All Forum Posts by: Jon Schwartz
Jon Schwartz has started 37 posts and replied 926 times.
Post: Where to buy first property( Nevada or Texas)

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @Angeli Castrence:
@Jon Schwartz
Yes, I’m interested in the Carmelina property. What do you think about tenants not paying rent due to the pandemic?
They have already started construction in that corner. There’s also a low-income apartment building being constructed in Bundy and Nebraska, where the animal shelter used to be. You’re right, plenty of development in this area.
Angeli,
Tenant non-payment is definitely an issue because the eviction moratorium is in place until Jan 31, 2021. So a few things are important when pursuing a property now:
Firslty, you want to get the last six month's payment history for the property, and then you want to verify it with bank documents. If the tenants have been paying this entire time, they're unlikely to suddenly stop because there's a new owner. Tenant who have continued to pay rent have maintained they jobs or care too much about their credit to take advantage of the situation or both.
Secondly, you want to go into the deal with additional reserves. If you househacked this property and moved into the lowest-rent unit, you'd be collecting about $6000/month from the other units. You might want to have 6 months, or $36K, in reserves to cover any unpaid rent that might occur. If all tenants have been paying rent, you might only need 3-4 months reserves. Having reserves insulates you against the risk of non-payment.
I've made a spreadsheet that I called "The Househacker Calculator." Enter the basic info, and the spreadsheet auto-populates the rest with a pro forma and a longterm projection. Here's what the results for this property look like:

Given the price and current rents, I think this is a really good candidate for a househack!
Best,
Jon
Post: PLEASE HELP: Buying First Home

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @Diana Camacho:
I have been looking at duplex these last few days and assuming I can rent out the unit quickly, I would end up paying less per month than if I buy a condo. Thanks for the tip @Twana Rasoul and @Theresa Harris!
Also, buying a duplex under $700k would use up my entire savings for the downpayment and closing. I would not have any money for repairs if needed. I have noticed that the homes are typically very old. Especially in the areas I am looking for and can afford. Are there certain things I should stay away from when considering a duplex (e.g. yr built, etc.)?
Diana, when you're considering how much property you can afford, but down payment percentage are you using?
It's traditional to put 20% down, but when you buy a duplex and have rental income coming in, you might be able to put just 10% down and still have a totally manageable monthly cost. That'll free up funds for renovations.
I've put together a spreadsheet to run this math, happy to share it with you!
Best,
Jon
Post: House Hacking w/ Friend

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @Jerry Mical:
Jon, thank you for pointing this out and providing the video. It appears the main issue is if you have a non-occupant signer on the loan when buying an actual duplex, triplex, or quadplex, it would require a 25% down payment by the FHA for the loan. With that requirement, it appears the only option if we were to House Hack is to use the 3.5% FHA loan to get a SFH and then rent out the rooms, rather than units of a duplex, triplex, or quadplex.
Do you know if there were any reason we couldn't turn it into a duplex, triplex, or quadplex after closing? Might not be worth it, but just thinking of all of our options.
Originally posted by@Jon Schwartz:
Originally posted by @Jerry Mical:
Hello BP House Hackers!
I have been reading blogs and listening to podcasts about house hacking and I am extremely interested in the whole idea. One issue, my wife and I have no desire to live in a house hack ourselves. However, one of my close friends is single and is interested in purchasing his first house and likes the idea of a house hack. His available capital is low and knowledge of real estate investing is little to none. So I had the idea that I could invest with him in his house hack. Has anyone else attempted to do this?
My idea would be that he qualifies for the 203k FHA loan and would live in the house for at least a year. I would put up most of the capital at 3.5% and would help him with landlording and rehabbing etc. We would split everything after initial down payment. Assuming we are able to have tenants cover the mortgage and still have some additional cash flow, we would split the additional cash flow. He would pay me his additional cash flow until our capital contributions in the property were equal and then he could do what he wills with his additional capital and we would maintain our even 50/50 split in the property. Once a year is up, rinse and repeat until we have a few properties, picking up equity and cash flow as we go along.
Is there anything I am overlooking as to why this wouldn’t work? My credit history is strong and I am assuming I would be able to add that to his credit profile in the financing process, right? Anything else I am missing?
Jerry,
You'll have to check your local zoning ordinances regarding converting an SFR into a duplex, triplex, or fourplex. Here in LA, each parcel of land is zoned for a specific use: single-family, low-density multifamily, high-density multifamily, commercial, industrial, etc. You can't convert a building's use contrary to how the parcel is zoned.
If such is the case where you live, you might actually be able to create a deal by finding a single-family home on a parcel zoned for multifamily use!
FYI, most municipalities or counties have online zoning maps, usually called the GIS system. "GIS" stands of "geographical information system." Google you city or county name and "GIS" and you'll probably find it. LA's is called ZIMAS, and it's awesome.
The other reason not to convert a SFR into a duplex is cost, of course.
Best,
Jon
Post: House Hacking w/ Friend

