All Forum Posts by: Thomas Rutkowski
Thomas Rutkowski has started 20 posts and replied 801 times.
Post: Where to store rental reserves?

- Financial Advisor
- Boynton Beach, FL
- Posts 819
- Votes 791
Originally posted by @Tony Kim:
Originally posted by @Mike S.:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Maybe. But I bet you I can find a better less complicated and cheaper way to get all the above benefits with a combination of term life (for actual insurance) and investing the rest in a brokerage in Roth IRAs and taxable accounts invested in simple index funds which you can also borrow tax free against. In general the more complex the contract the less benefit you as a consumer will gain. Term life is a simple contract. You pay a premium and if you die your beneficiaries get paid. It is no different than your car insurance or homeowners insurance. Offloading risk. Anything else is not insurance.
On the short term, cheaper probably as term life insurance is cheap when you are young. However on the long term, not only will you not be able to find cheap term insurance when you are getting older, but also a permanent life insurance will give you more money back than a term life. So with permanent life insurance you get free insurance as it is paid for by the increasing return.
A Roth IRA has a low limit of $6k premium per year, and if you are a high income earner you can't even pay into it.
A brokerage account is not tax free, and historically the S&P500 returns on the long term has been in the 7%-9% range pre tax. Depending on your tax bracket that could be equivalent to a 4 to 5% post tax. And it is with all the volatility, including correction time when it can drop more than 30%. It takes decade to recover from such a correction, and if you need money during that time you are in a very bad position. In a permanent overfunded life insurance you will not have corrections. Only positive gains.
Margin loans are very risky and subject to margin calls. Of course if you only borrow 20% of the value of your portfolio, you are safer, but in no way can you borrow 90% of it like in a permanent life insurance.
I do have a brokerage account, a Roth IRA, a 401k but I also have an IUL where I put all my cash flow. One is not exclusive to the other, and a wise investor should diversify his assets.
So I currently have a TL policy that will pay out a set benefit to my wife should I die prematurely.
For PL policies, what's the interplay between the cash value and death benefit? If I have a PL policy with a death benefit of $500k, what happens to the cash value that has accumulated when I die? Do the beneficiaries receive both the DB and the CV?
The cash value is part of the death benefit. Its quite literally the policy owner saving up the death benefit for the insured over the insured's lifetime. This cash can be accessed via policy loans secured by the cash value. At the time the insured dies, the death benefit pays off any outstanding loans and the rest of the death benefit goes to the beneficiary.
As an example, a policy with a $1M death benefit and $400,000 of cash value will still only pay $1M to the beneficiary. $400K comes from the cash value and the insurance company kicks in the other $600K from their risk pools.
Post: Where to store rental reserves?

- Financial Advisor
- Boynton Beach, FL
- Posts 819
- Votes 791
Originally posted by @Adam Widder:
@Thomas Rutkowski is the whole dollar earning the 5.5%?
Nice graph and have a copy of the webinar?
In a properly-designed, maximum over-funded policy, 85-cents of every dollar of premium goes to the cash value. 85-cents is earning 5.5%. That is why the graph shows the curve starting at $850. You start off a little short, but you make it up very quickly.
Thesis of webinar was this: A Maximum Over-funded Life Insurance Policy is the best place to store your emergency fund because it allows you to maximize your return potential while minimizing risk and maintaining liquidity.
Post: Where to store rental reserves?

- Financial Advisor
- Boynton Beach, FL
- Posts 819
- Votes 791
Post: Where to store rental reserves?

- Financial Advisor
- Boynton Beach, FL
- Posts 819
- Votes 791
You summarized the options very well. Understand that in a properly designed, maximum over-funded life insurance policy about 85 cents of every dollar goes to the cash value. That means you have a choice between 100% of your savings earning 0.5% or having 85% of your savings earning 5 to 6%. I think its an easy decision to make.
Stocks/bonds really have no place in a reserve account. Its not exactly liquid when the market is down 40%.
Post: Using Whole Life Insurance Policies to Finance Properties

- Financial Advisor
- Boynton Beach, FL
- Posts 819
- Votes 791
Originally posted by @Gregory Stewart:
My first post into the bigger pockets forum. New/aspiring Investor doing my homework interacting with the forum each day. I thought this was perfect question to be my first post. Has anyone used a whole life insurance policy to help finance or pay for costs on investment properties. Has it worked for you or someone you know? Would you recommend a specific mutual policy?
This subject has been beat to death here on BP. This is one of the oldest and most thorough discussions: https://www.biggerpockets.com/...
This concept absolutely works. Most people just don't understand the difference between a normal whole life policy and one that is Maximum Over-funded. Their not the same.
Post: Infinite Banking Concept

