Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Andrey Y.

Andrey Y. has started 114 posts and replied 1826 times.

Post: Is REI worth a divorce??

Andrey Y.Posted
  • Specialist
  • Honolulu, HI
  • Posts 1,887
  • Votes 1,264
Originally posted by @Eric Bilderback:

@Andrey Y.

Quite right if you can’t have the upmost respect and admiration for one of the founders of NWA that helped bring in gangster culture across the US and world who is a women gong to respect?  Obviously not a some schmuck that would spend his time helping kids not foment anger and bitterness, all while working himself to death to make a better life for his wife and children LOL!

 Girls like bad boys, didn't you hear?

But serious Dre is handsome, successful, talented..

Obviously you need to work yourself to death to achieve what he did. Money and success at that scale isn't just given to you.

I guess they want a rich and successful guy, but don't want to see how sausage is made? 

"oh he's broke" "he doesn't spend enough time with me"

Uhhh.. can't have it both ways, but many childishly think they can Lol

Post: Is REI worth a divorce??

Andrey Y.Posted
  • Specialist
  • Honolulu, HI
  • Posts 1,887
  • Votes 1,264
Originally posted by @Eric Bilderback:

Starting investing in real estate will only make things worse especially if you both aren’t on board with the sacrifice.  I’m a romantic and hate to see marriages and relationships fail.  

Best advice I ever head on marriage is

1. Men want to be admired by their wives

2. Women want to be loved by a man they admire

Being someone your wife admires is not an easy feet but if you can pull it off I believe you and most other guys will live happy lives.

Good luck my friend,

 Regarding your last statement,

Even handsome Billionaire icon Dr DRE had trouble being a guy his wife admired lol

Post: Trump/CDC Halts evictions nationwide to the end of the year

Andrey Y.Posted
  • Specialist
  • Honolulu, HI
  • Posts 1,887
  • Votes 1,264
Originally posted by @Steve K.:
Originally posted by @Andrey Y.:
Originally posted by @Steve K.:
Originally posted by @Andrey Y.:
Originally posted by @Steve K.:
Originally posted by @Andrey Y.:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @Greg Scott:

It is amazing that we have left multi-billion dollar decisions in the hands of un-elected bureaucrats.

This is Trump's doing:

The agency order, the result of an Aug. 8 executive action by President Donald Trump directing the CDC to study the issue, would impose criminal penalties on landlords who violate the ban. Evictions for reasons other than nonpayment of rent will be allowed to proceed. 

source: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/01/trump-administration-block-evictions-backlash-407060

 Trump has done more directly for real estate investors than any president. Admittedly, this sort of policy is to appeal to the majority of the electorate as the "compassionate" thing to do. Heck, he has so much (mostly unfounded and false) flack being thrown his way, he is only human and sometimes needs to make decisions to win favor from the largest group in order to get re-elected. I cant blame him.

Another ding against SFH active investing, and another + for passive investments in large communities which have the benefit of economies of scale.

Which policies of his specifically directly help real estate investors? I think most economists are saying he simply benefited from inheriting a strong recovery set in motion by his predecessor, then screwed things up a bit with bad foreign policy (trade war with China that US consumers ultimately paid for), and a corporate tax cut that didn't move the needle as far as anyone can tell, before completely plunging us into a recession by being completely incompetent throughout Covid 19. 

Also not sure how passive syndications will fare any better than active SFR's through this. Seems like tenants will be less likely to take advantage of a mom and pop landlord who they know personally than a large faceless entity that manages their 100+ unit apartment building.

I've heard syndication sponsors say in their sales pitches that apartments defaulted less than SFH's in the last recession and so they are recession proof. However this is a much different recession that I believe does not favor large apartments. Current market trends clearly show people are choosing to live in detached homes with yards where they can socially distance in the suburbs, and are fleeing dense living situations such as large apartment buildings in city centers.

Also there's no precedence for syndications being tested in a down economy quite like this seeing as they really only started gaining popularity in 2012 after the JOBS act made syndications a common investment vehicle for the general public. Before then, they were limited to sophisticated accredited investors/ very wealthy people with the right connections. I would think the typical syndication investor back then would be more likely to be able to ride out a down economy than the newer generation of passive investors who can get in with much less capital/ financial security. Many of the new breed have probably never had a capital call like we're seeing syndicators asking for currently. This recession is the first time the new iteration of the "crowd sourced" syndication model will truly be tested in a down cycle. It will be interesting to see how it plays out with the new lower barrier to entry and a higher number of operators who only know a bull market and are highly leveraged. 

