Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Becca F.

Becca F. has started 24 posts and replied 818 times.

Post: Experience with new program for out of state fix and flipping?

Becca F.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco Bay Area
  • Posts 825
  • Votes 1,211

@Chris Nerio

I did get on a call with two people, one for Martel Turnkey and another for FlipSystem. I considered buying their turnkey rental but I wasn’t familiar with their markets (mostly Ohio, Detroit area and a few Memphis homes). bought in the Indianapolis metro area since I knew that area well (used to live there). 

For FlipSystem I couldn't justify spending the $15,000. I would just use that money towards a down payment - I work with a real estate agent who does deals with many investors and has had a few off market properties (I know many investors don't use realtors but I prefer to). I'm looking cautiously at doing fix and flips with an exit strategy of holding the property as a rental if it didn't sell. Since I only had the one call with FlipSystem she didn't mention taking out a hard money loan. Interest rates with HML and private lenders are higher than bank loans. Did they explain HMLs to you? Did you decide to sign on with FlipSystem?

Post: Where is everyone investing these days for both STR and LTR?

Becca F.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco Bay Area
  • Posts 825
  • Votes 1,211
Quote from @Eric Fernwood:

Hello @Kelly Cynamon,

Choosing an investment location should not be based on people's opinions. While everyone has an opinion, it may not be the best location for you. Many people choose a location based on low cost and initial return. However, neither is a good indicator of a location that will help you become financially independent.

Inflation and Financial Independence

Every time you go to the store, it costs more and more to purchase the same set of goods due to inflation. To counteract the effects of inflation, your rental income must keep pace with it. If rents fail to keep up with inflation, you won't have additional dollars to pay inflated prices, and you will eventually be forced to return to the daily grind of working for a living.

Local demand determines prices and rents. In areas with low demand, prices, and rents will not rise fast enough to offset inflation. Additionally, investing in low-cost, low-growth locations is actually the most expensive way to reach financial freedom. If you're curious why, feel free to ask.

Some indicators of locations where rents will not keep pace with inflation include:

  • The population at the state or local level is not increasing. Without population growth, there will not be a demand for additional housing. So, either prices and rents will be static or rise very slowly.

  • Urban sprawl - Most cities in the US, such as Phoenix, Memphis, and Indianapolis, have large open areas surrounding them that enable unlimited expansion through urban sprawl. This leads to a slow or stagnant increase in property prices and rents in established areas, as people prefer to rent or buy newer homes.

  • Crime - The value of your rental property is directly linked to the availability of jobs in the surrounding area. Unfortunately, most companies have a limited lifespan, and over the next 10 to 20 years, the companies employing your tenants are likely to disappear. Cities with high crime rates are not attractive to new businesses, which means that replacement jobs may not be created. Consequently, most available jobs in the area will be low-paying service sector jobs.

    Cities rely on property and sales taxes to fund their budgets. When the area's income decreases, so does property and sales tax revenue. This forces cities to cut back on services, which, in turn, leads to an increase in crime. Higher-income residents then leave the area, perpetuating a cycle of declining city income, services, and increased crime. Few cities have ever recovered from this economic "death spiral." Never invest in any city on Neighborhood Scouts' list of the 100 most dangerous US cities.

  • High operating costs - Every penny you lose to taxes and insurance decreases your rental income. Look for states with low taxes and insurance. Insurance - ValuePenguin, Metro Property Taxes - LendingTree

There are more location considerations, but the above is a good start.

The limitation of return calculations

Return calculations only predict how a property is likely to perform under ideal conditions on the first day. They provide no insight into the future. However, most people want to keep their properties for the rest of their lives. So, what happens after the first day is much more important. Take a long-term view of the metro area's future economic health. Your financial independence is linked to the performance of the location over the long term.

Kelly, I hope the above information is helpful. If you or anyone else would like more details about my investment methodologies, which I used to deliver over 480 high-performance investment properties, please DM me for a free white paper.


 Eric I looked up the Neighborhood Scout's List of 100 Dangerous Cities: 

https://www.neighborhoodscout....

Several of the cities that investors are posting about are on this list (in order of highest violent crime rate per 1000 residents) : Memphis, Detroit, Cleveland, St. Louis, Kansas City Missouri. 