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @Jerry Mical:
Hello BP House Hackers!
I have been reading blogs and listening to podcasts about house hacking and I am extremely interested in the whole idea. One issue, my wife and I have no desire to live in a house hack ourselves. However, one of my close friends is single and is interested in purchasing his first house and likes the idea of a house hack. His available capital is low and knowledge of real estate investing is little to none. So I had the idea that I could invest with him in his house hack. Has anyone else attempted to do this?
My idea would be that he qualifies for the 203k FHA loan and would live in the house for at least a year. I would put up most of the capital at 3.5% and would help him with landlording and rehabbing etc. We would split everything after initial down payment. Assuming we are able to have tenants cover the mortgage and still have some additional cash flow, we would split the additional cash flow. He would pay me his additional cash flow until our capital contributions in the property were equal and then he could do what he wills with his additional capital and we would maintain our even 50/50 split in the property. Once a year is up, rinse and repeat until we have a few properties, picking up equity and cash flow as we go along.
Is there anything I am overlooking as to why this wouldn’t work? My credit history is strong and I am assuming I would be able to add that to his credit profile in the financing process, right? Anything else I am missing?
Jerry, I have heard that having a non-occupant co-applicant on the loan affects the minimum down payment on an FHA loan.
Here's a video about it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bn8ZB8lAoPo&feature=youtu.be
This might cause a crinkle in your plan.
Good luck!
Jon
Post: Newbie from Los Angeles, California

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @Mike Lopez:
Hello everyone!
I'm Mike, a newbie from LA. Currently I work in the entertainment industry for a advertising agency, cutting trailers, tv spots and other sorts of content for movie, tv shows, etc. Sound fun right? watch movies for work. It was at first but I quickly found myself putting in a lot of hours to move up (to an editor position) and I'm burning out.
I found BP after a youtube binge and was instantly hooked. I signed up for the 90 Day Challenge seminar, loved it. Signed up for BP Pro that day and jumped in head first. That was a month ago and in that time I have read HOW TO INVEST IN REAL ESTATE, HOW TO INVEST IN REAL ESTATE WITH NO MONEY DOWN, THE BOOK ON RENTAL PROPERTY INVESTING. I might add I have not read a book in the last 4 years since i graduated from college so I don't know how this person is.
My current goal is to purchase a property in LA that I can house-hack. I'm meeting with a friend this weekend who is actually a realtor to get all my questions answered. After that, Im hoping to invest out of state where cashflow is actually possible. Apartment complexes look interesting, but I think I'll stick to multifamily/BRRRR units.
If you read this far, you are my MVP (Real Estate Rookie reference :P)
Thank you and good luck on your journey!
Michael,
Welcome to the nerdy, obsessive world of BP!
Fellow LA investor and editor here. I edit movies and TV, mostly streaming stuff for Netflix now. I started in advertising at a commercial house in Santa Monica, but I fled when I was about your age and became an apprentice editor in the Union. I suffered the burnout, pushed through, worked my way up, and now invest to slowly transition out. I enjoy the work, but I have a 2yo daughter now, so if I can spend less time at my bay, I will!
Congrats on getting up and running like a boss! I have one more book recommendation for you:
https://www.amazon.com/Every-E...
This book is all about the numbers -- but I promise it's digestible. It's important to have your head wrapped about the numbers, especially in LA where a lot more wealth is built in equity/appreciation than in cashflow.
It's great that you're meeting with an agent friend, though I must ask: if your friend an investor? You're going to get a much different, perhaps not-so-helpful viewpoint from an agent who just sells houses to retail clients.
Best,
Jon
Post: Refinance or Sell? Relocating to LA from Nashville

