The lease structure reduces management headaches and provides strong occupancy stability, which makes the financing model work very well for both lender and investor.

It might be a good model to check on though.  

The lease structure reduces management headaches and provides strong occupancy stability, which makes the financing model work very well for both lender and investor.

I invest in the Midwest, and while it’s not USF, the student rental model works similarly—you just need systems in place.

We’d love to see more of your input on investor questions—it’s the kind of expertise that helps everyone make smarter decisions.You’re already skilled at analyzing deals, which is a big part of what makes investors confident.

Would you be hesitant if the sponsor was jumping from sfr to multifamily but has a track record for 20+ years of running a value add sfr portfolio and wants to scale same model in multifamily.   

Hoping someone with 1031 expertise can help me here. 

The build to rent or build to sell model is great.

delays.Timeline benchmarks (typical cosmetic flip)Close to demo start: 48–72 hrsDemo: 3–5 daysRoughs + inspections: 5–10 daysFinishes + punch: 10–14 daysTotal on-site: 4–6 weeks (heavy rehabs longer, keep under 4 months)  3) Revenue: Sell Smart in a Slower MarketUnderwrite conservativelyARV from adjusted comps within 0.5 miles and 90 days when possible; stress-test with –3% to –7% price drift.Use days-on-market (DOM) tiers to model carry (Base / +15 days / +30 days).Renovate to the buyer, not your tasteDesign for the median buyer in your submarket.

I appreciate you taking the time to respond and to share your expertise :-)