I'm surprised that Nashville and Houston are on this list. The Nashville area property appreciation has increased significantly - I visited Brentwood and Franklin a while ago and those were really nice suburbs. I don't have rental properties in any of those 100 cities. My approach is that I'd rather have few Class A properties than buy 50 to 100 Class C properties but I did buy a Class C SFH recently (PM company is screening the rental applicant right now) in Indianapolis. Class A anywhere has a terrible Rent to Price ratio at current prices and interest rates. One of my investor friends said that tenants with higher incomes don't want to live in high crime areas so tenant quality may be lower and they will be rougher on your property and have higher turnover.

Thoughts about that 100 cities list and my investor friend's viewpoint? I'm not sure where I should buy next. 

Post: Knob + Tube Rewire

Becca F.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco Bay Area
  • Posts 825
  • Votes 1,211
Quote from @Ryan Normand:
Quote from @Becca F.:

From seeing the other comments, I paid much more for electrical re-wiring on a knob and tube wiring on SFH in San Francisco Bay Area. My total electrical costs were $47,560 (labor and materials including 4 new LED recessed lights, light switches etc). This is including the cost of the permit. Mine is a 3 bedroom 2 bath 1400 sq ft main living area with about 800 sq ft downstairs room and 1 bathroom downstairs. I renovated everything in the kitchen and 3 bathrooms so those rooms were down to the studs/wood frame. They managed to re-wire the living room, dining room, bedrooms and downstairs room by cutting out holes in the drywall and feeding the new wiring in the walls. To pass electrical inspection there were outlets installed every 6 feet in each room.

My new breaker panel with labor was $5815 with labor (included in that total $47,560 above). I had to get a gas stove for the kitchen because the electrician said it would have overloaded the existing electrical power or amps (I'm not an electrician so my terminology is probably incorrect) and it would have cost more if I wanted an electric stove. The original stovetop was electric.

For Indianapolis $25,000 sounds reasonable to me, depending on what is done. I also own SFH rentals in the Indy area, both move in ready so no electrical work done.


 I know everything is more expensive in the Bay Area, but DAAAANG that is sky high, especially considering the house was only 1400 sf and the most difficult rooms to run wire in were already gutted down to the studs. I hope they at least patched the drywall back for you!


 It's 1370 sq ft for main living area and has about a 700 sq ft room downstairs. They called it a basement in the appraisal although it's technically not underground. So total sq ft that they rewired was just under 2100 sq ft. The electrician did 3 walk-throughs with me before and after the re-wiring. There were burn marks in the wood frame in the kitchen from the old wiring- that was scary. The contractor did patch up all the drywall and it looks great. 

Post: Knob + Tube Rewire

Becca F.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco Bay Area
  • Posts 825
  • Votes 1,211

@Josh Danna

From seeing the other comments, I paid much more for electrical re-wiring on a knob and tube wiring on SFH in San Francisco Bay Area. My total electrical costs were $47,560 (labor and materials including 4 new LED recessed lights, light switches etc). This is including the cost of the permit. Mine is a 3 bedroom 2 bath 1400 sq ft main living area with about 800 sq ft downstairs room and 1 bathroom downstairs. I renovated everything in the kitchen and 3 bathrooms so those rooms were down to the studs/wood frame. They managed to re-wire the living room, dining room, bedrooms and downstairs room by cutting out holes in the drywall and feeding the new wiring in the walls. To pass electrical inspection there were outlets installed every 6 feet in each room.

My new breaker panel with labor was $5815 with labor (included in that total $47,560 above). I had to get a gas stove for the kitchen because the electrician said it would have overloaded the existing electrical power or amps (I'm not an electrician so my terminology is probably incorrect) and it would have cost more if I wanted an electric stove. The original stovetop was electric.

For Indianapolis $25,000 sounds reasonable to me, depending on what is done. I also own SFH rentals in the Indy area, both move in ready so no electrical work done.

Post: Are opportunities in the west gone?

Becca F.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco Bay Area
  • Posts 825
  • Votes 1,211

@Jordyn Lai

I'm in California and have 2 properties here. I'm buying in Indiana now. It is very difficult to cash flow or even break even (meaning rent covers mortgage PITI, not counting vacancy rates, capital expenses and repairs at current prices and interest rates. My first Indiana SFH is Class A in a nice suburb with excellent schools - I bought it 10 years ago but it was my primary residence, costs less than a Tesla and it had upgrades. The appreciation has been good, 70% since 2013 as of 2021 (when I did a cash out refi), might be worth a little more.

