Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Dan H.

Dan H. has started 31 posts and replied 6408 times.

Post: To rent or sell? - Looking in Novato and San Rafael CA

Dan H.
#1 General Landlording & Rental Properties Contributor
Posted
  • Investor
  • Poway, CA
  • Posts 6,533
  • Votes 7,604
Quote from @Paloma Wodehouse:

Hi Dan, 

Thank you for bringing this up. I did further research and this zone is very ADU friendly. One set back is that one of the rooms is not permitted. That said, the below information states we should be ok to create either a duplex or JADU, plus future detached ADU. Let me know if there's anything else I might be missing? Thank you!

  • Conventional Financing: You’ll still qualify for conventional financing when you refinance. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac allow:
    • Single-family with 1 ADU classification, OR

    • 2–4 unit multi-family classification (duplex/triplex), both of which are eligible for conventional loans.

  • Refi & Resale: Future refinancing and buyer financing are not an issue as long as you stay ≤4 units. When you go to sell, a buyer could use an FHA, VA, or conventional loan depending on occupancy.


    A SFH with multiple ADUs is not a triplex. After splitting the SFH, you WILL have a single family home with likely a JADU and when you add the ADU, you have 2 ADUs. This is all allowed by various state laws. As indicated, I have seen inconsistent application of the rule against conventional financing for multiple ADUs and it does seem arbitrary that you can conventionally finance a triplex but by rule cannot get conventional financing on a SFH with multiple ADUs.

    Note if your zoning allows for a triplex, you could upgrade to a triplex, but it is likely the fees will be greater than the ADU route.

    You may qualify for a lot split. 

    You need to know the ramifications of any decision.   You may want to consult with a trusted expert.

    Good luck

    Post: Tenants threatening at move-in

    Dan H.
    #1 General Landlording & Rental Properties Contributor
    Posted
    • Investor
    • Poway, CA
    • Posts 6,533
    • Votes 7,604
    Quote from @Carlos Lez:

    Esteemed colleagues,

    I’m facing a tough situation and would appreciate your perspective.

    On August 9th, three students (with their parents as guarantors) placed a deposit on my 3-bedroom Victorian near a college campus. As is common here, the prime leasing season is July through mid-August, and once school starts, demand drops off sharply. Accordingly, I removed the unit from the market after their deposit.

    Their lease start date was today, August 16, 2025. However, when they arrived with their parents for move-in, they “freaked out.” This is an older Victorian (not a modern apartment), but it is clean, habitable, and up to code. The students had toured it in person before applying. We take pride in maintaining our properties, though of course, they aren’t new construction.

    The tenants are now refusing to pay first month’s rent and sent the following notice citing habitability issues under California law (Civil Code §1941.1 and implied warranty of habitability). Their claims include:

    • Mold and old food around stove
    • Mold on walls
    • Blood stains, dead insects, dust throughout
    • Dirty stove/microwave, bathroom unsanitary
    • Windows unclean with missing/damaged screens
    • General filth, unswept floors
    • Showerhead replacement needed

    They are demanding deep cleaning, mold remediation, replacement of window screens, painting, etc. and state they will withhold rent until this is completed. They’ve also threatened complaints to the local housing authority/code enforcement.

    From my perspective:

    • The unit was cleaned and is habitable.
    • It’s not new, but it was shown in person before application, and the condition hasn’t materially changed since.
    • We pride ourselves on keeping units up to code and in good repair.

    My concerns:

    1. I held the property for them during peak leasing season and may now be stuck with a vacancy.
    2. They’re making demands that feel like buyer’s remorse rather than legitimate habitability issues.
    3. They are refusing to pay move-in rent, even though they signed a lease and provided a deposit.

    Questions for the community:

    • How would you handle this?
    • Is this a case where I should meet their demands hoping this will not continue , or is it better to cut losses and move on?
    • Has anyone dealt with similar “last-minute” habitability disputes where tenants change their minds after committing?

    Any input on best practices or legal/strategic next steps would be greatly appreciated.


     I see by mutual agreement the lease has been terminated.  I suspect this was best option for all parties.

    None of those items other than potentially the mold is cause for breaking a lease.   A place does not have to be clean to rent it,   The walls do not need to be freshly pained assuming it is not flaking lead paint.   The shower head does not need to work perfectly.

    However, addressing those items will help obtain higher quality tenants at maximum rent.

