Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Tony Kim

Tony Kim has started 12 posts and replied 831 times.

Post: Millionaire - RICH or Middle Class?

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015
Originally posted by @Jon Haft:

A quote I once heard that I've always liked is "rich people are rich because they act like they are poor and poor people are poor because they act like they are rich"

my family is an example of this. My wife comes from money and they never spend anything. they wear old clothes and drive old cars, and my family doesn't come from money and they spend almost everything they earn but they have the latest clothes and cars

Yeah, but TRULY rich people certainly don't act like they are poor.  They act like they are rich.....as well they should. Perhaps your wife's family is a exception however.

As for whether or not a millionaire is rich or middle class, I think even a qualified purchaser in a primary city would be hard pressed to call herself rich. All it would take is a few years of living lavishly to put a huge dent into that $5 million.

Post: Roofstock review. NEWBIES BEWARE!!

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015
Originally posted by @JC Wu:

@Tony Kim

Who's your TK provider? An LA TK provider that only serves locally? 

Roofstock is more like a "broker on steroid" rather than a true TK provider as another BP investor put it. I thought it's kinda fitting although not exactly. At the same time, I can't come up with a better description myself. 

I didn't have the balls (still don't) to invest in my local market - San Francisco Bay Area, which is one of the, if not THE most expensive market. I wasn't comfortable with putting too much at stake as a newbie, so I invested in cheap markets to just get my feet wet. Exactly like @Jay Hinrichs said, too inconsistent for someone like me. 

CrowdStreet is pretty good, too. I might invest in a self-storage facility deal next, which should serve me well during the impending recession -- the four Ds (divorce, dislocation, death, disaster). 

Ohio Cash Flow is my TK provider. They're based out of Toledo, OH.  Couldn't be happier with them. I don't use a TK provider for my local properties... For one, they don't exist. I buy and manage all of my local properties via my in-house staff, which consists of two people, my wife and I.  :) 

I don't blame you for feeling that way about SF. Prices are sky high and there is no relief in sight. Ever thought about investing in nearby gentrifying areas such as Richmond? That is my strategy for LA now that prices are sky high here too (though, not nearly as high as your neighborhood). I recently purchased a four-unit near USC/Exposition Park which is an area that is still relatively affordable but has been changing a lot. 

Post: California to make "Solar "mandatory for new Homes!!!!!!

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015
Originally posted by @Andrew Smith:
Originally posted by @Dennis M.:

No wonder 79% of Californians want to move ! It might have the third biggest economy in the world but that doesn’t mean much when that economy is completely broke lol as per usual ,this is insane government control run amuck . Will the people ever learn there ?, sadly I fear that answer is NO

 Actually CA has a surplus. https://www.politifact.com/california/statements/2018/dec/18/jerry-brown/does-california-have-budget-surplus-nearly-30-bill/

Seriously, how long is this false narrative about CA's budget going to be stuck in peoples' heads? CA's been in surplus for so many years now...  Will some people ever learn?  Sadly I fear that answer is NO.

Post: Spouse wants to be the Property Manager

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015
Originally posted by @Joseph Firmin:

I have recently begun my REI business and purchased my first duplex. It is about to close (next week!) and I have planned the renovation and am ready to start improving the asset prior to renting out. I have been on this journey of acquiring the knowledge, connecting to awesome people and asking questions since September 2018. I have kept my wife in the loop during the process and let her know about everything I've been doing and learning and she has been very supportive.

She is from MX and English is her second language and is in the process of preparing to take the TOEFL as she recognized that she need to improve her English prior to going back to work.

She mentioned the other day that she'd like to be involved in the business and maybe she could manage the properties that we acquire.

I'm looking for feedback from the community on how to best coach and encourage her without pushing too hard (understanding English makes the learning hard).

Thank you, very grateful for your responses!

I would tell her that having English as a second language is not nearly as important as her skills in dealing with other people, thinking logically with a business mindset, presenting herself with confidence, being personable, developing rapport, and putting in a consistent level of dedication on a daily basis. My wife also speaks English as a second language and she has been great in managing our properties. She often struggles finding the right words during conversations, but I have found that our tenants don't mind that at all.

Post: Roofstock review. NEWBIES BEWARE!!