I recently bought Class C moving up to a Class B in Indianapolis, move-in ready except a few minor repairs. It's listed for rent with a property management company now. I'm ok with the seller getting the equity since I didn't want to do an OOS BRRRR. I did a local renovation and I thought it was very stressful and I was on site every week. Also it isn't cheap to hire a contractor in the Bay Area. I may consider a OOS BRRRR or flip now that she has trusted contractors but I would fly out there to look at distressed property before making an offer. If can send you my real estate agent's info, if you would like. She works with lots of OOS investors. The other markets I've heard were good are Cincinnati, Columbus, Cleveland, Memphis, Kansas City Missouri.

Post: Should I sell my house or rent it out?

Becca F.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco Bay Area
  • Posts 825
  • Votes 1,211
Quote from @Sunny D.:
Quote from @Michael Cai:
Quote from @Sunny D.:
Quote from @Michael Cai:
Quote from @Corby Goade:

@Michael Cai Absolutely- you can still access most of that equity tax free if you keep it, and I assume you haven't had a buy and hold rental before? If not, you haven't even begun to experience the tax benefits and they only get better over time. 

Yes- keep it, and if you want to scale, get a HELOC before you move out and begin your journey. Don't miss the forest for the trees- there are thousands of people here who are kicking themselves for selling their primaries and flips without really considering finding a way to keep them.

I did my calculation, if I keep it long term - I mean really long term, suppose the property goes up to 840k in 13 years, not unreasonable, by that time my 15 tear mortgage is paid off..so I will have 850 minus 500k gain * 15% long term tax = $75k, so I after tax will have 775k, compare to sell it now and net 380 or 390k. Nothing else will make me an extra 380k after tax in 13 years, all while still cash flowing on that property, so you are completely correct that to build wealth I can hold it for a really long time and no worry about paying tax on the gain. Plus I already have a HELOC of 250k on that house, so holding long term is an option.. but if I sell it in 4 ,5 years then it's not worth having to pay tax

If I need the money then sell it in 2 years. Unfortunately I may need the money, I'm supporting wife and two kids :), either way I will rent it for two years and see what my situation is at that time and decide..

My first CA rebtal home in Folsom, I bought it for 255k in 2012. I rented for 1750$ and broke even on cashflow. I took a 15 year mortgage, refinanced at 2.25 pct and only have 40k left on the original 205k loan. I paid off a few 100$ a month once in a while . Property is worth 700k and rents now for 2850$ with 1000$ cash flow.  In 2 years I will own it clear. I don't plan to refinance,  the cash flow of 3000$ is what I seek. There is no need to keep chasing volume in assets, I have 2 other sfh in folsom that will be paid off in 10 years. Cashflow is not king, debt free with high quality growth assets is the king.

Are you saying I should keep holding this property and not selling it? 
Yes if it's a class A asset which will have a good balance of rent growth and appreciation , given you have a sweet mortgage.  Anything you buy for next 2 years, expect 6 pct min interest 

Eventually in 10 years you can 1031 to a high end investment asset if you are bored ;)

This is coming from someone who tried too many things in last decade (mostly in last 6 years)
- bought 7 sfh or duplex in Cleveland west side (sold 4 for nice profit , 3 left)
I won't buy there anymore, tenant class not appealing for me
- 2 flips in Cleveland,  marginal profit
- 1 sfh in Birmingham, will get rid of it someday
- 3 out of state flips in Chicago ( lost net 60k on all)
- 5 bay area flips with a partner ( my net profit maybe close to 300k)
- close to a million in multiple real estate syndication deals
- 3 sfh in folsom 

At this point, i will be happy to own 5 sfh in class a areas debt free and rest go for passive deals.

 

 That's quite a number of real estate transactions. On the Cleveland properties are these Class C or D when you said tenant class isn't appealing anymore? 

I just purchased a Class C potentially moving up to Class B SFH in the Indianapolis area. It's listed for rent by my property management team. My other 3 properties are Class A (two SFH, one in Bay Area, one in very nice Indianapolis suburb with great schools) and multi-unit in Bay Area (with co-investors). I'm not sure if I made the right move by going Class C but I can't give that house back to the seller lol...There's no Class A property anywhere that I've found that will positive cash flow or even break even (meaning rent covers mortgage PITI, not counting vacancy rate, capital expenses, or repairs)

I don't think I should 1031 exchange the Class A Bay Area SFH to buy 5 to 20 Class C properties in the Midwest (or anywhere out of the Bay Area like Central Valley or Stockton. That was the recommendation by a few investors. That seems like a huge headache. I'm at loss of what to do so I'm not buying anything for now until the Class C house gets rented out and put my money into index funds and a 3.8% premium savings account.

