All Forum Posts by: Harish V.
Harish V. has started 3 posts and replied 191 times.
Post: How to go after Growth Equity Group-Brett Immel, Preston Despenas

- Investor
- Fremont, CA
- Posts 195
- Votes 112
Quote from @Harish V.:
i was also one of the victims of GEG. They now are.all working under new name sdirawealth. Beware of dealing with them. Any information of how to pursue the matter with them. It's nice to see you standing for your members.
Post: Grocapitus - Anyone have experience with them?

- Investor
- Fremont, CA
- Posts 195
- Votes 112
Quote from @Harish V.:
BTW the properties are listed here on Bigger pockets:
I will like to know how people make money buying at 5.62% cap rate when 30yr mortgage is hitting 6%.
Post: Grocapitus - Anyone have experience with them?

- Investor
- Fremont, CA
- Posts 195
- Votes 112
BTW the properties are listed here on Bigger pockets:
Post: Grocapitus - Anyone have experience with them?

- Investor
- Fremont, CA
- Posts 195
- Votes 112
Quote from @William Woodring:
Update on my post
As pointed out, the initial terms on my contract in Oct 2021 were beyond industry standards. It took a posting from me fir Grocapitus to make adjustments?? What’s that say about Grocapitus and their business model.
Grocapitus had an ephipany about industry standards?
So I would assume the San Antonio project is sold out if the terms have been adjusted to be more reasonable. However, as of June 2022, I see these properties are still being advertised. When I made my earnest money deposit, in Oct, I was told production would be in 2022 and completed by 2023. That was the only production schedule I was given even though I specifically earmarked the buildings I was purchasing in the project. I was told ( I better hurry, the project is just about sold out)
As of June, the project is still selling and now the timeline has moved to the right by another year, 2023-2024. If I hadn’t got out of the project, I would have tied up $500,000 for potentially 3 years.
Industry standards are currently between earnest money to ownership is 12 months.
Grocapitus is saying it’s ok to tie up hundreds of thousands of $$ for 3 years. Incredibly poor business deal.
As for the increase in rental potential on the properties. That means nothing until the properties are sold and rented. Even with a bump of $200 in rent. That will most probably be offset by an increase in new mortgage costs and increased rates.
It seems there are still issues with the San Antonio project. I am glad I walked away. It wasn’t a good deal and since the project production keeps moving to the right and there seems to be an unlimited number of properties available, one has to wonder what’s going on. I find that amusing as I was told I was buying the last “two” buildings and I better hurry or they would be gone. I would caution any investor to beware and run the numbers independently of the spreadsheets provided by the Grocapitus sales team.
I am surprised that they let you out when you had paid the earnest money. I do wish everyone else does have better experience with Mr. Neal and company than I had. Wish anyone who invested with them best of luck. They seem to indicate now their portfolio is 1B from earlier 500M. So they have grown quite a bit.
Post: Is real estate appreciation a myth? Adjusting for inflation

- Investor
- Fremont, CA
- Posts 195
- Votes 112
Quote from @Darius Ogloza:
@Joe Villeneuve I truly do not understand your comments regarding measuring value/equity. All I know is it feels nice to hold real estate worth millions. In any event, I agree you cannot know in advance how a particular market is going to move but sufficient demographic data exists to allow you to make educated guesses about where growth is going to happen. We are invested in Northern California, Gulf Coast Florida and sunbelt (largely Las Vegas). So far, these bets have played out quite well. We sold our midwestern bets in 2014 once we fully digested the above principle and realized that capital costs were certain to outpace gains over the long run in those places.
Post: Looking for areas that have several fourplexes ?

- Investor
- Fremont, CA
- Posts 195
- Votes 112
Quote from @Brandon Vukelich:
Check out Neal Bawa and his Grocapitus, their Equinox development in Idaho Falls. That's more of syndication option but that's the only "newer" group of 4plexes I've heard of recently. I think you may be hard pressed to find 10+ available in the same neighborhood. We have communities of 4plexes in our area but unlikely that there would be 10+ motivated sellers right now. Best wishes on your
I will stay away from Neal Bawa due to my experience. Your experience may vary. Check out all sources before you proceed.
Post: Is real estate appreciation a myth? Adjusting for inflation