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015
Originally posted by @JC Wu:

@Nina M.@Jason G.@Heshel Mangel@Account Closed It took my entire president's day afternoon to write that last post. Hope it helps. Best of luck to you all and happy investing. :)

I appreciate you posting your story. I'm very sorry to hear what happened......and to be honest, your story made me really glad that I went with my turnkey company...which is about as close to 'set-it and forget-it' as possible. Their affiliated PM has also been best in class. The key is to find someone trustworthy, and I think I got lucky with the company I ended up with.

I can appreciate Roofstock's business model, but if I wanted to passively invest out of state, they would be the very last company I would use. And if I actually wanted to be less passive, Roofstock would again be the last company I would use because their listings aren't exactly what I would call good deals. If I'm going to play a more active role in the purchase, what's the point in paying the prices listed on Roofstock's platform? It would be much better to find someone local to the area and put together a deal with his/her help. I would only use Rootstock if I had a rental property that I wanted to unload

And although I'm happy with my TK provider, I'm pretty sure that will be the only one I purchase. Like you, I also invest in private placements and notes through various online sites like YieldStreet and Equity Multiple. The cash flow has been very good for both my TK as well as the syndicated deals, but only one of those has a good exit strategy along with potential for capital appreciation. The rest of my stuff is located locally here in Los Angeles and constitutes the largest portion of my portfolio by far.

Post: Accredited Investor Question

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015
Originally posted by @Sothea K.:

Hello, Does anyone know how would I calculate an asset where there are 2 owners for an investment home? Do I account the entire value of the home or half of it?

Half, unless we are talking husband and wife. If you own 1 million or more in non primary residence assets jointly with your spouse, then you are accredited.

Post: Veterans Housing Vouchers

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015

In my area, the veterans housing vouchers have higher maximums than the standard Section 8 vouchers. My plan is to rent to as many Section 8 veterans as I can for my units new Exposition Park, which is a relatively low-income area, and then possibly sell the property at a premium.

Post: 401K: Continue Contributions or Stop?

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015
Originally posted by @Thomas Rutkowski:
Originally posted by @Bill F.:

@Thomas Rutkowski

Is there any resources which you could point someone to that clearly lay out these products, fees, returns, risks, so that someone could model out some scenario returns? For instance you mention Mass Mutual; is there a term sheet of some sort which spells out the details of their offerings that I can then take and compare to another companies product?

I've seen you post a few times about "properly designed policies" What exactly separates a proper from improper policy design? 

Also, do you sell these products yourself?

 This is what a properly designed policy looks like. This was on a 46 year old female, non-smoker, preferred. I'm using an IUL chassis so that you can see the itemized expenses. This is the primary difference between Whole Life and Universal Life: one is a black box and the other is unbundled into its component parts. One of my Whole Life designs would look very similar, you just wouldn't see the itemized expenses. 

Notes:

1. 6.38% is the interest crediting rate. This is well below IUL historical returns and consistent with current Mass Mutual and Penn Mutual dividends right now.

2. The Death benefit is reduced to absolute minimum right after last premium is made. Note the small difference between the cash value and the death benefit at this time. Its this gap that represents the risk to the insurance company. The cost of insurance represents the cost of a 1-year term to cover this gap.

3. The COI gets more expensive every year as the insured ages, but the net amount at risk gets smaller. Notice that the COI as a % of cash value remains constant. This totally blows a hole in the argument that rising insurance costs as you age will cause a UL to lapse.

4. Note that COI as a percentage of Cash Value varies around 0.25%. This is in line with the expense ratio of most index mutual funds. But this policy will provide about 3 times the after tax income at retirement. This policy could sustain an annual income stream of $48,000 tax-free to age 120. Not bad for only 5 premiums of $50K. 

5. I have the illustration that this is based upon.

6. Every design looks just like this. The relative ratios of premium and cash value remain constant. Its the death benefit that changes from case to case.

7. This has an early cash value rider that eliminates the surrender charges. Surrender value = Accumulation Value.

Hope this helps everyone understand what an overfunded policy is supposed to look like.

So maybe I'm reading this chart wrong, but it looks like we pay an annual policy premium of 50,000 per year for 5 years at which time your accumulated value will be 247,691. Every year after that, the value of your policy goes up but we aren't paying any additional premiums.  By year ten, the value of your policy is 305,485. This can't be correct, can it? What exactly am I missing?