    At a minimum, I would get a good cleaning crew in there.   Request they especially address any areas with mildew.   I would also replace the shower head if it is not functioning correctly.  Analyze whether painting is necessary. 

    Once you have it cleaned, list it for rent unless you receive something official such as red tag that indicates you cannot rent the unit.  

    Good luck

    Post: To rent or sell? - Looking in Novato and San Rafael CA

    Dan H.
    #1 General Landlording & Rental Properties Contributor
    Posted
    • Investor
    • Poway, CA
    • Posts 6,533
    • Votes 7,604
    Quote from @Paloma Wodehouse:

    Very thoughtful and insightful replies, thank you all. We believe we've found a good SFH that we can renovate / split in half to rent out both sides. The plan would be to do this first (live in one unit still), rent out the other and then refinance so we can then pull some more money out to build a new ADU in the back of the house.

    As you all alluded to, new investors can be surprised by the many fees. While we know we can afford the mortgage, closing costs, and insurance, the renovations will need to go a slowly since we don't have much capital (and need to make sure to keep some for emergency funds). Do you recommend a budgeting system to easily keep track of monthly fees + construction costs? I know we need to find a CPA that works with real estate investors asap to help with these things as well. All your expertise is so very much appreciated. It's taken us some time to save up enough money to be able to buy our first investment property, so we definitely want to make sure we do it right. 

    As far as investing out of state - That is definitely something we're interested in, but since my husband can save us quite a lot of money by working on the house himself (and will have his contracting license very soon), we feel investing at home is the best first step. 


     Is the current unit you are creating by the split going to be classified as a JADU?   Is the area already zoned for MF?

    Make sure you know/understand the conventional financing rules (Fannie/freddie).   2 ADUs are not allowed for conventional financing by rule, but I have seen inconsistent enforcement.   If you are adding 2 ADUs, recognize that conventional financing may not be available.   Even if you get the conventional financing on your refinance, recognize that it may not be available for a future refi or when you go to sell the property.


    >will have his contracting license very soon

    I believe statewide, owner builders are exempt from needing a contractors license.  I  In addition, W2 workers of the owner do not need to be licensed.  However, there are some recent disclosure rules for non contractor upgrades/enhancements at time of sale.  

    good luck

    Post: To rent or sell? - Looking in Novato and San Rafael CA

    Dan H.
    #1 General Landlording & Rental Properties Contributor
    Posted
    • Investor
    • Poway, CA
    • Posts 6,533
    • Votes 7,604

    I agree with the sentiment expressed by @Nicholas L., it is a tough market.

    However I believe cash flow is possible with one or more of the following:

    - off market, below retail purchase

    - value add without an extraction of the value added

    - creative financing

    - alternate rent strategy (STR, MTR, rent by room)

    - patience

    - low leverage

    All of those require work, have risk, historically produce low return, or take more time than I desire.

    However, looking at the list you are better situated for the value add than most investors.   Having a husband that is a carpenter not only can save on carpentry, but he likely has contacts for many of the trades.

    The alternate rent models are more effort than traditional LTR, but it can produce more income.   

    Buy 2 units (duplex or SFH with ADU) that is in need of rehab. Move into the better unit and quickly rehab the worse unit. Then use one of the alternate rent models to optimize income. Rehab the other unit while living in the unit.

    I am not implying this is easy or without sacrifices.   I am implying this approach can maximize returns.  There will likely be times that are not easy.   Living in a construction zone is not going to be easy.

    Go in aware.   Many people think all tenants are good, there is good cash flow on turn key LTR leveraged purchases, there are no vacancies and associated tenant flips, that all components in a property last forever, that property tax and insurance cannot increase significantly.  In short, many people under estimate the effort involved in being a landlord.

    Good luck

    Post: Potential tenant sneaking in a service dog?

    Dan H.
    #1 General Landlording & Rental Properties Contributor
    Posted
    • Investor
    • Poway, CA
    • Posts 6,533
    • Votes 7,604

    Lying on an application voids their application.  I get threatened with lawsuit slightly regularly.   I have never been sued for anything related to RE.

    Issue in your case is an ESA is not considered a pet.  If you ask if they have a pet, the answer can be no but they have an ESA.


    fortunately you have applicants that applied prior to perspective tenant with the ESA. 

     By the way I use PetScreening.com.   They claim to flag bogus ESAs.  I personally believe they do not do great at this, but if the tenant believes they do a good job at detecting bogus ESAs, the tenant will not apply and risk their application fee if they have bogus ESA. It is easier for them to apply somewhere that does not check for a bogus ESA.