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @Pablo Hernandez:
My gf and I are in the process of moving to Los Angeles and currently own 2 properties in Nashville that cash flow about $500/mo (total after all is said and done). I bought the first one knowing nothing about REI using an FHA for 365k and now have it listed at 415k, and the other at 200k , put about 30k into it and am planning on listing it for 275k. We will likely have around $115k to put down on our next property.
Our plan is to put the cash down on a fourplex in Los Angeles using an FHA. (LA allows you to borrow up to 1.4mil on an fha)
Is this a sound plan, or should We keep these as rental properties, refinance both, take cash out of the equity and try to buy something in LA with whatever that affords us?
Our long term goal is to have enough rental income to allow us to quit our 9-5!
Grateful for any and all tips
Cheers
Pablo,
An early welcome to LA! It's an interesting and complex real estate market out here. Rent control laws and a huge diversity of submarkets make LA difficult, but very rewarding with the right amount of research and diligence.
I think you'll be in a great position to househack a fourplex if you're planning to enter the market in the second half of 2021. Right now, the eviction moratorium both A) makes it difficult to estimate cashflows in the near term and B) makes it potentially difficult to move into a fourplex if it involves relocating a tenant. This is allowed under LA rent control, but if the tenant refuses to move out, you have to go through the eviction process -- and evictions of any kind are still on hold. Come mid-2021, the eviction moratorium should be lifted, the backlog should be worked through the court system, and we'll have our normal processes in place again.
More importantly, though, a lot of investors out here are anticipating price declines in 2021. The eviction moratorium's expiration will create an increase in vacancy, and the expiration of forbearance programs in April 2021 will force some owners (of multifamily, not just SFRs) to sell. Put these together, and you get lower valuations across the board. Nobody's predicting a crash, but more like a 10-15% dip. (And none of us has a crystal ball, of course!)
A commenter above asked if you'd really get a better IRR in LA. If you enter the market during next year's softness, I think you will. Real estate is slow-moving and cyclical, and LA peaked late last year/early this year. Next year is the time to jump in.
As far as your options go, if you're serious about LA, I think you need to sell the Nashville properties. Reason being: LA is expensive.
If you cash-out refi at 75% LTV on both Nashville properties, how much capital will that produce?
If you sell both properties and come to LA with $115K, you'll be able to put 10% down plus closing costs on a $1M property, roughly. You're gonna need that money if you plan to buy and live in a fourplex. Finding a $1M fourplex in a decent neighborhood is really tough out here. You might have to settle for a triplex. (And really, duplexes -- including the one I'm househacking right now -- go for well over $1M is really good neighborhoods!)
(Side note: a friend of mine bought a $1M fourplex in a gentrifying neighborhood called Highland Park in 2017 or 2918. He had to fix the foundation and replace part of the exterior stucco. Anyway, now he's getting something like $2500/unit, all 1-beds. LA is a tough, expensive market -- but there's a lot of reward!)
There are a few pockets in LA where inexpensive submarkets border more expensive markets, so you can find a great opportunity in a slightly rougher patch two blocks from a great area. And if you're targeting an area like this, there are some great loan programs sponsored by the government to help you.
I'm a nerd for the LA market; shoot me a message if you have more questions. I'd love to download everything I know so you have a reasonable expectation of what to expect out here.
All the best!
Jon
Post: Education to get Started?

