Skip to content
General Real Estate Investing

User Stats

45
Posts
16
Votes
Daniel Ahern
  • Investor
  • Bali, Indonesia
16
Votes |
45
Posts

Hello! and where to find Cash flow 4-Plexes?

Daniel Ahern
  • Investor
  • Bali, Indonesia
Posted Feb 10 2016, 20:56

Hello!

I'm just getting started on BP.  Love it!  It's great to be connected to a community of like minded RE investors.  So much to learn, so much to do!!

------ THE PLAN ------

I plan to purchase $3 mil of small Multi-Unit properties by the end of 2016.  The general goal is to purchase *** FIVE ***  4-Plex's worth $600K each, where I put %20 down (so $120K down on each).

The stretch part of the plan - I'd like each 4-Plex to cash flow $2K a month. OK, well, if that's not realistic, I'm open to reason.

Ideal property is a C property in a B area (using an A,B,C,D area scale).

I live in LA but think the market is too overheated here to get anywhere close to the cash flow goal so am actively investigating & number crunching external markets (Atlanta, Tacoma, San Antonio, Charlotte, Austin, etc.). 

------ THE HELP I'M LOOKING FOR ------

I'm looking for help locating these small Multi's that can cash flow.

I'm also looking for input regarding the cash flow goal.  What's a realistic cash flow goal for a $600K 4-plex if I put 20% down?  I'm willing to work, search, direct mail market, submit 3 offers a day, etc. etc.  I've got 17 years experience with software so am very capable and actually really enjoy number crunching & analysis part of this.  Really interested in your input/experience/guidance on confirming my cash flow goal or setting a more realistic one.

Great to meet ya's,

Daniel

User Stats

59
Posts
35
Votes
Eric B.
  • Engineer
  • Seattle, WA
35
Votes |
59
Posts
Eric B.
  • Engineer
  • Seattle, WA
Replied Feb 11 2016, 00:19

Greetings and welcome.  Well you certainly are ambitious.  Im experinced in the Tacoma market and thats how i was alerted to your post.  Your valuation for 4 plexes may be a bit high for the area but ball parkish may be closer for B+/A areas .  I have b properties in b/c tacoma area.  Multis are a bit pricy right now so your cash flow goal will require work to acheive locally but is fairly realistic.  My advice is to stay nimble and evaluate duplexes as well as larger units.  Why 4 plexes?  20% is available but you may find 25% to be more accessable.  Larger units or areas closer to sea-town or pemium neighborhoods in tacoma would allow you to get closer to your 600k price point but honestly that sounds like a cali price to me.  Higher price generally lower cash flow but better appreciation.  If you you like to talk feel free to reach out to me. Good luck in your quest.

User Stats

201
Posts
82
Votes
Eric Dowling
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
82
Votes |
201
Posts
Eric Dowling
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied Feb 11 2016, 00:34

Welcome to BP Daniel Ahern You have certainly come to the right place!

I love your goals and it sounds like you will do very well this year! There are so many options in what market to invest in, and you will hear a lot of different ideas on how to invest your money. Here is my take:

One of the biggest downsides to the LA market is it is so expensive to get into. You have the luxury of being able to get into the market here. You probably won't get 2k per month here, but you will still cash flow well while having assets in one of the top markets in the U.S.

Don't write off LA just because you hear people, especially on BP, complain about how hard or crazy it is here. There are success stories everyday.

BiggerPockets logo
BiggerPockets
|
Sponsored
Find an investor-friendly agent in your market TODAY Get matched with our network of trusted, local, investor friendly agents in under 2 minutes

User Stats

44
Posts
11
Votes
Alex Gaw
  • Paralegal
  • Austin, TX
11
Votes |
44
Posts
Alex Gaw
  • Paralegal
  • Austin, TX
Replied Feb 11 2016, 13:44

I don't understand, if you have capital to put 20% down on $3 million worth of assets, why are you wanting to operate in the small multi-family arena, where value is a function of demand, rather than larger multi-families, where value is a function of income?

[EDIT] Also, welcome to BP! It's a great place!

User Stats

12,855
Posts
1,377
Votes
Mark Nolan
Pro Member
  • Professional
  • Carlsbad, CA
1,377
Votes |
12,855
Posts
Mark Nolan
Pro Member
  • Professional
  • Carlsbad, CA
Replied Feb 11 2016, 14:17

@Daniel Ahern

Welcome to Bigger Pockets. It is a good community to network and learn about all aspects of real-estate investing.

User Stats

45
Posts
16
Votes
Daniel Ahern
  • Investor
  • Bali, Indonesia
16
Votes |
45
Posts
Daniel Ahern
  • Investor
  • Bali, Indonesia
Replied Feb 11 2016, 23:55

@Alex Gaw  Hi Alex, good question, appreciate your input.  If I buy 4-plexes, I can put 20% down and use 30 year mortgages (locking in current low rates).  If I buy larger than 4-plex, now it's commercial and I need 30% or 35% down and can only use variable rate 7 year loans. 

I have about $600K to work with.  At 35% down, that extends to ~$1.7 Mil in properties.  At 20% down, that leads to ~$3 Mil in purchases. Huge difference right?  That along with being able to lock in low interest rates has me thinking it's the right path.

What are your thoughts?  Anything I'm not seeing or misunderstanding here?