Post: Dealing with Tenants who are bringing up laws.

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015
Originally posted by @Louis W.:

There is no lease agreement anymore. The old one long expired. So, I want to discuss signing a new lease with an increased rate. They bring many issues about the rental unit and refuse to discuss a new lease. They talk about cutting their rent payment because they spend money to fix issues themselves. They threaten me with legal means and bring it the attention to local anti-gen support groups

It's a mistake to bring up increased run to any tenant verbally in person.  There is actually NOTHING to discuss. The rent is going up and that's all there is to it. Just send them a notice that their rent is going to increase 3% or whatever the maximum annual allowed amount is. 

As for the money they spent on making repairs, ask for receipts or some sort of proof of expense and if it is genuinely the type of expense that should be covered by the landlord, just provide reimbursement. But I agree with @Albert Ng If you could somehow get these hippie jokers off your property, that would be the best scenario. 

Post: 401K: Continue Contributions or Stop?

Tony KimPosted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles
  • Posts 843
  • Votes 1,015
Originally posted by @Harrison Sharp:
Originally posted by @Jonathan R.:

@Harrison Sharp Why is it horrible advice? It’s about opportunity cost. If you can take your money and make a much better return than do it. Being a slave to Wallstreet is horrible advice. He gets zero match. I too do a 401k up to 6% but I get a 75% match up to 6%. I like to control my money.

Withdrawing your 401k is about the dumbest thing you can do, you'll have a 10% haircut off the top and then you'll have a large amount of taxable income on your tax return next year so set aside another 20-25% for that. In what world is it good advice to recommend taking a guaranteed 30% loss before you even are able to get another investment? Also 401k loans are risky as well, even if you get the interest, if you leave the company you're at you have to pay back the entirety of the loan within a short time period, again hope you have cash set aside for that... the better advice would just be to keep his money in the 401k, start contributing to a roth 401k instead of traditional and lower the amount, and then saving additional money on the side for real estate.

And as far as your tax and market timing points... Most people aren't in a higher tax bracket when they retire unless you've built up a massive real estate portfolio that is cash flowing a ton with paid off properties. I agree the market could be overpriced right now, but trying to time the stock market is a fools game. He's dollar cost averaging every paycheck and thus limiting his exposure to large drops assuming he continues to do so during a correction. Additionally, we just saw a 20% pullback in December, why not get in now? That could have been the selloff that was coming. Everyone is terrified of another 2008 and those events simply don't happen very often. What we just saw in a 20% pullback are more normal and par for the course.

I emptied my 401K and IRA twice so far and it has played a key role in allowing me to reach the point where I am now...which is financial independence (ie, I could quit my job right now if I wanted). Without using the funds from these accounts, I'm pretty sure I would have missed out on some really good opportunities and my financial picture would be no where close to what it is right now....let alone financially independent.

However, with that said. I still agree 100% with the advice above. When I think back about how lucky I was with the timing of the investment as well as being presented with the opportunity, I can't help but think emptying my retirement accounts like that was pretty reckless. Luckily for me, it worked out quite well....and if anyone is thinking about doing the same thing, please consider where we are in the current real estate cycle. I made my investments during a red-hot California and Asia real estate market and my timing was very lucky. Doing the same thing right now at the crest of the current cycle would be an absolute terrible move in all 50 states, Asia, and Europe. In fact, it's a pretty reckless move at all points in the cycle.

Also, someone else mentioned perhaps parking your money in the AHP fund as an alternative to CD's or other low-risk investments. Don't let the liquidity terms fool you.  This is not a low-risk, money-market type of investment that happens to earn double-digits. You are assuming equity-like risk without any of the upside. Your returns are capped at 12% in the previous fund, and in the current offering, I believe it is capped at 10%. These are good coupon rates for debt-style investments, but the AHP investment is structured as an equity investment. The sponsors are earning 30-35%.....i.e., they are taking substantial risks. And usually, equity investments are structured so that the majority of profits above and beyond the preferred return goes to the investors.  AHP is structured so that 100% goes to the sponsor. Also, flexible liquidity can be good, but there is also a very big downside to this....though I imagine there is something in the agreement where the sponsor can freeze redemptions in certain situations.