During the height of the worst real estate recession in the last 100 years, large multifamily had the lower mortgage delinquency rate out of all real estate subclasses (0.4% MF vs. 4.0% SFH) so yes, the syndication model (which is just a generic term for raising investor capital and is nothing new) absolutely was tested and passed with flying colors.

That's the exact sales pitch I was referring to. The thing is, the syndication model has changed dramatically since 2008. Back then syndications were limited to investors who could pony up $500-1M minimum, and they weren't just open to anyone, you had to have connections. These days anyone can join a crowdfunded syndication and there are a lot more inexperienced operators in the space than there were in 2008. That recession was also driven by sub prime mortgages which affected primarily single family homes. This time the trends are not working in favor of large apartment buildings. Look at the stats. Inventory in detached single family homes in the suburbs is at all time lows, while the highest vacancy rates are in large apartment buildings in city centers.

I'm picking up two new construction SFH rentals in FL, and already I've put more time on the phone (8-12+ hrs.) into making this 1031 transaction happen that I did the entirety of my passive investments during all of 2019. And I haven't made a dime on them yet!

SFHs is work, not investing. If I wanted a job, I would keep working my 9-5 which pays $400/hr. Owning SFHs is a pain, and it's not scalable.

Different strokes for different folks my friend. I’m in real estate full time, make much higher returns investing actively than I could by doing it passively In syndications, and enjoy it! Good luck, I wish you continued success in all your investments. 

 Well of course, you SHOULD be getting higher returns actively because you are working a JOB to get them. A passive investor accepts a lower return and diversification for freedom of time - which is a more valuable commodity than $$.

If I have $2MM in real estate syndications, that earn me a 1.9 EM over say 5 years, that is $900K over 5 years - $180K/yr. paying almost no taxes on it - and working 100 hours per YEAR to get it - that's a $1800.00 per hour clip. I don't think I've received any radiology job offers at more than $400-500 per hour, so passive investing it is lol

Post: Trump/CDC Halts evictions nationwide to the end of the year

Andrey Y.Posted
  • Specialist
  • Honolulu, HI
  • Posts 1,887
  • Votes 1,264
Originally posted by @Steve K.:
Originally posted by @Andrey Y.:
Originally posted by @Steve K.:
Originally posted by @Andrey Y.:
Originally posted by @Steve K.:
Originally posted by @Andrey Y.:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @Greg Scott:

It is amazing that we have left multi-billion dollar decisions in the hands of un-elected bureaucrats.

This is Trump's doing:

The agency order, the result of an Aug. 8 executive action by President Donald Trump directing the CDC to study the issue, would impose criminal penalties on landlords who violate the ban. Evictions for reasons other than nonpayment of rent will be allowed to proceed. 

source: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/01/trump-administration-block-evictions-backlash-407060

 Trump has done more directly for real estate investors than any president. Admittedly, this sort of policy is to appeal to the majority of the electorate as the "compassionate" thing to do. Heck, he has so much (mostly unfounded and false) flack being thrown his way, he is only human and sometimes needs to make decisions to win favor from the largest group in order to get re-elected. I cant blame him.

Another ding against SFH active investing, and another + for passive investments in large communities which have the benefit of economies of scale.

Which policies of his specifically directly help real estate investors? I think most economists are saying he simply benefited from inheriting a strong recovery set in motion by his predecessor, then screwed things up a bit with bad foreign policy (trade war with China that US consumers ultimately paid for), and a corporate tax cut that didn't move the needle as far as anyone can tell, before completely plunging us into a recession by being completely incompetent throughout Covid 19. 

Also not sure how passive syndications will fare any better than active SFR's through this. Seems like tenants will be less likely to take advantage of a mom and pop landlord who they know personally than a large faceless entity that manages their 100+ unit apartment building.

I've heard syndication sponsors say in their sales pitches that apartments defaulted less than SFH's in the last recession and so they are recession proof. However this is a much different recession that I believe does not favor large apartments. Current market trends clearly show people are choosing to live in detached homes with yards where they can socially distance in the suburbs, and are fleeing dense living situations such as large apartment buildings in city centers.