- Financial Advisor
- Boynton Beach, FL
- Posts 819
- Votes 791
Originally posted by @Mike S.:
Originally posted by @Tony Kim:
So with a $50k per year premium, let's say that after 2 years, I can borrow close to 90K and that will be an interest free loan. I use that to invest in real estate earning 8% a year.
The advantage here over just saving your money for two years outside of the policy and then investing is that in addition to the life insurance death benefit, your policy's cash value continues to grow tax deferred (i.e., working in two places at once)?
Also, doesn't the cash value go to the insurance company upon the death of the insured?
The cash value of your policy growth uninterrupted while you are using it as a collateral for a loan.
That is the same principle as using a cash out refi. You have an asset (the life insurance or a home) that is growing in value every year (in the case of a home, the value can go down). You are taking a loan that is using the asset as collateral. The asset continues to grow, but you have cash that you can use to reinvest in other assets producing more income. The loan that you are taking is tax free, and the interest that you are paying back to the lender may be also tax deductible if the proceed are use for investment.
So your money is growing at two places at the same time.
When you buy a home for cash, you are paying closing cost, broker fee, stamp tax, etc... If you want to get a mortgage cash out, the lender will not give your 100% of the home value. Usually you may get only 70%. So if you refi every year, it will take a few years of increased home value so the 70% that you can cash out will exceed the initial cash that you put in to buy the home. If you die, when you heirs will sell the home, they will get the proceed of the sale, minus the outstanding loan due.
When you buy a permanent overfunded life insurance, instead of paying a one time amount, you need to put a steady amount of money for at least 5 to 7 years to minimize the cost while meeting the IRS guideline. As soon as you put a premium, only 75 to 85% of the premium you payed will go to the cash value (the rest pays the cost of insurance, and the different front loaded fee). You can borrow around 90% of that cash value immediately. Every year your cash value increase (either by a steady 3 to 5% in a Whole Life insurance, or a variable 0 to 13% in an Index Universal Life). When you die, your heirs don't get the current cash value, but will get the current death benefit minus the outstanding loan. The death benefit is higher than the cash value. It is a lot higher when you are younger, and become closer to the cash value when you reach your life expectancy. And that is a great feature, as if you die young you may have put only $50k in premium, have a $40k cash value, but your death benefit may be $2M. When you reach 80 y/o you may have put $500k in premium, have a cash value of $3M but a death benefit of only $3.5M.
The growth in a permanent overfunded life insurance is not fantastic, but it is tax free, so to compare apple to apple, a 6% conservative IRR of an IUL, or a 4% IRR in a WL may be closer to a 9% or 7% in a taxable account. On top of it you have a life insurance that will protect your family if you die early. But also it is a liquid asset that you can use as collateral to reinvest. When you use it that way, because you are not withdrawing the money from the life insurance, but only using it as collateral, the full value of the life insurance continues to grow uninterrupted. And it you use the proceed to reinvest, you can also deduct the interest of the loan from your investment gains. Cash value loan are easy to obtain, and don't need the long and arduous underwriting that you get for a mortgage. You don't need to pay mortgage insurance, it does not affect your credit score. Life insurance are also asset protected and don't count as asset on a financial aid form.
The Infinite Banking (TM) concept use WL life insurance as part of a way of spending your money. I don't personally believe that you should use this for buying non revenue producing asset (ie spending, buying cars, etc...). Like for velocity banking, it is a framework that works for people who have difficulty managing their spending.
However as a real estate investor, I am 100% behind the use of overfunded life insurance policy as part of my wealth building strategy. It is a complex product and some will prefer the lower guaranteed rate of a Whole Life insurance, while others like myself will prefer the more volatile returns of an Index Universal Life insurance that should outperform the return of a WL in the long run. As an heavily front loaded product, you take a small hit of opportunity cost for the first few years, but after year 5 to 8, you are getting ahead. Like most of real estate investments it's a long term play.
Excellent summary Mike!
One thing I want to clarify is your use of the "heavily front loaded" statement.
I don't believe life insurance is heavily front loaded. If you analyze the costs in a perfectly-designed, maximum over-funded policy, you'll find that:
1. In the years that you are paying premium, the expenses work out to be about 15% of the premium. Turned around, that means that about 85% of every premium dollar goes to the cash value. [Note: you may see an illustration showing 90%, but just realize it is including the first year dividends/interest crediting]
2. In the years after you stop paying premium, the load on the policy's cash value is about 0.25% =/-
Post: Infinite Banking Concept