Post: Should I sell my Bay Area property to buy a house with cash in Phoenix?

Becca F.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco Bay Area
  • Posts 825
  • Votes 1,211
Quote from @Herman Fox:
Quote from @Becca F.:
Quote from @Herman Fox:
Quote from @Bailey Coleman:

I would try to keep the house in CA. Rent it out long term or maybe even an airbnb. California investors buy here for the appreciation. If you sell you will potentially miss out on hundreds of thousands of dollars that house would appreciate for over the next 10+ years. Herman if you sell the house in CA you pay taxes on that money you collect for selling. I would do a cash-out refi and pull up as much money out. The money you pull out of a cash out refi is not taxed. Then used that money to buy more property in AZ. 


 Oh!  i didn't realize doing a cash-out-refi doesn't incurr capital gains or is a taxable event.  I will definately consider that as an option and dig into that more especially if that allows me to keep property and access more cash to use in AZ, this is perfect!  

Thank you!


 Herman, has this home been your primary residence for at least 2 years? If yes, you qualify for the Section 121 exclusion by the IRS. You don't pay capital gains tax on up to $250,000 for single filers and $500,000 married filing jointly. You can own a house for 5 years but if you lived in it at least 2 out of the 5 years (e.g. if you live in it for 2 years, rent it out for 2 years then sell it) and qualify for Section 121. 

https://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/...

I would lean towards Option 1. I favor keeping a Bay Area SFH and trying to pull equity out of it. Once you sell that house, if you ever want to move back or want the house back for some reason it's gone and it'll be difficult to re-enter the California market especially with a 2.5% interest rate.

I have a SFH rental here with tons of equity and I'm leaning 95 to 98% chance of keeping it. I'm considering selling and doing a 1031 exchange for out-of-state rentals (prices are up everywhere and interest rates are higher so that factors in my decision) and other states don't have a Proposition 13 which limits property tax increases to 2% a year. I'm getting on a call next with a realtor to discuss all my options.


Hi Becca!  I'm curious how your call went with your situation and thanks for sharing!

The more I think on my scenario along with yours, the more I am aligning with your thinking that keeping the 2.5% SFH in Bay Area and finding a way to pull equity out of it is the best. If i can rent it out consistently considering all the upkeep and capex, it could be cash flowing asset, though i'd feel a bit bad about renting my house for my fellow owner neighbors around me whom i've lived amongst for more than 6 years.

Otherwise YES, i've lived in it for more than 2 years so i will look into Section 121 as you suggested to consider as a selling option.  I've never heard of this until your mention, and it would meet the 500k cap in equity non taxed for my wife and I. thanks again for mentioning this!


For right now she said she recommended that I don't sell it since this area (San Francisco) is not getting high demand or it's more difficult to find renters now - people are leaving the city as a product of the pandemic, remote work and other reasons. Depending on what part of the Bay Area you are in your market may be seeing different activity. Her recommendation was to look at doing a 1031 exchange in the future. I gave her all my numbers, mortgage payments (PITI) on all rentals and primary residence and rental income. We didn't get into a deeper analysis with property taxes for California and other states, which have no Proposition 13. The property tax on my Indiana SFH rental (that I bought 10 years ago) has gone up another $500 a year (no renovations done). At this rate the property tax will be the same as my California property taxes if it keeps increasing in the 10% to 25% range. My property tax rate there for that county is 2.771%. Indiana is a landlord friendly state and the home prices are much lower than the Bay Area. It seems like property taxes in the Bay Area are in the 1% range. I'm seeing around 0.62% average property tax in Arizona unless you have a different number.

 If you look strictly at purchase prices and rent to price ratios on the surface it looks like it's better to buy OOS. I'll agree on the California not being landlord friendly which is big factor with investing here. Factor in Proposition 13 and how long you've owned your home, your property tax can be relatively low to super high. Her recommendation was to sell the S.F. house in the near future (not this year or next year) and 1031 exchange and buy a multi-unit, an apartment building out of state to get a higher return but I would need to talk more to her about this. I also don't know much about commercial loans. 

