All Forum Posts by: Matthew McNeil
Matthew McNeil has started 31 posts and replied 686 times.
Post: Can my rental bank account be linked to my standard bank acount?

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
No problem as long as your RE assets aren't in an LLC, otherwise you've co-mingled funds. Thus you've pierced the veil regarding a major tenent of Asset Protection.
Post: Is a Home Warranty worthit

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Simple answer; No. You can do a search and read all the comments from investors who've used the warranties and realized it wasn't worth it. I consider my decision to buy warranties many years ago as the single worst mistake I've made as a REI. AS @Jason D. wrote above, The money paid to the warranty company is MORE than claims paid out.
Post: How did you raise your down payment for your first deal?

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Someone offered to sell his house to me with no down payment. He held the note until I sold the house 6 years later, which gave me a sizable amount that I used to purchase more properties.
Post: Anyone investing in Boise?

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Originally posted by @Mike Willis:
Matthew,
Do you use a property manager or do you self manage?
Thanks,
Michael
I've used the same property management company for 10+ years. They've taken excellent care of me. Lonsgest I've ever had a vacate house is 2-3 weeks.
PM me and I'll provide the contact info if you want. Cheers!
Post: Debt to income ratio

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
The debt-to-income ratio is the percentage of your gross monthly income that goes to paying your monthly debt payments. The DTI ratio is one of the metrics that lenders, including mortgage lenders, use to measure an individual's ability to manage monthly payments and repay debts.
Post: Selling Cashflowing Homes in Midwest for No-Cashflow in San Diego

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Originally posted by @Ben Wilkins:
Originally posted by @Matthew McNeil:
Originally posted by @Twana Rasoul:
So I'm in the process of trying to sell my Single Family Homes in the Midwest (Springfield IL) in order to purchase another property here in San Diego (occupied 2-4) unit that will be around $0 cashflow at best, assuming all units rented, including the one I'd be occupying.
seems like I'm doing the exact opposite of what investors on here are doing. Feels like everyone else is avoiding prime locations (Los Angeles, San Jose, Seattle, New York, etc.) with no cashflow and targeting cashflow locations in the Midwest, South, etc.
is anyone else doing this by any chance? or am I just crazy and on this island alone?
You're not crazy nor are you on the island alone. There are two ball parks that BP members play in, each of which have different guidelines. One being West coast investment properties that don't cashflow but appreciate significantly higher than the Midwest and South. I'm a West coast investor and I although I understand the mindset of people investing in different regions, their approach to REI is a different approach to REI in the West. I'll give you an example based on your post. A Midwest investor would NEVER invest in a property unless it was cashflowing a minimum of $100 per month on the low end. However, a West coast investor would not necessarily walk away from a sub $200 per month cashflow if he understands that appreciation in his market is not speculative and he doesn't need the CF at this time, and he has enough funds to cover vacancies, maintenance, etc.
I'm getting ready to add another SFH to my portfolio and I've been researching and running numbers for 12 months. I'll cashflow $50. I don't need the CF rightnow and I have more than sufficient emergency funds to cover unforseen problems. I'll hold it for at least 10 years before I pull money out. As a West coast investor I'm very confident its a sound investment located within a healthy market that's appreciating and supported by a university and state capital.
"If he understands that appreciation in his market is not speculative"
I don't know that appreciation is ever anything other than speculative. Sure, an "overall history" of housing prices shows that they go up - but this could just be based on inflation rather than the value of the property. Saying that appreciation isn't speculative is claiming something close to being a crystal ball - there's no guarantee that a property will appreciate, regardless of which market it is in. There is a lot of data showing that it will most likely appreciate, but there is zero "proof" that it will 100% definitely appreciate.
A mathematical comparison is Brocard's Conjecture, which has been tested out to "2 * 10^9" but is still only accepted as a conjecture. My point being: that's a massive number that shows a fantastic trend... but it's still only speculation or conjecture.
Buying into a non-cashflow market based on appreciation is always speculative, regardless of what market you go to. There are definitely markets that have 99.9% better odds of appreciating, and some show fantastic trends... but appreciation will always be conjecture.
Add in your assumption of 100% occupancy - that might be a great goal, but also is really tough to have 100% all of the time. Did you include maintenance savings? CapEx? If you're waiting out appreciation, then you'll most likely be holding on to the property and will have stuff to fix down the line. With those expenses, your "zero cash flow at best" quickly becomes negative.
Are you crazy? No. Is this a good investment strategy? It can be if you minimize your risks. Is appreciation ever "not speculative"? Heck no. Personally, I'm in the real estate investing business for the cash flow - but that's what fits my goals. I acknowledge the strengths and weaknesses of my investing strategy, and I build my business around that.
My suggestion to you? Keep some of your cash-flowing properties to help cover your costs / expenses. Why give up cash flow now for a chance at appreciation in ten or fifteen years? Why trade everything for "zero cash flow at best" when you can hold two properties that are flowing for every X number of non-cash flow properties?
Ben, your points are entirely understandable. However, to write that "I don't know that appreciation is ever anything other than speculative" is something I need to counter.
The word "speculative" implies that the decision to invest is based on a guess or unproven strategy. Too often that word is automatically injected to describe an investment in a non cash flowing asset. If too much emphasis is placed on the hope of appreciation alone then the term is justified.
However, and this is my counter, the word “speculative” can appropriately be set aside if the investor has experience buying, selling, exchanging, and leveraging assets in a market where he has a long track record and understands his or her market. Just because someone invests in a West coast asset that doesn’t cashflow is not indicative of speculation.
Post: Are Business Management degrees beneficial starting a business?