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @Mayank Saxena:
@Jon Schwartz thank you for the reply. It's always helpful to hear from those who were in a similar situation, especially with renting in LA vs. investing out-of-state. I took a look at your portfolio and saw you're house-hacking in Hancock Park (nice area!) while being a passive investor in out-of-state ventures. I will 100% add your recommended book to the list of mine to read. I do see value in investing in LA, and I think your description about your LA duplex you're house-hacking is probably accurate where one tenant will probably subsidize (not totally cover) the mortgage, in a buy-and-hold strategy.
And yes - being industry bros (heyyy!) - I'm looking to spread my "risk" by investing in real estate, which I consider to be safer than the vacillations of our industry. Although I have a personal *magic monthly number* I'm working towards (re: real estate investments) - I'm more interested in building wealth than withdrawing any positive cash flows.
I'm a fan of investing in smaller markets because of the cash flow in seconday/tertiary markets (anywhere from KY, OK, GA, etc) - but I see your point about investing in higher appreciation areas like our Los Angeles.
Mayank,
If the goal is to smooth out the ups and downs of the entertainment biz, then cashflow is for sure a priority!
Lexington, KY offers some compelling opportunities. It's a generally well-off city with a very poor, quickly gentrifying core. Check our Rebuilt Investments.
I also really like Columbus, OH. Great agent out there named Remington Lyman. The best I've met in terms of working with out-of-state investors.
Best,
Jon
Post: Education to get Started?

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @Mayank Saxena:
Yes, another newbie here - but I want to ask experienced Investors and others about how to learn the "measured" way.
I've been listening to the BP podcasts for over a month, have seen & attended Brandon's webinars, and have read great posts/articles here - but I still fail to find a structured approach and learning.
Despite being a newbie, I'm more old-school in that I'd to have a solid foundation of understanding the basics.
Some questions I had;
- working out formulas using my own hand so I know exactly what I'm doing, instead of initially relying on the BP Calculators
- what's an NOI, Cap Rate, CapEx,
- how to estimate repair costs by just seeing a property on Redfin
- Living in L.A., is it better to start house-hacking in an expensive market (how can I even get in), or go out-of-state where entry-level is more approachable.
I have tons of these logistical questions. I guess I'm looking for a more sequential, progressive way of learning.
So any recommended ways to go about learning this? I see a course by Coach Carson. I know people take Real Estate courses (not terribly interested becoming an agent, would happily partner with someone who is - but am willing to if it'll be invaluable), or should I just read books? Currently, here are the books I'm reading;
- Real Estate Investing for Dummies (by Eric Tyson and Robert S. Griswold)
- How to Invest in Real Estate - the Ultimate Beginner's Guide to Getting Started (by Joshua Dorkin and Brandon Turner)
- The Book on Rental Property Investing (by Brandon Turner)
I've attended some BP webinars, I already get the whole Brandon buying his daughter those 3 rental homes that'll pay for her education, etc etc. Yes I'm motivated already - but I'm looking for a structured way to learn this.
Also - side bar, I rent in a rent-controlled apartment in LA. While I'd ideally like to house-hack in Los Angeles, I'm afraid the entry-level price here is too high, which is why I'm interested in investing in multi-families out-of-state. I'm hoping my education, which you guys will help me figure out, will guide me in seeing if I should invest out-of-state while still paying L.A. rent. Isn't that a zero-sum game?
Sorry if my post is too long. I'm not here to ask "hey newbie here, any tips?" - I'm seeking to learn by experience, but only after learning the fundamentals (the math) and then jumping in.
PS - I really enjoyed listening to the podcasts of James Wise, Cory Binsfield, Mike McKinzie, and liked listening to an L.A. investor who invests in out-of-state (I forgot his name, but remember his Milwaukee partner's name is Dawn @ Core Properties). Thank you guys, if you're reading.
Mayank,
Welcome, buddy! How're you enjoying this heat?
Firstly, here's my favorite book for understanding the numbers behind this whole thing of investing in real estate:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B018...
100% no fluff, all knowledge.
Between understanding the math and listening to personal stories on the BP podcasts, I think you'll start developing a strong foundation. When a question comes up, ask it here!
Also search "LA real estate" on meetup.com and start attending some virtual meetings. They're great for learning the lingo, understanding different processes, and meeting people.
As far a buying out-of-state while renting in LA, I was in a similar quandary when I first discovered BP. After a year of researching markets, including a four-day trip to Fayetteville, AR, I decided to househack in LA. All other things being equal, appreciation in high-appreciation markets builds more wealth over time than cashflow in cashflowing markets.
The caveat is that you need income from something other than your real estate. I'm a TV and film editor (we're industry bros!) and support myself just fine from that. For me, real estate investing is a ten-year program to replace my income. I mathed it out, and I think I'm better off riding LA appreciation for most of those ten years and then trading my LA assets for cashflowing properties in the Southeast closer to year ten.
You're right about the high LA price points, though. A duplex on Melrose ain't cheap! It's possible to get into a duplex with an FHA loan and only 3.5% down, but the monthly cost of that mortgage will prevent you from moving out anytime soon and cashflowing. It really depends on your specific situation. Message me if you'd like to chat more; I'm a nerd for this stuff!
Best,
Jon
Post: I have 100,000 and i dont know where to put it...

