Same for 2-years of job/income stability.Tenant Default: 10-20% probability of eviction or early lease termination.Section 8: Class C rents usually meet program requirements, proper screening still recommended.Vacancies: 10-20%, depending on market conditions and tenant screening.Cashflow vs Appreciation: Should cashflow immediately, at the lower end of relative rent & value appreciation.Class D Properties:Tenant Pool: Majority of FICO scores under 560, little to no good tradelines, lots of collections & chargeoffs, but should have no convictions/evictions in last 12 months.

If so you can't target Voucher Holders over tenants who pay their own rent, nor can you avoid/decline them simply because of their voucher.Here in Maryland, where I am licensed, Source of Income is a protected class so I will not opine on the pros/cons of the programs.

See below for what else can affect a condo's warrantability status.I utilize two programs for investor clients that do not scrutinize between warrantable/non-warrantable condos.

BRRRR can work on Detroit Land Bank/Land Trust houses, but only if you treat them like heavy rehabs with strict compliance: read every program stipulation, confirm deed restrictions and rehab timelines, and underwrite all‑in cost with big‑ticket items first (roof, sewer, foundation, electrical, HVAC) plus contingencies and holding time; many lenders won’t finance until work is complete, so plan cash, private, or bridge funds and expect permit oversight and inspections.

Other names mentioned were Kenny Bedwell at STR Insights and Bill Faeth’s coaching programs.

I'm pretty impressed with the mentor program, but we are growing at such a rate that it needs some expansion - hope to see that soon.Best of luck to you!

What’s happening sounds more like a HUD and Section 8 program mismanagement issue than a policy change from the top.Local housing authorities depend on the annual HUD budget allocations, and when those get delayed, reduced, or rebalanced, they sometimes have to freeze rent increases just to make their existing contracts pencil out.

ya thats a favorite trick of many of these types of companies hey will we pay you back or refund your fee you paid for our program in exchange for an NDA and public retraction.. we see that on BP often mainly with trianing courses were the trainee demands a refund based on their cancellation rights or their opinion the program sold was not what was represented.. next thing you see is that person post a glowing post about the person they just complained about.. so you know they did that either to get a refund or signed an NDA in a way I cant blame them as folks do whatever they need to do to get their money back and If they went into debt to pay for training like many do .. there are substantial financial ramifications for them and getting paid back gets them out of jail so to speak

Hahaha thats a clever name that is suspiciously close to the NFIP (National Flood Insurance Program).

If there’s physical damage dishwasher goes out 3 times in one year like it has in the program I work at the company pays the first $500 towards repairs or the new one.