User Stats

45
Posts
16
Votes
Daniel Ahern
  • Investor
  • Bali, Indonesia
16
Votes |
45
Posts
Daniel Ahern
  • Investor
  • Bali, Indonesia
Replied Feb 12 2016, 00:02

@Eric Dowling Thanks Eric.  Yes, this is exactly what I'm wrestling with now.  Stay local or venture out.  I'd definitely prefer to stay local and I want to believe what you're saying but I'm not seeing the opportunities locally at the moment.  Any advice on micro-areas & property type combo in LA to maximize cash flow?

User Stats

45
Posts
16
Votes
Daniel Ahern
  • Investor
  • Bali, Indonesia
16
Votes |
45
Posts
Daniel Ahern
  • Investor
  • Bali, Indonesia
Replied Feb 12 2016, 00:03

@Mark Nolan Thanks Mark, learning more every day!

User Stats

1,260
Posts
975
Votes
Logan Allec
  • Accountant
  • Los Angeles, CA
975
Votes |
1,260
Posts
Logan Allec
  • Accountant
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied Feb 12 2016, 00:11

@Daniel Ahern, have you considered South LA?  Many people smarter than me are saying that that's where the appreciation is going to be in LA over the next decade or so.

User Stats

14
Posts
2
Votes
Alexander G.
  • Queensland
2
Votes |
14
Posts
Alexander G.
  • Queensland
Replied Feb 12 2016, 11:27
Originally posted by @Daniel Ahern:

@Alex Gaw  Hi Alex, good question, appreciate your input.  If I buy 4-plexes, I can put 20% down and use 30 year mortgages (locking in current low rates).  If I buy larger than 4-plex, now it's commercial and I need 30% or 35% down and can only use variable rate 7 year loans. 

I have about $600K to work with.  At 35% down, that extends to ~$1.7 Mil in properties.  At 20% down, that leads to ~$3 Mil in purchases. Huge difference right?  That along with being able to lock in low interest rates has me thinking it's the right path.

What are your thoughts?  Anything I'm not seeing or misunderstanding here?

Also interested in seeing the answer to this last question...

User Stats

56
Posts
7
Votes
Simon Gill
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
7
Votes |
56
Posts
Simon Gill
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied Feb 12 2016, 12:06

I looked at 4-plex in LA....and I learned your better off buying a 4-plex out of state because higher rate of return. Turn-key.

Realistically, you could buy a house in LA for $600-800k and bring in the same cash flow with 4 tenants.  The choice is either to buy and risk all your egg under one tenant or reduce your risk and hope all four tenants stay. 

User Stats

45
Posts
16
Votes
Daniel Ahern
  • Investor
  • Bali, Indonesia
16
Votes |
45
Posts
Daniel Ahern
  • Investor
  • Bali, Indonesia
Replied Feb 12 2016, 12:57

@Simon Gill Hi Sam, thanks for jumping in. Could throw some numbers together for you what your are thinking regarding cash flow for $600-$800k home in LA? You're saying rent out 4 rooms in an SFR? That sounds nightmarish to manage... maybe I'm not understanding correctly.

User Stats

45
Posts
16
Votes
Daniel Ahern
  • Investor
  • Bali, Indonesia
16
Votes |
45
Posts
Daniel Ahern
  • Investor
  • Bali, Indonesia
Replied Feb 12 2016, 13:00

@Simon Gill

Let me try one more time... too many typos (and not sure how to edit a previous post)

Hi Sam, thanks for jumping in. Could you throw some numbers together for what you are thinking regarding cash flow for a $600-$800k home in LA? You're saying rent out 4 rooms in an SFR? That sounds nightmarish to manage... maybe I'm not understanding correctly.

BiggerPockets logo
Find, Vet and Invest in Syndications
|
BiggerPockets
PassivePockets will help you find sponsors, evaluate deals, and learn how to invest with confidence.

User Stats

45
Posts
16
Votes
Daniel Ahern
  • Investor
  • Bali, Indonesia
16
Votes |
45
Posts
Daniel Ahern
  • Investor
  • Bali, Indonesia
Replied Feb 12 2016, 13:43

@Logan Allec Hi Logan, thanks for chipping in.  Any more specifics regarding South LA?  Is that mostly about spill over from USC or other dynamics happening there?

User Stats

56
Posts
7
Votes
Simon Gill
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
7
Votes |
56
Posts
Simon Gill
  • Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied Feb 12 2016, 21:41

I meant you could buy a hous between $600-$800k or a 4-plex which generate the same cash flow number. The question is you want one tenant stress or 4 tenant stress. I'm not sure if 4-pled appraisal r usually higher than a house 

User Stats

45
Posts
16
Votes
Daniel Ahern
  • Investor
  • Bali, Indonesia
16
Votes |
45
Posts
Daniel Ahern
  • Investor
  • Bali, Indonesia
Replied Feb 16 2016, 22:48

I just spoke with a RE Agent in LA.  She said from time to time

"many income properties in LA are priced at a loss."  "Returns around 4-5% are for turn key properties... if that. If you're willing to venture into sketchy areas and willing to deal with relocations, you will get a lot more."

I'm still researching but I'm seeing other investors talk about 10%... as much as 20% Cash on Cash.  That compared to 4%-5%.  OK, the 10% to 20% was certainly not Turn Key so maybe that isn't fair.  Still crunching numbers...