Also there's no precedence for syndications being tested in a down economy quite like this seeing as they really only started gaining popularity in 2012 after the JOBS act made syndications a common investment vehicle for the general public. Before then, they were limited to sophisticated accredited investors/ very wealthy people with the right connections. I would think the typical syndication investor back then would be more likely to be able to ride out a down economy than the newer generation of passive investors who can get in with much less capital/ financial security. Many of the new breed have probably never had a capital call like we're seeing syndicators asking for currently. This recession is the first time the new iteration of the "crowd sourced" syndication model will truly be tested in a down cycle. It will be interesting to see how it plays out with the new lower barrier to entry and a higher number of operators who only know a bull market and are highly leveraged. 

During the height of the worst real estate recession in the last 100 years, large multifamily had the lower mortgage delinquency rate out of all real estate subclasses (0.4% MF vs. 4.0% SFH) so yes, the syndication model (which is just a generic term for raising investor capital and is nothing new) absolutely was tested and passed with flying colors.

That's the exact sales pitch I was referring to. The thing is, the syndication model has changed dramatically since 2008. Back then syndications were limited to investors who could pony up $500-1M minimum, and they weren't just open to anyone, you had to have connections. These days anyone can join a crowdfunded syndication and there are a lot more inexperienced operators in the space than there were in 2008. That recession was also driven by sub prime mortgages which affected primarily single family homes. This time the trends are not working in favor of large apartment buildings. Look at the stats. Inventory in detached single family homes in the suburbs is at all time lows, while the highest vacancy rates are in large apartment buildings in city centers.

 The definition of Accredited Investor has been around since 1933.

The definition of accredited investor has changed several times since 1933. If you think syndications of today  are the same today as they were during the last recession, you must not have been investing back then. After the 2012 JOBS act, syndications changed dramatically as they were opened up to a much wider range of investors, which brought about the current iteration of  the “crowd-sourced” syndication with a bunch of people investing $50k or less as opposed to before 2012 when syndications consisted of $500k-$1M minimum buy-ins and were mostly only available to wealthy people with direct personal connections to the sponsor. They certainly weren’t advertised in Facebook like they are now. So I don’t think the current model is the same version that is supposedly recession proof. If you want to drink that koolaid, fine with me, I don’t have a dog in this fight and I hope it works out well for you. Not following the “syndications are recession proof because in the last recession they did better than others asset classes” logic however, considering the last recession was completely different than what we’re dealing with now, and syndications are now completely different from what they were then. 

 Investing $25-$50K is less risky than investing $500-$1M any day of the week. It sound like you are proving your point for me.. as always, the strength of the deal on the buy and the quality and experience of the sponsor matters the most, not if more people can invest smaller amount of money. If anything, the new SEC laws allow accredited investor to diversify among sponsors, asset classes, strategies, and geographies since we can just put $50K into each deal vs. $1M :)

Post: Trump/CDC Halts evictions nationwide to the end of the year

Andrey Y.Posted
  • Specialist
  • Honolulu, HI
  • Posts 1,887
  • Votes 1,264
Originally posted by @Steve K.:
Originally posted by @Andrey Y.:
Originally posted by @Steve K.:
Originally posted by @Andrey Y.:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @Greg Scott:

It is amazing that we have left multi-billion dollar decisions in the hands of un-elected bureaucrats.

This is Trump's doing:

The agency order, the result of an Aug. 8 executive action by President Donald Trump directing the CDC to study the issue, would impose criminal penalties on landlords who violate the ban. Evictions for reasons other than nonpayment of rent will be allowed to proceed. 

source: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/01/trump-administration-block-evictions-backlash-407060

 Trump has done more directly for real estate investors than any president. Admittedly, this sort of policy is to appeal to the majority of the electorate as the "compassionate" thing to do. Heck, he has so much (mostly unfounded and false) flack being thrown his way, he is only human and sometimes needs to make decisions to win favor from the largest group in order to get re-elected. I cant blame him.

Another ding against SFH active investing, and another + for passive investments in large communities which have the benefit of economies of scale.

Which policies of his specifically directly help real estate investors? I think most economists are saying he simply benefited from inheriting a strong recovery set in motion by his predecessor, then screwed things up a bit with bad foreign policy (trade war with China that US consumers ultimately paid for), and a corporate tax cut that didn't move the needle as far as anyone can tell, before completely plunging us into a recession by being completely incompetent throughout Covid 19. 

Also not sure how passive syndications will fare any better than active SFR's through this. Seems like tenants will be less likely to take advantage of a mom and pop landlord who they know personally than a large faceless entity that manages their 100+ unit apartment building.