I recently purchased another SFH rental (move in ready, not a rehab) in the Indianapolis area, Class C but moving up a Class B and it was just listed for rent by the property management company so I'll see if that turns out to be a smart purchase. I worked with a realtor that works with many out of state investors and also got feedback from other local investors before I had put the offer in. I also used to live in Indiana so I know most of the areas, not down to the street but which are Class A, B and C areas and good/bad school districts. If I continue to buy anymore this year, it won't be from selling the S.F house and doing a 1031. I'll use my own money which will be a financial sting (or find a private lender and do a BRRRR) if buying in Arizona, Nevada, Florida or Nashville Tennessee which are appreciation markets vs. Midwest which is more cash flow with low price points.

Post: Advice on selling or renting my San Diego area condo when I relocate to Denver

Becca F.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco Bay Area
  • Posts 825
  • Votes 1,211

@Jacob Munson

I agree with above comments, hold onto the condo and rent it for 2 to 3 years so you still fall within the 5 years of ownership for the capital gains tax exclusion then maybe sell at that point. Another investor and realtor in San Diego told me that STRs are doing well (as far as people buying property now) so maybe consider STR or MTR. Unless you really don't want to deal with a PM or managing it far from Colorado then sell it.

My thought is if you own a California property with a good amount of equity to hold onto it. Once you sell it you won't get it (or similar property type) back and since you had in since early 2021 your interest rate is much lower than 2023 interest rates.

Post: Where is everyone investing these days for both STR and LTR?

Becca F.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco Bay Area
  • Posts 825
  • Votes 1,211

@Kelly Cynamon

I'm in the San Francisco Bay Area. I haven't done STR but I'm buying LTR in the Indianapolis area. Recently purchased a Class C SFH potentially moving up to a Class B for $130,000 (move-in ready). It will be put in the rental market soon. Projected cash flow $200 a month. I didn't want to do an out-of-state BRRRR. I may consider that now since my realtor has been great and knows contractors, etc. I'm a pretty cautious investor - I bought through a real estate agent. I haven't purchased off market, through wholesalers, tax liens or done any type of creative financing. I have all conventional loans. I'm not seeing anywhere which would replicate the appreciation on my Bay Area SFH. My property tax basis is reasonable for California because of Proposition 13. There's no Prop 13 in other states.

I bought a SFH in 2013 (my primary residence) in an Indianapolis suburb, Class A with great school district. When I rented it out, property taxes skyrocketed because I lost the homeowner's exemption, supplemental deduction and mortgage interest exemption (for 2023). I was cash flowing $400 a month. It's now closer to $162 a month but I'm keeping it since I have a low interest rate 3.875% and tax write offs and there's no way I could buy in a Class A neighborhood anywhere in the U.S. now.

I would have preferred to invest in an appreciation market such as Nashville Tennessee, Florida Panhandle, Arizona or Nevada but just from my brief searches my mortgage payment would be much higher than the rent I could charge (and that's not counting vacancy rates, capital expenses, and repairs). I'm not sure if I'll continue buying SFHs in the Indianapolis market. I've had other investors suggest multi-family but an apartment building will cost way more than a SFH.

I'm not seeing how anyone can cash flow $500 to $1000 a month buying at current prices and interest rates - if this happening, someone enlighten me :-) The key word being current prices not prices from 5 to 20 years ago. 

Post: How to Start in SoCal?

Becca F.Posted
  • Rental Property Investor
  • San Francisco Bay Area
  • Posts 825
  • Votes 1,211

@Kristina Rogers

Welcome to the world of real estate investing! I think building 7 homes or 10 condos is very ambitious for a first time investor. I agree with Bruce on this one - buying a SFH or duplex is much more do-able. If you don't have a primary residence you could house hack (rent out rooms in SFH, buy a duplex and live in one side, rent out the other) and get an FHA loan at 3.5% or conventional at 5%. When you said you have no money does that mean literally no money for a down payment?

With partnering with someone I think you need bring something to the table, like Bruce and Sebastian commented. I'm just now starting to be a little okay asking someone to partner and I have 4 properties. I've used my own money, leveraged with cash out refinances so I have some skin in the game. I could show my prospective partner how my investments are performing and here's my proposed deal. If I had $0 or no skills (I'm not a licensed contractor) would someone trust me to invest thousands or a million dollars of their money? 

You could also look into out-of-state investing where prices are much lower than California but you would need a good trustworthy team in place and get to know the local market there. Keep on learning and networking. Good luck!