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Long term success isn't proportional to what you may learn from majoring in business management. It helps, but much of it has to do with gaining knowledge in areas that compliment the direction you choose as a career or businessman.
Post: Selling Cashflowing Homes in Midwest for No-Cashflow in San Diego

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Originally posted by @Twana Rasoul:
So I'm in the process of trying to sell my Single Family Homes in the Midwest (Springfield IL) in order to purchase another property here in San Diego (occupied 2-4) unit that will be around $0 cashflow at best, assuming all units rented, including the one I'd be occupying.
seems like I'm doing the exact opposite of what investors on here are doing. Feels like everyone else is avoiding prime locations (Los Angeles, San Jose, Seattle, New York, etc.) with no cashflow and targeting cashflow locations in the Midwest, South, etc.
is anyone else doing this by any chance? or am I just crazy and on this island alone?
You're not crazy nor are you on the island alone. There are two ball parks that BP members play in, each of which have different guidelines. One being West coast investment properties that don't cashflow but appreciate significantly higher than the Midwest and South. I'm a West coast investor and I although I understand the mindset of people investing in different regions, their approach to REI is a different approach to REI in the West. I'll give you an example based on your post. A Midwest investor would NEVER invest in a property unless it was cashflowing a minimum of $100 per month on the low end. However, a West coast investor would not necessarily walk away from a sub $200 per month cashflow if he understands that appreciation in his market is not speculative and he doesn't need the CF at this time, and he has enough funds to cover vacancies, maintenance, etc.
I'm getting ready to add another SFH to my portfolio and I've been researching and running numbers for 12 months. I'll cashflow $50. I don't need the CF rightnow and I have more than sufficient emergency funds to cover unforseen problems. I'll hold it for at least 10 years before I pull money out. As a West coast investor I'm very confident its a sound investment located within a healthy market that's appreciating and supported by a university and state capital.
Post: Buying a house this month, take possession next year??

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Originally posted by @Daniel Kong:
I'm attempting to purchase a property with a tenant already in place. The plan is to purchase the property this month. However, the purchase agreement that my agent wrote up has "The possession of the Property shall be delivered to the Buyer on or before 1/31/2020". She said this is standard language in the purchase agreement when there is a lease already in place. I plan to honor the lease, but would like the lease transfered over to me, along with the security deposit and any contract with the Property Management Company. Does this verbage sound correct, or should it be worded differently? Trying to protect myself also against the seller extending the lease or changing the terms such as the monthly amount, etc. Thanks in advance!!
Aside from the deposit transfer question you might want to consider using an Estoppel Certificate or Letter. This link provides more info;
Post: Seller not in the United States??

- Rental Property Investor
- Boise/Portland
- Posts 709
- Votes 742
Originally posted by @Jared Garza:
So I have a seller ready to sell for a great discount but they’re currently living out of country for work
It is them and their aunt (who lives locally) that need to sign. I know I can use DocuSign to form the contract (it is a wholesale deal) but how will i structure the deal with the seller out of country?
Thank you from the bottom of my heart for any helpful advice!
Jared, I don't know about structuring the deal as you asked, but I can advise you regarding the deal needing to be legally signed.
The ONLY qualified entity that can legally notarize a Real Estate Purchase Agreement is a Consular official at the US Embassy near the location of the aunt.
I've used the Embassy before when I'm engaged in buying and selling while I'm overseas.