Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: David Song

David Song has started 24 posts and replied 662 times.

Post: Starting to feel Disappointed

David SongPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Redwood City, CA
  • Posts 675
  • Votes 884
Quote from @Kenny Kuramoto:

I've been reading for a few months now on biggerpockets and feel like the beginner posts are starting to be not informative.  Lots of people replying with consider my location here or my location is best I can help you. I feel like people are just selling themselves not giving actual advice.. am I wrong for this?


 You are right. A lot of self promoters trying to rip off new investors. 

Post: Housing crash deniers ???

David SongPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Redwood City, CA
  • Posts 675
  • Votes 884
Quote from @James Hamling:
Quote from @David Song:
Quote from @James Hamling:
Quote from @David Song:

@Greg R.

Housing prices will always go up. Buy anytime. - bigger pockets.com

Reality: numerous REI lost their life savings in 2009 and maybe 2022. Over leveraging, insufficient reserve, short term loan with balloon payment, etc.

Flippers bought in Q1 2022 will learn the lesson now. Many of them are losing their shirt. None will tell you publicly.

The price decline started in April 2022, and has been declining for the last 4 months. The bottom has not been reached yet. This is nationwide, from CA to Texas, everywhere. 


 Sorry David, but as you seem to believe prices have been declining in the entire nation, uhm, Minnesota IS in the U.S. and so far for 2022, we have had price INCREASES every month, this year. Not decline, not flat line, INCREASE. 

While it's not the bezonkers level it was last year, it's pacing around 10% YOY. 

Velocity has slowed, we almost have 1 full month inventory on existing homes now.... 0.9 to be exact. 

Sorry, James. I do not follow MN, it’s too cold. I spent 5 years in Columbus, OH, and have already made my decision not to live there in my lifetime.
Also, I am not talking about YOY, but comparison to the peak achieved in Q1/2022. YOY even California is still positive. YOY data could be very misleading. Since the price peak was achieved in Q1 22, the YOY number may still be positive a few months after the dramatic decline started in April. Unless you are checking on listings frequently in person,  you will not be able to tell the market trend. 
if you really want to use YOY data, you have to wait until Q1 2023 to get a real feel about the market.



 Wait.... your telling me your whole premise for some "crash" is a month over month number you found of a decline in some market...... that's ridiculous. 

Cold or not, Twin Cities is one of the major national markets, set to over-take Chicago in near term of years, so I'd say it matters, as you were saying "everywhere in the nation" is in decline since April. Andy yes, I do track the numbers, constantly, it happens to be my job. And our numbers YOY, which happens to be the widely established measurement of such movements, but also the month over month, increasing. 

To be honest, I am still amazed each data release at the constant incline, I am, I didn't expect it at this moment with loss of velocity but #'s don't lie. 

If you use YOY data, feel free. I simply do not use that at all. By the time those data shows any trend, the market has already shifted for months. 

Post: Housing crash deniers ???

David SongPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Redwood City, CA
  • Posts 675
  • Votes 884
Quote from @James Hamling:
Quote from @David Song:

@Greg R.

Housing prices will always go up. Buy anytime. - bigger pockets.com

Reality: numerous REI lost their life savings in 2009 and maybe 2022. Over leveraging, insufficient reserve, short term loan with balloon payment, etc.

Flippers bought in Q1 2022 will learn the lesson now. Many of them are losing their shirt. None will tell you publicly.

The price decline started in April 2022, and has been declining for the last 4 months. The bottom has not been reached yet. This is nationwide, from CA to Texas, everywhere. 


 Sorry David, but as you seem to believe prices have been declining in the entire nation, uhm, Minnesota IS in the U.S. and so far for 2022, we have had price INCREASES every month, this year. Not decline, not flat line, INCREASE. 

While it's not the bezonkers level it was last year, it's pacing around 10% YOY. 

Velocity has slowed, we almost have 1 full month inventory on existing homes now.... 0.9 to be exact. 

Sorry, James. I do not follow MN, it’s too cold. I spent 5 years in Columbus, OH, and have already made my decision not to live there in my lifetime.
Also, I am not talking about YOY, but comparison to the peak achieved in Q1/2022. YOY even California is still positive. YOY data could be very misleading. Since the price peak was achieved in Q1 22, the YOY number may still be positive a few months after the dramatic decline started in April. Unless you are checking on listings frequently in person,  you will not be able to tell the market trend. 
if you really want to use YOY data, you have to wait until Q1 2023 to get a real feel about the market.


Post: Is cash flow overrated?

David SongPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Redwood City, CA
  • Posts 675
  • Votes 884
Quote from @Llewelyn A.:

I think I'm very highly qualified on this topic to share my experience.

Here is a true story.