I've heard syndication sponsors say in their sales pitches that apartments defaulted less than SFH's in the last recession and so they are recession proof. However this is a much different recession that I believe does not favor large apartments. Current market trends clearly show people are choosing to live in detached homes with yards where they can socially distance in the suburbs, and are fleeing dense living situations such as large apartment buildings in city centers.

Also there's no precedence for syndications being tested in a down economy quite like this seeing as they really only started gaining popularity in 2012 after the JOBS act made syndications a common investment vehicle for the general public. Before then, they were limited to sophisticated accredited investors/ very wealthy people with the right connections. I would think the typical syndication investor back then would be more likely to be able to ride out a down economy than the newer generation of passive investors who can get in with much less capital/ financial security. Many of the new breed have probably never had a capital call like we're seeing syndicators asking for currently. This recession is the first time the new iteration of the "crowd sourced" syndication model will truly be tested in a down cycle. It will be interesting to see how it plays out with the new lower barrier to entry and a higher number of operators who only know a bull market and are highly leveraged. 

During the height of the worst real estate recession in the last 100 years, large multifamily had the lower mortgage delinquency rate out of all real estate subclasses (0.4% MF vs. 4.0% SFH) so yes, the syndication model (which is just a generic term for raising investor capital and is nothing new) absolutely was tested and passed with flying colors.

That's the exact sales pitch I was referring to. The thing is, the syndication model has changed dramatically since 2008. Back then syndications were limited to investors who could pony up $500-1M minimum, and they weren't just open to anyone, you had to have connections. These days anyone can join a crowdfunded syndication and there are a lot more inexperienced operators in the space than there were in 2008. That recession was also driven by sub prime mortgages which affected primarily single family homes. This time the trends are not working in favor of large apartment buildings. Look at the stats. Inventory in detached single family homes in the suburbs is at all time lows, while the highest vacancy rates are in large apartment buildings in city centers.

I'm picking up two new construction SFH rentals in FL, and already I've put more time on the phone (8-12+ hrs.) into making this 1031 transaction happen that I did the entirety of my passive investments during all of 2019. And I haven't made a dime on them yet!

SFHs is work, not investing. If I wanted a job, I would keep working my 9-5 which pays $400/hr. Owning SFHs is a pain, and it's not scalable.

Post: Trump/CDC Halts evictions nationwide to the end of the year

Andrey Y.Posted
  • Specialist
  • Honolulu, HI
  • Posts 1,887
  • Votes 1,264
Originally posted by @Steve K.:
Originally posted by @Andrey Y.:
Originally posted by @Steve K.:
Originally posted by @Andrey Y.:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @Greg Scott:

It is amazing that we have left multi-billion dollar decisions in the hands of un-elected bureaucrats.

This is Trump's doing:

The agency order, the result of an Aug. 8 executive action by President Donald Trump directing the CDC to study the issue, would impose criminal penalties on landlords who violate the ban. Evictions for reasons other than nonpayment of rent will be allowed to proceed. 

source: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/01/trump-administration-block-evictions-backlash-407060

 Trump has done more directly for real estate investors than any president. Admittedly, this sort of policy is to appeal to the majority of the electorate as the "compassionate" thing to do. Heck, he has so much (mostly unfounded and false) flack being thrown his way, he is only human and sometimes needs to make decisions to win favor from the largest group in order to get re-elected. I cant blame him.

Another ding against SFH active investing, and another + for passive investments in large communities which have the benefit of economies of scale.

Which policies of his specifically directly help real estate investors? I think most economists are saying he simply benefited from inheriting a strong recovery set in motion by his predecessor, then screwed things up a bit with bad foreign policy (trade war with China that US consumers ultimately paid for), and a corporate tax cut that didn't move the needle as far as anyone can tell, before completely plunging us into a recession by being completely incompetent throughout Covid 19. 

Also not sure how passive syndications will fare any better than active SFR's through this. Seems like tenants will be less likely to take advantage of a mom and pop landlord who they know personally than a large faceless entity that manages their 100+ unit apartment building.

I've heard syndication sponsors say in their sales pitches that apartments defaulted less than SFH's in the last recession and so they are recession proof. However this is a much different recession that I believe does not favor large apartments. Current market trends clearly show people are choosing to live in detached homes with yards where they can socially distance in the suburbs, and are fleeing dense living situations such as large apartment buildings in city centers.