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @Jon Schwartz:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @Jon Schwartz:
Originally posted by @Etienne Dubois:
If money was not an issue and i had 100,000 USD on the side to put for down payments, would investing in expensive cities like los angeles be a good idea because of the rental occupancy rate there, or would it be wiser to invest it in somewhere that has a lower occupancy rate but i can buy more with 100,000 in down payments.
Etienne, I'd invest for appreciation in a market like Los Angeles. If money's not an issue at present, and you want your money put to best use, invest in a place like LA (and I vote specifically for LA).
Let's just do some quick math:
Let's say $100K is going to be 25% down payment on one or several properties. In your appreciation market, you'll receive no cashflow, but the building will appreciate 5% per year. In the cashflow market, you'll earn a fantastic 15% cash-on-cash return but no appreciation. All financing terms are identical. Let's remove costs associated by buying and selling. To further simplify, let's say there's no principal paydown (since it will be equivalent in both examples).
What's your investment horizon? Let's say seven years...
In seven years, in your appreciation market, you'll own a property worth $562,840. You borrowed $300k to buy it, so you profit in year 7 is $262,840.
In the cashflow market, after seven years, you will have made $105,000 in cashflow. You'll have no profit in the sale of the building because it didn't appreciate.
Now, cashflow-lovers are going to make the following argument: cashflow is money-in-hand whereas appreciation is speculative.
They would be right that cashflow is money-in-hand in that you get it regularly, not as a big lump sum at the end. This makes the early cashflow payments more valuable than the later appreciation harvesting. However, if money is not a current concern, as is the case in this example, the actual value of those earlier payments is lower. To be really nerdy and mathy about it, you can use a much lower discount rate when analyzing the value of future earnings.
However, is appreciation speculative? In the Midwest, yes. In cities that have populations under 1M and might or might not be ascendant, absolutely. But in an international gateway city with a longterm average appreciation rate of 6.7% going back to 1975 -- meaning this longterm average incorporates the five recessions that have occurred since? Appreciation is far less speculative than Midwestern investors make it out to be, and to the extent that it is more speculative, the reward is much greater.
So, buy LA, my friend!
Best,
Jon
"In the cashflow market, you'll earn a fantastic 15% cash-on-cash return but no appreciation."
Can you tell me where this 15% market is, here in 2020?
I can't! I was using exaggerated numbers to make my point.
I'm coming more and more to the conclusion that REI is great for professionals like builders/developers/rehabbers, and middlemen like agents/brokers/lenders- but for non-professional individual investors, it's only great in the right market conditions.
Interesting...
You're probably right if you're trying to go from 0 to 60 using real estate as your primary income.
I think REI works best if you already have an income and has a long time horizon. It's like that saying that people overestimate what they can achieve in a year and underestimate what they can achieve in a decade. If you have income and educate yourself about what separates a solid buy from an average (not to mention stupid) buy, you get really change the trajectory of your life and be somewhere you didn't expect in ten years.
Post: NY and CA are the land of the flee, and Texas is the destination

- Realtor
- Los Angeles, CA
- Posts 952
- Votes 1,153
Originally posted by @Nate Marshall:
No one really wants to move to California. I expect Oregon, Washington, Illinois, New York, New Jersey, Wisconsin and Minnesota to make that list. Wisconsin and Minnesota can probably be saved but the rest depend on some Governors and Mayors being removed from office.
Nate, statistically you're right as far as Americans go. CA suffers from a net outflow migration to the other 49 states.
However, more people from the rest of the world move into California each year than Californians move out into the rest of the US. So our total/global net migration is positive.
The other drive of population growth in California is births. More Americans are born in California each year than in any other state.
Best,
Jon