty deed vs warranty deed and got this info:


A general warranty deed protects the grantee against any title defects or claims arising at any point in time. Whereas, a special warranty deed only protects the grantee against title defects arising from the actions or omissions of the grantor during its ownership.

A general warranty deed protects the grantee against any title defects or claims arising at any point in time. Whereas, a special warranty deed only protects the grantee against title defects arising from the actions or omissions of the grantor during its ownership.


I popped in here originally to say that doing a quit claim deed can nullify your title insurance. I've been told to "reclose" if I need to change names so that the title insurance "sticks". (Oddly, in my experience, if you close again into a new name that is owned by the same owner, the title insurance has transferred/not needed to be repurchased.)

I'm not sure if a special warranty deed will wipe out the title insurance or not, but I wanted to bring it up so you can ask your attorney/title company. :)


The OP is in Texas...quitclaims are not used here as title companies will refuse to ensure them. Transferring property from the titled owner to an LLC that is wholly owned by the same party isn't a nullifying action with most title underwriters. The only beneficiary of a GWD over a SWD is the title company. I never transfer by GWD because it can allow a title company, via it's subrogation clause, to sue me (as the seller) for a title issue that pre-dated my ownership. Why anyone would think this is a good idea is beyond me.