    Good luck

    Post: Is anyone still expanding the portfolio of STRs?

    Dan H.
    #1 General Landlording & Rental Properties Contributor
    Posted
    • Investor
    • Poway, CA
    • Posts 6,533
    • Votes 7,604

    We Placed an offer today on a cabin that if the offer is accepted will be an STR.

    The underwriting on this purchase is leaner than any property that I have ever purchased.   So why did I make an offer?

    - RE is challenging everywhere

    - the itch to purchase got over whelming.   

    - it is a nice luxury cabin in the sierras.   The area has a lot of giant sequoias including one of the biggest in the world, a nice river, a cute little town, and I know a very competent (understatement) co-host that serves that area.

    - it is near turn key.  This is a rarity for my purchases.   With greater effort/risk I should get greater return.  This being near turn key, it should have lower return.

    - my family can use it and if the $hit ever hits the fan, we have a place to escape to.

    This definitely is not a home run purchase. My underwriting shows IRR after a couple years that exceeds the S&P lifetime by an ok margin. More of a base hit on a luxury cabin that I will be proud to own.

    In addition most people consider my underwriting conservative (I consider it slightly conservative). For example, I used $500/month maintenance/cap ex which I consider my best estimate but most would consider conservative.

    Expected stabilized monthly rent ratio is 2.1% (yearly 25.3%).  As indicated it is a tough market so in this market, I consider this pretty good in a location I want to own.  I would definitely pass if this was not a location that I want to own or if I did not have a good co-host in that area.

    Good luck

    Post: What’s Your Most Valuable Lesson From a Rehab or Flip?

    Dan H.
    #1 General Landlording & Rental Properties Contributor
    Posted
    • Investor
    • Poway, CA
    • Posts 6,533
    • Votes 7,604
    Quote from @Jules Aton:

    Great points. My most basic thought is that the money is made when you buy not when you sell. And in most cases a quality neighborhood is worth the premium. 

    >And in most cases a quality neighborhood is worth the premium.

     #1) Higher psf areas have the potential to add more value.   A year ago I did a rehab in an area with ~$2k psf value.   I added a half bathroom using existing footage.  Comps show this half bathroom added $50k value.  How much value do you think a half bathroom added can add in a market where the psf is $100?


    #2) Older properties cost more to rehab.   Lathe and plaster is difficult and heavy.   Plumbing and electrical work is expensive.   Replacement windows are expensive.   Older units need more work. 

    good luck

    Post: Keep a negative cash flowing condo in this market?

    Dan H.
    #1 General Landlording & Rental Properties Contributor
    Posted
    • Investor
    • Poway, CA
    • Posts 6,533
    • Votes 7,604
    Quote from @William Hudson:

    Hi all,
    First time poster, long time listener of the various BP pods. 

    I own a 2/1 condo in unincorporated Jeffco just outside of Golden, CO proper. Have had it for a year, and bought it to occupy with my fiancée before upgrading to an SFH.

    Plan was to hang onto the condo with a tenant in it and hold for small cashflow and appreciation due to the desirability of Golden (we have a golden address and many don’t even realize we aren’t in the city). The average sale price in our zip was nearly $1 million at the time of purchase last year- it’s now down about 9% per Redfin. 

    At this time last year-  units in the complex were renting for $1750/1800, which was about the same as my mortgage payment + condo fees. 

    Today, similar units are renting as low as $1550-1600, while my mortgage + HOA fee is nearing $1950 monthly.

    Obviously , the market has turned south AND the complex has increased monthly fees, along with adding a special assessment. The HOA is extremely incompetent- they only allow cronies of its president onto the board. The fee is $500 monthly for no amenities of any kind (the pool was filled in with concrete in the 1990's). The parking lot is riddled with potholes. The exterior stairways and landings are in very poor shape. abandoned / unregistered cars sit in the parking lot, homeless sometimes camp out, etc.

    On top of this, our little sub market is being discovered. New luxury rental buildings have come online, one just broke ground half a mile away, and another is approved and will go up right next door (200 rental units). It is in a “path of progress” as far as being the cheapest area of a very expensive, desirable town. 

    Choices are:

    A. I paid $259k, and could realistically unload it for $225k today. 


    B. Or I could rent it out and negative cash flow at roughly $325/month. 

    My concerns: 

    There is a real risk of a even higher negative cash flow after the next budget is rubber stamped. The complex also lost FHA status due to it having far more tenant occupied units than owner occupied (they don't official track this, violating their own by-laws).