Also there's no precedence for syndications being tested in a down economy quite like this seeing as they really only started gaining popularity in 2012 after the JOBS act made syndications a common investment vehicle for the general public. Before then, they were limited to sophisticated accredited investors/ very wealthy people with the right connections. I would think the typical syndication investor back then would be more likely to be able to ride out a down economy than the newer generation of passive investors who can get in with much less capital/ financial security. Many of the new breed have probably never had a capital call like we're seeing syndicators asking for currently. This recession is the first time the new iteration of the "crowd sourced" syndication model will truly be tested in a down cycle. It will be interesting to see how it plays out with the new lower barrier to entry and a higher number of operators who only know a bull market and are highly leveraged. 

During the height of the worst real estate recession in the last 100 years, large multifamily had the lower mortgage delinquency rate out of all real estate subclasses (0.4% MF vs. 4.0% SFH) so yes, the syndication model (which is just a generic term for raising investor capital and is nothing new) absolutely was tested and passed with flying colors.

That's the exact sales pitch I was referring to. The thing is, the syndication model has changed dramatically since 2008. Back then syndications were limited to investors who could pony up $500-1M minimum, and they weren't just open to anyone, you had to have connections. These days anyone can join a crowdfunded syndication and there are a lot more inexperienced operators in the space than there were in 2008. That recession was also driven by sub prime mortgages which affected primarily single family homes. This time the trends are not working in favor of large apartment buildings. Look at the stats. Inventory in detached single family homes in the suburbs is at all time lows, while the highest vacancy rates are in large apartment buildings in city centers.

 The definition of Accredited Investor has been around since 1933.

Post: Trump/CDC Halts evictions nationwide to the end of the year

Andrey Y.Posted
  • Specialist
  • Honolulu, HI
  • Posts 1,887
  • Votes 1,264
Originally posted by @Steve K.:
Originally posted by @Andrey Y.:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @Greg Scott:

It is amazing that we have left multi-billion dollar decisions in the hands of un-elected bureaucrats.

This is Trump's doing:

The agency order, the result of an Aug. 8 executive action by President Donald Trump directing the CDC to study the issue, would impose criminal penalties on landlords who violate the ban. Evictions for reasons other than nonpayment of rent will be allowed to proceed. 

source: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/01/trump-administration-block-evictions-backlash-407060

 Trump has done more directly for real estate investors than any president. Admittedly, this sort of policy is to appeal to the majority of the electorate as the "compassionate" thing to do. Heck, he has so much (mostly unfounded and false) flack being thrown his way, he is only human and sometimes needs to make decisions to win favor from the largest group in order to get re-elected. I cant blame him.

Another ding against SFH active investing, and another + for passive investments in large communities which have the benefit of economies of scale.

Which policies of his specifically directly help real estate investors? I think most economists are saying he simply benefited from inheriting a strong recovery set in motion by his predecessor, then screwed things up a bit with bad foreign policy (trade war with China that US consumers ultimately paid for), and a corporate tax cut that didn't move the needle as far as anyone can tell, before completely plunging us into a recession by being completely incompetent throughout Covid 19. 

Also not sure how passive syndications will fare any better than active SFR's through this. Seems like tenants will be less likely to take advantage of a mom and pop landlord who they know personally than a large faceless entity that manages their 100+ unit apartment building.

I've heard syndication sponsors say in their sales pitches that apartments defaulted less than SFH's in the last recession and so they are recession proof. However this is a much different recession that I believe does not favor large apartments. Current market trends clearly show people are choosing to live in detached homes with yards where they can socially distance in the suburbs, and are fleeing dense living situations such as large apartment buildings in city centers.

Also there's no precedence for syndications being tested in a down economy quite like this seeing as they really only started gaining popularity in 2012 after the JOBS act made syndications a common investment vehicle for the general public. Before then, they were limited to sophisticated accredited investors/ very wealthy people with the right connections. I would think the typical syndication investor back then would be more likely to be able to ride out a down economy than the newer generation of passive investors who can get in with much less capital/ financial security. Many of the new breed have probably never had a capital call like we're seeing syndicators asking for currently. This recession is the first time the new iteration of the "crowd sourced" syndication model will truly be tested in a down cycle. It will be interesting to see how it plays out with the new lower barrier to entry and a higher number of operators who only know a bull market and are highly leveraged. 

During the height of the worst real estate recession in the last 100 years, large multifamily had the lower mortgage delinquency rate out of all real estate subclasses (0.4% MF vs. 4.0% SFH) so yes, the syndication model (which is just a generic term for raising investor capital and is nothing new) absolutely was tested and passed with flying colors.