A fiend, let's call him "Bob", and I invested at the same time, in 2004.

He bought Cash Flowing properties in CT and I invested the same amount into a 3 Family Brooklyn, NYC property.

We both spent about $200k for our Investments.

This is an 18 year history of the comparison.

Bob's CT properties cash flows approximately $1,000 per month for all of this time.

My Brooklyn, NYC property didn't cash flow in 2004, but today, it cash flows $5,000 per month.

Bob's CT Property did get some appreciation, but the increase is something like $300k more than what he paid for it.

My Brooklyn, NYC property is worth $3 Million more than what I paid for it.

The one issue that is not being talked about is where do you want to live? This needs to be factored in.

Bob, unfortunately, in 2004, loved living in Manhattan. He rented an apartment for about $2k at that time when he made the purchase of his CT cash flowing properties.

Bob thought it was great that his $2k apartment was being subsidized by the $1k cash flow he was making per month from these CT properties.

HOWEVER, what Bob didn't take into account was the rent appreciation that would have eventually happened in NYC.

Bob's CT properties did not significantly increase over the 18 years.

HOWEVER, Bob's rent where he lived DID skyrocketed over the 18 years!

Bob, who was paying $2k a month in Rent in Manhattan, is now pay $5k per month today.

He went from a net of $2k rent minus $1k of Cash Flow to $5k rent minus $1k cash flow.

In other words, Bob's impact to his living costs went in exactly the wrong direction.

Not only that, Bob became priced out of the market in NYC.

He could have afforded to buy a property in 2004. But today, that is completely impossible.

Contrasting this with my own scenario, I am not only cash flowing $5k more than what I was in 2004, but my Appreciation is approximately $3 Million more.

The theme here is that if you really want to live in a highly appreciating City, which now seems to be EVERY desireable City everywhere around the US and the world, from NYC to Austin, even cheap places in PA and the boondocks of Florida seems to be completely priced out for many of the CASH FLOW Investors here, you should FIRST buy in the place you want to live in forever.

The problem with buying out of the area you wish to eventually settle roots into is that you may get priced out completely, even if you are building a cash flowing portfolio.

Something to think about.

Buy your first property, rental or otherwise, in the area where you are most likely to build your Roots.

There is a huge difference between those of my family, 90% of them, that did not invest or buy their home in the area where they live, and myself.

My Partners and I own 10 small multi-family properties in Brooklyn, NYC. This is where our families settled down.

The 10% of us who bought in Brooklyn, are incredibly lucky. We secured our homes forever. WE cannot be priced out.

The 90% is like "Bob".

My advice, don't be like "Bob."

At least buy the home you want in the area you want.

Investor Llew


LOL. Too many Bob,  in 2004, 2012, today, and 10 years from now. By the time they realize they made the wrong choice, it’s too late. 

Post: California Vs Out of State (really, but why?)

David SongPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Redwood City, CA
  • Posts 675
  • Votes 884
Quote from @Bruce Woodruff:
Quote from @David Song:

We all know that in the past, Cali was the bomb. We're talking about the next 15 years...... Lots of variables here, way too many to really have even an informed opinion.


Almost identical debate 10 years ago. For the future, each person shall make their own investment decision. I am simply saying my decision is stay within Bay Area. That was my decision 10 years ago. That is also my decision today.

In another 10 years, we shall come back and revisit this debate. I am sure there will be another batch of new investors claiming that Bay Area is too expensive.

Post: California Vs Out of State (really, but why?)

David SongPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Redwood City, CA
  • Posts 675
  • Votes 884
Quote from @James Hamling:
Quote from @Osazee Edebiri:
Quote from @Zach Cohen:

I am a new investor in the San Diego area and I am weary of investing here/ California for multiple reasons.... the income tax on rentals is high... like the above poster stated the tenants can essentially squat here with out paying rent and landlords have no rights... and this is not the same California of even 5 years ago. The state is overrun by crime and homelessness, people are leaving this state in a mass exodus as are corporations. 

Agreed, some nasty issues, but do you think there is another state that beats California in 15 years and why? 

Stating the negatives of Cali doesn’t mean that other states will beat it in 15 even with those issues.

 Another state that beats CA with 15yr Len's, there is about 42 of them, take your pick. 

Look, first and foremost, look at your median home price. It's so high, how much appreciation can happen? To argue they can considerably appreciate is to argue that wages can by 3x/4x national average in CA. Why would any co. with half-a-wit have there operations in a place where production cost will be a multiplier higher? 

Silicon valley is in process of relocation, along with countless other CA based operations for this exact fact. 

CA is arguably seen it's peak. There is a long list of major issues starting to pop up, water is just 1. Not to mention there is a very real probability that CA will no longer be "CA" in 15 yrs, very good chance it will be 2 separate states. It's at the final mile for this to happen and the water issue could be the final straw that breaks the issue. 