     Conventional loans are still possible, but harder to get because the master insurance policy on the roof is inadequate.

    Finally, reserves are very low.  The building is 50 years old and full of deferred maintenance.  Many owners bought a long time ago and aren’t involved in the management of the community.  

    Short term rentals under 30 days aren’t allowed. Some owners appear to try advertising 30 day+ stays on various platforms. 

    For a “TLDR”:


    Should I keep a condo in a gentrifying area, but in a very troubled complex, and bank on future appreciation? This would lose $325 a month, and probably a lot more after the next budget is ratified. It would likely take years for my value to recover in real $ to the purchase price, let alone higher  

    Or should I “rip off the band aid,” and unload a condo that negative cash flows and likely will for the foreseeable future given the state of the Denver market, as well as new, much nicer units being built in the immediate area?    I’d lose about $50k doing this. 

    For what it’s worth, an agent thinks I should hang onto it. There are 8-9 other units in the complex for sale currently, all of which have had price cuts or fallen out of contract. 

    Thank you for any insights you may have and sorry for being long winded. I felt the nuance of the condo issues were germane to the choice here. 


     In my underwriting I use the conservative number in any range.  This places your cash flow far worse than your calculation.

    $1550 (rent) - $38 (2.5% vacancy based on local vacancy rate) - 1950 (piti + HOA) - $200 (maintenance/cap ex) - $155 (pm all inclusive - even if self managing allocate for cost as your time has value) = negative $793

    This negative cash flow projection has to be combined with the various HOA issues.

    I have posted numerous times that building wealth is about total return and the best cash flow over long holds is in markets with highest rent growth.   There is a strong correlation between appreciation and rent growth.  The analysis therefore must include appreciation forecasts.

    Golden has pretty good long term appreciation, but its near term appreciation has not been good relative to other markets (it is not that golden has been poor, but other markets have done great).   

    https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/co/golden/real-estate

    So the question is will the appreciation be able to over come the negative cash flow and HOA issues. I personally would feel more comfortable if the recent appreciation was at least average. Because the near term appreciation is below average, I likely would sell (I virtually never sell) and cut the losses.


    good luck

    Post: If This Were Your Property — How Would You Make It Pay Off?

    Dan H.
    #1 General Landlording & Rental Properties Contributor
    Posted
    • Investor
    • Poway, CA
    • Posts 6,533
    • Votes 7,604
    Quote from @Anthony T.:

    Hi BP Community!

    Long time lurker, first time poster. I’ve appreciated the information this community has shared and hope to tap into the knowledge base to get guidance on leveraging our existing property.

    My brother and I own a multifamily rental property that our father transferred to us in 2021. Because he transferred it to us, we are subject to potential capital gains.

    Property is 4 units (duplex, house, cottage) with a remaining mortgage of $390K at a great rate (3.5% / 30yr fixed). Property appraised for $2.7M in 2021. Before taking over, our father had kept rents below market in favor of keeping long term tenants. We generate solid cash flow and our cap rate based on FMV is <3%. Property is in ok shape - built before 1990. The duplex and house are decent but I'm worried the cottage may require investment in the near future.

    We both live in California, the property is in our name as joint owners. Our experience in real estate has been managing this property ourselves. The property is in Silicon Valley close to tech companies and is in a prime location where there is strong housing demand.

    We're exploring the best ways to leverage our property and are especially focused on opportunities that can generate wealth and a one-time ROI. That said, we're also interested in hearing creative ideas—especially if they could provide strong, sustainable cash flow over the long term.

    Here are some of scenarios we’ve been contemplating:

    Option 1: Develop the land and build 6 (or more) multifamily units. I'm thinking of townhomes 3BR/3Ba ~1500 sqft. We're zoned for that many units at a minimum as I have spoken to the city. I have seen lots of similar size and zoning develop projects like this. We realize this would be a huge undertaking and we would need to bring in a lot of expertise to help lead development. I have spoken to a couple of lenders and it seems our biggest challenge would be bringing ~20% of construction costs to the table as capital. Broad strokes, I believe this scenario has the biggest ROI potential from one project however this will come with big challenges including capital, expertise, and risk.

    Option 2: Pursue the same as Option 1 but just entitle the land and sell it / reinvest.