- Financial Advisor
- Boynton Beach, FL
- Posts 819
- Votes 791
Originally posted by @Tushar P.:
Originally posted by @Tony Kim:
Originally posted by @Thomas Rutkowski:
I don't believe that you are looking at it properly. The life insurance cash value is not the investment.
1. You are wrong about the borrowing In a properly-designed policy, you can borrow immediately upon issue. Further, a properly-designed policy should have about 85% cash value to premium. So a $50,000 annual premium would allow for an immediate loan of about $42,500.
2. Who says it has to be consumer debt? Be aware that point of The Double Play is to put your money to work in two places at one time. Use a policy loan, or better yet, a cash value line of credit from a bank, to invest in real estate. Now you are putting your money to work in two places at once.
3. Understand that because of the tax advantage of this structure, you are earning a higher combined rate of return. This means that you will quickly catch up to and surpass where you would have been had you simply invested your cash directly in real estate.
You don't need to be a mathematician to know that this makes sense.
So with a $50k per year premium, let's say that after 2 years, I can borrow close to 90K and that will be an interest free loan. I use that to invest in real estate earning 8% a year.
The advantage here over just saving your money for two years outside of the policy and then investing is that in addition to the life insurance death benefit, your policy's cash value continues to grow tax deferred (i.e., working in two places at once)?
Also, doesn't the cash value go to the insurance company upon the death of the insured?
Interest free loan, really? How does the money within the insurance policy continue to grow - can it be invested in anything desired? I haven’t looked into insurance policies as an investment vehicle because I’ve heard it’s not a good strategy.
I think borrowing from 401k/IRA is done by people who are really desperate or are gullible enough to be sold on that, because the interest paid to the 401k/IRA is by the person themselves (i.e. the interest income is not new money). Besides the fact that money doesn't continue to grow within the 401k/IRA because it has been taken out of the 401k/IRA. Unlike margin loans in brokerage accounts (right now can borrow at 1.6% interest rate for balances over 5 mm$) where the borrowed money is deployed in investments outside the brokerage account and continues to grow within the brokerage account too (e.g. invested in index funds) because they were not really pulled out of the brokerage account.
Policy loan interest is not zero.
Hypothetically, if the cash value is earning 5% and you can get a loan at 4%, then anything you do with that 4% money is adding value on top of the 5% the cash value is earning. Plus there is a tax advantage of being able to deduct the interest as a business expense.
This means that you will earn more over time utilizing The Double Play and leveraging the cash value to invest in real estate than by simply taking the same money and investing directly in real estate.
Post: Infinite Banking Concept

- Financial Advisor
- Boynton Beach, FL
- Posts 819
- Votes 791
Originally posted by @Tony Kim:
Originally posted by @Thomas Rutkowski:
I don't believe that you are looking at it properly. The life insurance cash value is not the investment.
1. You are wrong about the borrowing In a properly-designed policy, you can borrow immediately upon issue. Further, a properly-designed policy should have about 85% cash value to premium. So a $50,000 annual premium would allow for an immediate loan of about $42,500.
2. Who says it has to be consumer debt? Be aware that point of The Double Play is to put your money to work in two places at one time. Use a policy loan, or better yet, a cash value line of credit from a bank, to invest in real estate. Now you are putting your money to work in two places at once.
3. Understand that because of the tax advantage of this structure, you are earning a higher combined rate of return. This means that you will quickly catch up to and surpass where you would have been had you simply invested your cash directly in real estate.
You don't need to be a mathematician to know that this makes sense.
So with a $50k per year premium, let's say that after 2 years, I can borrow close to 90K and that will be an interest free loan. I use that to invest in real estate earning 8% a year.
The advantage here over just saving your money for two years outside of the policy and then investing is that in addition to the life insurance death benefit, your policy's cash value continues to grow tax deferred (i.e., working in two places at once)?
Also, doesn't the cash value go to the insurance company upon the death of the insured?
Sorry for the late reply. I've been really busy and haven't had time to get on social media. No, the life insurance company does not keep the cash value. The cash value of a policy is literally the policy owner saving up the death benefit for the insured over the insured's life expectancy.
If the insured dies in the early years, the insurance company pays most of the death benefit. If the insured dies late in life, then the cash value makes up most of the death benefit.
The risk that the insurance company covers is the gap between the DB and the CV
DB = Death Benefit, CV = Cash Value
Post: Infinite Banking Concept

- Financial Advisor
- Boynton Beach, FL
- Posts 819
- Votes 791
I don't believe that you are looking at it properly. The life insurance cash value is not the investment.
1. You are wrong about the borrowing In a properly-designed policy, you can borrow immediately upon issue. Further, a properly-designed policy should have about 85% cash value to premium. So a $50,000 annual premium would allow for an immediate loan of about $42,500.
2. Who says it has to be consumer debt? Be aware that point of The Double Play is to put your money to work in two places at one time. Use a policy loan, or better yet, a cash value line of credit from a bank, to invest in real estate. Now you are putting your money to work in two places at once.
3. Understand that because of the tax advantage of this structure, you are earning a higher combined rate of return. This means that you will quickly catch up to and surpass where you would have been had you simply invested your cash directly in real estate.
You don't need to be a mathematician to know that this makes sense.
Post: Which is better for Real Estate Investing: IUL or Whole Life?

- Financial Advisor
- Boynton Beach, FL
- Posts 819
- Votes 791
Hi @Nick Colucci - I do a webinar on the first Thursday of every month. All of the recordings are kept here: https://innovativeretirementst...
The one you are referencing is from 2/29/2020.
You may find a lot of other titles that interest you as well.
This Thursday I'll be discussing why cap rates are so low on IULs right now and why that's not really a bad thing.
You can get on my list to be notified of new webinars at the same link above.
-Tom