Countless other states that have a lot of growth happening, and on the horizon to come. CA, are we to believe it has another 30% growth over next 15yrs? How? 

I do not know if you have invested in Bay Area before. In terms of salary, one of my tenant renting a 3bed1.5bath house in south San Francisco, earns over 320k as a fresh college graduate. Majority of my tenants earns over 10k per month, even with construction job and cleaning job. Annual family income of 120 k is considered low income and eligible for subsidized housing.

I used to hire a migrant demolition guy, who left US about 5 years ago. His son and daughter remained in US. His son, jose, took over the operation at the age of 19 years old. He earns about 8 k/mo by doing demo job and some excavation job. His wife can easily earn about 3-5k. Those are 20 year old non college educated kids. 

What lies in the future is open for debate, but what happened in the past is already clear. At this moment, I still believe that Bay Area is the best RE location in the US. Bought 4 properties this year, over 3 m total.

Post: California Vs Out of State (really, but why?)

David SongPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Redwood City, CA
  • Posts 675
  • Votes 884
Quote from @Tony Kim:
Quote from @Jay Hinrichs:
Quote from @Matthew Crivelli:

California offers high property taxes, tenant friendly laws to a fault, ENDLESS regulations and more volatility than anywhere in the country. Old timer type wisdom would tell you to invest elsewhere and I would have to agree.


property taxs are not high in CA..  they are high in TX  IL and other states but not CA.  And not sure about volatility either although 08 meltdown cental valley and  Eastern LA got hammered at the same rate that  PhX  LV  FLA  GA got hammered .  Tenant rights is an issue though on the West coast.  It will be interesting to see where it all goes in the coming years.. I grew up in Cupertino and well my parents bought our home in the mid 65s for 25k  and well its worth probably 3 mil today.. so thats one positive about what has happened in Ca.. and I have benefited personally in the appreciation game in CA.. I bought a property ( Bare land ) for 30k in 96 in Sonoma county never touched it and sold 2020 for 2 mil.. thats not bad. I could have bought a rental for 30k some where and probably made net 400 a month maybe  or 5k a year profit times 24 years thats 120k profit and the rental is worth 80k today in those markets and probably would have spent 40k over those 24 years minimum on cap ex.. So which is better ???

Biggest mistake my parents made was to sell their prime Manhattan Beach home. Per Zillow and Redfin, the house is now worth an estimated $5 million. If they had kept the home, they would be paying property taxes based on an assessment value of around 500K IMO. Talk about low property taxes! Of course, they had no way of knowing MB would be the de facto location for rich people living in Southern California. But it's amazing how this false narrative about Californians paying high property taxes keeps getting perpetuated (kinda like California being broke). What makes property taxes even more insanely low in CA is if you are 55 or older, you can sell your primary home and buy a new one and transfer your base year value to avoid a sudden jump in taxes based on your new assessed value.


 Too many examples like that. Most Bay Area investors I personally know are strongly against OOS investing, whereas BP thinks OOS is the smartest invention in the world. One old couple who owned an apartment in San Bruno told me that they lost everything in their Las Vegas apartment, whereas the san bruno one performed way better during the 2009 recession.

Looking back 13 years, if I invested anywhere other than Bay Area, my net worth would be less than half, probably 60%-70% less. The OOS advocates today, making the same argument that persisted on BP for over a decade, still do not realize that their theory has already been proven wrong by the recent history. Nobody can predict future, but the past 10-year history has already been written. It’s not hard to do a retrospective analysis and find out that any Bay Area investors over the past 10 years are big winners. 

Post: California Vs Out of State (really, but why?)

David SongPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Redwood City, CA
  • Posts 675
  • Votes 884
Quote from @Dan H.:
Quote from @David Song:
Quote from @David Song:
Quote from @Osazee Edebiri:

I think the constant discussion of California vs anywhere else is intriguing. So I pose a question. Hypothetical, if a person had a  2 million dollars to invest, they purchased property with 1 million in California and 1 million in any other state, which would perform better after 15 years and why? 

This assumes anything and everything will happen, which is the real life case anyway.  I am not automatically assuming California will perform better just because I live here in the Bay Area. I think someone may have interesting incite to why another state could out perform California property in the next 15 years.

This question has been debated on BP for over a 
This question has been debated on BP over a decade. About 10 years ago, I made the decision to stay in CA Bay Area, rather than OOS. Looking back, that decision certainly paid off big time. I am curious about those folks decided to go OOS 10 years ago, how are they doing. I am sure they are doing fine, with the nationwide appreciation in the recent years. But I would love to know if they regretted their decision.