    Option 3: Explore subdividing the lot and build individual SFRs? I am not sure about zoning restrictions for something like this. My understanding is SFR construction is less expensive. Would this be any different from Option 1? I am not sure what our financing options are for this scenario.

    Option 4: Leverage the equity via HELOC/cash out refi for further real estate investment. I believe we have a lot of leverage here so we could grow the portfolio significantly. I've read about DSCR options and feel like we could easily qualify and bring capital to reinvest elsewhere.

    Option 5: Same as Option 4 but house hack a multifamily property for my brother to live in as a primary residence.

    I’d love to hear your thoughts on the different ways we could approach this. If anyone is open to connecting, I’d appreciate the chance to talk it through. We don’t feel we are leveraging our situation to its maximum and with so many options, it’s been overwhelming. It would be helpful to get a reality check on what makes the most sense so we can narrow in on a strategy.

    San Jose is up ~45% over last 5 years (source neighborhoodscout) but the last couple years have been better than the start of the 5 year period.  This implies your property s almost certainly valued at significantly more than $2.7m.  You may be looking at a valuation near $3.5m.   

    https://www.neighborhoodscout.com/ca/san-jose/real-estate

    it does not help your gains tax, but it does imply that you likely have significant equity to leverage in what ever you decide.

    i am a big fan of sophisticated value adds.  I define sophisticated value adds as primarily  knowledge based versus actually doing the work and have the risk of rehabs/development.  I once had my value add being a law that was passed the legislation and recognizing what this lawwould do to valuations of certain properties.   My first protege sold a property for $1.5m that had current use value below $1m due to a recently changed/resvinded ADU bonus density program (before it was changed).  No rehab or development required.   This means no risk and little effort.

    good luck

    Post: Looking for Ideas to Reduce High Negative Cash Flow – 2-Unit

    Dan H.
    #1 General Landlording & Rental Properties Contributor
    Posted
    • Investor
    • Poway, CA
    • Posts 6,533
    • Votes 7,604
    Quote from @Miguel Alvarez:
    Quote from @Dan H.:
    Quote from @Miguel Alvarez:

    I’ve got a 2-unit in San Diego that’s bleeding cash:

    • $10K/month all-in expenses (mortgage + MI + other costs)

    • $7.5K/month in rent income

    • Locked at 5.5% interest

    • Can’t raise rents for another year, and local rents are trending down

    Even with future rent bumps, I’m years away from breaking even.

    Possible moves I’ve thought about: 

    - Short-term rentals

    - Expanding the units (lot space available), or adding a second story (to create more units). 

    I don’t have blueprints, so building would mean paying to get plans drawn.

    What would you do in my shoes? Looking for any and all creative, outside-the-box ideas.


     San Diego is my market.  Retail purchases without a value add with traditional financing requires patience to have cash flow as an LTR.

    Seeing the purchase has already made, you will not be getting a desperate seller to sell off market below market price or good alternative financing.

    That leaves

    - value add: for you first effort you likely will not be adding much value in excess of costs. ADUs in San Diego have achieved terrible valuation. Value adds require work and have risks.   I would only recommend this route if you were planning on doing more than just this project.

    - alternate rent models: STR, MTR, rent by room. I have not done rent by room in many years but my son is currently doing it to live at reduced housing costs. Each tenant equates to additional work. If you rent a full unit, the tenant drama within the unit is not typically your concern. That is not the case when the LL rents by the room. It can produce better income. MTR and STR also require more effort than LTR. If you have a good location and unit and can be an outstanding host, you can have income that exceeds LTR by enough to justify the effort. I believe most units/hosts will not meet each of those criteria and will be challenged to exceed LTR income by enough to justify the additional work.

    That leaves patience.   Virtually every residential purchase in San Diego looks great 10 years after the purchase.   Some look great much sooner than 10 years.. Getting to that point when every month is costing you money is the challenge.

    Curious what sort of underwriting you did prior to purchase?  Were you aware MF is rent controlled?  Are your units below market rent?  If you are city of San Diego, did you account for the new trash fee?   You are likely at least 5 years and likely more from being cash neutral.   If you are below market rent and a tenant vacates it could be faster.

    Mostly I ask these questions in hopes of educating other newbie RE investors.

    Because the expensive cap ex items last many years, I fear your expenses likely do not allocate properly for these costs and your cash flow is worse than you realize.

    I believe the current market is challenging.   Most local listings on the mls will have challenges similar to what you are experiencing.