Post: Trump/CDC Halts evictions nationwide to the end of the year

Andrey Y.Posted
  • Specialist
  • Honolulu, HI
  • Posts 1,887
  • Votes 1,264
Originally posted by @Steve K.:
Originally posted by @Andrey Y.:
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @Greg Scott:

It is amazing that we have left multi-billion dollar decisions in the hands of un-elected bureaucrats.

This is Trump's doing:

The agency order, the result of an Aug. 8 executive action by President Donald Trump directing the CDC to study the issue, would impose criminal penalties on landlords who violate the ban. Evictions for reasons other than nonpayment of rent will be allowed to proceed. 

source: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/01/trump-administration-block-evictions-backlash-407060

 Trump has done more directly for real estate investors than any president. Admittedly, this sort of policy is to appeal to the majority of the electorate as the "compassionate" thing to do. Heck, he has so much (mostly unfounded and false) flack being thrown his way, he is only human and sometimes needs to make decisions to win favor from the largest group in order to get re-elected. I cant blame him.

Another ding against SFH active investing, and another + for passive investments in large communities which have the benefit of economies of scale.

Which policies of his specifically directly help real estate investors? I think most economists are saying he simply benefited from inheriting a strong recovery set in motion by his predecessor, then screwed things up a bit with bad foreign policy (trade war with China that US consumers ultimately paid for), and a corporate tax cut that didn't move the needle as far as anyone can tell, before completely plunging us into a recession by being completely asleep at the wheel/in complete denial/total lack of leadership and spreading divisiveness/doing anything he can to get votes throughout Covid 19. 

Also not sure how syndications will fare any better than active SFH home investments through this. Seems like tenants will be less likely to take advantage of a mom and pop landlord who they know personally than a large faceless entity that manages their 100+ unit apartment building.

I've heard syndication sponsors say in their sales pitches that apartments defaulted less than SFH's in the last recession and so they are recession proof. However this is a much different recession that clearly does not favor large apartments. Current market trends clearly show people are choosing to live in detached homes with yards where they can socially distance in the suburbs, and are fleeing dense living situations such as large apartment buildings in city centers (which is what most syndications are).

Also there's no precedence for syndications being tested in a down economy quite like this since they really only started gaining popularity in 2012 after the JOBS act made syndications a common investment vehicle for the general public. Before then they were limited to sophisticated accredited investors, mostly wealthy people with the right connections to get in to these deals, who were more likely to be able to ride out a down economy than the newer generation of passive investors who can get in with much less capital/ financial security. This recession is the first time the new iteration of the "crowd sourced" syndication model will truly be tested. It will be interesting to see how it plays out with the new lower barrier to entry and a higher number of operators who only know a bull market and are highly leveraged. 

 If you cant figure out the policies Trump enacted to directly and numerically benefit real estate investors, then you've never (properly) done your taxes.

Post: Trump/CDC Halts evictions nationwide to the end of the year

Andrey Y.Posted
  • Specialist
  • Honolulu, HI
  • Posts 1,887
  • Votes 1,264
Originally posted by @Account Closed:
Originally posted by @Greg Scott:

It is amazing that we have left multi-billion dollar decisions in the hands of un-elected bureaucrats.

This is Trump's doing:

The agency order, the result of an Aug. 8 executive action by President Donald Trump directing the CDC to study the issue, would impose criminal penalties on landlords who violate the ban. Evictions for reasons other than nonpayment of rent will be allowed to proceed. 

source: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/09/01/trump-administration-block-evictions-backlash-407060

 Trump has done more directly for real estate investors than any president. Admittedly, this sort of policy is to appeal to the majority of the electorate as the "compassionate" thing to do. Heck, he has so much (mostly unfounded and false) flack being thrown his way, he is only human and sometimes needs to make decisions to win favor from the largest group in order to get re-elected. I cant blame him.

Another ding against SFH active investing, and another + for passive investments in large communities which have the benefit of economies of scale.

Post: How to go after Growth Equity Group-Brett Immel, Preston Despenas

Andrey Y.Posted
  • Specialist
  • Honolulu, HI
  • Posts 1,887
  • Votes 1,264
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

SDIRA Wealth also works with Morris Invest. I'm beginning to think SDIRA is as corrupt as these others...

 SDIRA Wealth IS Growth Equity Group. Same exact tactics and scam, just under a different name after their 'business model' came to light to myself and hundreds of others.