Around 20 years ago we purchased two OOS properties. I loved the location of both but especially one on the sand at Gulf Shores Alabama. The other was lake front in Alabama. We sold them both because our San Diego RE was performing far better. Two hurricanes hitting the Gulf Shore RE in consecutive years was also a factor on us selling that property. The properties were not appreciating like San Diego. the cash flow was going in the wrong direction because the STR rents were not going up as fast as the property tax and insurance. Our insurance on the Gulf Shores property went up something like ten fold in just a few years (going from memory). There were two large claims for the damage from the hurricanes.

There are times that I wish we had kept the Gulf Shores property, but it is not because I believe it would have produced better return than the San Diego properties.  It is because a duplex like that does not exist in Southern Ca and, if it did, it would be >$10m.  

Our San Diego properties have produced great returns.  The rents compared to purchase price is incredible.  The appreciation has been incredible.  The property tax is very reasonable especially on the longer hold properties (thanks prop 13).  The insurance has increased at reasonable rate.  


Thanks for sharing your experience. Personally, I know friends who sold their Bay Area property and move to Las Vegas. They missed about 1 M in appreciation over the last decade. That is for only 1 property.

 Today, I see a lot of new investors repeating the same investing philosophy that those OOS advocates made 10 years ago. They only believes in cash flow, not appreciation. They believe cash flow is real, appreciation is just a dream.

At least from my investment experience over the last 13 years, the real world outcome is contradictory to their belief.

Cash flow is superficial, appreciation is the real deal. Your investment outcome will largely dependent on the regional appreciation, not its cash flow. Cash flow can be affected by accidental incidence, like a stolen AC, a bad tenant, etc. Whereas appreciation is not. Ten years ago, if you buy a property in Bay Area, no matter how bad the cash flow was, and how bad the tenant was, you will at least triple your property value. 1 M property purchased in 2012, 200k down, now 3m. How much return is that? What kind of cash flow can compare to that kind of appreciation?

The best investment is usually with the least cash flow, contrary to what is preached on BP.  The only regret I have is that I should not focus that much on cash flow 10 years ago. Instead, I should have bought property with negative cash flow in better neighborhood.

Post: California Vs Out of State (really, but why?)

David SongPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Redwood City, CA
  • Posts 675
  • Votes 884
Quote from @Osazee Edebiri:
Quote from @David Song:
Quote from @David Song:
Quote from @Osazee Edebiri:

I think the constant discussion of California vs anywhere else is intriguing. So I pose a question. Hypothetical, if a person had a  2 million dollars to invest, they purchased property with 1 million in California and 1 million in any other state, which would perform better after 15 years and why? 

This assumes anything and everything will happen, which is the real life case anyway.  I am not automatically assuming California will perform better just because I live here in the Bay Area. I think someone may have interesting incite to why another state could out perform California property in the next 15 years.

This question has been debated on BP for over a 
This question has been debated on BP over a decade. About 10 years ago, I made the decision to stay in CA Bay Area, rather than OOS. Looking back, that decision certainly paid off big time. I am curious about those folks decided to go OOS 10 years ago, how are they doing. I am sure they are doing fine, with the nationwide appreciation in the recent years. But I would love to know if they regretted their decision.



 Yes David, that is the question, if someone moved out of state was moving a better decision in terms of investment. Life might make someone move, but if they choose to move because they thought they would perform better, that's what I want to hear results for. 

I still remember the interesting debate 10 years ago. So many people wants to go OOS, buy cheap 50k house in Midwest. At that time, I was also debating whether I should go OOS. I visited Las Vegas a few times to check out their market. Not much better than Hayward at that time.

I decided at that time to stay local, buying 1-2 properties per year. That is what I did over the past 10 years. 

Post: California Vs Out of State (really, but why?)

David SongPosted
  • Real Estate Broker
  • Redwood City, CA
  • Posts 675
  • Votes 884
Quote from @David Song:
Quote from @Osazee Edebiri:

I think the constant discussion of California vs anywhere else is intriguing. So I pose a question. Hypothetical, if a person had a  2 million dollars to invest, they purchased property with 1 million in California and 1 million in any other state, which would perform better after 15 years and why? 

This assumes anything and everything will happen, which is the real life case anyway.  I am not automatically assuming California will perform better just because I live here in the Bay Area. I think someone may have interesting incite to why another state could out perform California property in the next 15 years.

This question has been debated on BP for over a 
This question has been debated on BP over a decade. About 10 years ago, I made the decision to stay in CA Bay Area, rather than OOS. Looking back, that decision certainly paid off big time. I am curious about those folks decided to go OOS 10 years ago, how are they doing. I am sure they are doing fine, with the nationwide appreciation in the recent years. But I would love to know if they regretted their decision.