    Good luck

    Thanks so much for taking the time to write such a thorough and educative response — I really value insight from someone who’s actively operating in the San Diego market.

    For context:

    • I knew about rent increase limits going in, but didn’t expect to have to drop my rents as much as I did at the start. When I first listed, demand wasn’t strong enough and I wasn’t attracting favorable tenants. On top of that, I started having people break in to squat at night, which pushed me to secure tenants quickly.

    • I landed at about 12.5% below my projected rents. Thankfully, the tenants I ended up with have been great — they do STR/MTR rentals themselves (I allow subleasing).

    • According to Rentometer, my units are still under market. I’ve also tried the BiggerPockets rent estimator, but the confidence interval was low. If there’s a more reliable local rent comp tool you’d recommend, I’m all ears.

    • My $9,300 monthly total is the actual all-in payment, but I round to $10K for analysis to account for property tax increases, landscaping, and now the new trash fee.

    • The property is in Grant Hill — not the easiest neighborhood, but it's still pulling STR/MTR demand (budget-conscious visitors to SD, mostly).

    • I was also banking on more favorable interest rate cuts along with continued appreciation — both of which didn’t play out as quickly as I expected, throwing off my original projections.

    Regarding your question on my underwriting prior to purchase — can you clarify what you mean specifically? I want to make sure I’m understanding/learning fully.

    I’m willing to put more capital into the property if it means shortening the negative cash flow period. From your experience:

    • Have you seen STR or MTR operators in similar neighborhoods pull enough premium to materially close this kind of gap?

    • Any value-add plays short of a full ADU build that have actually penciled out recently?

    • Strategies you’ve seen for bridging cash flow in a soft rent market without over-leveraging?

    • And if you were in my shoes, would you stay the course, avoid major changes, and just let time do the work?

    Really appreciate your perspective — this kind of detailed, reality-based feedback is gold.

    Why was your rent estimate off by 12.5%?   fortunately you found good tenants.

     Rentometer is my preferred rent estimation tool, but I do not simply use their number.  I have Rentometer pro and eliminate included comps if they are not a decent comp for any reason.  BP pro has a deal for Rentometer pro   I forgot the exact details.

    >My $9,300 monthly total is the actual all-in payment, but I round to $10K for analysis to account for property tax increases, landscaping, and now the new trash fee

    Using actuals prior to large cap ex items hitting end of life means you are under estimating the expenses.   In your underwriting how did you estimate the maintenance and cap ex?

    >I’m willing to put more capital into the property if it means shortening the negative cash flow period. 

    buying the cash flow produces a poor return.  You are likely better off keeping this extra money for reserves and suffering the negative cash flow

    >I was also banking on more favorable interest rate cut

    Interest rates have fallen but with your rat being 5.5% I think it is unlikely that a rate reduction will help you any time soon.

    >Have you seen STR or MTR operators in similar neighborhoods pull enough premium to materially close this kind of gap

    I do not have experience of STRs in such a lower cost area.   I suspect it would be a challenge.  My STRs are in Mission Beach and Pt Loma.

    >Any value-add plays short of a full ADU build that have actually penciled out recently?

    The best value adds are property specific.  It would be challenging to purchase a property without an identified value add and then to identify a worth while value add.

    >Strategies you’ve seen for bridging cash flow in a soft rent market without over-leveraging?

    Similar to the value add, such strategies are typically property specific and identified prior to purchase. I think it is unlikely that STR or MTR will work in that area. I suspect you can make rent by room work, but the effort will be higher than your current effort.

    >And if you were in my shoes, would you stay the course, avoid major changes, and just let time do the work

    I am fairly pro San Diego RE and believe virtually all acquisitions look good if held 10 years.   However, buying in one of the lowest class areas in the city means all the issues with lower class areas.  Even if it looks good at 10 years, you likely would have dealt with a lot of $hit to get there.   I would sell (I never have sold in San Diego so coming from me this is something).   I do believe if you hold 10 years and deal with all the issues, you will do fine but would it be worth dealing with all the issues and negative cash flow to get there?

    There are a lot of easier investment options available than dealing with negative cash flow in a lower class area.  By the way I used to live in encanto.  Not sure how you would compare the 2, but I think I would only rate Logan heights worse than encanto.  I know there are some good people who live in such areas.   Problem is that there are a lot of people who live on the edge.  There are people who do not take care of their rented units.  It is challenging to consistently find good tenants that also do not experience an event that makes paying rent an impossibility.


    good luck