- Investor
- Fremont, CA
- Posts 195
- Votes 112
Quote from @Mike Dymski:
Quote from @Harish V.:
Quote from @Mike Dymski:
Quote from @Harish V.:
Quote from @Eric James:
One stated benefit of investing in real estate is price appreciation. However, if you look at inflation adjusted real estate prices for the most part there isn't much appreciation. There are specific points in time like 2006 (we know what followed that) and right now when real estate exceeds inflation adjusted prices. However, over the long term it doesn't really appear that real estate appreciates much beyond inflation. Is real estate appreciation a myth?
Look at long term studies 100yr+ you will see
Inflation is 3% range. Bonds are in same 3% range
Real estate is 6-7% range.
Stocks are in 10% range.
There are periods of divergence from this and there will be catchup. Here is bigger pockets article on this:
Bonds vs. Stocks vs. Real Estate: Which One Wins? | Blog (biggerpockets.com)
This is offcourse favoring real estate, however you can look up other indpendent sources and find that stocks normally get 10% total returns considering dividends are reinvested.
In my opinion stocks are best for passive strategies that are long term.
If an investor can only get a 6-7% total return on real estate, they definitely should invest in something else. Direct owned real estate is too much work to not achieve outpaced returns. Most of us have 20-25+% minimum IRR hurdles. Otherwise, could just invest passively with others and get returns in the teens.
The numbers I quoted are compound annual returns. If you are saying that compound annual returns of 20% are easily achieved then anyone who started with 25k in 2000 should have turned it to a 1m. Without adding any more money to it.
Also by extension, what you are saying is that govt pension funds etc which are modeling in 7.5% return and not able to achieve are fools. I sure hope CalPERs etc can adopt your model. They may be able to support all pension and even reduce taxes.
Harish, yes, 20-25+% IRR threshold. Do you invest in real estate? If so, I'm interested in your IRR experience and threshold return. Your profile says syndication experience. We can passively invest in syndications and achieve returns in the teens. So, there is no sense in investing in active direct owned real estate without a premium to that return. Incidentally, the 20-25% is about what it takes for the total return in a syndication to split returns and provide LPs with returns in the teens. It's not my model...it's most investors' models. None of us would invest in real estate for a 6-7% return...can get that with index funds/ETFs.
For my personal investments made in 2005, return is 7-8%. Anything after 2012/13 is 20% plus. Which highlights the fact that returns can be higher than trend sometimes. Other times they may br lower than trend.
i personally expect most of future return for next 10+ yrs to come from rental increases rather than appriciation. I do hope i am wrong and you are right, it only benefits me :-)
Post: Is real estate appreciation a myth? Adjusting for inflation

- Investor
- Fremont, CA
- Posts 195
- Votes 112
Quote from @Taylor L.:
There are two types of appreciation in real estate: market appreciation and forced appreciation. Market appreciation is out of our control, and is the type of appreciation you're referring to here. Market appreciation is nice to have, but since it's largely out of our control we can't put too much emphasis on it.
Real estate's advantage over Wall Street is that we have the ability to force appreciation of our properties. We can buy properties that are underperforming, fix them up, and sell for a higher value later. Only billionaire activist investors can do that on Wall Street, and even then they're rolling the dice (cough, Elon, cough).
Post: Is real estate appreciation a myth? Adjusting for inflation

- Investor
- Fremont, CA
- Posts 195
- Votes 112
Quote from @Gregory Chadwell:
From early on i was told to buy real estate as a HEDGE against inflation. The dollar seems to be chasing the peso right now. Look at the cost of everything!
Yes but hedge works due to increasing rents, values are not likely to go up. Listen to recent podcast by Ashwath Dhamodharan on this and see if you agree.
Post: Is real estate appreciation a myth? Adjusting for inflation

- Investor
- Fremont, CA
- Posts 195
- Votes 112
Quote from @Mike Dymski:
Quote from @Harish V.:
Quote from @Eric James:
One stated benefit of investing in real estate is price appreciation. However, if you look at inflation adjusted real estate prices for the most part there isn't much appreciation. There are specific points in time like 2006 (we know what followed that) and right now when real estate exceeds inflation adjusted prices. However, over the long term it doesn't really appear that real estate appreciates much beyond inflation. Is real estate appreciation a myth?
Look at long term studies 100yr+ you will see
Inflation is 3% range. Bonds are in same 3% range
Real estate is 6-7% range.
Stocks are in 10% range.
There are periods of divergence from this and there will be catchup. Here is bigger pockets article on this:
Bonds vs. Stocks vs. Real Estate: Which One Wins? | Blog (biggerpockets.com)
This is offcourse favoring real estate, however you can look up other indpendent sources and find that stocks normally get 10% total returns considering dividends are reinvested.
In my opinion stocks are best for passive strategies that are long term.
If an investor can only get a 6-7% total return on real estate, they definitely should invest in something else. Direct owned real estate is too much work to not achieve outpaced returns. Most of us have 20-25+% minimum IRR hurdles. Otherwise, could just invest passively with others and get returns in the teens.
The numbers I quoted are compound annual returns. If you are saying that compound annual returns of 20% are easily achieved then anyone who started with 25k in 2000 should have turned it to a 1m. Without adding any more money to it.
Also by extension, what you are saying is that govt pension funds etc which are modeling in 7.5% return and not able to achieve are fools. I sure hope CalPERs etc can adopt your model. They may be able to support all pension and even reduce taxes.