All Forum Posts by: Michael Le
Michael Le has started 14 posts and replied 1605 times.
Post: AirBnB in Medium Size Multifamily Buildings?

- Developer
- Houston, TX
- Posts 1,635
- Votes 1,365
We have a B+ property in a good area but our property manager had liability concerns about putting AirBnB next to long term tenants. Also, as Greg mentioned, some lenders have covenants now that leases shouldn't be less than 30 days so that would cause you to break your covenants to do AirBnB. But yes, the money can be very good. I'm still interested in trying to figure it out for my own property. In the end we compromised and have 4 corporate units which get us double rent.
Post: 117-Unit Value-add in Phoenix Closed Today

- Developer
- Houston, TX
- Posts 1,635
- Votes 1,365
Originally posted by @Ben Leybovich:
Originally posted by @Brent Crosby:
@Ben Leybovich completely agree. I think it’s necessary to the evolution of the site. When I first started 8 years ago the majority of the content on the site now would be perfect, now much of it is no longer relevant to me simply because it’s oriented to beginners and small deals. And rightly so. Bottom line is that the site has to do more to curate and centralize info on larger deals and accredited investors. If they don’t it leaves the door open that someone else will, which would cause an exodus of experienced investors and be to the detriment of the site and who it currently caters to.
Brent, we have to conceive of BP as a business. In business, you do things that are most likely to monetize the most. As @Scott Trench indicated, you and I constitute a tiny minority of the audience on BP, which may not be essential for the overall monetization strategy (no maybe about it). That said, the evolution of the site will do just fine without you and me. We are a casualty of business realities, and BP is fine and dandy with that.
This is why I am asking Scott if there is a way that makes sense. BP can't really allocate human capital to a project that will not monetize much, and I get that. We are a minority, but we are here. So, I am just wondering if there is a more or less painless way to create something like a subscription platform that would attract enough revenue for BP to feel good about having done it...not sure that there is. But, certainly not necessary for the evolution of the business. Just a want.
Ben, on popular streaming platforms out there (Twitch, etc) there are ways for people to show monetary approval of the content provided. Usually it is in the form of a 'subscription' to that specific content provider or a way show more enthusiastic 'thumbs up' or other things. Not all of it translates to a business platform, such as BP, but I think there could some lessons learned from that. Patreon is another service that is popular and allows artists and musicians to make a living based on the donations of donors. It'd be an interesting concept if BP every wants to go down that path. Could entice more people to create content than would otherwise be inclined to without incentive.
Post: Did we hit our business plan?

- Developer
- Houston, TX
- Posts 1,635
- Votes 1,365
Originally posted by @Brian Burke:
Kyle, I always like to say that you can never go broke making money. Locking in gains is a good thing because the future is always uncertain. If you can achieve year 6 performance in two years that’s a winner. Lock it in and then do it again on the next one. If you stay in and the market turned against you, you’d kick yourself for life.
My philosophy is to exit at the earliest opportunity, which is where I’ve added the most value in the shortest time. If you add 80% of the value in two years, there’s little to gain by waiting five more for the other 20%.
Hi Brian, my follow-up question to you is... in the current market where it is hard to find deals, does it make more sense to just refinance and lock in most of those gains, and then hold the property and cash flow.
Post: Houston-Woodlands Multifamily Meetup

- Developer
- Houston, TX
- Posts 1,635
- Votes 1,365
Post: Houston-Woodlands Multifamily Meetup

- Developer
- Houston, TX
- Posts 1,635
- Votes 1,365
Come join @Juan Vargas and myself for this month's meetup where Josh Benporat of Madison Title will be joining us! He will be discussing why it's very important to have not just any title company, but the correct title company on your team and how his team at Madison has assisted clients close on transactions where other title companies could not.
As always, we will have time to network and discuss multifamily investing before and after the presentation. See you there!
P.S. Don't forget your business cards!
Post: New Apartment Construction

- Developer
- Houston, TX
- Posts 1,635
- Votes 1,365
At a high level what they say is correct but that doesn't mean it is right for your property. If you're building in the urban core where it will be mainly younger, single tenants, then having 2-3 BRs could be detrimental.
Post: Why not Take Loans Instead of Raising Capital?

- Developer
- Houston, TX
- Posts 1,635
- Votes 1,365
Originally posted by @Shafi Noss:
Thanks for the responses everyone. @Brian Burke's point about banks lending only enough to be covered by collateral answers my question. I hadn't thought about that but it's so clear when pointed out.
To me this raises 2 more questions, which I may need to research myself.
The first is why are private lenders willing to take the higher risk/return investment while banks aren't? I'd guess it's something like banks are set up to deal with the large loans systematically but not the small loans. They're larger institutions so they have a financial reputation to uphold. I can also see the argument that they have more to lose, but it seems like long-lived institutions like banks could afford to take high risk investments as long as they were profitable in the long run. Not sure how to think about that.
The second question is from @Rick Martin. Aren't you still fully leveraged, just borrowing from a different source? Of course that difference might be critical. Curious to hear your thoughts on why investors are safer leverage. Is it because they're paid with a pref instead of with collateral?
By private loans I assume you mean private money lenders for single family investments. In this case there are a couple of reasons:
- The private money lenders generally lend based off 60-70% of the after repair value of the property minus any repair costs... not 100%. So not too different than a bank. This is so they could fire sale the property and get their money back if need be.
- And to follow-up with the above point, SFR is more liquid and they could in a few short weeks sell the property off quickly if they need. You can't do that with large multifamily.
Post: Multi-Family Syndication & Tax Depreciation

- Developer
- Houston, TX
- Posts 1,635
- Votes 1,365
As you mention, the recapture happens at the time of sale. If you refinance instead then you don't have to yet. When you recapture it will be at 25% rate which is likely lower than your income tax rate. So it's still very much worth it to do since you're delaying when you have to pay and you're paying at a lower rate. And if you happen to pick up another property the same year then you can offset those gains and kick the can down the road some more.
Post: Average cash on cash

- Developer
- Houston, TX
- Posts 1,635
- Votes 1,365
The COC is calculated based on the amount of money you have in the deal. So if they return your money in a refinance then you have less of that money still left in the deal and your COC jumps.
Post: Leaving multifamily investing- What NNN props do you recommend?

- Developer
- Houston, TX
- Posts 1,635
- Votes 1,365
We used to have one very active lady on BP who's answer to everything was DSTs. Are you the new industry rep? Your post history indicates that's all you talk about.